Intellectual or Pseudo-Intellectual

Started by KharmaDog2 pages

Intellectual or Pseudo-Intellectual

Distinctions Between Intellectuals And Pseudo-Intellectuals

By Sydney Harris, Detroit Free Press, (11/20/81)

*The intellectual is looking for the right questions to ask; the pseudo is giving what he claims to be the right answers.

*The intellectual is evidently motivated by a disinterested love of truth; the pseudo is interested in being right, or being thought to be right, whether he is or not.

*The intellectual is willing to admit that what he does not know is far greater than what he knows; the pseudo claims to know as much as can be known about the subject under consideration.

*The intellectual states as good a case for his adversary as can be made out; the pseudo sets up a straw man and beats it to death for the sake of seeming superior.

*The intellectual is deeply and constantly aware of the limitations of human reason; the pseudo makes a deity of reason and tries to force it into realms it cannot penetrate.

*The intellectual seeks light from whatever source, realizing that ideas are no respecters of persons and turn up in the most unexpected places from the most improbable people; the pseudo accepts ideas, when he does, only from experts and specialists and certified authorities.

*The intellectual advances an hypothesis that he hopes may be true; the pseudo propounds a dogma that he insists is true.

*The intellectual recognizes that opposites are not always contradictory, and may indeed reinforce each other; the pseudo paints a picture in black and white, right or wrong, leaving no room for a contrary viewpoint.

*The intellectual knows there are no final answers to human questions; the pseudo makes each tentative and provisional answer sound like a finality.

*The intellectual is courageous in opposing majority opinion, even when it jeopardizes his position; the pseudo slavishly follows "the most reliable authorities" in his field sneering at heresies.

*The intellectual never talks down to his audience, but tries to be as clear as possible; the pseudo talks above his audience to mystify and impress them."

I realize that I am being completely unoriginal for posting someone else's thougths. I just thought that some people might find it interesting. Any thoughts?

So, am I correct in assuming you say I as aperson is pseudo intellectual and NOT my phylosophies? because you did say you were not refering to my philosophies as pseudo intellectual.

ps. very funny differences.

Man, take a pill. You were commenting on people unoriginality, I retorted that people could say the same about you in that some of your likes and dislikes are stereotypical of pseudo-intellectuals. If you think that you fall into that category that is your problem. What I think shouldn't make thatbig of deal to you.

I just posted the above because I find it very interesting and that aalot of people might be suprised where they fall on that list.

I think all this arguing between me and you inspired you to make this thread. I do have a productive effect on you, don't I - this is the second thread inspired by me....the first one was Arrogance - philosophical deffinition and response or something like that.

I don't think I fall into that category anyway. And it's mere opinion of people when they label someone as belonging to a category such as so-called pseudo intellectuals. I think it's senseless to categorize someone based on their intellectual preferences, it's mere opinion.

ps I do take pills already, can't afford to take more.

Originally posted by Philosophicus
this is the second thread inspired by me....the first one was Arrogance

🙄

Re: Intellectual or Pseudo-Intellectual

Originally posted by KharmaDog
I realize that I am being completely unoriginal for posting someone else's thougths. I just thought that some people might find it interesting. Any thoughts?
I like them 😄 .. and I also enjoy how they're worded.. very concise

lets say for some, that thing Kharma so elegant came up with, is as the writing on the wall

It's totally ridiculous to cast people as either intellectual or pseudo intellectual. People doing that is not intellectual at all...they're also jealous and threatened.

It's totally ridiculous to cast people as either intellectual or pseudo intellectual. People doing that is not intellectual at all...they're also jealous and threatened
not as threatened as people who see themselves as intellectual to be labeled as pseudo intellectual

It's totally ridiculous to cast people as either intellectual or pseudo intellectual. People doing that is not intellectual at all...they're also jealous and threatened.

This coming from the guy who labels people as "idiots" when they don't agree with him.

I think what bothers some people is that this list actually describes them very accurately.

I am neither threatened nor jealous of another's intellect whether it is superior or not. I am just annoyed by some who claim to be what they are not, and try to put down others to prove to themselves that they are worthy of the labels that they thrust on themselves (who also in this case display a monumental example of immaturity).

They're idiots not because they don't agree with me, but 'cuse they really are idiots.

Dude...you're banned. Get over it.

Re: Intellectual or Pseudo-Intellectual

Originally posted by KharmaDog
I realize that I am being completely unoriginal for posting someone else's thougths. I just thought that some people might find it interesting. Any thoughts?

Interesting!I think I am a pseudo it just seens to match my personally then the other one.JM

Jackie, you do know tht being a psuedo intellectual is a very undesirable thing don't you?

Re: Re: Intellectual or Pseudo-Intellectual

Originally posted by Jackie Malfoy
Interesting!I think I am a pseudo it just seens to match my personally then the other one.JM

🤣 😆 💃 😱 😂 💃 💃 💃

lol.. jackie is crazy.. but at least she's honest (I think... 😑 )

Originally posted by FeceMan
Dude...you're banned. Get over it.

why was he banned?

Originally posted by bobby_sox
why was he banned?

http://www.killermovies.com/forums/f13/t326183.html

Please get back on topic.

"*The intellectual knows there are no final answers to human questions; the pseudo makes each tentative and provisional answer sound like a finality."

This passage sounds a bit, funny... because as it is mentioned that there are no final answers to human questions, that is a finality...!!! Isn't it??
What can there be no finality?? Nothing basicly...

EVERYTHING is finality...

there is no such thing as pseudo-intellect. Researchers have proven that there are over seven different kind of intelligence. The more popular is your "booksmart" scenario but ranges go from musical, spatial to your street smarts. Therefore a pseudo intellect really doesn't exist. He may be weak in an area where he believes or wants people to believe him to be otherwise.