Click HERE to see this thread with all of the graphics, features, and links.

3

9

DAMN IT... couldnt it have been 1 times table??


eleventy2

27 (ignoring Foxmeister's post, don't know the number eleventy2)

33

3x27=81

Originally posted by FoxMeister
33
Wrong.

I think the correct way of counting in multiples of three would be 3, 6, 9, 12....

You are multiplying by 3, Slay.

Originally posted by Bardock42
I think the correct way of counting in multiples of three would be 3, 6, 9, 12....

You are multiplying by 3, Slay.

You forgot 13! shock

Originally posted by Bardock42
I think the correct way of counting in multiples of three would be 3, 6, 9, 12....

You are multiplying by 3, Slay.
No it's not. Or is it.

Originally posted by Council#13
You forgot 13! shock

No, I certainly didn't, seeing as 13 is not a multiple of three.

What the hell is wrong with you guys.

243...

It's better this way.

Originally posted by Bardock42
No, I certainly didn't, seeing as 13 is not a multiple of three.


No, but it has 3 in it.

Originally posted by Council#13
No, but it has 3 in it.

So does your mom.

Originally posted by Bardock42
No, I certainly didn't, seeing as 13 is not a multiple of three.

What the hell is wrong with you guys.
No, you take a number and multiply it by 3, then multiply that by 3 and so and so on.
Example:
3x3= 9
3x9 = 27 and so and so on.

2,187

Originally posted by Bardock42
So does your mom.

Which part of her?

19,683

59049

Originally posted by Bardock42
Heck if I know. I just said she got three in her. Convenient seeing as she also has three major orifices.


6561



177147

Originally posted by Bardock42

You can do that, but it is not a multiple of three counting game then. Since 6 is by definition a multiple of three. Get it?

Look, moron, the point is, you count by mutiplying by 3 then multiply the outcome and so on, not post the entire table of three.

177,147

Originally posted by Slay
Look, moron, the point is, you count by mutiplying by 3 then multiply the outcome and so on, not post the entire table of three.

Look, that is not what he intended and not what he said. It was supposed to be a multiples of three counting game. Multiples of three are all numbers that can be divided by three.

Basically he wanted to list us the sequence 3n, n element of the natural numbers. Just trust me on this. I am right.

Originally posted by Bardock42
Look, that is not what he intended and not what he said. It was supposed to be a multiples of three counting game. Multiples of three are all numbers that can be divided by three.

Basically he wanted to list us the sequence 3n, n element of the natural numbers. Just trust me on this. I am right.
Fine, fine, I lost interest anyway.

531,441

Too Much Information

Originally posted by Bardock42
I think the correct way of counting in multiples of three would be 3, 6, 9, 12....

You are multiplying by 3, Slay. Yeah, they're doing exponents of 3.

6

1594323