... Speak No Truth, See No Truth, Hear No Truth ...

Text-only Version: Click HERE to see this thread with all of the graphics, features, and links.



Deano
Have a read..

OFFICIAL 'INQUIRIES' ...

http://www.davidicke.com/images/stories/December2%202006/3_monkies.jpg

... SPEAK NO TRUTH, SEE NO TRUTH, HEAR NO TRUTH ...

Hello all ... George Orwell's Newspeak works on the principle of describing something in the very opposite terms of what it is really there to do.

For example, in his novel, 1984, the Ministry of Plenty was responsible for food rationing and control; the Ministry of Truth was the government's propaganda machine; the Ministry of Peace ran a perpetual war; and the Ministry of Love was the place where dissidents were tortured.

We see the same principle in what are called 'official' inquiries, Congressional 'investigations' and 'Royal Commissions'. They would appear on the face of it to be efforts to establish the truth of what has happened, but, as they are Newspeak phenomena, they are actually there to do the opposite.

The blatant examples of this are legion, including the 'inquiry' into the death of Princess Diana that reported a few days ago. I'll come to this later, but there are so many examples of my theme here.

The Warren Commission into the assassination of President Kennedy decided that he was killed by Lee Harvey Oswald and there was no wider conspiracy or group involved. This was the version that those who really killed the president wanted the public to believe and the Warren Commission was set up to reach the desired conclusion, no matter what the evidence to the contrary.

The Commission was established by Lyndon Johnson who replaced Kennedy in the White House, a life-long political crook who was well aware of what was going to happen in Dealey Plaza that November day in 1963. It was he who reversed all the Kennedy policies on the Vietnam War, interest-free money and much else, once the bullets were fired.

http://www.davidicke.com/oi/extras/December2006/justiceearl.jpg

The Commission was headed by Chief Justice Earl Warren, a Freemasonic Grand Master in California, and was dominated by Illuminati insiders and people who hated Kennedy. These included the World Bank President, John J. McCloy, the future US President, Gerald Ford, a 100% stooge of the cartel, and the infamous Allen Dulles, the first head of the CIA who was fired by Kennedy.

They came to the conclusion that they were told to come to by the shadow people and thus supported the lie that Oswald was the killer. Hardly anyone in the United States believes this now and nor should they, given that Kennedy and Oswald were so clearly set up.

http://www.davidicke.com/oi/extras/December2006/magicbullet.jpg

The Commission even had to invent the insane 'magic bullet theory' to explain wounds to Kennedy and Texas Governor John Connally. The magic bullet had to dramatically change direction, ricochet off bones, and yet remain in the pristine condition in which it was found. Connally refused to accept the Commission's findings and told a friend of mine that he could not say publicly what he knew because of threats made against him and his family.

This is what most official 'inquiries' are established to do. The outcome is decided beforehand and the 'facts' are made to fit. Any potentially fatal evidence, fatal to the official story that is, is simply ignored.

We saw a wonderful example of this with the 9/11 Commission that was supposed to reveal the truth of what happened that terrible September day in 2001. Of course, its real job was to maintain the cover up. This is why Bush first appointed the manipulator par excellence, Henry Kissinger, to head this 'inquiry', but he was forced to step down because of his lack of independent credibility and his refusal to reveal the client list of his Illuminati front company, Kissinger Associates.

His replacements were also insiders, as they were bound to be. Thomas Kean had been a director of the National Endowment for Democracy, a long-time front for CIA covert operations overseas and has investment connections to the same Saudi sources that have funded both President Bush and Osama bin Laden. Among them are Khalid bin Mahfouz, who was named by the Clinton State Department as a financer of terrorism. Vice chairman Lee Hamilton sits on advisory boards to the CIA, the President's Homeland Security Advisory Council, and the US Army.

The 9/11 Commission's final report was written by executive staff director, Philip Zelikow, who was appointed by Bush to the President's Foreign Intelligence Advisory Board and was for three years on the National Security Council of father Bush. Zelikow has worked closely with Condoleezza Rice and even co-wrote a book with her, Germany Unified and Europe Transformed: A Study in Statecraft. She appointed him to be the main writer of the Bush National Security Strategy in 2002 that used 9/11 to justify the policy of attacking countries that posed no imminent threat. This was the guy who was executive director of a Commission 'investigating', among other things, the actions of Bush and Rice on September 11th.

http://www.davidicke.com/oi/extras/December2006/norman.jpg
Norman Mineta

One piece of vital evidence that the Commission refused to include in its written report was that of the Secretary of Transportation, Norman Mineta, who's testimony demolished the official story that claimed the authorities had 'lost' Flight 77 as it headed for Washington and crashed (so it is claimed despite the evidence) into the Pentagon. But Mineta told the Commission how he was in the White House underground command bunker at this time with Vice President Cheney and he knew that the 'plane' had most definitely not been 'lost'. Mineta said in evidence:

'During the time that the airplane was coming in to the Pentagon, there was a young man who would come in and say to the Vice President, "The plane is 50 miles out." "The plane is 30 miles out." And when it got down to "the plane is 10 miles out," the young man also said to the Vice President, "Do the orders still stand?" And the Vice President turned and whipped his neck around and said, "Of course the orders still stand. Have you heard anything to the contrary?"'

So Norman Mineta, the Secretary for Transportation who had ordered the skies to be cleared that morning, was telling the 9/11 Commission that the official version was a lie as he had seen at first hand. Then there was the comment from Cheney about the orders still standing. What orders? Well, they could not have been the orders to shoot down the plane because it wasn't shot down. That only the leaves the possibility that the orders referred to not shooting it down and allowing it to continue to the Pentagon.

This was devastating testimony and demanded at the very least serious questioning of Cheney. But instead of doing this, the Commission simply did not mention what Mineta had said in its written findings because the idea was to suppress the truth, not expose it.

The same technique can be found all over the world and it can be summed up in one sentence: You don't establish an investigation that could destroy you unless you know before the start that it won't.

In Britain, Prime Minister Tony Blair appointed a stooge called Lord Hutton to 'investigate' the death of weapons expert, David Kelly, and the reporting of a BBC journalist called Andrew Gilligan, who quoted Kelly anonymously as saying that the government's 'dossier' on the alleged threat from Saddam Hussein had been 'sexed up' to sell the war.

Deano
http://www.davidicke.com/oi/extras/December2006/lordwhitewash.jpg

Lord Hutton, or Lord Whitewash as he became known, reported that the BBC was in the wrong, that David Kelly committed suicide when he was clearly murdered, and that Tony Blair and the Intelligence agencies did nothing amiss.

The report led to the sacking of Andrew Gilligan and the resignations of the BBC chairman and Director General when what Gilligan had said turned out to be true. The dossier had been 'sexed up', in fact massively so, because they knew that Saddam did not pose the threat they claimed and did not have the weapons of mass destruction they alleged to be stockpiled.

But place-man Hutton, appointed by Blair, gave his master the decision that he not only demanded, but needed to survive.

http://www.davidicke.com/oi/extras/December2006/diana_stevens.jpg

Which brings us to the last few days and the report of the 'inquiry' into the death of Princess Diana in that Paris tunnel on August 31st 1997. This 'inquiry', called Operation Paget, was headed by Lord Stevens, the former head of the London Metropolitan Police, who decided after three years and four million pounds that the official story was indeed true.

'Our conclusion is that, on all the evidence available at this time, there was no conspiracy to murder any of the occupants of the car', Stevens said. This was a tragic accident. There was no conspiracy and no cover-up.'

Did anyone ever think there would be any other outcome from the moment the 'inquiry' began?

Eighteen key witnesses were not interviewed by the Stevens team and the Monte Carlo jeweller, Alberto Repossi, claims that the Operation Paget detectives pressured him to change his story about providing the ring for what he said was the imminent engagement of Diana and Dodi Fayed. Repossi says he has the receipts and CCTV footage to show that Diana and Fayed chose a £230,000 emerald and diamond band called Dis-Moi Oui - Tell Me Yes.

http://www.davidicke.com/oi/extras/December2006/dis-moi-oui.jpg

The jeweller says he opened his store at the Place Vendome across from the Ritz Hotel for Dodi Fayed to visit on August 30th. Repossi says that detectives told him it was not an engagement ring and he went on:

'They warned me that if anyone lied to Lord Stevens then he had the power to get people sent to prison. They kept repeating the warnings of the risk to my reputation and the bad press coverage I would get. But despite all this, I was not prepared to change what I'd said before because it was the truth.'

But whatever the truth, such inquiries are not interested if it puts the establishment they serve in any danger of exposure. Stevens says he found 'no evidence' that Prince Philip was in league with British Intelligence over Diana's murder and that 'Philip saw no reason to comment on any of these claims'.

Oh, that's okay then, if British Intelligence says there was no link and no involvement and Prince Philip sees no reason to comment, there is 'no evidence' that such connections exist. Crazy.

Stevens also said there was 'no evidence' that the National Security Agency (NSA) in the United States had ever bugged Diana's phones and other communications. How does Steven's know this? Because US officials had assured him that this was the case and that secretly-recorded conversations in their possession shed no new light on her death. Firstly, those last two sentences are in direct contradiction of each other and, secondly, did he demand to hear the conversations that were secretly recorded? No, he took their word for it - the same with British Intelligence when they said the same and denied they had Diana under surveillance.

http://www.davidicke.com/oi/extras/December2006/nsa.jpg

'Hello, this is Lord Stevens, is that National Security Agency?'

'Sure is, buddy.'

'Did you bug Diana's phones?'

'No, sir.'

'Okay, thank-you, sorry to bother you.'

'No problem, bye ... heh, heh, heh, heh.'

I know from my own source close to Diana that British Intelligence was indeed tracking her every movement and that she was warned by friendly agents within MI5 that she should watch her back because her life was in danger. This is where much of her information came from when she wrote about Prince Charles planning to kill her in a car accident.

My source, Christine Fitzgerald, a friend of Diana for nine years, was there to be interviewed by Lord Stevens and she is quoted extensively in The Biggest Secret, but naturally Lord Stevens and co would never go there.

http://www.davidicke.com/oi/extras/December2006/mannakee.jpg
Murdered detective Barry Mannakee with Diana

In the late 1980s, with her marriage nothing more than a public show, Diana was having a relationship with her personal detective, Barry Mannakee, but he died in a motorcycle 'accident' in 1988. By 1990, Diana was having a relationship with Captain James Hewitt. One day, about this time, she went rushing into Christine Fitzgerald's healing centre in London in a terrible state. Christine told me what happened next:

'She was crying hysterically and I said "What's a matter?" You know it was dog's died stuff, bottom lip out, full sob. She came galloping through the door. I gave her Rescue Remedy, clutched her, hugged her, calmed her down, and said now tell me what's going on. "I can't believe it, I can't believe it, they killed him", she sobbed. I said: "Who did they kill?" She told me about her affair with the detective and how he was decapitated on a motorbike and how she thought it was a terrible accident. But now she knows the royal family killed him because Prince Charles' senior detective had just told her that if she didn't cool it with Hewitt, the same would happen to him. He told her she should not think that she was indispensable, either.'

http://www.davidicke.com/oi/extras/December2006/jameshewitt.jpg
James Hewitt

In 1998, in the Independent Television documentary, Diana - Secrets of the Crash, James Hewitt says that he, too, had been warned to stop seeing Diana or the consequences would not be pleasant. He said:

'The telephone calls were anonymous, but left me in no doubt that they knew what the situation was. They were threatening. They said it was not conducive to my health to continue the relationship.'

'The telephone calls were anonymous, but left me in no doubt that they knew what the situation was. They were threatening. They said it was not conducive to my health to continue the relationship.'

'The said your relationship is known about. It is not supported. We cannot be responsible for your safety and security and suggest that you curtail it forthwith.'

James Hewitt was further quoted in The Times of London about these threats and his comments supported completely the story Diana had told Christine Fitzgerald. Hewitt said that the clearest warning came when he was told that he would suffer the same fate as Barry Mannakee.

The royal family are figureheads for the established order that includes those controlling the government, 'law enforcement' and the intelligence networks. This is the cabal which, with others in France, killed Diana.

Yet Lord Stevens tells us in his official report that there is no evidence that the royal family or intelligence agencies were involved in her death. Of course they were, the Steven's report is a farce and comes from a long line of farces collectively know as 'official inquiries'.

Nowadays, whenever I see the word 'official' my mind reads it as 'lie'.

Dec 23rd david icke newsletter

Strangelove
You are certainly a crazy, Deano.

While I certainly agree that the Warren Commission's finding's were non-conclusive, it's irresponsible or even downright stupid to believe that it was run by Freemasonic Grandmasters and Kennedy-haters. The result of the Commission was designed to bring a close to the travestial ordeal (hence why the documents related to it will be released within the next 20 years) and allow the country to move on during a time of crisis (the Vietnam War).

It was the same with Ford pardoning Nixon. A presidential impeachment trial would have wracked country's consciousness and brought an indelible taint to the office of the Presidency. It was for the good of the nation.

Now I'm not saying I agree with the actions of Ford or the Warren Commission, I understand why they did it, and it wasn't due to any poppycock conspiracy theories.

As for the rest of your drivel, it's all crackpot tomfoolery. roll eyes (sarcastic)

Text-only Version: Click HERE to see this thread with all of the graphics, features, and links.