Click HERE to see this thread with all of the graphics, features, and links.

OMG. I forgot who I was going to post. You guys post till I'm reminded.

On that note, I'm going with Tobey Maguire.

Don't be mean. Tobey's lovely and he did a fab job with Peter Parker!

You're right. I change my vote to Britney Federline from CrossRoads.

Oh, Spideys Sister, I worked in the Forest Hills Tower (also called CE Tower) in Queens back in May!

I know the words "nice" and "Queens" don't usually go together in the same sentence, but that was a pretty damn nice part of town!

it has to be tom cruise..
though he is well versed in psychiatry

Bill Paxton & Helen Hunt from "Twister". *Ugh*

Keanu Reeves

^agrees you bet to post his name

Originally posted by botankus
On that note, I'm going with Tobey Maguire.

I agree.He is one actor who comes to my mind as a bad actor.I also agree that Tom Cruise is a horrible actor.Totally over rated.

Sharon Stone is the worst actor of all time. She is only famous for one thing if you get my meaning

orlando bloom - yep, great looking bloke, but i just dont think he is all that great at acting!!

the chick from sabrina the teenage witch

the cat from sabrina the teenage witch

the aunts from sabrina the teenage witch

anybody involved with sabrina the teenage witch

the agents who represent cast members of sabrina the teenage witch


and paul walker (keanu reeves' clone)

Shak ONeil dear god it was really bad and in truth any Basketball player including MJ

That moron from 'Punked'.. He can't even change that moronic way of speaking.

Keanu Reeves, Orlando Bloom, Ben Affleck.

Originally posted by overlord
That moron from 'Punked'.. He can't even change that moronic way of speaking.

If we're talking about Ashton Kutcher, who cares??!! He makes for sweet eye candy IMO.

Leonardo Di Caprio

Pierce Brosnan.Other than George Lazenby he was the worst Bond Ever.He seems to only play himslef in most his movies.

Just look up the Razzie Award winners for worst actors.

Orlando Bloom is terrible...

Originally posted by Miss Kinky
Leonardo Di Caprio

little harsh no? basketball diaries.. the aviator.. good films good acting..

maybe hes not anthony hopkins but hes not the worst actor ever...

Tom Cruise is prob the worst guy actor. Paris Hilton is prob the worst female. House of Wax was horrible

Originally posted by fuct_up_kid
Orlando Bloom is terrible...

are you joking? he was great in pirates.

Vin Diesel!

The worst is Paris Hilton.

I really don't know how to spell his last name but David Arquette is pretty sucky.

Jon Heder. He tries so hard to not by Napoleon Dynamite anymore but his acting is still awful in Just Like Heaven.
Originally posted by Impediment
Bill Paxton & Helen Hunt from "Twister". *Ugh*
But Bill Paxton was good in Frailty, no?

Ben Affleck, and Kevin Costner.

I'm sorry but I just cant stand to watch those two.

Anna Nicole Smith. she was in some ridiculous movie where she was in a Helicopter and....


Ugh... God... I can't think of it anymore.

Originally posted by Darth Macabre
Ben Affleck, and Kevin Costner.

I'm sorry but I just cant stand to watch those two.

Agreed

I Can not Stand Daniel Radcliffe his acting sucks (Though he did good crying in the 4th )

Ben Afleck hands down the worst.

Bill Paxton, Keanu Reeves (in the Matrix movies), Vin Diesel, Paris Hilton.

Shane West sucks and Paris Hilton.

hillary duff all the way

*pukes*

George Clooney and his crooked head monotone in every movie

Judge Reinhold.

Ben Affleck, Keanu Reeves and Tom Cruise.

Jessica Simpson?

I thought Ben Affleck did well in Dazed and Confused...havent seen any other films with him though.

Originally posted by lovebuzz
little harsh no? basketball diaries.. the aviator.. good films good acting..

maybe hes not anthony hopkins but hes not the worst actor ever...

not to mention This Boys Life and The Departed,

you can't say he is a bad actor, becuase he simply isn't


I hate Daniel Radcliffe, he is just too annoying too watch.

Originally posted by Micheal_Myers
Jessica Simpson?

I thought Ben Affleck did well in Dazed and Confused...havent seen any other films with him though.

Agreed with Jessica Simpson. Her attempts at acting sickened me.

Originally posted by AbnormalButSane
Agreed with Jessica Simpson. Her attempts at acting sickened me.

She has a killer body in Dukes of Hazzard though, waste of film that movie was though, but just saying.

Originally posted by ScarletSpeed
not to mention This Boys Life and The Departed,

you can't say he is a bad actor, becuase he simply isn't


I hate Daniel Radcliffe, he is just too annoying too watch.

Agreed, Leo's a little irritating to watch sometimes but he's a good actor

Daniel Radcliffe gets on my nerves, but he's all I see when I think of Harry Potter

Originally posted by botankus
On that note, I'm going with Tobey Maguire.

Tobey's an amazing actor. He was great in "Seabiscuit", and is an absolutely incredible Peter Parker in the "Spider-Man" trilogy.

My pick is Hayden Christensen. And if not him, then Keanu Reeves.

Originally posted by Toku King
My pick is Hayden Christensen. And if not him, then Keanu Reeves.

Oh my god I agree about Hayden Christensen, he pisses me off so much. When I saw him in Jumper I was appalled.

that honor has to go to sylvester stallone.

Originally posted by Isredel
The worst is Paris Hilton. heck yes!

The one actor I really want to punch whenever I see him would be Nicholas Cage. Hate that guy. I wouldn't go as far as to call him the worst actor. He obviously has some skill (of course not much). But man he pisses me off.

Originally posted by Toku King
My pick is Hayden Christensen. And if not him, then Keanu Reeves.

ahem *points to star wars episode III* what about hayden christensen?
*points to the matrix* and keanu reeves?

anyway id have to go with paris hilton. my favorite part of house of wax was when she died. infact, i think thats the only good part in the whole movie!

Originally posted by Darth Demise
ahem *points to star wars episode III* what about hayden christensen?
*points to the matrix* and keanu reeves?

anyway id have to go with paris hilton. my favorite part of house of wax was when she died. infact, i think thats the only good part in the whole movie!

what about those films?...just because they were big films doesn't mean they act well in them...as much as i love those films both Hayden and Keanu were terrible in them

and as a general rule it's probably not fair to include people who have merely been in films because they're famous in some other field (or in the case of Paris Hilton...famous because she's famous)

i think the problem with alot of people mentioned is that they choose bad films...Costner for example....although when you see him in dances with wolves and 13 days you can see he does have talent

on that note....my vote goes to Nicholas Cage...i think his facial expressions are just idiotic...he doesn't know how to do them appropriate to what he's saying....his voice is terrible and unbelievable when his voice is raised...i especially cant figure out why they chose him for WTC because his facial expressions are so bad...and alot of the film was close ups of his characters face in the rubble...

Hayden and Keanu are both pitiful.

i personally think hayden did a great job in episode III. i could possibly see the keanu argument maybe.

ok upon further inspection of my memory i realize that the most challenging part of that movie for hayden was probly the vader scene at the end. he had to act like a bada$$. so a trained monkey could do his part in episode III. my mistake, sorry about that =).

Originally posted by Syren
Hayden and Keanu are both pitiful.

Hayden yes...Keanu?....well...devil's advocate, point break, a scanner darkly, street kings....all very good perfomances

i think there are actors who needs good directors though...Michael Caine being an example...because some of his performances are shockingly bad...and some are fecking amazing

sarah michelle geller
tea leoni
John Travolta
tom arnold

Originally posted by jaden101
Hayden yes...Keanu?....well...devil's advocate, point break, a scanner darkly, street kings....all very good perfomances....

POINT BREAK!! thank you i was trying to remember the name of that movie! yeah he was good in that.

Originally posted by jaden101
Hayden yes...Keanu?....well...devil's advocate, point break, a scanner darkly, street kings....all very good perfomances

i think there are actors who needs good directors though...Michael Caine being an example...because some of his performances are shockingly bad...and some are fecking amazing

I guess Keanu just irritates me because he acts so slowly, if that makes sense? He seems to sound out his words too much when he speaks. I prefer effortless and fluid acting. I like Devil's Advocate but when I think back to the film I always feel less then satisfied, like something just wasn't right

Originally posted by Syren
I guess Keanu just irritates me because he acts so slowly, if that makes sense? He seems to sound out his words too much when he speaks. I prefer effortless and fluid acting. I like Devil's Advocate but when I think back to the film I always feel less then satisfied, like something just wasn't right

i know what you mean but he has at least some degree of diversity...unlike the ben afflecks of this world...the difference between ted (theodore) logan and Neo and constantine at least show that

Ben Affleck is just Ben Affleck...in sometimes different time periods

i think with Neo being Keanu's primarily known character...and it being such a boring character with dialogue that rarely ventured beyong "i dont know" means he has a worse reputation than is deserved

Keanu Reeves was a good Bob Arctor. He gets kudos for that.

Originally posted by Darth Demise
ahem *points to star wars episode III* what about hayden christensen?

He sucked at acting in that movie.



He sucked in that movie.



Happy for the death of a bratty actor who you don't really know? You're a little twisted, aren't you?

Originally posted by ragesRemorse
sarah michelle geller
tea leoni
John Travolta
tom arnold

No.

Originally posted by jaden101
i know what you mean but he has at least some degree of diversity...unlike the ben afflecks of this world...the difference between ted (theodore) logan and Neo and constantine at least show that

Ben Affleck is just Ben Affleck...in sometimes different time periods

i think with Neo being Keanu's primarily known character...and it being such a boring character with dialogue that rarely ventured beyong "i dont know" means he has a worse reputation than is deserved

Very true, although I stand by my statement about Devil's Advocate

I loved Constantine hmm

Ben Afflick. Keanu Reeves, The two twins on the sweet life of Zack and Cody.

Originally posted by Toku King
Happy for the death of a bratty actor who you don't really know? You're a little twisted, aren't you?

You have no idea!

Originally posted by Syren
Very true, although I stand by my statement about Devil's Advocate

I loved Constantine hmm

They had one of the best comic characters and in fact one of the best comics ever written that they could basically have just copied panel for panel and managed to end up with an average, maybe slightly above average film. I enjoyed Constantine, but the pain of knowing about the movie that could have been, hurt just a little too much.

Originally posted by Bardock42
They had one of the best comic characters and in fact one of the best comics ever written that they could basically have just copied panel for panel and managed to end up with an average, maybe slightly above average film. I enjoyed Constantine, but the pain of knowing about the movie that could have been, hurt just a little too much. I know you'll make fun of me for this, but I thought Keanu's acting was OK in that movie, ONLY that movie, the rest of the time he sucks.

Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
I know you'll make fun of me for this, but I thought Keanu's acting was OK in that movie, ONLY that movie, the rest of the time he sucks. Won't make fun of you for that. I disagree, but that's really not a stupid thing to believe, dude.

Originally posted by Bardock42
Won't make fun of you for that. I disagree, but that's really not a stupid thing to believe, dude. I bought him as the demon hunter/exorcist/whatever with a haunted past, trying to regain his soul.

I do NOT, however, buy him as the "one", running around kiciking everyones ass.

Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
I bought him as the demon hunter/exorcist/whatever with a haunted past, trying to regain his soul.

I do NOT, however, buy him as the "one", running around kiciking everyones ass.

What Jaden said about Affleck, which I disagree with by the way, I think applies to Reeves. I have seen him as five "different" characters I believe and he always plays them the same way. There's so little difference between either of his characters it is saddening. As I said, the makers of Constantine had ****ing gold on a diamond platter in a bed of trillion dollar notes presented to them, to end up with the movie they did in the end means that every person connected with the making of it must be the worst at whatever they are doing. Weird, I am sure I had a point. Oh right, I think Reeves sucks as actor, but since the one thing he does in this capacity is alright for some movies he gets by. Now, the one thing Nicholas Cage can do just makes me angry, which is why I hate him. Though granted, I haven't seen the movies that everyone praises him for, it's just, I want to punch him everytime I see him on screen so I am not sure I would enjoy them.

Who should have been cast as Constantine then?

Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
Who should have been cast as Constantine then?

I don't know. All I know that two Buffy characters were ten times better John Constantine's than Keanue Reeves, which is just sad.

I think maybe....Colin Farrell? I just realized that the character should have been more gruff looking, like with three or four days worth of beard.

Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
I think maybe....Colin Farrell? I just realized that the character should have been more gruff looking, like with three or four days worth of beard.
God I hate Colin Farrell.


Maybe Hugh Jackman? No idea really, doesn't need to be a big name. The Character should be ****ing English though..

Originally posted by Bardock42
God I hate Colin Farrell.


Maybe Hugh Jackman? No idea really, doesn't need to be a big name. The Character should be ****ing English though.. you didnt like Colin Farrell in that CIA movie with Pacino?

Maybe.....Christian Bale? Josh Hartnett?

Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
you didnt like Colin Farrell in that CIA movie with Pacino?

Maybe.....Christian Bale? Josh Hartnett? We maybe have to establish something. I'm not a movie geek, I likely watch the average amount of movies...maybe slightly above.

Also, Christian Bale could do any role in this world at any time, while sleeping.

Originally posted by Bardock42
We maybe have to establish something. I'm not a movie geek, I likely watch the average amount of movies...maybe slightly above.

Also, Christian Bale could do any role in this world at any time, while sleeping. well, Josh plays pretty boys all the time, but did you see 30 days of night?

Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
well, Josh plays pretty boys all the time, but did you see 30 days of night? Constantine isn't really a pretty boy.

Didn't see that movie though, is it good?

Originally posted by Bardock42
Constantine isn't really a pretty boy.

Didn't see that movie though, is it good? I know he isnt a pretty boy, thats what I mean, thats why I am suddenly agreeing that someone should have played him that wasnt a pretty boy.

GOOD movie. Josh Hartnett is pretty gruff, kind of a laid back badass.

Owen Wilson,Will Ferrell,Ben Stiller...they are always the same
put them in a period drama and theyd still be Owen Wilson.Will Ferrell and Ben Stiller.

Quentin Tarantino is a BAD actor but hes very entertaining in whatever hes in

Originally posted by vintageSW77
Owen Wilson,Will Ferrell,Ben Stiller...they are always the same
put them in a period drama and theyd still be Owen Wilson.Will Ferrell and Ben Stiller.

Quentin Tarantino is a BAD actor but hes very entertaining in whatever hes in

Owen Wilson and Ben Stiller aren't bad actors, they're extremely talented and highly comedic.

Will Ferrell, I agree with

I see what you mean about them coming over as themselves rather than the character they're playing but that's the point, I think. They make the character, could you imagine anyone else playing said character as well as Wilson or Stiller or injecting even half of the vivacity? I certainly couldn't.

As for putting either of them in a period drama, who would? shrug

true Ben Stiller is funny but acting is about believing in the character
its just always the same character with those 3
Ronnie Barker was a great comedic actor as was Peter Sellars
not those 3

I certainly disagree with that. Owen Wilson's charavters in Shanghai Noon, Zoolaner, Starsky and Hutch and Wedding Crashers were certainly not the same.

Originally posted by Bardock42
I certainly disagree with that. Owen Wilson's charavters in Shanghai Noon, Zoolaner, Starsky and Hutch and Wedding Crashers were certainly not the same.

well i guess you need to take a step back because...

they are

they are always 99% Owen Wilson
he cant escape from it
the only dramatic bit of acting the guy has done was the failed suicide attempt
that certainly doesnt fit the same old same old Wilson you see onscreen
hang on though maybe hes the new De Niro
offscreen hes a damaged insecure needs to be loved type but on screen hes the cool laid back ladykiller...Owen wilson...I SALUTE YOU!!
hes the new ****ing Olivier!

Originally posted by vintageSW77
well i guess you need to take a step back because...

they are

they are always 99% Owen Wilson
he cant escape from it
the only dramatic bit of acting the guy has done was the failed suicide attempt
that certainly doesnt fit the same old same old Wilson you see onscreen
hang on though maybe hes the new De Niro
offscreen hes a damaged insecure needs to be loved type but on screen hes the cool laid back ladykiller...Owen wilson...I SALUTE YOU!!
hes the new ****ing Olivier!

Odd. In the world I live in there is a little more space between worst and best. Must be easier in yours.

Will Ferell was great in Stranger Than Fiction. I just can't agree with people naming one of those SNL people as the worst actor of all time, as its not really what they are in the game for.

Chris O Donnell.

Chris O Donnel's been great in a few films. Just bad luck that alot of the high profile films he has been in have flopped horribly.

Not suggesting Keanu Reeves is a good actor at all, but I think people are misunderstanding his role in The Matrix.

The role of Neo would have been played that way by anyone, as it needed to be. Keanu was just lucky enough to find a character who matched his inability to act. The part was meant to be about a human man who is more or less thrust into an ironically robotic way of thinking after being told to free his mind. That's why, toward the end of the first movie and for the next two, he is more or less emotionless.

Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
I do NOT, however, buy him as the "one", running around kiciking everyones ass.

He wasn't just running around kicking "everyone's" ass. It wasn't like Bruce Lee where you're genuinely meant to believe he beats all these people as a normal man.

It wasn't about bad assery or him being some kind of musclebound fighter.

Now I see why you stick to Rocky and Aliens Vs Predator to be honest. I don't mean that in a bad way, I just think you should lay off any movie that isn't intensely straightforward.

Saying that, I find Rambo as believable as The Matrix. Less so. At least Neo had a reason for being able to do what he did.

-AC

Personally I think the not so straightforwardness of the Matrix is immensely overrated. I also agree that he didn't play Neo badly...Neo was just an annoyig character.

It is overrated in the second and third movies, they bought into their own "intelligence" and tried making it too smart, and it just ended up being like someone was reading from a thesaurus. Funnily enough, it was the stupid people with no vocabulary who got tricked into thinking The Architect's speech was profound and smart, that praised it. It was people who got it that didn't see why it was needed, like me, and slated it.

The first genuinely had about a million possible paths to take, and was chock full of ideas and references, philosophy and theology. Of course, they got their first big cheque and then took the worst path; the path to the next big cheque.

-AC

Originally posted by Alpha Centauri
It is overrated in the second and third movies, they bought into their own "intelligence" and tried making it too smart, and it just ended up being like someone was reading from a thesaurus. Funnily enough, it was the stupid people with no vocabulary who got tricked into thinking The Architect's speech was profound and smart, that praised it. It was people who got it that didn't see why it was needed, like me, and slated it.

The first genuinely had about a million possible paths to take, and was chock full of ideas and references, philosophy and theology. Of course, they got their first big cheque and then took the worst path; the path to the next big cheque.

-AC

Even though there might have been a million possible paths (though I am not exactly sure what you are referring to, that doesn't refer to any movie, ever), I don't think the first movie itself was such an intelligent masterpiece. You'll probably say "I don't get it", but to me it was nothing more than a decent action movie, with an interesting, though not really revolutionary, plot idea. Not really much better or worse than it's sequels.


Also, Carrie-Ann Moss is ugly. Doesn't really have anything to do with the movie...just saying.

There's always the possibility that someone gets it and just doesn't find it interesting, so I'm not going to assume you don't get it.

I just find the ideas and philosophy put into it to be interesting anyway, and it combined a lot of intelligent questions and notions with some revolutionary cinematic ways of putting it across. I enjoyed it very much.

-AC

Originally posted by Alpha Centauri
There's always the possibility that someone gets it and just doesn't find it interesting, so I'm not going to assume you don't get it.

I just find the ideas and philosophy put into it to be interesting anyway, and it combined a lot of intelligent questions and notions with some revolutionary cinematic ways of putting it across. I enjoyed it very much.

-AC

I can agree with that second thing. It's enjoyable and it does have interesting ideas. But I am sure you also know those dumbass Matrix lovers that just refer to it as if it is the Holy Grail of everything. I recently rewatched the trilogy and afterwards read a review by one of those idiot that just interpreted everything he could think of in the movie. But that's not really the film's fault.

Also not that of a shitty actor.

Like Nicholas Cage for example.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e6i2WRreARo&eurl=http://www.cracked.com/video_15451_scenes-from-wicker-man-pulled-out-context.html

Kurt Russell was a bad actor on Big trouble In Little China.

Originally posted by DethRose
Kurt Russell was a bad actor on Big trouble In Little China.

Disagree. Also an awesome movie.

Originally posted by Bardock42
I can agree with that second thing. It's enjoyable and it does have interesting ideas. But I am sure you also know those dumbass Matrix lovers that just refer to it as if it is the Holy Grail of everything. I recently rewatched the trilogy and afterwards read a review by one of those idiot that just interpreted everything he could think of in the movie. But that's not really the film's fault.

Also not that of a shitty actor.

Like Nicholas Cage for example.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e6i2WRreARo&eurl=http://www.cracked.com/video_15451_scenes-from-wicker-man-pulled-out-context.html

Yeah, but a lot of that is usually caused by the desire to fit in.

Like when people say South Park is very intelligent. It's not, it's just obvious commentary on "important" issues made simple enough for people who wish they were smart, to understand.

-AC

Originally posted by Alpha Centauri
Yeah, but a lot of that is usually caused by the desire to fit in.

Like when people say South Park is very intelligent. It's not, it's just obvious commentary on "important" issues made simple enough for people who wish they were smart, to understand.

-AC

Ouch.

I think it is intelligent. Not in the way that what they say needs years of thinking and research to realize as true, but it is quite well done and sadly one of the few commentaries that do actually say what needs to be said, at least in the US as far as I can tell. I agree though, it is nothing where I'd say "Shit, I never looked at it that way, those guys must be gods", just "Damn, that had to be said, and they said it well". It's a very head on approach to political satire, not very much room for interpretation.

That's not intelligence, though.

That's "guts" if anything. Saying it well is just about articulation and balance. I don't even think it's well done, I think it's insulting a lot of the time.

They go so far as to more or less explain precisely what's being said, hardly any left to the imagination. That's me though.

-AC

Originally posted by Alpha Centauri
That's not intelligence, though.

That's "guts" if anything. Saying it well is just about articulation and balance. I don't even think it's well done, I think it's insulting a lot of the time.

They go so far as to more or less explain precisely what's being said, hardly any left to the imagination. That's me though.

-AC They do sometimes explain it extremely precise. Though that can be funny, imo. Well, I enjoy their humour very much and also their political ideals, which I find sadly underrepresented in my country and in the US. I guess I give them credit for at least being more intelligent than a huge amount of people and programs.

Originally posted by DethRose
Kurt Russell was a bad actor on Big trouble In Little China.

now there is a great comedic performance by someone who isnt a comedian

he pulls it off nicely in Overboard too AND Death Proof

Originally posted by vintageSW77
well i guess you need to take a step back because...

they are

they are always 99% Owen Wilson
he cant escape from it
the only dramatic bit of acting the guy has done was the failed suicide attempt
that certainly doesnt fit the same old same old Wilson you see onscreen
hang on though maybe hes the new De Niro
offscreen hes a damaged insecure needs to be loved type but on screen hes the cool laid back ladykiller...Owen wilson...I SALUTE YOU!!
hes the new ****ing Olivier!

Owen Wilson was really good in The Royal Tenenbaums. That character was different than his typical ones.

Originally posted by Ronny
Keanu Reeves

Tom arnold

Santa claus *****

Dennis Quaid...AWFUL

Originally posted by ragesRemorse
Dennis Quaid...AWFUL

i hear he's meant to be quite good in vantage point

Dennis Quaid was great in Far From Heaven. He should received a nomination for it.

Daphne Zuniga comes to mind (if she counts).

Originally posted by First_Tsurugi06
Daphne Zuniga comes to mind (if she counts).

Son of a b*tch! raygun

Originally posted by Spideys Sister
OMG. I forgot who I was going to post. You guys post till I'm reminded. I renembered. :3

Kirsten Dunst, that chick who played Mozarts wife in Amadeus, Will ferrel, and Eminem's Girlfriend in 8 Mile.
(Adam Sandler win props for every movie he's been in... especially Zohan, The Wedding Singer, Little Nicky and Longest Yard.)

Jessica Alba

Overactors and overactresses
Dick Van Dyke,Angela Lansbury,Brian Blessed and Donald Sinden come to mind

Originally posted by Britrogue
Don't be mean. Tobey's lovely and he did a fab job with Peter Parker!

He did a great job in Sea Biscuit and Cider House Rules, horrible as Peter Parker, castingwise anyway.

Paulie Shore

She's not ugly! Outside of the slicked down hair in the Matrix films, she is fine.

Originally posted by =Tired Hiker=
He did a great job in Sea Biscuit and Cider House Rules, horrible as Peter Parker, castingwise anyway.

I liked him as Parker. I think it were ok movies. Even that shitty third one....

He was great in Pleasantville though.

Never saw Pleasantville. Is it worth a view?

Originally posted by =Tired Hiker=
Never saw Pleasantville. Is it worth a view?

In my opinion, yeah. Loved that movie.

I'll put it on my queue.

Originally posted by =Tired Hiker=
I'll put it on my queue.
I should warn you though, I do have pretty shitty taste.

Oh, I already knew that.

Originally posted by =Tired Hiker=
Oh, I already knew that.

Fair dos then.

I just have to say it, you wouldn't know how often people come to me saying "BARDOCK...I want the 2 hours of my life back you stole me".


Odd...usually it is directly caused by or at least related to Escape from LA.

I'll put that one on my queue as well.

Originally posted by =Tired Hiker=
I'll put that one on my queue as well.

Excellent choice. Two movies that couldn't be more different.

I thought that Maguire was quite good in Cider House Rules and Wonder Boys.