Listen up, Running zombies are nothing new!

Text-only Version: Click HERE to see this thread with all of the graphics, features, and links.



Johnlindsey289
If your familar with the mainstream horror flicks like "Dawn of the Dead"(2004) and "28 Days Later".. saying they running zombies are new, WRONG!

They have existed before in early foreign horror movies that you should definitely watch! there was of course Umberto Lenzi's 1980 Horror/Sci-fi/action shocker "Nightmare City" ( a.k.a. City of the Walking Dead) which featured the first running zombies but these zombies also drove cars, have cruddy faces, and weild weapons including sucking blood like vampires.

Then there was "Lifeforce", "Return of the Living Dead trilogy", 'The Stuff" and "Zombi 3" that also had zombies that ran.

papabeard
fish

T.M
Originally posted by Johnlindsey289
If your familar with the mainstream horror flicks like "Dawn of the Dead"(2004) and "28 Days Later".. saying they running zombies are new, WRONG!

They have existed before in early foreign horror movies that you should definitely watch! there was of course Umberto Lenzi's 1980 Horror/Sci-fi/action shocker "Nightmare City" ( a.k.a. City of the Walking Dead) which featured the first running zombies but these zombies also drove cars, have cruddy faces, and weild weapons including sucking blood like vampires.

Then there was "Lifeforce", "Return of the Living Dead trilogy", 'The Stuff" and "Zombi 3" that also had zombies that ran.

i don't care IMO it still looks stupid yes

and 28 days later isn't a zombie movie

beta-wolf_101
Yep those people where still living. Sorry to ruin it for you.

Deano
Originally posted by T.M
i don't care IMO it still looks stupid yes

and 28 days later isn't a zombie movie

thats true, and neither is nightmare city

Cinemaddiction
This is like the 5th time you've brought this up. "28 Days Later" isn't "mainstream", it doesn't feature "zombies", and nobody ever claimed that. This whole "running zombies" is such a dead issue...nobody cares.

Wolfie
Arguing with a conversation that is long over with.

tpaquin
28 days later is mainstream, though.

Impediment
If you want to argue semantics, the people in "28 Days Later" were still very much alive and not considered "zombies". They were merely infected with "rage" or whatever it was.

Cinemaddiction
Originally posted by tpaquin
28 days later is mainstream, though.

"28 Days Later" is an independent U.K. movie that ended up showing in the US about 3 years after it was originally released, and even then, it only made it to 1,400 screens nationwide, compared to what most would consider mainstream, like "Land of the Dead", showing on 2,300 which is more of a mainstream release.

Text-only Version: Click HERE to see this thread with all of the graphics, features, and links.