Originally posted by DarkC
What, you think being sarcastic is trolling?
No. I think being an argumentative **** and trying to pick a fight in every thread you post in is trolling though, and that's precicely what they were doing at the time
Originally posted by DarkC
There's no gas-cells in a lightsaber, correct, because there is no need for them. We do need a power source from which to heat the surplus plasma,
Surplus from what? Plasma is not a substance that just 'appears' out of nowhere, so there would have to be something to either create it, or store the gas which is then energized to become plasma.
Originally posted by DarkC
Kinetic energy is the energy of movement of molecules/ions and this is what causes heat.
Yes. If the blade of a lightsaber was composed of a rotating stream of gravitons, then the motion of those particles would indeed induce heat in things it came into contact with (as a file will heat the metal it is filing, despite neither being hot to start with)
Originally posted by DarkC
A proper plasma-based lightsaber would not heat the hilt as you described. If the kinetic energy of the active ions in the lightsaber were only confined to the limits of its magnetic field, then how can it affect the environment outside without any physical means?
Magnetic fields can not contain heat. It might be possible to contain a stream of plasma inside a magnetic bottle, but that would do nothing to contain the heat, which would still escape. Think of the blade of a lightsaber. It has a white core, and then the colored glow surrounding it. Lightsaber cuts are not the thickness of the entire visible colored glow, but only the thickness of the inner core. It could be that the colored glow is particle decay from the main core, and the color simply a result of the type of crystal used in the refraction of the particles.
That suggests that there is not a 'magnetic field' either confining the shape of the blade, or preventing the particles of the blade escaping, therefore, if there was plasma involved, then its heat would escape. If however, there is no plasma, and the blade is some other form of coherent energy (I suspect gravitons) that would explain why the blade of a saber does not produce heat (despite the particle decay) but creates heating effects when it comes into contact with a solid object.
Originally posted by DarkC
Explain to me scientifically why the electromagnetic envelopes would not account for the fact that they can be held against another, albeit with difficulty.
Magnets (and magnetic fields) either repel or attract. The blades of lightsabers neither attract nor repel each other in the way magnets do. What you call the 'difficulty in holding the blades together' is not a case of the blades trying to repel from each other, but a case of the fighters trying to physically push their opponent and using the blade as the balancing point.
Originally posted by DarkC
It's the most likely way how a lightsaber works. Matthew Stover, author of the official novelization of ROTS. He continuously mentioned Anakin's lightsaber as a "bar of blue plasma", especially during his turn to the dark side.
No it's not. Star Wars rarely displayed tractor beams or forcefields of the same type seen on Star Trek, but graviton devices (forcefields/tractor beams) are the kind of technology that would best explain not only a lightsaber's blade, but the properties that it displays. And the official LFL answer on lightsabers is that the blade is 'pure energy', which is not plasma. Energy, however, can take many different forms, and a graviton would indeed be a form of energy.