Click HERE to see this thread with all of the graphics, features, and links.

http://www.cnn.com/2006/US/10/18/child.porn/index.html?section=cnn_topstories


Kew-kew.

Good work

Awesome. But without a website to watch, where are pedophiles going to get their dose of naked children? Will they actually o out and molest the children themselves?

A good point of discussion, and not one solved easily. But the main issue is that kids get abused to provide content for these sites as well. It has to be stopped somehow, and we have to start somewhere. Hiding behind a 'it's going to be done anyhow' mentality isn't helping in fighting child pornography. Tell it to a parent who's kid got raped on the internet, 'hey sorry, at least it was done in a proper bed, and not some back alley downtown'.
The offenders need to be chased and prosecuted as much as possible with all means available, if only for the chance of some seeking professional help. Visitors of these sites must be tracked down, arrested and forced to undergo mental analysis, therapy and monitoring, and possibly castration.
These are innocent kids we are talking about, allowing them be prayed on by sexually distorted sickos is not an option.

Originally posted by Mr. Sandman
Awesome. But without a website to watch, where are pedophiles going to get their dose of naked children? Will they actually o out and molest the children themselves?

If this was all faked and no children were used then you would have a point. Children were used and forced however and that makes this a good thing, not a bad thing.

http://pr0n.encyclopediadramatica.com/images/4/4b/1155146709583.jpg

Originally posted by PVS
http://pr0n.encyclopediadramatica.com/images/4/4b/1155146709583.jpg

Kudos to the law enforcement agency's involved in this bust.

They should strap those pedophile bastards to Humvees in Iraq as shielding for our troops. IMO.

Remember operation human shield, protect our tanks and planes as well

Thank god, I thought they supported child porn for a while there

Yeah, it was ****ing close today...

I never said this was a bad thing, it's excellent. But they sure as hell didnt catch everyone who watched the site(the site made 2 million a month for crap's sake), there are still a whole lot of sick people out there with no release(excuse the pun) for their depraved ways.

Yea, you can catch all the pedophiles you want who run and watch websites, but the point is that the damage is already done. You need something to prevent it from happening in the first place. If a pedophile has a website to visit, he won't go and rape a child. One less child to go through such an ordeal.

But another child has all ready... the one on the site. The fact that that child's suffering provides 'entertainment' for a greater number of phedo's compared to the damage they could individually do to a greater amount of kids doesn't justify anything.
The whole abuse, no matter the scale, has to be stopped. You can't just allow a victim-to-viewer ratio, where would you draw the line?

Originally posted by Mr. Sandman
I never said this was a bad thing, it's excellent. But they sure as hell didnt catch everyone who watched the site(the site made 2 million a month for crap's sake), there are still a whole lot of sick people out there with no release(excuse the pun) for their depraved ways.

Yea, you can catch all the pedophiles you want who run and watch websites, but the point is that the damage is already done. You need something to prevent it from happening in the first place. If a pedophile has a website to visit, he won't go and rape a child. One less child to go through such an ordeal.

Faked child porn might do that, on the other hand big punishments might also convince people to stop watching and keep their pants up.

Originally posted by Fishy
Faked child porn might do that, on the other hand big punishments might also convince people to stop watching and keep their pants up.

Exactly, that's where "Operation Human Shield" comes in, if that wouldn't work for a deterrent, I am sure other means can be found.

Originally posted by PVS
http://pr0n.encyclopediadramatica.com/images/4/4b/1155146709583.jpg You raise a good point



http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b289/Trppnclark1167/HUZZAH.jpg

Originally posted by Fishy
Faked child porn might do thatHmm... photo-realistic CGI kiddie porn? The entrepreneur in me says I could make millions... but it would probably be considered immoral...

Originally posted by xmarksthespot
Hmm... photo-realistic CGI kiddie porn? The entrepreneur in me says I could make millions... but it would be immoral...
Fixed.

Technically no children are getting hurt, in fact it's protecting children. CGI kids don't have feelings.

Originally posted by xmarksthespot
Technically no children are getting hurt, in fact it's protecting children. CGI kids don't have feelings.
Doesn't mean it's not immoral.

So you'd prefer to let real children do the kiddie porn? You're a monster.

it's always great to see pead0s get pwned by th3 l@w

Originally posted by xmarksthespot
Technically no children are getting hurt, in fact it's protecting children. CGI kids don't have feelings. It's the same with violent computer games, doesn't make people more violent.

my question is what these pedo's are being charged with? they havent sexually assaulted any children yet, so therefore they cant be given jail time for not commiting a crime. looking at pictures of children naked is a crime? im not trying to defend them, but it just seems like theyre jumping the gun a little bit with this. the best thing they can do is throw them in a treatment program. what does jail time give them? that doesnt improve anything, except for taking away the slight possibilty of them assaulting a child. even with treatment though, you can never really erase a persons fetish, it can diminish slightly but never disappear. but that still doesnt mean that they all have it in them to commit the crime. the interesting point i also wanted to make is that most of these men who are looking at child porn were probably victimized when they were young, making them also victims of rape and molestation just like the kids in the child porn pictures. these people have problems and to me it seems a little unfair that they are focusing more on capturing the guys looking at the pics, than really going out and finding the people who took these pictures and have actually RAPED these children. its like if they made eating chocolate cake illegal, but then they left chocolate cake out everywhere for everybody to see and putting whoever ate it in jail. they need to get rid of the chocolate cake and worry about that more than the guys who struggle with eating chocolate cake.

Originally posted by Pandemoniac
But another child has all ready... the one on the site. The fact that that child's suffering provides 'entertainment' for a greater number of phedo's compared to the damage they could individually do to a greater amount of kids doesn't justify anything.
The whole abuse, no matter the scale, has to be stopped. You can't just allow a victim-to-viewer ratio, where would you draw the line?

It works on the same priciple as many other things, sacrifice the few for the fate of the many.

2, 3, 4 children molested vs the 125+ that could have been had it not been for the site.

I'm not saying to stop pursuing those who contiue the running of these sites, just saying that there will be consequences.

Originally posted by .pace Opera:.
its like if they made eating chocolate cake illegal, but then they left chocolate cake out everywhere for everybody to see and putting whoever ate it in jail. they need to get rid of the chocolate cake and worry about that more than the guys who struggle with eating chocolate cake.

That is a very intelligent statement.

Originally posted by Mr. Sandman
It works on the same priciple as many other things, sacrifice the few for the fate of the many.

2, 3, 4 children molested vs the 125+ that could have been had it not been for the site.

I'm not saying to stop pursuing those who contiue the running of these sites, just saying that there will be consequences.

Of course there will be, but letting that site stay open is no alternative... The only alternative is creating porn with people who look younger then 18 but are older or with faked porn... The first one probably already happens, the second one is still illegal in this country because it's to hard to check if those pictures are real or not... But that might become regulated some time

I think letting the site stay open, but quietly picking off 5 or 6 pedophiles that visit the site at a time would be more effecient in the long run. that way you'd get WAY more than just 125 of them, and the children that end up being molested stay at a minimum. after you get nearly all of the pedos, shut down the site.

Originally posted by Mr. Sandman
It works on the same priciple as many other things, sacrifice the few for the fate of the many.

2, 3, 4 children molested vs the 125+ that could have been had it not been for the site.

I'm not saying to stop pursuing those who contiue the running of these sites, just saying that there will be consequences.

True perhaps, and I can't offer a solid solution to this problem either. Still every victim in this is one to many, so is every hint of tolerance in this matter, irregardless of the theories behind it.
If we accept the sacrifice of some to save many others, what else is next? Real snuff movies for those who get off on real murders, so they wont go out and kill people themselves?

Originally posted by Mr. Sandman
I think letting the site stay open, but quietly picking off 5 or 6 pedophiles that visit the site at a time would be more effecient in the long run. that way you'd get WAY more than just 125 of them, and the children that end up being molested stay at a minimum. after you get nearly all of the pedos, shut down the site.

That would be better but from what I heard and of course a bit of personal experience those communities are ussually tight, and don't trust a lot of people so if a few of them would suddenly dissapear and then a few more and then a few more it would be known.

Of course it's really just a website without a forum or whatever it would be doable but there are probably a lot of risks to it, especially if those people keep in touch with eachother.

also, it seems that alot of the websites originated from other countries where child pornography isnt illegal, such as Denmark. so often times its hard for the united states to shut them down because they dont have any way of doing it without bringing up foreign affairs.

Originally posted by xmarksthespot
So you'd prefer to let real children do the kiddie porn? You're a monster.
I can't tell if this is a Bardock post or a post that is going to make me sigh in exasperation.