Click HERE to see this thread with all of the graphics, features, and links.

I have only seen the new one. Can somebody tell me there differences.

no

go watch the original.

No disrespect.........but i can not fathom how you people can watch a remake without ever having seen the original film. Okay....you're all hyped to go see the flick about the guy in the mask who kills people with a chainsaw.........if you're all hyped about the subject matter, why didn't you ever watch the original sometime in the past 30 years? very same subject matter.

well the only difference was that the original was, raw,original and amzingly entertaining. The remake is none of those things. the best thing about the ramake that i have found are the big t1tted scenes with jessica beil.

The original was good, unique, innovative and powerful.

The remake was bad, generic, boring, and typical.

That is so true

The original will always be one of the best horror movies I have seen.BTW,I agree with ragesremorse,love jessica's titties.

agreed............she's got some nice utters on her.

Unusually - perhaps uniquely: The remake was better.

bahaahaahaaaahaaa

credibility down to zero..........

actually I only said this to see if I could give you or backfire a brain hemorrhage. I havent even seen the remake.

Indeed.But that's beside the point.The original TCM is much more effective.

I also thought that the actress who played Sally in the original did alot better job than Biel did.

After watching the original twice this week I finally came around(I know I should have done so before even seeing the remake) but anyway I now love the original, I see that the remake has totally faild in some of the plases whare the original succeded

Yea, she can milk my cow anyday

lol.

i have a question. How come in the basement scene (REMAKE), when Biel get her white shirt wet, there's no *** impression on her shirt?

/horrornoobmode

The original is the better of the two. Know why? Because it really happened!

/endhorrornoobmode

Not necessarily.Ed Gein(a real life serial killer)was the inspiration for leatherface and the movie.Tobe Hooper said so himself.

It was a joke......

Don't take it like I was bitching.I was just ponting out a fact.Alot of peole beleive it or not,don't know that.

Thus the "/horrornoobmode" tags. You're absolutely right in what you said, though. Good luck getting that through the heads of the 5th grade contingent that make up the majority of the Horror forums clientele.

<---6th grade

i dunno, i'm having a hard time convincing some girls i know who are 17 and 18 that leatherface isn't real, they think the footage at the end of the remake is real and when i asked them why they said "because it looks old, and they said it was real on the movie"....****in idiots

I just bet that they also think that the blair withch footage is real

How sad.

leatherface is real!

- plugs ears -

lol.I think leatherface looks the best in the original.

Yea, they tried to make him look to "scary" and "vicious" in the remake

Exactly.

I liked em Both!! Sure you cant beaet the original, But the new one was pretty scary. The scne with the boy friends face was pretty creepy, and cool. And Biel is the sexiest damn thing on earth!!!

yea I liked the remake, but it can even touch the original.

remkes tend to turn out crap ... so i didnt watch it

just like the Psycho remake.

there are a few good remakes

The Thing
Dawn of the Dead
The Fly

haven't seen the DOTD remake but I heard it was badass.

i liked the remake, but the remake still aint got nothing on hoopers version