Click HERE to see this thread with all of the graphics, features, and links.

For audio-
http://mediamatters.org/items/200604190001
From yesterday:
"There are too many RDDBs in high places and in the media and in the courts for us to stand up to this fanatical enemy. And so unless the RDDB is reined in somehow or taken out of power, we're going to die as a nation. I swear to God that's what people are saying to me. And these are intelligent people, wealthy people. They are very depressed by the weakness that America is showing to these psychotics in the Muslim world. They say, "Oh, there's a billion of them." I said, "So, kill 100 million of them, then there'll be 900 million of them." I mean, would you rather die -- would you rather us die than them? I mean, what is it going to take for you people to wake up? Would you rather we disappear or we die? Or would you rather they disappear and they die? Because you're going to have to make that choice sooner rather than later."

Anyone's thoughts?

My one regret about my religion is that Judaism doesn't have a concept like excommunication cause bastards like this scum make us look bad.

Scum/jerks come in all flavors

this was supposed to go with the above

We have to not let people push us to that point. However, what if it did come to that?

...
Ehrm... Next image I see are people marching, arms raised to hail, swelling hearts, conceited madness...

It does sound like a speech made by Adolf Hitler:
Just change a few words...
"There are too many Jews in high places and in the media and in the courts for us to stand up to this fanatical enemy. And so unless the Jew is reined in somehow or taken out of power, we're going to die as a nation. I swear to God that's what people are saying to me. And these are intelligent people, wealthy people. They are very depressed by the weakness that Germany is showing to these psychotics in the Marxist world. They say, "Oh, there's a billion of them." I said, "So, kill 100 million of them, then there'll be 900 million of them." I mean, would you rather die -- would you rather us die than them? I mean, what is it going to take for you people to wake up? Would you rather we disappear or we die? Or would you rather they disappear and they die? Because you're going to have to make that choice sooner rather than later."
...
Doesn't it... ???

Originally posted by The Omega

...
Ehrm... Next image I see are people marching, arms raised to hail, swelling hearts, conceited madness...

It does sound like a speech made by Adolf Hitler:
Just change a few words...
"There are too many Jews in high places and in the media and in the courts for us to stand up to this fanatical enemy. And so unless the Jew is reined in somehow or taken out of power, we're going to die as a nation. I swear to God that's what people are saying to me. And these are intelligent people, wealthy people. They are very depressed by the weakness that Germany is showing to these psychotics in the Marxist world. They say, "Oh, there's a billion of them." I said, "So, kill 100 million of them, then there'll be 900 million of them." I mean, would you rather die -- would you rather us die than them? I mean, what is it going to take for you people to wake up? Would you rather we disappear or we die? Or would you rather they disappear and they die? Because you're going to have to make that choice sooner rather than later."
...
Doesn't it... ???

Yes, just a few keys words changed and we are barbarians. It's a thin line between civilized humans and barbaric animals.

Originally posted by Shakyamunison
Yes, just a few keys words changed and we are barbarians. It's a thin line between civilized humans and barbaric animals.

I don't know if animals can be "barbaric." They're just doin' their thing.
And isn't "civilized humans" bordering on oxymoron?

Originally posted by Mindship
I don't know if animals can be "barbaric." They're just doin' their thing.
And isn't "civilized humans" bordering on oxymoron?


*Lost for words.*

Well...people suck anyways...so I'll cast my vote for killing 5.99 billion people instead....

I'll go for 100 billion mosquitos! I hate those f****** things!

How about we just kill those who take up 2 parking spots?

Originally posted by Mindship
And isn't "civilized humans" bordering on oxymoron?

So true...

Well, he's right about one thing. There needs to be less people in this world. But, I don't think those that deserve to die should be from any specific group. In fact, no one deserves to die, but it's a necessary evil.

In fact, this guys seems to be saying that killing 100 million of them would be a pretty useless act, because there are still 900 million of them left. I think he's actually supporting the flat out extermination of all muslims.

Originally posted by Capt_Fantastic
Well, he's right about one thing. There needs to be less people in this world. But, I don't think those that deserve to die should be from any specific group. In fact, no one deserves to die, but it's a necessary evil.

In fact, this guys seems to be saying that killing 100 million of them would be a pretty useless act, because there are still 900 million of them left. I think he's actually supporting the flat out extermination of all muslims.

Yeah I think a fair 90 percent of every group should be exterminated.....that would solve some major issues.

Yeah, cuz we can justly choose who gets to be in the unlucky 90% and who gets to live.

Originally posted by Janus Marius
Yeah, cuz we can justly choose who gets to be in the unlucky 90% and who gets to live.

Draw names out of a hat.....

But then you'll have some guy fixing that. When it comes to one's life, all bets are off. The idea of a "mass purge" makes about as much sense as trying to save every possible life using all means- it's not feasible and certainly not practical.

Originally posted by Janus Marius
But then you'll have some guy fixing that. When it comes to one's life, all bets are off. The idea of a "mass purge" makes about as much sense as trying to save every possible life using all means- it's not feasible and certainly not practical.

We should spend all of our effort going into space instead of war. That will help the population problem.

Originally posted by Janus Marius
But then you'll have some guy fixing that. When it comes to one's life, all bets are off. The idea of a "mass purge" makes about as much sense as trying to save every possible life using all means- it's not feasible and certainly not practical.

Yeah, not practical....but still....also, if someone was in charge who wouldn't cheat....could work out.

Originally posted by The Omega

...
Ehrm... Next image I see are people marching, arms raised to hail, swelling hearts, conceited madness...

It does sound like a speech made by Adolf Hitler:
Just change a few words...
"There are too many Jews in high places and in the media and in the courts for us to stand up to this fanatical enemy. And so unless the Jew is reined in somehow or taken out of power, we're going to die as a nation. I swear to God that's what people are saying to me. And these are intelligent people, wealthy people. They are very depressed by the weakness that Germany is showing to these psychotics in the Marxist world. They say, "Oh, there's a billion of them." I said, "So, kill 100 million of them, then there'll be 900 million of them." I mean, would you rather die -- would you rather us die than them? I mean, what is it going to take for you people to wake up? Would you rather we disappear or we die? Or would you rather they disappear and they die? Because you're going to have to make that choice sooner rather than later."
...
Doesn't it... ???


No it doesn't, or it could be that I don't just don't have that vision you are attempting to stir.

If Michael Savage was one of these 100 million people it might be worth it.

Michael Savage is a great name...kind of like Max Power

for those of you who don't know, his real name is michael weiner and he is a nutritionalist and former friend of alan ginsberg and lawrence ferlengetti who one day began threatening his freinds with guns and became a right wing radio host under the name michael savage so he could make money. He's insanely popular and my point in posting this thread was pointing out this country's standards. The FCC regulates the airwaves (which by definition are "public space" and censors violence, but with the exception of NPR and Air america, they won't let you have a radio show unless you are to the right of hitler.

Well we had Howard Stern for awhile and that was enjoyable family programming

Originally posted by Bardock42
Yeah, not practical....but still....also, if someone was in charge who wouldn't cheat....could work out.

That's what Marx used to think. Unfortunately, the concept of the benevolent dictator/leader never works out, even for a purge lottery scenario.

Originally posted by Janus Marius
That's what Marx used to think. Unfortunately, the concept of the benevolent dictator/leader never works out, even for a purge lottery scenario.

I wouldn't say that's all true....

I would. You give any one man absolute power and he abuses it, even if his original intention is good. Look at Oliver Cromwell, for instance.

Originally posted by Janus Marius
I would. You give any one man absolute power and he abuses it, even if his original intention is good. Look at Oliver Cromwell, for instance.

Err.... one instance is not proof that it is always like that...

When did Marx say there should be an absolute ruler or a dictator?

i would laugh off savage's rant if bush was not planning the same.
a coincidence would be all the hinting of keeping the nuclear (nuKuLer) option "on the table", as well as bush's plans to invade iran (though we are supposed to believe he will tolerate and allow diplomacy for the time being), not to mention renewed nuclear testing in nevada's proving grounds come early june.

looks like freedom may come in the form of a mushroom cloud.

Originally posted by Capt_Fantastic
When did Marx say there should be an absolute ruler or a dictator?

Marx noted that during the transition period going from old world order to the new one, a benevolent dictator or ruling body would be neccessary to make sure that everything went according to plan before putting the power in the hands of the working class.

100 million would conotate that bush would take out tehran, any nuclear sites in Iran, Moscow, Beijing, Minsk, Islamabad, Kapustin Yar/Znamensk, about 100 little russian villages, about as many chinese nuclear sites, Minsk, and Pyonyang.
So like, 300 Patriot missiles, no threat of world war III, 100-300 million dead, full spectrum dominance for the US, no electricity for the eastern hemisphere. several species of animals completely extinct. Irreparable environmental damage, earthquakes and volcanoes all over the world and at least 400 million additional deaths worldwide from radiation sickness and cancer.
GO DUBYA!!! GO SAVAGE!!!

SOleran>"No it doesn't, or it could be that I don't just don't have that vision you are attempting to stir."
Then I suggest you go read up on Hitlers rhetorics.

Darth Jello> Who controls this FCC?

PVS> Bush wants to begin nuclear testing again?
In 1963, all nuclear and many non-nuclear states signed the Limited Test Ban Treaty, pledging to refrain from testing nuclear weapons in the atmosphere, underwater, or in outer space. The treaty permitted underground tests. France continued atmospheric testing until 1974, while China continued up until 1980. The last underground test by the United States was in 1992, the Soviet Union in 1990, the United Kingdom in 1991, and both France and China continued testing up until 1996. After adopting the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty in 1996, all of these states have pledged to discontinue all nuclear testing. Non-signatories India and Pakistan both last tested nuclear weapons in 1998.

The current FCC chairman is former bush-cheney campaign advisor Kevin Martin who is also advised by five comissioner's one of whom is vacant. They are also heavily influenced by threats from the religious right and corporate bribes.

Marxist parents? Here I was thinking people had overcome the whole Marx-phobia. Funny to tie them in with bizare pseudo religious/political, what with the whole "no religion thing."

And the US isn't standing up to Muslims? Gee, if two concurrent military operations in the Middle East is the US not doing anything to in the Islamic region I would hate to see what his idea of doing something actually looks like. Oh, doing something would be having a whack at purges, a bit of lite genocide.

People who say the world is to crowded and/or to hostile and suggest extermination as a solution should give the example by blowing their own brains out.

Originally posted by Pandemoniac
People who say the world is to crowded and/or to hostile and suggest extermination as a solution should give the example by blowing their own brains out. Nah, it's too crowded by you people....

Imperial_Samurai> "Here I was thinking people had overcome the whole Marx-phobia."
Well, haven't you noticed that UCC's use even a word like "liberal" as an insult?? Strangely enough usually the same people who make the claim that "human nature" is an obstacle to socialism...