Click HERE to see this thread with all of the graphics, features, and links.

I thought it was good.Not that scary mind you,but good.I've never seen the 1974 version but I plan to rent it soon.

That's funny, because I thought it was crap.

eh.

It wasn't crap....it wasn't great.......the remake is just an average slasher film, nothing special...nothing out of the ordinary. The only thing I really have against the movie is them throwing the TCM name on it. If you can't do it better.......why do it at all? It's sort of disrespectful to the original...........especially when all they made was a decent movie on par with most of the tripe that's coming out these days.

why on god's green ****ing earth did you watch the Texas Chainsaw remake before the original?

I agree with evil dead it was ok, but nothing special.

A really good flick I really enjoyed it and was tense the whole way through im sorry ive never seen the original and am not really planning to for now.But all and all it was really horrifying to see.And I agree with zombieman those torture scenes and where leatherface is where that guys face where done very well and at the right moment.

I was so on the edge of my seat when I was seeing leatherface chase that kid through the laundry hangline and when he cut of his leg I was just like..."Awesome!".

But I also found alot of flaws in it like you do in most every horror movie that comes out.There was alot of times where she could have tooken leatherfaces chainsaw one in particular where at the end when he and leatherface where in the locker hallways and leatherface was beeing torn up.He dropped the chainsaw and she could have picked it up and taken it with but instead she left it there and ran

4/5 for me it was good and worth picking up and its a thrill ride the whole way through

these are the same comments that people were making after Friday the 13th first came out almost 25 years ago.........

now we can look back on it and say it was just an average, pointless slasher flick........made to sell popcorn. Same will be said about this remake.

The original TCM on the other hand is now 30 years old and is still being praised as one of the best horror movies ever.

I thought both movies were good, Biel really helped the new, well her knockers anyhow. WOWWEEE

agreed.

Jessica Biel.Yes.
Anyway,back tot he topic.I do plan to see the first one very soon.I expect to be on the edge of my seat.

Jesicca Biel was plus to the movie I agree

Fortunately the remake is so far off from the original it didn't completely ruin it for you.

the remake was ok..the original rocked

Texas Chainsaw Massacre is actually a good movie. I like Jessica Biel and how she added pizaz!

i havta change my avator, bye bye

who's the hot chick in your avatar?

that is one sexy kitten.......MEOWWWW!

Looks like Taylor Hanson to me.

Is that her name?

- googles Taylor Hanson for nude photos -

haha, oh lord.

Jessica Biel is part of the reason why the movie was crap.

um....no.......she helped the flick.........

Only redeeming part of the movie, IMO. Throwing in that kid from "The Ring", giving him Austin Powers dentures and having him HELP the stranded kids is what ruined it.

It's the ****ing Texas Chainsaw Massacre! You don't HELP anyone!

Jessica Biel was light in dark film

It was crap. End of story. The only credit I'll give it is that it managed to fool every one of my friends into thinking it was a true story.....Not that that's hard to do mind you....

it wasnt crap

boy am I glad you came along. Here for the past 13 months the horror forum has been open we've all been sitting around discussing/debating horror films. Thank god you have come along and made that unnecissary..................finally no more talking back and fourth about a movie, we can just ask Anywien and settle a discussion before actually ever starting one.

http://www.psychopathictraders.com/forum2/images/smiles/jerkit.gif

I'm going to watch The Real Texas chainsaw Massacre, tonight on C4 UK

Evil Dead,I dont get it

I didn't say end of discussion, I said end of story. That means you people can still discuss it all you like, but I know it was crap and that's good enough for me.

did you say something?

Ok you want to get technical, replace the word "say" in my last post with "state", and "said" with "stated". Happy?

Evil Dead, dont disrespect her opinion just because you dont like it

ahahaha

I have too much fun messing with new people on here.....

I really could care less about her opinion........I was merely mocking some new person coming into the forum and stating, "end of story".....like because this person rolls in with their opinion, it is somehow greater than everybody elses so now that we've got her opinion, discussion closed....nothing more needs to be said.

end of story?

Whats the word for sayings such as, end of story and at the end of the day and you dont have to be a rocket science

Em, anyway I saw the Real Texas chainsw Massacre John Kleason, last night, and it had nothing to do with the movie, apart from he shot two people in Texas. But they couldn,t pin it on him, because of a Technicality, you americans and your bloody Technicalities, so they got him done for lesser offences. He did 9 years then he was released, and the you know what, he came to my beloved country United Kingdom, and the USA, didn,t disclose any information to our authortities, because they were under know obligation to do so, WHAT! he's a bloody lunatic. anyway after terrorising an english community for a while and a poor old lady he married, because she thought he was a war hero, and a really nice fellow. He was finally caught out when he threatened to blow some ones head off because he kicked him out of the gun club. And some IT kid found out about his past on the internet. The Texas Authorities found new evidence that he did it, about 20 years later, and he was once again locked up. Hooray. (There wasn't even a chainsaw)

Evil Dead,it was merely a figure of speech and thats no way to treat a newbie

The new TCM was crappy and unnecessary, end of story.

right.....

you see hes allowed to, hes a mod

It's a right of passage here on the Horror forums. It's a rather "No Holds Barred" type environment, here.

End of story.

Now it's official, bitches.

ok......

I love C-dic.......













bitches.

They never found his body did they? all they found was the piece of footage of him attackin those police guys

I think so, that in my opinion is one of the freakest parts of the remake because its actual footage

* sigh* No it's not, it's fake just like the movie.

No, thats parts Real

Though I never saw the original TCM, I really enjoyed the remake.

No it isnt. Nothing in the movie is real

yeah it is

The entire movie is pure fiction. Should you chose to realize that is up to you, but your credibility on these forums will be forever marred.

I don't know how many times we've been down this road before, too many, that I can unfortunately attest to.

The movie is loosely based on the exploits of Ed Gein, a Wisconsin farmer who has his cover blown in 1957. They found furniture made of human skin, bowls made out of bone, yadda, yadda, yadda.

No chainsaw, it wasn't set in Texas, he's only credited with 4 murders, etc. Do I need to go on, or do you people believe that there was a family of cannibalsitic psychopaths living in the Texas outskirts, tax free, under the radar, who hacked people up, shoved them on meat hooks, and had a mentally invalid son who wore dead skin masks all day, who chased people around with a Chainsaw?

Please read this over and over untill it sinks in. I'll reiterate the main point, nothing in either of the TCM films is real, nothing.

I never said that he had a chainsaw or that he had a cannibalistic family or that he killed 5 teens when they broke down in the middle of nowhere.I merely stated that I believed that the ending clip was real.

Jesus Christ on a stick.........here we go again.

plz give us eviedence that it is not real.......................................................................................

Evidence? Is common ****ing sense not enough? Give me evidence that it is real, in that case.

Got another shocker for ya, the Easter Bunny? Fake. Santa? A myth. The Tooth Fairy? It's your parents, one of which has a secret fetish for rotting baby teeth.



No shit.





This is the first time you used the word "believed", though. The other times you were implying that it in fact was real.

It can not be real because the guy Ed Gein did not attack the cops, and did not bring down kids into the basement where he put them on meat hooks. You need to realize IT IS NOT REAL.

Thats because I dont know for sure it was real but it doesnt seem to far-fetched to think its not I mean all it was was a guy coming at the police men then it ended

Have you been Studying my post?

You know me, lol.

There's just a big difference between stating a fact as a fact, and stating something as a matter of opinion, soley based on what it "appeared" to be.

The keyword in the movie's disclaimer, "based", alone tells you the footage wasn't real. On top of that, the police footage would have been shot with a "Super 8", 8 mm handheld video camera, the same camera the original TCM was shot with. The footage shown at the beginning of the movie boasted the quality of that of digital video, with a grainy, superimposed "worn" filter, to make it look real.

Trust me, I can be as analytical as I have to be to get people to realize this is all a hoax.

the first one was hilarious. It was retarded. I enjoyed the killings in the new version.

Hilarious = retarded? For TCM? Cine-man, you want to take this one?

Also, I'm a big proponent of expressing thoughts and ideas through words instead of smilies, but this last post above this one confused the hell outta me.

Kid's got me confused on this on this one, so I can't exactly say what I am feeling.

There wasn't anything funny about the movie. The only laughter I think this movie could produce would be nervous laughter, just because the more you get into the movie, mentally, the more and more realistic it comes across.

Not that such a family exists, knowing this movie is loosely based on real events, it's just Tobe Hooper's presentation of the situation and characters that seems like an average day gone wrong, just by making a "Wrong Turn". Pun intended.

It's just a bare bones, spooky horror movie that maintains a real sense of urgency and realism throughout the whole movie, and doesn't need special effects, scary backdrops, or creepy background music to heighten the mood.

As for the 2003 TCM, in comparison, it's a very dramatic, easy going, and simplsitic rehash of the original. There was no tension, as the kids were just conveniently picked off. It was fully of jump scares to make up for the lack of creepiness rooted in realism embodied by the original.

There is no redeeming qualities to the remake, IMO. Other than Jessica Biel showing that she really can act, and had "Scream Queen" movies not died out in the 80's, along with JLC's horror movie career, Biel would wear the crown with credibility.

I know she screamed alot

I know now the TCM is complete fabrication, it was so long ago when I saw the original, but I'm sure it was hyped to be a true story. But I was very young and beleived anything at the time. I saw a Documetary the other night about the real TCM and it has no comparisons to the movies, apart from someone killed someone else in Texas.

yeah but thats hollywood for ya

1st one was crap remake was crap sorry

I havent seen the first one but the remake may have been uneccessary but it wasnt crap

true but no piont mking sumthing thats not gonna plz people

Than says it Unneccessary but certainly not crap

..and how do you know it's going to please people until you put it out there? You don't. I'd tread lightly if I were you, praising movies like "POTC", while shitting on the original "TCM", in a Horror forum of all places.

I thought she was talking about the remake

Both.

I thought the first was supposed to be "psychological".

The new one was crap, end of story. closedeyes

Evil Dead, please tear me to pieces.

Ill do it

*tears dario to pieces*

Well The remake was a decent remake the only thing i liked better about it then the original was probaly the way it was shot with new cameras because you got to see things better and also the part where the guy got his leg cut off and you see him tortured was a good chilling scene but other then that it shouldnt be compared with the orig tcm but i still found it enjoyable t watch for fun

and also evil said the f word in a previous post on the first page and it was uncensored so i wanted to try it ****ing green earth

well it didnt work and i dont understand that because if you go to the first page and read evil deads post you can clearly see he wrote f'uck with out having to make it any speacil way

This is the horror forum I see people swear here all the time where in other threads they would get warning ...its weird .

We're a whole different breed, around here. We get special treatment.

****
shit
cock
pussy
*****

yeah.....I'm bored. PM me Deniro and I shall share my secret with you.....

evil dead is gay!!

okkk

I cant wait till i know how to swear

hes not really gay were just picking on for saying someone he thought was a girl was hot.

year were the cooler people

Evil Dead is awesome.

The only good thing in that movie was Eric Balfour and he died at the begining of the movie closedeyes

this thread has gone a long way since texas chainsaw massacre, lol

this movie kicked ass and dont complain about my god

????????????

Orlando Bloom is a hot little piece of ass.............don't deny it. He looks like a 16 year old girl just coming into her prime.

well what ever floats you boat.

With that child molester mustache and point nose, he looks like a sewer rat. But, maybe that just adds to his "disturbingness", as S.P. would put it.

no, no.......the LOTR Orlando Bloom.

Yep, Legolas is gay icon material all the way.

Evil Dead is starting to disturb me

*backs away slowly*

wait

THAT ORLANDO BLOOM?

i saw it last thismorn bout 4am its cool, i like it

Thats an interesting time to watch a film

evil dead needs therapy

yes I do...........you don't even know the half of it. I'm one sick ****.

closedeyes

No need to state the obvious

closedeyes

actually orlando is bisexual so you were half right.
the remake of texas chainsaw massacre is the bloodiest movie in history, the second is passion of the Christ.

"TCM" (2003) isn't shit. Apparently you've never seen "Dead Alive."

I dont know the Passion was bloody

Guess you've never seen "Dead Alive", either?

No I havent....not into low-budget independent films if thats what it is

The TCM remake isn't bloody at all. If the TCM remake was a porno and how much blood there was determined how harcore it was, then the TCM remake would be a really softcore porn.

The remake doesn't beat the original, but what I did like about the remake is that leatherface is more of the main killer. In the original his family is in control, in the remake his rules go.

the passion is one of the gorest movies of all time. Hard to expect for a christian movie. I was quite surprised how bloody it was.

your quite right, all the gores really implied. hell chucky was more gory.

very true, he was always being bossed around in the first now he in charge.

I dont like when horror movies rely on the gore and violence.TMC remake relied more on psychological scares,chase scenes and such.