Click HERE to see this thread with all of the graphics, features, and links.

The so called 'Indestructible metal' of the 616 universe is no longer unbreakable within the Ultimate universe.

Let's look over the facts ...


Wraith states in Ult X-men #3 that it's a 'semi-Indestructible' metal
In issue #11 Wolverine is sealed inside a 'adamantium cage' and fury later states a Iraqi shell blew it to bits
Ultimate Hulk versus Wolverine


Also how would such a 'Indestructable' metal fit into the Ult universe . If it's supposed to be more realistic a unbreakable metal wouldn't even exist....

Ultimate pwns, and Adamantium bein indestructible is lame...

So is Ultimate Cap's shield not indestructable?

Originally posted by HellMaster93
Ultimate pwns, and Adamantium bein indestructible is lame... Completely agree bro...

Is Ult Cap's shield just adamantium?

Originally posted by HellMaster93
Is Ult Cap's shield just adamantium?

Dont think so ?

What if Ultimate adamatium is just as strong as it is in the 616 reality but everything in the Ultimate U is so much stronger.

Hey its possible.

An iraqi tank shell is so much stronger in the Ultimate universe????

Originally posted by grey fox
The so called 'Indestructible metal' of the 616 universe is no longer unbreakable within the Ultimate universe.

Let's look over the facts ...


Wraith states in Ult X-men #3 that it's a 'semi-Indestructible' metal
In issue #11 Wolverine is sealed inside a 'adamantium cage' and fury later states a Iraqi shell blew it to bits
Ultimate Hulk versus Wolverine


Also how would such a 'Indestructable' metal fit into the Ult universe . If it's supposed to be more realistic a unbreakable metal wouldn't even exist....

Adamantium was never truly "indestructible"... it just couldn't be destroyed by most means humans have at their disposal

The adamantium cage probably had to have had standard steel or titanium hinges/joints that would have been more vulnerable to attack

Ult Hulk versus Wolverine was the first time one of their matches made sense, his legs were ripped from his torso meaning that the spinal cord was severed.... the spine is not a solid piece of bone, it's many small, interlinking bones that are NOT joined together like a chain... basically all the Hulk did was rip away the tendons/ligaments/cartilage/other stuff that fills the space between the bones

Why wouldnt anyonme know that...?

Originally posted by HellMaster93
Ultimate pwns, and Adamantium bein indestructible is lame...

And Bingo was his name-o.

i know a guy called Bingo...

No material is truely indestructable. Not even 616 Cap's shield which is supposed to be the strongest natural (non-magical/mystical) object in the universe. RK Thor did a number on it.

Also, we don't even know if Ultimate Adamantium has the same molecular construction as 616 Adamantium. For all we know, what the Ultimate universe refer to Adamantium could be secondary adamantium or even carbonadium (Omega Red's tenticles).

Originally posted by HellMaster93
Is Ult Cap's shield just adamantium?


I don't think it has ever been confirmed...........

1. Eh makes sense to me

2. Bad writing

3. Wolverine dosent have adamantium ligaments, so basicly his arms and legs can be ripped off

Originally posted by Scoobless
Adamantium was never truly "indestructible"... it just couldn't be destroyed by most means humans have at their disposal

The adamantium cage probably had to have had standard steel or titanium hinges/joints that would have been more vulnerable to attack

Ult Hulk versus Wolverine was the first time one of their matches made sense, his legs were ripped from his torso meaning that the spinal cord was severed.... the spine is not a solid piece of bone, it's many small, interlinking bones that are NOT joined together like a chain... basically all the Hulk did was rip away the tendons/ligaments/cartilage/other stuff that fills the space between the bones

Exactly. On all counts.

I understand all of the 'ligaments can be ripped' etc etc. But I doubt the writers actually thought of that ...

does anyone know when the next ish of Ult. Hulk Vs Wolvie comes out anyway?

evilninja

http://www.killermovies.com/forums/showthread.php?s=&threadid=411183&highlight=wolverine+hulk+forumid%3A95


runaway2

Originally posted by grey fox
I understand all of the 'ligaments can be ripped' etc etc. But I doubt the writers actually thought of that ...
Earlier in the issue, didn't Jennifer Walters ask Wolverine about if his ligaments were coated in adamantium? I think they did think of it.

Originally posted by grey fox
I understand all of the 'ligaments can be ripped' etc etc. But I doubt the writers actually thought of that ...


why is that?


cmon, give them more credit than that

a 15 year old would know that

I agree

Originally posted by grey fox
The so called 'Indestructible metal' of the 616 universe is no longer unbreakable within the Ultimate universe.

Let's look over the facts ...


Wraith states in Ult X-men #3 that it's a 'semi-Indestructible' metal
In issue #11 Wolverine is sealed inside a 'adamantium cage' and fury later states a Iraqi shell blew it to bits
Ultimate Hulk versus Wolverine


Also how would such a 'Indestructable' metal fit into the Ult universe . If it's supposed to be more realistic a unbreakable metal wouldn't even exist....

1) yeah semi as in nothing is truly indestructible, but adamantium comes close.
2) the cage itself isn't destroyed so its likely parts of it aren't adamantium. thats why you see it in one piece, but opened.
3) like someone else said Hulk tears the ligaments or spinal cords, not the adamantium.

If the ultimate universe is supposed to be more realistic then we wouldn't be reading the comic would we? as in mutants, like adamantium, don't exist

Originally posted by The Pict
1) yeah semi as in nothing is truly indestructible, but adamantium comes close.
2) the cage itself isn't destroyed so its likely parts of it aren't adamantium. thats why you see it in one piece, but opened.
3) like someone else said Hulk tears the ligaments or spinal cords, not the adamantium.

If the ultimate universe is supposed to be more realistic then we wouldn't be reading the comic would we? as in mutants, like adamantium, don't exist "More realistic" doesn't imply stringent adherence to actuality.

Originally posted by The Pict
1) yeah semi as in nothing is truly indestructible, but adamantium comes close.
2) the cage itself isn't destroyed so its likely parts of it aren't adamantium. thats why you see it in one piece, but opened.
3) like someone else said Hulk tears the ligaments or spinal cords, not the adamantium.

If the ultimate universe is supposed to be more realistic then we wouldn't be reading the comic would we? as in mutants, like adamantium, don't exist

Sorry to burst your bubble, but just because something is more realistic doesn't mean it's completely true or scientifically possible. ""

Originally posted by Solidus Snake
why is that?


cmon, give them more credit than that

a 15 year old would know that

Oh yes , I should really give credit to the guy who decides to tie marvel in with lost.

Originally posted by grey fox
Oh yes , I should really give credit to the guy who decides to tie marvel in with lost.

Well, if it was stated in the comic itself, I think the credit is due.

Originally posted by grey fox
I understand all of the 'ligaments can be ripped' etc etc. But I doubt the writers actually thought of that ...

They did. It was mentioned in passing by Jen Walters. Millar even mentioned in a interivew that he doesn't know why none of Wolverine's super strong adversaries thought of it before.

Originally posted by H. S. 6
Well, if it was stated in the comic itself, I think the credit is due.

No , what I'm saying is , is that the man is too focused on writing lost then on this.

Think Bagely/Bendis when they got Ult Carnage confused with Normal Carnage. Their to focused on one to separate it from the other....

Originally posted by marvelprince
They did. It was mentioned in passing by Jen Walters. Millar even mentioned in a interivew that he doesn't know why none of Wolverine's super strong adversaries thought of it before.

Then I'll accept that.

To be honest I'd actually agreed with you guy's a while back about the ligaments . But i needed a third thing for my adamantium rant so i wanted to see what the reactions would be.