Click HERE to see this thread with all of the graphics, features, and links.

in the movie Star Wars: Revenge of the Sith, its really stupid how obi-wan kills general grievous. I mean come on, a blaster???!!! its supposed to be a lightsaber battle!!! if anyone agrees with me, reply to this message!!!!! I mean, it takes away the whole star wars spirit!

Well, it WAS a lightsaber battle. If you remember, all 4 of Grievous's sabers got knocked out of his hands. And obi-wans fell when he was riding Boga.

Yes, it's lame but so is dedicating a thread to it.

especially with such a ridiculously vague title.
this IS really stupid

Indeed.

Thread Hijack: Love the sig and Avatar Mccusto.

Good call....

I didnt see anything worng with it. I thought it was quite funny to see his face blow up.


I liked seeoing sumone get killed in a diff. way by a jedi, bcuz WOOHOO a lighsaber. They're nothing special about seeing one get killed. It's always the same.

Besides, Grievous had 4 sabers, it would seem kinda weird, if he died by a guy who had only one.

Where's the skill, ya-no?

Originally posted by Ivel55
in the movie Star Wars: Revenge of the Sith, its really stupid how obi-wan kills general grievous. I mean come on, a blaster???!!! its supposed to be a lightsaber battle!!! if anyone agrees with me, reply to this message!!!!! I mean, it takes away the whole star wars spirit!

Yeah, just as it was stupid for Indiana Jones to kill that Arab swordsman with a gun. He was suppose to fight him without having to use his gun.

Originally posted by Forcewielder
Yeah, just as it was stupid for Indiana Jones to kill that Arab swordsman with a gun. He was suppose to fight him without having to use his gun.

All because Harrison Ford had the trots and wanted the scene to be over.

Back to the thread...I liked the fact that they had Obi-Wan defeat him with a blaster, it mixed things up a bit.

Originally posted by SS_181st_Snow
Thread Hijack: Love the sig and Avatar Mccusto.

Thanks

Originally posted by Forcewielder
Yeah, just as it was stupid for Indiana Jones to kill that Arab swordsman with a gun. He was suppose to fight him without having to use his gun.

Yeah. People in movies operate on the Honor System. If the bad guy attacks you with melee, you MUST respond with melee. If you are on opposing sides of a vast army, you must seek out your equal in combat and fight; the nearby combatants will widen the gap so you have plenty of swinging room. And no one will interfere with your battle.

Ok, dude, Grievous died by a blaster. So did half the Jedi in that movie. It's nice to leave the traditional saber kill for once, I'm glad they did it like that. Makes it a lot cooler and tense.

C'mon, if Obi didn't kill him with a blaster, he could have never said my ulitimate favorite line:
"So uncivilized."

Yeah, that line rather amused me. Hold on, why do the makers of these ridiculous threads post a stupid question/comment/statement, then like never show up again. It's like they watch us as they plan their evil plan of stupidity without saying a word in return.

If it is than so be it

That is the most disturbing sig I have ever seen.

Originally posted by Ianus
That is the most disturbing sig I have ever seen.

puke

Originally posted by Ianus
That is the most disturbing sig I have ever seen.

yes it is and I reported it as it doesnt even come close to the pg-13 limitation of this board

Hmmm, that does require a special award of grossness... I like it!

Originally posted by Jedi Priestess
yes it is and I reported it as it doesnt even come close to the pg-13 limitation of this board

How come? It's a fat guy and a woman sucking on toes. Last I knew, that qualified as PG-13.

oh come Lance, no way does that rate pg13.......many have commented on the sheer grossness of the pic Not like it matters anyway because nothing will get done about it, it's always been anything goes at kmc so why would today be any different.

Originally posted by Jedi Priestess
oh come Lance, no way does that rate pg13.......many have commented on the sheer grossness of the pic Not like it matters anyway because nothing will get done about it, it's always been anything goes at kmc so why would today be any different.

I don't see anything wrong about it. If you find fat guys gross then stop talking to me then. I myself am overweight.

There is nothing Rated R about that signature, thus is rates PG-13 or below. Which is allowed on KMC. It's just for shock value, nothing more.

Its not the fact that its of a fat guy. OK, what is objectable is what the said fat guy is doing and the oh nevermind.......like I said its pointless, this whole section is a shiethole anymore anyway.

I know I'm a moron, and yes it does gross me out, but I don't see anything TOO wrong with it. But don't get me wrong, it's gross

thank you ken, i'll probably be banned because I refuse to change it.
You can turn on network tv and see stuff twice as bad as my sig. Somebody with chopped off legs and arms and burned to as crisp is ok for pg-13 , but heavens we can't have a fat guy thats just too much.
whatever

I personally don't think it's against the rules but it is seemingly in poor taste. Looks photoshopped too.

oh and priestess just because you find something gross doesn't make it R, next time when you decide to run tattle tale on someone, you should take into consideration that not everyone shares your narrow minded pussy foot view of acceptable content.

Originally posted by Ken Kenobi
How come? It's a fat guy and a woman sucking on toes. Last I knew, that qualified as PG-13.

It doesn't.

It's overly sexual in nature and simply unpleasant. I told him to remove the sig, he refused, and met my request with immature insults about "my mom". He's now been permanently banned. Funny thing, he wouldn't have been banned if he just made his point in a decent, civilized manner.

Oh well, no more ugly fat guy playing with his breasts.

Damn. Pwned.

Originally posted by BackFire
It's overly sexual in nature and simply unpleasant.

Originally posted by BackFire
It doesn't.

It's overly sexual in nature and simply unpleasant. I told him to remove the sig, he refused, and met my request with immature insults about "my mom". He's now been permanently banned. Funny thing, he wouldn't have been banned if he just made his point in a decent, civilized manner.

Oh well, no more ugly fat guy playing with his breasts.

I've seen much more sexual signatures here on KMC (including images of women with a breast exposed but they never got in trouble), and ones much more gross as well.

But seeing as how he acted like a child after being requested to remove it...good riddance.

There's numerous things wrong with the sig.

1. The guy is ugly and simply not nice to look at. There's no reason to have a sig like that other then to just bother and annoy people - Trolling. Sigs like this have no place on this forum as they can/do disgust other members who don't wish to see some fat guy with DD breasts while they're trying to have a discussion.

2. It's very possible that the guy in the photo is under 18 years of age. It's also possible that Stinger doesn't have his permission to use that photo in his sig (assuming the picture isn't of stinger himself).

3. The insinuation of the picture is clear. It's sexual and unpleasant and has no place on the forum.

Sexual signatures are okay as long as people don't get offended by them or they're not overly explicit. These images where a woman's breast is exposed are also not allowed, you should report them if you see them, they are in a clear violation of the rules as well.

Just because some sexual/gross sigs slip by us doesn't mean that they're "okay".

After seeing all the illiterate and retarded threads of Stinger78 I hoped he would be banned but now it seems he is actually a very disturbed individual too..

I would have objected banning on his sig, acting like a child kinda does it though. I think I'm gonna use that siggie from now on.

Originally posted by Ianus
Yeah. People in movies operate on the Honor System. If the bad guy attacks you with melee, you MUST respond with melee. If you are on opposing sides of a vast army, you must seek out your equal in combat and fight; the nearby combatants will widen the gap so you have plenty of swinging room. And no one will interfere with your battle.

Hah! I knew it!

Originally posted by BackFire
It doesn't.

It's overly sexual in nature and simply unpleasant. I told him to remove the sig, he refused, and met my request with immature insults about "my mom". He's now been permanently banned. Funny thing, he wouldn't have been banned if he just made his point in a decent, civilized manner.

Oh well, no more ugly fat guy playing with his breasts.



daamn jawdrop


anyway back to the point of this thread. I did not think it was stupid at all because 95% of the fight was with lightsabers. I thought it was more dramatic how grevious was just about to kill obi and just then he shoots him with a blaster. I also thought more about how embarrasing it must have been for grevious to die from blaster shot

Originally posted by queeq
I would have objected banning on his sig, acting like a child kinda does it though. I think I'm gonna use that siggie from now on.

Burn that sig and then pray to God that it was fake and not real.

Originally posted by BackFire
There's numerous things wrong with the sig.

1. The guy is ugly and simply not nice to look at.




Well, no offence but your sig isn't exactly beautiful either.

I wouldn't have banned him just for the sig. It doesn't show pornagraphy, and it doesn't seem overly expicit to me. But then again I'm not a mod so I couldn't have done anything about it.


If only he wasn't so idiotic as to make childish jokes.

I didnt ask that he be banned. I just thought the sig wasnt right. And BF agreed.

So do I.

Originally posted by steverules
So do I.

what? dude use a quote

Originally posted by queeq
I would have objected banning on his sig, acting like a child kinda does it though. I think I'm gonna use that siggie from now on. jawdrop Vader: Noooooooooooooooooooo!!!!!!!!!11!!1!!1111Originall
y posted by darth vraya
Well, no offence but your sig isn't exactly beautiful either.

I wouldn't have banned him just for the sig. It doesn't show pornagraphy, and it doesn't seem overly expicit to me. But then again I'm not a mod so I couldn't have done anything about it.


If only he wasn't so idiotic as to make childish jokes. Let's report backfire!!

I thought his jokes were wonderful though, check it out:
Stinger78 thread: Holy crap....a cool cameo

This is so cool.I just watched starr wars again and I noticed that when the palpatine becomes evil he looks like the emporer on return of the jeti and i thought that was very un nessasery because he dies in six.

I think Lucus is awsome but he did this to tie the trilogies together but why isn't mace in the origionals. because lucus is a racist biggot and a jerk.

Ast: What?

Shut the hell up!

Originally posted by overlord
jawdrop Vader: Noooooooooooooooooooo!!!!!!!!!11!!1!!1111 Let's report backfire!!

I thought his jokes were wonderful though, check it out:
Stinger78 thread: Holy crap....a cool cameo

This is so cool.I just watched starr wars again and I noticed that when the palpatine becomes evil he looks like the emporer on return of the jeti and i thought that was very un nessasery because he dies in six.

I think Lucus is awsome but he did this to tie the trilogies together but why isn't mace in the origionals. because lucus is a racist biggot and a jerk.

Ast: What?

Shut the hell up! lol

I thought we were going to get back to the point of this thread...

Let's delete this thread.

Originally posted by overlord
Let's delete this thread.

Hear, Hear

Well, CLOSE it...