Click HERE to see this thread with all of the graphics, features, and links.

Did you guys hear about Daniel's new role?
Does this mean he won't play for Harry Potter anymore?
I heard that he's decided to go nude from now on.
What do you guys think?

Of course he'll still play Harry, why not?
I really don't think he'll play everything in the nude.
However, have you seen the pictures?

Ha Nickey, you beat me to the punch, I was about to come and post this thread today.

I actually just posted this news on my website. I also posted some pictures of Daniel in this play.

http://www.the-leakycauldron.net/

(yes the website is finally out, I know) But anyways, go check out the pictures in the gallery. Daniel's going to be in this play called "Equus." and there's a nude scene or something like that. I'm really not sure how to take this. He's young, I really don't see a point to "shed his Harry Potter" image or whatever. It seems a bit much.

**** Dan. yawn

I know, I was quit surprised by this....hmmm

Originally posted by RoguePw25
Ha Nickey, you beat me to the punch, I was about to come and post this thread today.

I actually just posted this news on my website. I also posted some pictures of Daniel in this play.

http://www.the-leakycauldron.net/

(yes the website is finally out, I know) But anyways, go check out the pictures in the gallery. Daniel's going to be in this play called "Equus." and there's a nude scene or something like that. I'm really not sure how to take this. He's young, I really don't see a point to "shed his Harry Potter" image or whatever. It seems a bit much.

Whew, I thought you came here to close the thread.
I don't care whatever movie he plays in.
I just hope he finishes all the Harry Potter movies.
I'm holding breath until the 10:00 news tonight

Yeah I know what you mean. Do you think that he would go so far as to stop doing the HP movies?

Maybe.
Just pray or hope he doesn't.

those pictures look fake to me

What pictures

I guess he means those pics of Dan...

They aren't fake

The pictures on Rogue's site.

They're at Rogue's site,Mugglenet and most likely every other HP site....

Originally posted by Barker
**** Dan. yawn He'll end up coming up short.

Originally posted by Nickey
Did you guys hear about Daniel's new role?
Does this mean he won't play for Harry Potter anymore?
I heard that he's decided to go nude from now on.
What do you guys think?

Is Harry goin to die? Its such a good movie. Being naked, well. Just a role

Originally posted by ~Pielover~
He'll end up coming up short.

People have to remember that Daniel Radcliffe isn't Harry Potter. He's an actor. An actor that wants longevity in his career.

There's only two movies left after the 5th one is out. And by then he'll be 23 or 24.

He's of legal age in UK and I applaud him for taking a serious role (most theatre enthusiasts consider his role in Equus to be very difficult and very demanding) to be a serious actor.

Harry Potter won't exist forever. Hell, the series ends in July. Does Daniel deserve his acting career to end with the book/movies? No. The purpose of such a serious and exhibitionist role is to break out of the Harry Potter mold. By strutting nude around a stage and stimulating an orgasm on stage as well, he's showing to the world that he's no longer a little boy, he's an adult who can do whatever he pleases, he intends to be a serious actor and he most certainly not Harry flipping Potter.

People need to learn to distinguish the character from the actor. They're not the same things. He's only trying to lengthen his career and have a successful job.

Originally posted by Draco69
People have to remember that Daniel Radcliffe isn't Harry Potter. He's an actor. An actor that wants longevity in his career.

There's only two movies left after the 5th one is out. And by then he'll be 23 or 24.

He's of legal age in UK and I applaud him for taking a serious role (most theatre enthusiasts consider his role in Equus to be very difficult and very demanding) to be a serious actor.

Harry Potter won't exist forever. Hell, the series ends in July. Does Daniel deserve his acting career to end with the book/movies? No. The purpose of such a serious and exhibitionist role is to break out of the Harry Potter mold. By strutting nude around a stage and stimulating an orgasm on stage as well, he's showing to the world that he's no longer a little boy, he's an adult who can do whatever he pleases, he intends to be a serious actor and he most certainly not Harry flipping Potter.

People need to learn to distinguish the character from the actor. They're not the same things. He's only trying to lengthen his career and have a successful job.

Bravo for that and very well said. You certainly saved me a job. I've been gnawing my knuckles in irritation at the reactions I've come across to this news

The majority of fans seriously need to grow up. Daniel is.

ya, but it's kinda weird because we've seen him playing a 15 year old boy. Now, we're going to be seeing pictures of him parading around on stage buck naked.

Question, will he be naked naked, or just, softcore naked?

True..but we'll probably have to deal w/that.

Originally posted by allofyousuckkk
ya, but it's kinda weird because we've seen him playing a 15 year old boy. Now, we're going to be seeing pictures of him parading around on stage buck naked.

Question, will he be naked naked, or just, softcore naked?
Hardcore bestiality, apparently.

omg, i am so going to see it

im gonna ask my parents to make a pit stop in london on the way to israel this summer

It's not hardcore bestiality. The character Alan Strang rides a horse, and has feelings of sexual ecstasy. Really, this whole thread seems pretty immature. Dan has the right to branch out into any acting opportunities that he wants, and the play "Equus" is an extremely complex and intriguing play, and the role of Alan Strang has been played by such amazing actors as Anthony Hopkins.

Dan didn't have to play this role nude, some actors haven't, he's doing so to preserve what the writer of the play wanted when he wrote it.

Let's all grow up and stop making jokes about Harry Potter showing his wand, eh?

lets not kid ourselves, Dan knew that he would be getting this publicity and he knew there are a lot of girls who would die to see his wang

personally, I dont think he's good enough of an actor to play Alan

BUT he got the part because he is really famous and he's going to sell tickets

Originally posted by siriuswriter
It's not hardcore bestiality. The character Alan Strang rides a horse, and has feelings of sexual ecstasy. Really, this whole thread seems pretty immature. Dan has the right to branch out into any acting opportunities that he wants, and the play "Equus" is an extremely complex and intriguing play, and the role of Alan Strang has been played by such amazing actors as Anthony Hopkins.

Dan didn't have to play this role nude, some actors haven't, he's doing so to preserve what the writer of the play wanted when he wrote it.

Let's all grow up and stop making jokes about Harry Potter showing his wand, eh?
Even you have to know that publicity was the main reason that he agreed to do it. And I don't recall any wand jokes.

ditto to what Barker said, but also, even if there were some wand jokes, who cares? Surely Dan expected some to react that way.

Personally, I'm not sure if he's that good of an actor to play this role myself. It seems as though he's only doing it to shed his Harry Potter image, which I'm really questioning as to why

Originally posted by Draco69
People have to remember that Daniel Radcliffe isn't Harry Potter. He's an actor. An actor that wants longevity in his career.

There's only two movies left after the 5th one is out. And by then he'll be 23 or 24.

He's of legal age in UK and I applaud him for taking a serious role (most theatre enthusiasts consider his role in Equus to be very difficult and very demanding) to be a serious actor.

Harry Potter won't exist forever. Hell, the series ends in July. Does Daniel deserve his acting career to end with the book/movies? No. The purpose of such a serious and exhibitionist role is to break out of the Harry Potter mold. By strutting nude around a stage and stimulating an orgasm on stage as well, he's showing to the world that he's no longer a little boy, he's an adult who can do whatever he pleases, he intends to be a serious actor and he most certainly not Harry flipping Potter.

People need to learn to distinguish the character from the actor. They're not the same things. He's only trying to lengthen his career and have a successful job.

Very well said.

Originally posted by RoguePw25
ditto to what Barker said, but also, even if there were some wand jokes, who cares? Surely Dan expected some to react that way.

Personally, I'm not sure if he's that good of an actor to play this role myself. It seems as though he's only doing it to shed his Harry Potter image, which I'm really questioning as to why

Because the book ends in July and the movie series is soon to follow.

He's only seventeen. The movies will end by the time he's about 22 or 23.

What's wrong with putting a stake in career capital?

It's what I would do. He's smart to venture into new career decisions.

If he doesn't start to shed the Harry Potter persona now, his career is gonna be cut short....

Originally posted by RoguePw25
ditto to what Barker said, but also, even if there were some wand jokes, who cares? Surely Dan expected some to react that way.

Personally, I'm not sure if he's that good of an actor to play this role myself. It seems as though he's only doing it to shed his Harry Potter image, which I'm really questioning as to why

To shrug off the Harry Potter mold is certainly part of the reason that Dan's doing this, but this role is also a challenge, and he's said that he's excited to take it on.

I don't think that the director of the play would have cast him if he weren't a good actor. Sure, all the publicity helps, but people would go to the play even if Daniel Radcliffe weren't in the role of Alan Strang.

You make a very good point.

"Equus is an iconic play. The nude scene is part of it. I can't do it with my pants on. That would be rubbish.

"We've done the scene a couple of times in rehearsal. I had no particular qualms. There's nothing that would stop me getting my kit off if that's what the work demands. The key to serious acting is to lose your inhibitions, to become free and fearless."

This is what Dan's said, just recently, after the pictures have come out. I think he's being extremely mature about all the comments that are being made, and he also sounds incredibly committed to the integrity fo the play.

I've read "Equus" and seen a couple of versions of it, and all the comments that have come from Dan, the director, everyone involved in the play, really, have made it sound like this adaptation will be brilliant.

I came in kinda late sry but ye my mom told me bout the role and she said parents r flippin out but my moms cool bout it still he'll finish out the movies I'm sure cuz it wouldn't be right 2 replace him now I understand y he's doing this nude role but just because he persues his career farther doesnt mean hes going to give up his previous works

why would he be giving up Harry Potter?
He's doing this play when he's not filming.
He's done filming OOTP so why no do something in between filming for HBP?
and obiously, he's not ditching the Harry Potter role and going nude all the time. how ridiculous.
It's just something on the side, and i think it's good for him, he'll be expanding his knowledge as an actor.

Am I the only person that thinks he looks bad with his shirt off?

no, he has weird chest hair and isnt very muscular....

I think he looks pretty sexy but that's just me

He can't act for shit..... so i don't really give a damn

Originally posted by hom3r
He can't act for shit..... so i don't really give a damn He has a point.

Just a small point; he is an actor, not a wizard. His name is Daniel Radcliffe, not Harry Potter. Regardless of the state of his current acting skills, surely this role can only serve to make him better?

I get your point, but also, he started his reputation as Harry.
He has at least a million fans.
Now just imagine if he were to leave the role as Harry Potter.
Wouldn't that lower his publicity?

Yes, but not a lot. He'd be in other films/plays, and he'd still be incredibly famous.
Syren, you summed it up in a nutshell.

Originally posted by Nickey
I get your point, but also, he started his reputation as Harry.
He has at least a million fans.
Now just imagine if he were to leave the role as Harry Potter.
Wouldn't that lower his publicity?

So these so-called fans only love him when he's playing Harry? That doesn't bode well, I can't imagine how they could even begin to call themselves fans.

If they're appreciative of the actor, Daniel Radcliffe, then they'll love the fact that he's branching out. Also, where does it say that he'll stop playing Harry? I'm sure he'll complete all seven movies

Okay.
Sorry
I was just trying to make a theory.
But good work!

Again he wont stop his Harry Potter role but don't dis him and actually he started his carrer playing as the young David Copperfield check ur facts ppl

As syren had said he's Daniel Radcliffe not Harry Potter.
I honestly don't understand the big fuss.
It's not like he was only an actor for Harry Potter and just going to quit afterwards. he wants to continue to expand his acting career and just doing Harry Potter wont cut it. and also doing this play will establish him as Daniel Radcliffe not just the "boy who plays Harry Potter."
I think he's doing a good thing.

Originally posted by SouthernGirl814
Again he wont stop his Harry Potter role but don't dis him and actually he started his carrer playing as the young David Copperfield check ur facts ppl

you need to calm down

it isnt a big deal that he's doing something else, its a big deal that he's a 17 y.o actor who will be going on stage nude. That's weird.

And it isn't just Daniel. If Frankie Munez were as famous as him, and decided to do this, everyone would make a big deal as well. Although he's in his twenties. (tries to think of a young guy star)

Well I wasnt gettin mad but every1 keeps sayin that his 1st role was harry potter which it wasnt so I was just makin it clear that he had a career b4 harry potter and he will after harry potter no matter what hes an actor its his job not his life

Like most people are saying, he's an actor first and foremost. I personally feel that such a step can only take him further forward in his career and that cannot possibly be a negative, right?

Originally posted by SouthernGirl814
Well I wasnt gettin mad but every1 keeps sayin that his 1st role was harry potter which it wasnt so I was just makin it clear that he had a career b4 harry potter and he will after harry potter no matter what hes an actor its his job not his life

I understand.
But you misunderstood me.
I didn't mean that Harry Potter was his first role.
I know Harry wasn't his first role.
What I was trying to say was that more and more people started to notice him, than others did during his first role.

That's all.
But all in the past.

I get it I was just sayin

Originally posted by SouthernGirl814
Well I wasnt gettin mad but every1 keeps sayin that his 1st role was harry potter which it wasnt so I was just makin it clear that he had a career b4 harry potter and he will after harry potter no matter what hes an actor its his job not his life

I think she means that he's known for his Harry Potter role.
She never said that his first role was Harry Potter.

Thank You
At least someone understands
Lol

First night - standing ovation for Dan as Alan Strang.

Again I understand what she's sayin

Ok

I just got done writing an article on this guys. Also, I posted some pics of Daniel in this new play "Equus" Check it out here.

All of these pics that are coming out are... wow.

You can tell that everybody's really in their respective roles. It looks like the 30 year revival is going well!

I have to admit though he looks really old in sum of those pics and hes really hairy

Originally posted by SouthernGirl814
I have to admit though he looks really old in sum of those pics and hes really hairy

If you're talking about facial hair, he's been told not to shave for this role.

And yes... humans have body hair.

Dang you guys finally remembered this thread was here.
I mean no one has posted in here since the seventeenth.
Anyway, why is everyone making a big deal out of it?
I know what you're thinking "Weren't you the same one going crazy when you heard this?". And you're all right if you thought that.

But I realized what you've guys been saying. He's a grown man, and he needs take more serious roles if he wants people to take him seriously.
And I still hope that he will continue his role as Harry, but if he doesn't, what the hey?
Harry Potter won't be here forever, and neither will Daniel. So he has to live his life and do whatever he wants. And if his parents or his fans can't stop him, no one can.

So I'm proud of Daniel and I hope he has more good movies.
And I also hope him and Emma get together.
Lol






I hope no one is hurt or offended by my opinion.
Thank you very much.

Originally posted by siriuswriter
If you're talking about facial hair, he's been told not to shave for this role.

And yes... humans have body hair.

I know he was told not 2 shave im just statin the fact that he is really hairy and that makes him look older and as for the other girl that opinion has been stated like a billion times already

That was seriously gross,though.

Yea it was I mean personally out of all the roles he could've possibly chosen he chooses a nude role thats probably the farthest thing from normal

Yeah,i agree w/you..He obiously could have.

Or maybe he just wants the attention just on him. Because the h/p movies, there are other popular actors/actresses that are stars-of-the-movies.

Hahahahaha, Daniel Radcliffe , the old Harry Potter actor, is now playing as Alan. Alan gets sexual ectacy from riding a horse.

I think i'm going to piss myself

It's the pictures of him smoking that really get my blood boiling. And being in such close proximity to a woman other than Ginny? I mean, how dare he?? I just can't believe Harry would portray himself in such a disgusting way. How could he possibly think he could be anything other than the Boy Who Lived? Did I say Harry before? I meant Daniel... ermm

In case anyone didn't get it, that was sarcasm. You lot are a bunch of crackpots

I don't care crack about that Daniel dude. He sucks as a an actor anyway, who cares. There's a million other people in the world who can draw a scar on their forehead and put on stupid glasses. It's the whole issue about him getting horny after riding on a horse which disturbs me... Lmao

"... him getting horny after riding on a horse..."

Is that all there is to it? I mean, is there no underlying message, an attempt at a profound metaphor? shrug

Shaffer was inspired to write his play when he heard of a crime involving a teenage boy's apparently senseless mutilation of horses. He then set out to construct a fictional account of what might have caused the incident, without knowing any of the details of the crime. The play is posted as a postmodern detective story with psychoanalysis and psychotherapy framing the events. (For more on the psychoanalytical aspects of the work, see Little Hans: a case study by Freud.)

At the beginning of the play, 17-year-old Alan Strang is brought to a mental health facility for treatment by psychiatrist Dr. Martin Dysart after he is caught blinding horses with a metal hoof pick at the stables where he worked part-time. In learning to understand Alan and his motivations, Dysart is forced to reexamine the choices he himself has made and the validity of his vocation and to confront his spiritual atrophy, described as the result of a modern consumer culture that tolerates only enervated conformity. Dysart reflects: "That boy has known a passion more ferocious than I have felt in any second of my life. And let me tell you something: I envy it. ... I watch ...night after night — a woman I haven't kissed in six years — and he stands in the dark for an hour, sucking the sweat off his god's hairy cheek!"

According to Randy Harrison, who starred in the play's latest American revival (2005): "Equus is one of the most significant English-language plays of the past 30 years. Anybody who hasn't seen it or read it needs to, if they care at all about theatre or literature."

Other critics, both when the play debuted in the 1970s and presently, regard the play as pretentious and shallow. Some fault the play for relying too much on shock value over substance and for its gratuitous nudity.

Wikipedia.

I think it sounds interesting, I'd like to see it at some point. I also think a lot of people spend far too much time whining over the fact that it's Daniel Radcliffe - Oh my, not that Harry Potter actor! For shame! - and that there's a scene where he simulates an orgasm involving a horse. Surely there's more to it.

Originally posted by SouthernGirl814
I know he was told not 2 shave im just statin the fact that he is really hairy and that makes him look older and as for the other girl that opinion has been stated like a billion times already


Oh thanks for being sarcastic.disgust

But I'm confused.
Aren't these threads made for all people to state their opinions no matter how many times it's been said? confused
Whatever.

That's your opinion.
If that's how you see it, then so be it.

Nickey, you're right. Everyone's allowed an opinion... which also means SouthernGirl is welcome to hers

Yeah, you're right.
I know that.
It's just that I don't like people telling me something that I already know. It makes me feel as if people think I'm dumb.

But I know she doesn't mean it that way.
I guess that's how I am.
Sorry about that.
I'm telling, I get all these habits from my dad.

yea I really didnt mean to be mean and yea I'd like to see the play as well at one point even though its a little weird but im still kinda shocked that he would choose a nude play and the smoking pics bothered me

Originally posted by Syren
"... him getting horny after riding on a horse..."

Is that all there is to it? I mean, is there no underlying message, an attempt at a profound metaphor? shrug



I think it sounds interesting, I'd like to see it at some point. I also think a lot of people spend far too much time whining over the fact that it's Daniel Radcliffe - Oh my, not that Harry Potter actor! For shame! - and that there's a scene where he simulates an orgasm involving a horse. Surely there's more to it.

Thank you. I was about to go and post a really long and annoying something or other, but yours makes much more sense than mine ever would have.

There IS more to it. I've read the play and seen it, it's about passion, and how Alan Strang, even though his passion is misplaced, he has more of it than Martin Dysart, the psychologist, who's "normal," ever will, and Dysart is almost relcutant to "cure" Alan because than this huge thing, even though it was troublesome and not normal, out of his life will be gone. So. There's more to it than Dan getting horny on a horse, and smoking *the cigarettes aren't real, anyway,* and simulating sex on stage, and being generally naked.

Originally posted by SouthernGirl814
yea I really didnt mean to be mean and yea I'd like to see the play as well at one point even though its a little weird but im still kinda shocked that he would choose a nude play and the smoking pics bothered me

Don't worry about it.
That's how I am sometimes.
Like I said before, I get these stupid habits from my father.
I know, it's stupid right?


Lol
Friends?
*Reaches out hand, hoping you will it shake it.*

doped

Originally posted by siriuswriter
Thank you. I was about to go and post a really long and annoying something or other, but yours makes much more sense than mine ever would have.

There IS more to it. I've read the play and seen it, it's about passion, and how Alan Strang, even though his passion is misplaced, he has more of it than Martin Dysart, the psychologist, who's "normal," ever will, and Dysart is almost relcutant to "cure" Alan because than this huge thing, even though it was troublesome and not normal, out of his life will be gone. So. There's more to it than Dan getting horny on a horse, and smoking *the cigarettes aren't real, anyway,* and simulating sex on stage, and being generally naked.



I'm really glad that someone who's actually seen it is commenting here. Otherwise this thread is just filled with Dan-Fans and me. Nightmare

Originally posted by Nickey
Don't worry about it.
That's how I am sometimes.
Like I said before, I get these stupid habits from my father.
I know, it's stupid right?


Lol
Friends?
*Reaches out hand, hoping you will it shake it.*


*shakes hand* friends lol and I'm just sayin ceratin parts of the play seem to bother me in a way but I understand it

Originally posted by Syren


I'm really glad that someone who's actually seen it is commenting here. Otherwise this thread is just filled with Dan-Fans and me. Nightmare

No worries. I live to serve...

And I love this play, so am willing to play devil's advocate for it till the cows come home.

I definitely want to see it

There's a movie version of it, if you're interested, made in 1977 I think. It's a fairly good adaptation. I think Peter Shaffer *the playwright* helped with the screenplay. So.

I am still shocked that Dan would do that at the stage,though.

What, nakedness is censored in all film?

Theatre-goers more than likely know what they're getting themselves into, they wouldn't buy tickets if they were offended by the nudity. The fact that he's nude in this has been around everywhere.

Like I said, it's part of the play, the way Peter Shaffer wrote it. He's staying true to that. Stage or screen, or music video (people are near nude in those, I personally find it more offensive to be wearing that little clothing than to be naked) people see it.

It's hardly the main point of the play. Nudity and sex are to Equus as witchcraft is to Harry Potter. It's part of it, it's there for you to understand the characters, but... there's so much more.

I found some clips of it on youtube.com with Dan and it's really intense just watching the rehearsal clip u can feel the emotions in the play but I do think he's gone a little crazy but it's really interesting to watch and suprising but I want to see it in real life but I can't exactly go to the UK over night

At least, Daniel can use his experience from the HP movies in his new nude carrier! He can use magic to make his dick bigger

PMFG that was uncalled for holy crap

eh?

I said that was sumthin that needed 2 be left unsaid

Originally posted by siriuswriter

It's hardly the main point of the play. Nudity and sex are to Equus as witchcraft is to Harry Potter. It's part of it, it's there for you to understand the characters, but... there's so much more.

Well said

I don't know when that was originally written but I agree as well

Originally posted by siriuswriter
What, nakedness is censored in all film?

Theatre-goers more than likely know what they're getting themselves into, they wouldn't buy tickets if they were offended by the nudity. The fact that he's nude in this has been around everywhere.

Like I said, it's part of the play, the way Peter Shaffer wrote it. He's staying true to that. Stage or screen, or music video (people are near nude in those, I personally find it more offensive to be wearing that little clothing than to be naked) people see it.

It's hardly the main point of the play. Nudity and sex are to Equus as witchcraft is to Harry Potter. It's part of it, it's there for you to understand the characters, but... there's so much more.

Here

oh ok I commented the original too then lol but I agree one hundred percent u feel what its about when u see it or read about it no words even have to be said

Yay! Conversions! Today, "Equus," tomorrow, the world!

muahahaha...

wooooow

Originally posted by Syren
Well said
I love your sig,Syren!

Thank you, our esteemed Mod Lana made it

Personally.. I think people all just need to grow up. Dan obviously is, and as its been said his career will only last so long with Harry Potter. Now, see..I'm sure he will be REMEMBERED as Harry no matter what roles he takes on, but if he relied soley on these movies his entire career would be just that, a memory, nothing more. So bravo for Dan for taking a chance and expanding his horizion and taking on a more adult role.

Tragic I think thats been stated like 20 times now

Originally posted by SouthernGirl814
Tragic I think thats been stated like 20 times now

Sadly, all the tripe has been repeated more than 20 times.

I don't care how many times its been stated. I was simply adding MY opinion, whether it was already said or not. Get over it.

God how rude r u people I was just lettin u know and I agree with u still though

Well I have read through the thread and i'm well aware of whta has been said. I am educated enough to read, so really it was a waste of time to even bother saying. =)

Regardless. There is no use arguing, especially over something so small so forget it. Not a big deal.

Ok

When I was talking about the tripe, I was talking about the people who were dissing the play and who didn't know what they were talking about... I agree with you Tragic, it can't be said enough.

I know what I'm talkin bout on the play thank u very much

I don't really get it why people make a big fuss over it i mean it was in the news a couple of weeks ago that he was going nude

This thing started a couple of weeks ago read the dates but it's not that big of a deal but when u first see him playin the part u kinda wonder if he really has gone crazy

Southern, why would you wonder if he'd gone crazy?

Cuz of much emotion he puts into his part it really seems like he is crazy and in a way u kinda forget that ur watchin a play and its real life

Oh, you mean the character? It sounded like you were saying Dan Radcliffe is crazy for taking the part

Yea lol instead of acting like he's crazy it seems like he really is

That can only be a good thing, right? Means he's really carried off the part

*smirks*

Ah, manipulation.

Yea it is a good thing

Originally posted by siriuswriter
*smirks*

Ah, manipulation.

Originally posted by Syren



Oh dear, never mind. I was actually talking to you.

But never mind. My odd humor never gets across well in internet form.

We just dont get what you mean.Sorry..

Originally posted by siriuswriter
Oh dear, never mind. I was actually talking to you.

But never mind. My odd humor never gets across well in internet form.

Was I manipulating the conversation? Was it a good thing?

Haha. Yes, and yes.

have any pics come up

Originally posted by allofyousuckkk
have any pics come up
o.o what do you mean?

Originally posted by allofyousuckkk
have any pics come up

There have been offical publicity photos which feature Daniel Radcliffe, Joanna Christie (who plays Jill Mason) and a white horse, who is not in the play. The two actors are nude in these photos, but the nudity is not shown, the photograph either cuts off before the body parts or they are behind things.

There are also some photos from the play that are legitimate, yes. I would suggest looking here.

I got 4 words 4 those pics of Dan...IL EST BETE SEXY

Oh....kay.

Have fun with that.

It means he's a sexy beast in French lol

Actually that would be "Il est un bete sexy..." (without all the accents, of course)

but oh well, that wasn't what I was talking about. Never mind.

oh ok