Click HERE to see this thread with all of the graphics, features, and links.

Based upon this forums knowledge of David Ickes ideas and his fans are "alll" his fans stupid or just some of them?

who is David Icke?

tragically mislead

Originally posted by PVS
tragically mislead


I see the tragedy, but is the tragedy a symptom of stupidity

I think David Icke is a guy who trys to establish what really happend on like 9/11 and the Iraq war, but I may be wrong.

Originally posted by Clovie
who is David Icke?


Deano is the expert on him, I am sure he will lend you lots of literature if you wish

Lay off the flaming..

Originally posted by Cinemaddiction
Lay off the flaming..

angel

baiting

Not flaming

Same thing. Don't do it.

Am I doing it?

Or am I asking a valid question?

Let's stop splitting ****ing hairs here....



You admitted to baiting, you're basing your assessment of he and his fans on our forums, someone's already singled out Deano.........

Not going to tolerate much more of this personally, and it's not only this thread.

No I posted three words

Admitting nothing indicating, I understand how my posts could be percieved

No I am basing it on Ickes "son of god" comments, "Brasillian timewarp" ideas, theories on the royal family and lizrds etc. Don't tell me your a fan He wasn't much of a goalkeeper either, I saw him play

You're absolutely right, you didn't say you were baiting and not trolling a few posts above. Just because you plea to a lesser degree doesn't make you innocent.

Don't slip up.

Well, I 98% agree with Cinemaddiction. It's the 2% I don't understand.

There's no doubt this is a setup thread for Deano. That's obvious. However, how far across the board does this kind of "baiting" and "straight up, right off the bat singling-out" extend?

For instance, which of the following thread titles would not be acceptable under these guidelines (choose as many as apply)?

a) Let's jump the Attention Whores (a.k.a. Members who post too many photos in the Picture Thread!)
b) George Bush Followers: How can KMC allow mentally retarded users to join?
c) Where's Jackie Malfoy been, I could use a good freak show.
d) Anti-Abortion activists, it's time to abort you!!
e) Who here thinks people from Minneapolis, Minnesota smell?

I am sorry you have taken a dislike to me because I disagreed with one of your threads and found it elitist. I am also sorry I have upset your views that noobs should be seen and not heard, oh wise one, but following me round threads, its you know, a bit immature As is calling me a troll

Originally posted by botankus
Well, I 98% agree with Cinemaddiction. It's the 2% I don't understand.

There's no doubt this is a setup thread for Deano. That's obvious. However, how far across the board does this kind of "baiting" and "straight up, right off the bat singling-out" extend?

For instance, which of the following thread titles would not be acceptable under these guidelines (choose as many as apply)?

a) Let's jump the Attention Whores (a.k.a. Members who post too many photos in the Picture Thread!)
b) George Bush Followers: How can KMC allow mentally retarded users to join?
c) Where's Jackie Malfoy been, I could use a good freak show.
d) Anti-Abortion activists, it's time to abort you!!
e) Who here thinks people from Minneapolis, Minnesota smell?
He has a problem with me botankus, I suspect he is quite conservative, he is following me round on posts

Originally posted by botankus
e) Who here thinks people from Minneapolis, Minnesota smell? hysterical

Whirly this obviously is meant to be aimed at Deano...and really...do you think its necessary?
I think we have a David Icke Thread..no need for a new one that could be taken offensive.

Originally posted by Bardock42
Whirly this obviously is meant to be aimed at Deano...and really...do you think its necessary?
I think we have a David Icke Thread..no need for a new one that could be taken offensive.

yes I believe I have started at least one previously, its just the topic keeps coming up Bardock and Clovies earlier post indicates she did not know who he is.

Originally posted by whirlysplat
He has a problem with me botankus, I suspect he is quite conservative, he is following me round on posts

Well, I've "known" Cinemaddiction (Cory) longer than just about anybody else here at KMC. He's just doing his job. All I'm trying to do is just get some clarity here for probably my own future benefit (and be just a little humorous in the process).

No idea who David Icke is, though I don't mind hearing a good conspiracy theory, no matter how outrageous or mad. Of course "don't mind hearing" is vastly different to "believe totally". Still, it can be interesting, though I am yet to be convinced (I don't understand how the Lizards live underground, unless they are hibernating).

Still, lets avoid nastiness and conflict and have a good discussion.

Originally posted by botankus
Well, I've "known" Cinemaddiction (Cory) longer than just about anybody else here at KMC. He's just doing his job. All I'm trying to do is just get some clarity here for probably my own future benefit (and be just a little humorous in the process).

OK does Cory often follow people round threads "stalking" them? or is this something new, I mean I'm sure he is a good guy, but it really all goes back to this thread:

http://www.killermovies.com/forums/showthread.php?s=&threadid=354073&perpage=20&highlight=&pagenumber=9


I guess he doesn't like others opinions, or free speech

Is he doing his job or allowing personal feelings to cloud his judgement?

Originally posted by whirlysplat
yes I believe I have started at least one previously, its just the topic keeps coming up Bardock and Clovies earlier post indicates she did not know who he is.

Yes......but no need to start a new one you could have posted it in the previous Thread

Originally posted by Bardock42
Yes......but no need to start a new one you could have posted it in the previous Thread

true and a good point

Originally posted by whirlysplat
OK does Cory often follow people round threads "stalking" them? or is this something new, I mean I'm sure he is a good guy, but it really all goes back to this thread:

http://www.killermovies.com/forums/showthread.php?s=&threadid=354073&perpage=20&highlight=&pagenumber=9


I guess he doesn't like others opinions, or free speech

Is he doing his job or allowing personal feelings to cloud his judgement?

This thread doesn't show you in that much of a good light actually.....I often disagree with Cine (and he might be a little ....self.....err.....you know.....loving) but you just disturbed a perfectly good thread by reposting "elitist"......no need for that....

Originally posted by whirlysplat
true and a good point

Yes well I have my moments........

Originally posted by Bardock42
This thread doesn't show you in that much of a good light actually.....I often disagree with Cine (and he might be a little ....self.....err.....you know.....loving) but you just disturbed a perfectly good thread by reposting "elitist"......no need for that....

not quite sure what you mean with this Bardock please expand so I can answer you

I was just stating that I don't see why Cine is supposed to be wrong....I don't understand why yoiu posted in that thread if you were just calling people elitist.....

Originally posted by Bardock42
I was just stating that I don't see why Cine is supposed to be wrong....I don't understand why yoiu posted in that thread if you were just calling people elitist.....

Oh OK, basically I feel that thread was kind of creating a hierarchy, something I have a problem with and am satirising even as we speak in another thread. When you get constant "group think" in a forum that "these" people can "make decisions" and are "so respected" and are not mods it makes problems. imo Its self aggrandising.

Cine is a mod though......

Starting a thread with
"David Icke fans, are they all stupid" is NOT opening a debate.

Seriously, who here has the ability to answer "yes" or "no" to the above question in the first place.
Secondly, using a term like "stupid" is simply antagonizing.

Had the thread-title been
"David Icke, can someone explain him to me?" or "What is really the deal with this Icke-guy" you would've opened up for a debate.

I have NO idea who this Icke-guy is, so your thread title is not only loaded, it's also assuming a thing or two from the general forumite population which frankly does not exist.

Originally posted by Bardock42
Cine is a mod though......

I read that, fascinating............

So perhaps he feels many of the users on this forum are below him?

Is it a case of power corrupting and the road to hell being paved with good intentions. Interesting...................

Maybe his posts mean none of those things...but...........

i really hope i'm wrong............................................

Ah this is ridicolous I don't have to defend Cine.....and either way this thread is Biased and not necessary.

Originally posted by The Omega
Starting a thread with
"David Icke fans, are they all stupid" is NOT opening a debate.

Seriously, who here has the ability to answer "yes" or "no" to the above question in the first place.
Secondly, using a term like "stupid" is simply antagonizing.

Had the thread-title been
"David Icke, can someone explain him to me?" or "What is really the deal with this Icke-guy" you would've opened up for a debate.

I have NO idea who this Icke-guy is, so your thread title is not only loaded, it's also assuming a thing or two from the general forumite population which frankly does not exist.

Interesting........................................... an old poster on this forum who I have not seen in the GDF in the few months i've been visiting.................................................

your right about the assumpions in your second and last paragraph, they support my first

However if an idea is stupid or not only requires an opinion and argument like many threads and questions no one has the ability to merely answer yes or no

Originally posted by Bardock42
Ah this is ridicolous I don't have to defend Cine.....and either way this thread is Biased and not necessary.

I agree its not necessary and to a point regret making it, it was ill judged. I should have bumped my old one The first part of your post is fascinating

You overuse this "" smiley.....

Originally posted by Bardock42
You overuse this "" smiley.....

Talk to anyone on the comics forum about my smiley mafia as they call it

I don't feel like asking anyone aboot it.....no, i ask you my friend to do me (and maybe even some others) the favor of not overusing this smiley.....so can we as friends and equals on this forum not do that for each other?

Originally posted by Bardock42
I don't feel like asking anyone aboot it.....no, i ask you my friend to do me (and maybe even some others) the favor of not overusing this smiley.....so can we as friends and equals on this forum not do that for each other?

do you think this "" is elitist then, by the way I see you bumped Khamas thread I'd forgotten that one, so now Icke has three threads better?

No not elitist, I just dislike either "" or "" it seems to have a kind of unreasonable friendliness in it.

For example:

No I did not bump the thread
And I don't care how many Icke threads there are
I don't even care if people are elitist
So we are fine?
I

The impression I get, with regards to the smilies, is that:

tells me that you just said something that maybe, just maybe might have rubbed me the wrong way and you want me to know that you were kidding. Different than , which is usually after a statement that was obviously a personal jab in good humor, of course.

tells me that either you just said a straight-out compliment to me or...you just sided with or approved of something which may not be of general interest and you want people to know that everything's okay and you're not psycho.

What can I say I'm a friendly guy, this just feels wrong

Yes well....what aboot No Smileys? .... this one is ok...just cause iot rocks to much...I try to cut down on the smileys though...just feels wrong.

what about this one?

Useless

Originally posted by botankus
The impression I get, with regards to the smilies, is that:

tells me that you just said something that maybe, just maybe might have rubbed me the wrong way and you want me to know that you were kidding. Different than , which is usually after a statement that was obviously a personal jab in good humor, of course.

tells me that either you just said a straight-out compliment to me or...you just sided with or approved of something which may not be of general interest and you want people to know that everything's okay and you're not psycho.

about right

Originally posted by Bardock42
Useless

Never thought i'd get bored with smilies in a thread

it seems to me that your obsessed with david icke whirly, its quite obvious

This thread no matter how you defended has only one thing in mind. Flamming. Therefore closing...

Closed