LOTR was not as good as bad taste

Text-only Version: Click HERE to see this thread with all of the graphics, features, and links.



Fearnix
peter done a much better job on BT than he did on LOTR

LOTR could have been soooooo much better

Greenleaf_luver
How could LOTR have been better. I mean like what major things would you have liked him to change if any, you seem to have a stong opinion.lol laughing out loud

§pearhead
right...any specifics as to what you think could be improved?

Greenleaf_luver
Personally, i think Peter did a really good job.

Greenleaf_luver
I am really eager to know how LOTR could have been sooooo much better cause i really don't think so. Please define what you mean. confused

ArrghPirateGirl
I think they R great...The extended editions r evn better.....but i think if they did even more the movies would get alittle 2 long and people would bore from sitting 2 much

BloomBabyGirl
so true. theres only so long u can keep poeple in they seats during LOTR

Fearnix
1: He made the film for 12 year olds
2: It could have been more like the book
3: Should have done hobit first
4: Action was OK could have been better
5: Could have made legolas less of a savior
theres 5 for now

ladygrim
it woould of been beta if it was MOre like the books

Exabyte
1 I dont think they are, though PJ himself said that they were "recommendable for 8 years and older" stick out tongue

2 Could have been; but I doubt that most people would have liked it then.
It's great as it is as a film, and it's not LoTR, it's just an interpretation of it, and as such a briliant one.

There are already numerous threads about this opinion though -
http://www.killermovies.com/forums/showthread.php?s=&threadid=29857
http://www.killermovies.com/forums/showthread.php?s=&threadid=301533
http://www.killermovies.com/forums/showthread.php?s=&threadid=28401
http://www.killermovies.com/forums/showthread.php?s=&threadid=15349
http://www.killermovies.com/forums/showthread.php?s=&threadid=15296
http://www.killermovies.com/forums/showthread.php?s=&threadid=5456

Further
http://www.killermovies.com/forums/showthread.php?s=&threadid=10996
http://www.killermovies.com/forums/showthread.php?s=&threadid=22811
http://www.killermovies.com/forums/showthread.php?s=&threadid=13660
http://www.killermovies.com/forums/showthread.php?s=&threadid=13524
wink

3 Good idea... would have been interesting; though I think it was a good choice (good for PJ ^^) to make LoTR first as it is simply the better material for a good film;
Few people would be interested in dwarves visiting elves who sing weird songs all the time messed

5 yes yes yes

OrliNElijahsGrl
I wonder how many threads are gonna be made of how lotr could of been different...i think ive counted more than 5! lol! someone should make a official "How Lotr could of been different discussion" thread, that way, all suggestions of how it could of been different could be there, instead of there being over 100 new threads of it, you know?

And just to add...Peter Jackson did a amazing job on the trilogy and worked his ass off filming it and doing the things he did, and it should be well appreciated, he worked so hard on these films, and it turned out beautifully and amazing, so lets show some appreciation now eh? And to the ones saying it could of been better, well i would love to see how you would make it better

Darth Sauron
Man, no offense but Fearnix....all this persons threads i have seen is bashing something....or saying its not good

Which is just blatantly untrue..lotr not as good as BT.....nirvana the worst grunge band ever?

None of your points are logical...

Text-only Version: Click HERE to see this thread with all of the graphics, features, and links.