Click HERE to see this thread with all of the graphics, features, and links.

The only rule: If you lose, you can't win.

The only other rule: Losers can't declare losers.

Try to not make another thread

I crown myself victory!!! Oh i am so good! cool

Originally posted by K.Diddy
Try to not make another thread




So True, So True.

NBT and Diddy both lose.

Vinny loses.

No i crown myself victory!!! I shall not lose i will come in secret next time!!

You already lost. Remember the first rule...

Lord Paradise , You Lose.

Don't Forget the first rule, Now get Out.

A loser can't declare losers...

And anyone who would want me to lose is a loser, and therefore loses before actually posting that I lose.

*doesn't try to win*

everyones a winner if they try to win cuz eventually they will win.

I win. Thread over.

DanZeke loses; Itzak, ROYALGUARD and I are tied for first.

Originally posted by Lord Paradise
The only rule: If you lose, you can't win.

The only other rule: Losers can't declare losers.

You lose.

Closed.

Only a loser would try to declare me a loser... loser.

You lose.

Through flawed logic, I prevail.

ermm How do you play???

Originally posted by Lord Paradise
Only a loser would try to declare me a loser... loser.

You lose.

Through flawed logic, I prevail.
You Don't Win.

Through flawed logic, I prevail.

Originally posted by Barker
You Don't Win.

Through flawed logic, I prevail.

That's not logical at all, loser.

Thorinn: the rules are clearly explained.

so i can say i said it first....this thread is pointless and should be closed...

Originally posted by Lord Paradise
That's not logical at all, loser.
It Is.

I declared that you Don't Win, the Backdoor way of Calling you a loser, but I didn't actually call you a Loser, So I don't Lose. And You Lose twice for calling me a Loser when you've already lost.

justjakk loses... ROYALGUARD loses because he picked Bloigen over a dead fish in another thread... Thorinn loses for having a gratuitous avatar.

Down to Itzak and myself with a slight lead to Itzak, who's been less unscrupulous about this.

Slight lead goes to me for admitting this, and back again for saying that.

*wins*

Well that wasnt hardermm

Originally posted by Lord Paradise
That's not logical at all, loser.

Thorinn: the rules are clearly explained. oh ok..............*play's to lose*

Mist loses... Barker didn't specify whether or not I will win in the future and therefore loses.

Thorinn loses.

*pretends that he wins but actually loses* ermm

Okey-dokey.

And Barker by double-losing loses privileges as to deciding winning or not winning.

Originally posted by Lord Paradise
Thorinn loses. but how can you keep playing if your declaring losers thats your only other rule.



so in all reality, nobody wins, and everybody lose's, quit brilliant Lord P.

Originally posted by Lord Paradise
Only a loser would try to declare me a loser... loser.

You lose.

Through flawed logic, I prevail.

Remember the first rule. I've already declared you a loser; everything you say that follows is nullified and void.

Originally posted by Lord Paradise
Mist loses... Barker didn't specify whether or not I will win in the future and therefore loses.
But You've lost in the Present, which means the Future me will still outsmart you, making it Impossible that I'll lose to you in the future. And since you started the thread, I automatically win Forever.

Declaring losers doesn't make you a loser; if you've already been declared a loser you simply can't declare losers.

"Losers" by the way, can refer to my unposted judge of your character or my having posted it, i.e. only a loser would try and declare me a loser.

Originally posted by Barker
But You've lost in the Present, which means the Future me will still outsmart you, making it Impossible that I'll lose to you in the future. And since you started the thread, I automatically win Forever. in a weird way that makes sense.

*is a loser* weep

HS6 was already a loser (see above) before declaring that, so his declaring of me is null and void.

Barker: only time may tell, loser. Not winning at a given moment is not the same as losing at that given moment.

Originally posted by Lord Paradise
Declaring losers doesn't make you a loser; if you've already been declared a loser you simply can't declare losers.

"Losers" by the way, can refer to my unposted judge of your character or my having posted it, i.e. only a loser would try and declare me a loser.
I'm not Trying to Declare you a loser; You Are a Loser.

Which means, Logically, that I win. Again.

Originally posted by Lord Paradise
HS6 was already a loser (see above) before declaring that, so his declaring of me is null and void.

Barker: only time may tell, loser. Not winning at a given moment is not the same as losing at that given moment.
I'm winning, which makes me king. So I declare that Everyone Doesn't Win, Untill I Say otherwise.

*pokes Barker*

If I'm a loser, you're a loser, which leaves Itzak. I think we should declare him the winner.

Originally posted by Lord Paradise
*pokes Barker*

If I'm a loser, you're a loser, which leaves Itzak. I think we should declare him the winner.
No, I'm King.

You don't win, Itzak doesn't Win, due to the "Everyone Doesn't Win Law".

I can never be killed.

Besides, you just called me a loser, so you Don't Win Anyway.

Originally posted by Lord Paradise
HS6 was already a loser (see above) before declaring that, so his declaring of me is null and void.

Barker: only time may tell, loser. Not winning at a given moment is not the same as losing at that given moment.

Why are you still speaking? I don't remember giving you permission.

Originally posted by H. S. 6
Why are you still speaking? I don't remember giving you permission.
Cool

H.S. 6 Is Winning too, but not as much as me.

It's really quite simple:

You've proved that you win; I've proved that you lost. The resulting paradox will result in a never-ending thread spanning millenia, unless we give the win to a third party such as Itzak. My suggesting this gives me a Moral Victory.

Wait, I just realized there is no "everybody doesn't win" law. So we can both win if we agree to end this and share the title.

Originally posted by Lord Paradise
It's really quite simple:

You've proved that you win; I've proved that you lost. The resulting paradox will result in a never-ending thread spanning millenia, unless we give the win to a third party such as Itzak. My suggesting this gives me a Moral Victory.

Wait, I just realized there is no "everybody doesn't win" law. So we can both win if we agree to end this and share the title.
You never proved that I lost, Which makes you a "Doesn't Win'er for trying to start a Rebellion.

Originally posted by Barker
Cool

H.S. 6 Is Winning too, but not as much as me.

But you're a close second, so don't cry.

And besides, look on the bright side, since you can be my second-in-command, you have the right to speak whenever you want.

Of course I proved that you lost; I declared you a loser at a time when I was not a loser myself. I consider you a worthy opponent. I say we end this.

Itzak loses, just to erase that dimension of the thing.

Originally posted by H. S. 6
But you're a close second, so don't cry.

And besides, look on the bright side, since you can be my second-in-command, you have the right to speak whenever you want.
But I'm winning... cry

HS6 respects Marvel, giving him a leg up on Barker...

Originally posted by Lord Paradise
HS6 respects Marvel, giving him a leg up on Barker...
But HS6 Isn't Winning.

HS. 6. Is Almost winning. But He's not winning Just enough to Make me Forever King.

There is no almost. There are winners and losers.

H. S. 6... help me declare Barker a loser. He's a threat to both of us.

By the way, it doesn't specify that winners can declare losers either, which might throw the whole thing off.

Originally posted by Lord Paradise
There is no almost. There are winners and losers.

H. S. 6... help me declare Barker a loser. He's a threat to both of us.
But you already lost, you can't Declare Anything. No one can. Except H.S. 6, and If he does, he loses.

I win.
Originally posted by Lord Paradise
By the way, it doesn't specify that winners can declare losers either, which might throw the whole thing off.
I'm King. I can Call people "Not Winners". I can't say the L word though.

It doesn't say anything about Lord Paradise not automatically winning.

Originally posted by Lord Paradise
It doesn't say that you can't declare yourself winner, so ___ wins.
I was the only one winning, and as King, I made that Law.

So I win.

I think we should rethink our strategy.

if i have followed this well enough....H. S. 6 called LP a loser....so he cannot call losers....therefore, i didnt actually lose cause losers cannot call losers by the rules....it says nothing about threadstarter having immunity to this effect, so LP sucks....therefore, if by saying losers cant call anyone else losers, yet can say if someone is a winner, then LP can still judge who wins, but cannot say who loses....sounds like a pile of crap if you ask me, but then again, i didnt make this thread....


anyone who makes threads like this mustn't have a life with experience with other people

Chuck Norris already won this thread 3 years ago ermm