Teen arrested for sexually abusing herself

Text-only Version: Click HERE to see this thread with all of the graphics, features, and links.



whirlysplat
This is unbelievable

http://www.usatoday.com/tech/webguide/internetlife/2004-03-29-child-self-porn_x.htm

What does it say about the world.

Opinions.

Chiram
While it's sick. They shouldn't be allowed to arrest someone for doing it to themselves. messed.

Bardock42
Ah shit that shit just shitty doesn't shit (open) shit.

Oh now it did What the f**k? ....there is something wrong with this world...on te one hand that someone does that on the other that she gets arrested what the hell ....tssss

dark1365
Wow that story was retarded.

§pearhead
This is wrong on so many levels >.<

Fire
it's the application of the law to its full potential. I disagree with this however

Filth

ESP07
Disturbing, but somehow i'm not really surprised.

whirlysplat
But if she was not arrested would it not just be saying, "ok Paedos get the kid to say it was down to them and its all alright?"

big grin

Fire
nope because I think that even with a minors consent it would still be classified as rape.

whirlysplat
No I mean in regards to distribution of pics, not rape etc.


Originally posted by Fire
nope because I think that even with a minors consent it would still be classified as rape.

Fire
I think the same rule applies I doubt a minor can give consent for that

whirlysplat
If she was let off, then its a way of safely distributing for pervs all they do is use a teen girl as a front, hence she had to be prosecuted
Originally posted by Fire
I think the same rule applies I doubt a minor can give consent for that

debbiejo
It's considered distributing pornography...She has problems..

whirlysplat
Its the only thing we could think of that makes sense, she is distributing child porn

Originally posted by debbiejo
It's considered distributing pornography...She has problems..

Fire
voila debbie is right they should take her for that not for sexual abuse

whirlysplat
and thats the point I tried to explain a few posts back Fire

Originally posted by Fire
voila debbie is right they should take her for that not for sexual abuse

whirlysplat
Originally posted by whirlysplat
If she was let off, then its a way of safely distributing for pervs all they do is use a teen girl as a front, hence she had to be prosecuted

See

Fire
True, but I never disagreed to that I just disagreed to the fact that she shouldn't be prosecuted for sexual abuse

whirlysplat
Originally posted by Fire
True, but I never disagreed to that I just disagreed to the fact that she shouldn't be prosecuted for sexual abuse

debbiejo
She probably has Mad Cow...Now she's gone mad. eek!

dave123
Hmmmm... detective

Storm
I' m sorry but my first reaction was hysterical

whirlysplat
sadOriginally posted by Storm
I' m sorry but my first reaction was hysterical

Chiram
Originally posted by debbiejo
She probably has Mad Cow...Now she's gone mad. eek!


Right.

rubber dickie
what the f*ck!?!

that was just retarded to me. that did not make any sense at all.

shaber
That's insane. Was it a spoof item?

whirlysplat
Originally posted by shaber
That's insane. Was it a spoof item?

shellie
Originally posted by Storm
I' m sorry but my first reaction was hysterical mine too blink

glad Im not the only one hysterical

whirlysplat
Originally posted by shellie
mine too blink

glad Im not the only one hysterical

I'm sorry I don't get it, Whats so funny, I think its sad embarrasment

Trickster
I think it is funny. Not for her, just that the police would care.

Capt_Fantastic
Originally posted by debbiejo
It's considered distributing pornography...She has problems..

I agree with the first part. It is distributing pornography. But not just pornography...but pornography that features minors. I can understand why they didn't drop the issue when they found out it was the minor in the pictures that was the one distributing the pictures. The people she sent them to shold be pissed off, unless they knew she was 15.

Piggle Humsy
Originally posted by dave123
Hmmmm... detective

Exactly what I was thinking! yes

ragesRemorse
Why is everyone so surprised about this? She broke the law. It is child porn. This is like those cases where people are punished for sex with minors and the minors are made out to be the victim when most times the minor had just as much to do with the instigation than the person who sleeps with the minor. A fifteen year old girl posting nude pics of herself is just asking to be preyed upon by dirty old men. Of course she should be punished. Ignorance is only realized when it is pointed out.

s|m
^ I agree

spidergrl
What the f**k?

Imaginary
What the f**k?

IceWithin
nothing surprising...
but I don't agree while it's wrong that the girl does that, it's her right to take pictures of herself however the hell she wants to, she's perfectly aware of what poeple are like in the internet, she's taking the risks.

Curl_Up&Dye
they probably think that someone is putting her up to it, because in the eyes of the law a 15 year old cant legally consent to all of that. In arresting her on those charges, theyre probably hoping she'll give up "who put her up to it" or give up the names of people she chatted with, in hopes of a lighter sentance


i think she should be charged with distributing child porn... but thats it.

i doubt she'll end up doing much time for it, plus her records will be sealed when she turns 18 anyways.

Text-only Version: Click HERE to see this thread with all of the graphics, features, and links.