Problem - Reaction - Solution

Text-only Version: Click HERE to see this thread with all of the graphics, features, and links.



Deano
The Problem Reaction Solution Paradigm (The Hegelian Dialectic)
1) The government creates or exploits a problem blaming it on others
2) The people react by asking the government for help willing to give up their rights
3) The government offers the solution that was planned long before the crisis


Borrowed from David Icke's book.

There are techniques of mass manipulation that people need to understand if they are to begin to see through the game. The main one I have dubbed 'problem-reaction-solution'. This has been used for thousands of years to advance the agenda and is one the most effective weapons of them Illuminati. Problemreaction- solution is the key to understanding what really happened on September 11th 2001 and why.

It works like this: you know that if you openly propose to basic freedoms, start a war or centralise power, there will be a public reaction against it. So you don't openly and honestly propose such plans, you play the P-R-S scam. At stage one you create a problem. It could be a coup attacking another, a government or economic collapse, or a 'terrorist attack. Anything in fact that the public will think requires a 'solution'. At stage two, you report the 'problems' you have covertly created in the way you wish the people to perceive them. Crucially you find someone to blame for the problem, a 'patsy' like Lee Harvey Oswald when President Kennedy was assassinated, or Osama bin Laden. You spin the background to these events in a way that encouri1ges the people to demand thi1t "something must be done". These are the words you want to hear because they allow you to move on to stage three, the sting. At this point you openly offer the solutions to the problems you have yourself created. These solutions, of course, involve the centralisation of power, the sacking of officials or politicians that are getting in your way, and the removal of more basic freedoms as you advance further to your global fascist state. Just think of the freedoms that have been removed because of 9/11.

A more subtle part of the technique is to propose far more extreme changes than you expect to get away with because this allows any opposition to think you have compromised and met them halfway. But you know that you have other 'problems' in the pipeline to push the agenda on ..
With this technique you can so manipulate the public mind that people will demand or at least allow you to introduce what, in normal circumstances, they would vehemently oppose. The Oklahoma bomb at the Alfred P. Murrah Building on April 19th 1995 was a problem-reaction-solution classic, as I explained in And the Truth Shall Set You Free and Alice in Wonderland and the World Trade Ce1lter Disaster. What followed the death and destruction in Oklahoma were 'anti-terrorism' laws that sailed through Congress without challenge ~ removed fundamental freedoms from American people. Since September 11th, this agenda has been advanced in gigantic leaps. I don't share the attitudes of people like Timothy McVeigh, nor do I defend disturbed people like Osama bin Laden, but that's not the point. Establishing the truth of what happened is the point, no matter what the views and attitudes of those involved. It is called justice.

The two most effective problem-reaction-solutions in the twentieth century were the two global wars. They changed the face of the world, as wars always do, and led to a massive centralisation of power. The United Nations, like its predecessor the League of Nations, was an Illuminati creation to act as a Trojan horse, or stalking horse, for world government.
..............................................................

Deano

Grand_Moff_Gav
I don't think any Chancellor of Weimar Germany had an absolute majority in the Reichstag. However, The Fire is a fine example of the Problem Reaction Solution Paradigm...but for one thing...

The people didn't give up any rights, rather President Hindenburg gave them up for them...using Clause 42? Was it that one?

((And Hitler didn't use that to become Chancellor, he did it to weaken the power of the Communists...))

And there is still debate on if Hitler did have the Reichstag burned, he did capatalize on it, but did he burn it?

Bicnarok
theres also the

1. provoke problem
2. support overreaction
3. part solve problem which you caused (save part for a repeat)
4. milk your success.

This is the constant Isreali v palastine loop

Mr Parker
great thread Deano.thanks for posting it.

Mr Parker
Originally posted by Grand_Moff_Gav
I don't think any Chancellor of Weimar Germany had an absolute majority in the Reichstag. However, The Fire is a fine example of the Problem Reaction Solution Paradigm...but for one thing...

The people didn't give up any rights, rather President Hindenburg gave them up for them...using Clause 42? Was it that one?

((And Hitler didn't use that to become Chancellor, he did it to weaken the power of the Communists...))

And there is still debate on if Hitler did have the Reichstag burned, he did capatalize on it, but did he burn it?

yes he did.

Text-only Version: Click HERE to see this thread with all of the graphics, features, and links.