Originally posted by GalacticStorm
With omniscience you become all, you experience all, you feel all.
This is the Flaw of your argument..Thank you for revealing the problem....
Omniscience is simply the ability to SEE, FEEL , and KNOW ALL...nothing more, nothing less. Omniscience is NOT to become one with all. Your definition is incorrect.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Omniscience
http://www.m-w.com/dictionary/omniscient
http://encarta.msn.com/dictionary_/omniscience.html
Do yourself a favor and research the defintion of omniscience, thank you
Originally posted by GalacticStorm
Spectre talked of being one with all, of feeling all, of experiencing creation. He said nothing of being able to wield such power.
Becoming on with all is Omnipotence. When you become one with all that is, you ARE ALL THAT IS, therefore you can CONTROL ALL THAT IS....
By definition Omnipotence is the ability to DO ALL. However, one method of becoming Omnipotent is to BECOME All, so that control is INTERNAL as opposed to external....
It's been done before by Thanos w Cosmic Cube, and HOTU.....
Get it ?
Originally posted by GalacticStorm
Genis Vell had omniversal telepathy. Omniscience doesnt equal omnipotence.
I agree with you....Omniscience is not omnipotence. What's your point ? Spectre reached omnipotence AND omniscience as I proved above....
Originally posted by GalacticStorm
Its just a shame that was a depiction of omniscience. Show us how Spectre could actually use all the power of creation for his personal use as opposed to just being one with creation and being attuned to it.
The depiction was omnipotence because he became one with all....
You earlier tried to argue that this is Omniscience, which it is NOT
I already provided you with the CORRECT defintion of Omniscience, so please drop your argument, it is false
Originally posted by GalacticStorm
Show us one example where Beyonder displayed power a million times greater than all that exists in the multiverse as opposed to JUST showing us he was greater than the beings who actually faced him.
He didn't have to display this, when it was clearly stated by the Comic book Writer HIMSELF
Classic Beyonder was ALSO STATED to have been acting on a smallFRACTION OF HIS POWER
Originally posted by GalacticStorm
Theres not a single feat that illustrates what that caption would have us believe. /B]
Classic Beyonder was ALSO STATED to have been acting on a small FRACTION OF HIS POWER
Originally posted by GalacticStorm
Beyonder used a large amount of his power to kill Death and didnt have enough left to bring her back without someone volunteering to take Deaths place and yet he has a million times the power of the multiverse?
Classic Beyonder was ALSO STATED to have been acting on a small FRACTION OF HIS POWER
Originally posted by GalacticStorm
Beyonder had his power taken from him by Doom who had access to Galactus the planet eaters (and at most potential universe destroyer) tech for all of 5 mins before he was skilled enough to usurp the Beyonders power leaving him powerless and yet he has power a million times that of the multiverse?
Originally posted by GalacticStorm
Beyonder had a million times the power of the multiverse combined (apparently) and yet he could still be affected by the power of the multiversal M'kraan crystal?
Classic Beyonder was ALSO STATED to have been acting on a small FRACTION OF HIS POWER
Originally posted by GalacticStorm
Glowing with energy is not a display of power. That makes for a pretty picture. To judge how Beyonder would fare against others you go by how his power has been applied against things. What has he done in battle? What has he created? What has he destroyed? NOT a picture of Beyonder glowing and supposedly having such a high level of power. Wheres the reference point to verify that comment? What did he apply his power to after that to show us that he indeed did have a million times the power of the multiverse?
If you actually READ Secret Wars, or atleast Mr. Master's Beyonder Respect Thread, you'd have a clue what you were ranting about.....
And again:
Classic Beyonder was ALSO STATED to have been acting on a FRACTION OF HIS POWER
Originally posted by GalacticStorm
Theres a difference between MERELY being stronger in a fight against the abstracts and having a million times the power of their multiverse combined. Beyonder more or less showed the former, the latter was not only NOT proven on panel, but as ive illustrated was often contradicted.
THE WRITER CLEARLY STATED that Classic Beyonder possessed power millions of times that of the marvel multiverse. Stan Lee himself confirmed.....that should be more than enough proof....
And ALL OF BEYONDER's FEATS were done at a TINY FRACTION OF HIS POWER as STATED BY THE WRITER...
Do you understand, or will you still argue that the Writer was incorrectabout his OWN CHARACTER ????
You and Beta Ray Howard should hook up...you both love to challenge the writer's descriptions of thier own characters !
Originally posted by GalacticStorm
Nope. My comments about Phoenixes power are based on actual performed feats, NOT JUST a caption.
You rely on feats, AND narration, not to mention the HANDBOOK which the WRITERS formulated.
I find it hypocritcal of you to dismiss the NARRATION and WRITERS DESCRIPTION of Classic Beyonder, but you totally utilized narration and character description of the Pheonix.
I think your just mad that Classic Beyonder pwned Pheonix in the Secret Wars saga...