why do all movies in the second part suck ?
Text-only Version: Click HERE to see this thread with all of the graphics, features, and links.
dontworry x3
yeah that's something i don't know

Cinemaddiction
Not all of them do..? Got any examples?
LizzyT123
Dude! The first Saw was awful, the second was GREAT!
But I do know where your coming from. Most horror movies have awful sequels and crap.
Like A Nightmare on Elmstreet!
cropsy_is_god
Hellraiser 2 was amazin.
Wolfie
Saw 2, Hellraiser 2, Child's Play 2, Evil Dead 2, Halloween 2, all examples of great sequels.
It's the crappy sequels that give sequels a bad name.
DarkWizard
I think he means, in the 2nd half of the movie..
Cinemaddiction
Don't think so, boss. Movies are broken down in 3 acts, and anyone that thinks they have 2 "halves", shouldn't be watching movies.
DarkWizard
Originally posted by Cinemaddiction
Don't think so, boss. Movies are broken down in 3 acts, and anyone that thinks they have 2 "halves", shouldn't be watching movies.
3 acts, yes.
But there is still such a thing as the 2nd half of a movie.
There's a difference between the amount of Segments of a movie, all depending on the type of person viewing it.
I'm not disagreeing with you, By the way. Although it may sound like it.

BackFire
Either way, the thread starter is wrong.
Wolfie
If he did mean two halves of a movie, then that would suggest that the introduction is always better than the climax of the movie.
K.Diddy
Originally posted by dontworry x3
yeah that's something i don't know
Thats bullshit
Friday the 13 part 2
Halloween 2
Pandemoniac
Originally posted by BackFire
Either way, the thread starter is wrong.
Agreed
Text-only Version: Click HERE to see this thread with all of the graphics, features, and links.
Copyright 1999-2008 KillerMovies.