Shaak Ti and Ki-Adi-Mundi vs. General Grievous

Text-only Version: Click HERE to see this thread with all of the graphics, features, and links.



darthsith19
All from ROTS. Sure Grievous beat them from the Clone Wars but that was the Clone Wars cartoon in which Grievous's power was exaggerated. Now, the only rule is not to debate that. Anyone with logic will be able to realise that. Even if they can't there was an article on starwars.com saying both Grievous's and Mace's power was exaggerated in the cartoon. So now this is ROTS Grievous, where he is not exaggerated. Who wins?

darthsith19
Personally I feel the Jedi will win (with no causilties). Both Jedi are above average. If Cin Drallig can beat Grievous I'm fairly sure these two can. Also, I believe Maul to be slightly above Grievous in power. He fought Obi-Wan and Qui-Gon at the same time and lost and I'd say this team's stronger than that team so naturally they'd beat Grievous. Even in the cartoon at first when they fought him together they were afraid, a great weakness, and by the end when they weren't afraid anymore and were all ready to fight they dion't get a chance to fight him together. And if they're going to win it's going to be together. if either dies the other wouldn't be able to win.


So I think the Jedi win.

Fishy
GG will still win, you just have to put the CW cartoons in perspective compared to the movies. Obi Wan beat him because of his lightsaber fighting style not because GG became weaker or Obi Wan was far more powerful then those two. GG beat them in the clone war cartoons and he would beat them again.

darthsith19
Originally posted by Fishy
GG will still win, you just have to put the CW cartoons in perspective compared to the movies. Obi Wan beat him because of his lightsaber fighting style not because GG became weaker or Obi Wan was far more powerful then those two. GG beat them in the clone war cartoons and he would beat them again.
So Obi-Wan's fighting style is good against Grievous. So what? Big whoop. It doesn't make that big of a difference. And GG really didn't become weaker he was just overpowered in the Clone Wars Microseries.

Fishy
Originally posted by darthsith19
So Obi-Wan's fighting style is good against Grievous. So what? Big whoop. It doesn't make that big of a difference. And GG really didn't become weaker he was just overpowered in the Clone Wars Microseries.

As were the Jedi balance it out and GG would still win, what GG did in the CW toons he could have done in the movies. There is nothing to show differently, he just seems weaker in the movies but everybody does...

And actually es Obi Wan his graet style along with his good powers just made him do things against GG, things that others could never have done.

darthsith19
Originally posted by Fishy
As were the Jedi balance it out and GG would still win, what GG did in the CW toons he could have done in the movies. There is nothing to show differently, he just seems weaker in the movies but everybody does...

And actually es Obi Wan his graet style along with his good powers just made him do things against GG, things that others could never have done.
Some of the Jedi's power was exaggerated. Mace's, Kit's, Yoda's... but none of the ones from chapter 20.

So in the movie he could have ran up walls, dodged Republic Gunship fire, took out five above average Jedi Masters at the same time, pwnd Adi Gallia... no. Just no.

Fishy
No, but thats bullshit CW stuff, he could have probably beaten those Jedi though he should have had the power. To put CW GG into the movies you have to use some perspective on things. He couldn't have done the crazy stuff that even Dooku couldn't have done, but he could have done some shit that he did. He could still defeat the Jedi that he defeated just in a different way. If Obi Wan and GG would have fought in the CW cartoons GG would still have lost.

kingkman
General Grievous was strong and agile enough to completely defeat those jedi in the Clone Wars cartoons. He was still as strong and fast in the Revenge of the Sith movie. The reason he was able to own those jedi so badly was because the jedi weren't particularly great light-saber duelists and couldn't handle Grievous' quick and strong attacks, whereas Obi Won in ROTS was experienced and powerful enough to deal with Grievous' simple deadly attacks and easily defeat him.

kingkman
This is particularly shown in the game. Grievous' attacks are quick, strong and deadly but easy to exploit and once you are able to deal with them, he is easy. Windu, Yoda, Skywalker, Fisto, Drallig, Vos and Bulq would all be able to defeat grievous just like Obi-Won Kenobi.

Kaithen
GG takes this.....

aquaman
that's true kman but whenever you tlk bout the game here you get flamed like a thousand times.

Council#13
If you read Labryinth of Evil, he can still beat 4 Jedi Knights with little or no difficulty, but loses to Mace. I have no idea why I said those things

darthsith19
Originally posted by Council#13
If you read Labryinth of Evil, he can still beat 4 Jedi Knights with little or no difficulty, but loses to Mace. I have no idea why I said those things
Four Jedi Knights, yes. But wern't those four avg. Knights? Two powerful Masters > Four avg. Knights




Really? Cause if you have the Clone Wars DVD and listen to the AC he says they wanted to put some more powerful Jedi in that battle.

Council#13
Poo, the power of all the characters has pretty much been exaggerated the same amount. anyway the two masters win

darthsith19
Originally posted by Council#13
Poo, the power of all the characters has pretty much been exaggerated the same amount.
What? Yeah right, Mace was made like 30 times stronger. Grievous was not. Kit was not. Yoda was not. They were made 2 times stronger or less. I'd say Grievous was made almost twice as strong. Yoda and Kit were made 1.5 times as strong (as they really are).

Council#13
What? Sorry, that was a stupid post on my part

Let me rephrase that:
Grievous was not exaggerated THAT much as opposed to the exaggeration of the Jedi on Hypori and the Jedi defending Palpatine

darthsith19
Originally posted by Council#13
What? Sorry, that was a stupid post on my part

Let me rephrase that:
Grievous was not exaggerated THAT much as opposed to the exaggeration of the Jedi on Hypori and the Jedi defending Palpatine
??? The Jedi on Hypori? They wern't exaggerated. ???

Text-only Version: Click HERE to see this thread with all of the graphics, features, and links.