Click HERE to see this thread with all of the graphics, features, and links.

What will be the worst thing in man spider 3? After see the trailers, its difficult because it looks like a piece of crap so big as the other two, but lets guest. Its difficult to choose between the new evils , mary jane as gwen and gwen as mary jane, venom as a cameo for the fans, sandman being uncle ben killer and the old evils like spidey not funny at all or the organics.

Sorry, i cant choose, its very difficult . I would say that the biggest mistake is the movie itself, and the direction of that idiot Sam Raimi too. Meanwhile those stupid movies will be directed by Raimi and produced by Sony, the true spider man fans wont have a true and good adaptation of the marvel spiderman comics that make justice to such a culture icon.

I don't remember the line 'Who a im, im spider-man' being said by him

Technichal fault. The exact dumb line was " who I am? Im spiderman.

i can say out loud peter parker a nerd again, cos in the comics when he got the suit (spider not simbio) he started to be more man like but still shy, in the movies he is just a nerd,no ofense meant to the nerd comunity,for me organics web will never be forgiven but i dont care much as it worked in the movie.
and about spider being funny there is like 3 or 4 jokes in this one, if they are funny or not will depend on the audience, but they are there this time.

Please God let Spider-man be funny for once. One well timed joke and I'll be happy.

Yes, one or two jokes in the first one and one or two jokes in the second one isnt enough for a so funny character like Spidey is.

Uhm... I think the movies are well-done. I get annoyed when ppl like you bash every artisitic adaptation of something you're passionate about. I understand that you may not agree with all of the decisions of Sam Raimi, but just think of it as a certain writer writing a Spiderman arc instead of as a film, you don't have to like that specific writer, but I- along with the majority of fans- do.

First, Its called Spiderman and not Man Spider. Second wait and go see the film. I just know its gonna rock.

i think thats stupid harry taking over his fathers place as the goblin

ers..........what?

Uhm encase you didn't know... that happened in the comics as well..

Originally posted by bakerboy
Yes, one or two jokes in the first one and one or two jokes in the second one isnt enough for a so funny character like Spidey is.
It was pretty funny when Green Goblin man-plowed him into the glass window mid-swing. The thing was like a bellyflop into the side of a building and it came out of no where. Oh man, I was cryin'.

Originally posted by Jade Lightning
Uhm... I think the movies are well-done. I get annoyed when ppl like you bash every artisitic adaptation of something you're passionate about. I understand that you may not agree with all of the decisions of Sam Raimi, but just think of it as a certain writer writing a Spiderman arc instead of as a film, you don't have to like that specific writer, but I- along with the majority of fans- do.

Your right the movies were well-done, but Spider-man is known for his jokes. He always has something funny or witty to say during a battle. I would love to see this at least one in part 3.

Get out of here, troll! If you don't stop making threads just to stir shit then I will contact one of the moderaters!

I don't want a wise-craking Spidey. Why? It would get too annoying and his jokes would be too lame.
Him showing humor at a time like that would show immaturity and hes inability to take something like a big fight or someone's life seriously.

....have you ever read a Spider-man comic, BlackC@? They've proven he can do both. Jokes work when used in moderation...

A comic and movie are different. What might work in a comic might not work in a movie.

Well the only real mistake is Spidey not being funny and I don't think he will be in this movie. He's going to be darker, it would be lame if he was a badass and then starts joking in the middle of a fight. I'm glad he doesn't joke a lot because in the movies his voice is... irritating.

Baker, Gwen is NOTHING like the comic book MJ.

Don't sorry the good name of Spider-Man 3 with your slanderous filthy lies!!!

Bryce Dallas Howard wouldn't even comment on what her character was like!

Does anything else but lies come out of your mouth?

Originally posted by BlackC@
Get out of here, troll! If you don't stop making threads just to stir shit then I will contact one of the moderaters!

I don't want a wise-craking Spidey. Why? It would get too annoying and his jokes would be too lame.
Him showing humor at a time like that would show immaturity and hes inability to take something like a big fight or someone's life seriously.

No need for name calling. Somebody has been hanging out with Doc Ock too much. hehe

I didn't 'name-call'. I called him a troll. That's what he is.

Dr.StrongBad, are you eleven years old?

he is 13..well maybe noew he is 14.right? you do sound like that though.

Originally posted by Spiderman_RJ
he is 13..well maybe noew he is 14.right? you do sound like that though.

hehe nice one.

Originally posted by doctorstrongbad
Please God let Spider-man be funny for once. One well timed joke and I'll be happy.

I agree with this. I voted for spiderman not being funny. I'd rather not anyone messed with his origin too (the whole sandman thing) so those are the only two problems I have with the movie. Otherwise, I like it.

Originally posted by Arachnid1
I agree with this. I voted for spiderman not being funny. I'd rather not anyone messed with his origin too (the whole sandman thing) so those are the only two problems I have with the movie. Otherwise, I like it.

Thanks for the props Arachnid1. One more for the good guys.

Well, this thread was inevitable.

But, I still don't like the casting of Topher Grace. He's the only miscasting for the villains so far in these movies.

Originally posted by BlackC@
Dr.StrongBad, are you eleven years old?

Heh, that would be an insult to eleven year olds

Originally posted by doctorstrongbad
Thanks for the props Arachnid1. One more for the good guys.

No prob.

Originally posted by Doc Ock
Heh, that would be an insult to eleven year olds

You guys and your jokes. I'm glad I can keep people posting on here.

Didn't we already close a thread EXACTLY like this?

I'm getting reports from this forum?!?!

Yeah, so um, stop....or something. No need to insult people and call them childish and stuff.

The biggest mistake would be people trashing the movie before it comes out.

Its exactly the same mistake that people praising the movie before it comes out.

Bakerboy what I can't understand is why you keep bashing the movies. So you don't like them, we get it. I dislike Superman but I don't go to the Superman forum and bash him. The movie isn't even released yet and here I am in a "what will be the biggest mistake in man spider 3?" tread. Seems to me that you've made up your mind about it without actually seeing it. And will you please stop with "man spider" thing it's just stupid. Why don't you see the movie first and then make your treads?

Originally posted by the_satan32
Bakerboy what I can't understand is why you keep bashing the movies. So you don't like them, we get it. I dislike Superman but I don't go to the Superman forum and bash him. The movie isn't even released yet and here I am in a "what will be the biggest mistake in man spider 3?" tread. Seems to me that you've made up your mind about it without actually seeing it. And will you please stop with "man spider" thing it's just stupid. Why don't you see the movie first and then make your treads?

the_satan32 has a good point. If your going to act like that, do it in a DC forum. No marvel haters around here.

You always get ignorent fans who will never be satisfied with anything because any adaptation of one single comic book is looked as as raping the character in their eyes. They should get a life and stop being a typical fan.

Originally posted by DBZ MAN
You always get ignorent fans who will never be satisfied with anything because any adaptation of one single comic book is looked as as raping the character in their eyes. They should get a life and stop being a typical fan.

Can we say "fan-boy". Friends don't let friends be a fan boy. hehe

I kid, I kid beacuse I care.

Now that Black Cat has been warned about her childish name calling and trolling maybe this conversation can get back to being civilized again.Man there are so many betrayals to this next installment its pathetic but the worst one by far is the one i have just learned which is spiderman is being given a key to the city in man-spider 3.That tops them all even Sandman being Uncle Bens killer which was first until I learned of this one.Spiderman is hated by most of new york and here these idiots are making him into someone the entire city loves.
Raimi must be friends with that other idiot film director Tim Burton.He sure has taken lessons from him.who all can forget that crapfest batman 89 when that idiot had The Joker kill Batmans parents? Thank god Nolan came along to give true batman fans a true Batman movie.Just hope the same can be done for spidey someday as well.

well parker i told you once this was adaption and therefor would be problably having some changes,now they were based on the directors view and on the green greed machine (avi arad) who pushed to put venom in the movie for more cash.

about the city love,dont forget that once thomas fireheart started making good publicity for spiderman and most of the city started seeing him with good eyes,that what i see in this movie,a adaptation of that without the whole mistical puma saga.

im just gonna watch this a fun factor, im a huge spider fan and can let this one go,stop being such a fanboy parker,we never will get a comic fidelity movie.my hope is in the future someone reboots the franchise a la batman begins,and by that i mean better script not aimed at 6 years children.but being sony and arad the greed bastards they are i doubt,he ruined every marvel franchise from the tv series to movies,its time for him to go.
btw long time no see you parker.

all the movies were crap,but enjoyable,they just dont have a replay factor to them cos them you start seeing how stupid the movie really is and it stop being enjoyable.
the thing that i hate most in the franchise werent the changes,but the audience this was aimed at,the first movie to me is still a teen movie,the second was a little better,i see this one will be cheesy as the first.

the movie seems to have potential.. i just dislike the sandman being bens killer and harry's goblin outfit, atleast the helmet. ... i see the toys and gag.

seriously most of you expect 2much from hollywood.

Name calling? Excuse you, please quote my name call.

Me? A troll? A troll is by definition a poster that starts repetitive arguments simply to anoy then sit back and watch. Not surprisingly you have no idea what you're talking about. All you do is bring this up again, and again. And again, and again, and AGAIN!

I think it will be an enjoyable movie. As for the man-spider business, that's just silly since the name "man-spider" would imply a spider that possessed the abilities of a man, or appearence thereof. It's silly that you people complain about it so much when the people who brought the silly little comic character into existence are cool with it.

Venom's appearence isnt a cameo. He is a full fledged villain of Spiderman 3.I dont really see any flaws here.So the movie wont follow the comic exactly, who cares?You guys have read the comic already!YAY!!Time for something new.The original material is there to make it more interesting, instead of reliving the same exact storyline again.

Originally posted by Micheal_Myers
Venom's appearence isnt a cameo. He is a full fledged villain of Spiderman 3.I dont really see any flaws here.So the movie wont follow the comic exactly, who cares?You guys have read the comic already!YAY!!Time for something new.The original material is there to make it more interesting, instead of reliving the same exact storyline again. co-sign

Originally posted by Micheal_Myers
Venom's appearence isnt a cameo. He is a full fledged villain of Spiderman 3.I dont really see any flaws here.So the movie wont follow the comic exactly, who cares?You guys have read the comic already!YAY!!Time for something new.The original material is there to make it more interesting, instead of reliving the same exact storyline again.

Originally posted by Micheal_Myers
Venom's appearence isnt a cameo. He is a full fledged villain of Spiderman 3.I dont really see any flaws here.So the movie wont follow the comic exactly, who cares?You guys have read the comic already!YAY!!Time for something new.The original material is there to make it more interesting, instead of reliving the same exact storyline again.

Originally posted by Micheal_Myers
Venom's appearence isnt a cameo. He is a full fledged villain of Spiderman 3.I dont really see any flaws here.So the movie wont follow the comic exactly, who cares?You guys have read the comic already!YAY!!Time for something new.The original material is there to make it more interesting, instead of reliving the same exact storyline again.

This has got to be one of the smartest posts I've seen on these forums. You kick ass.

Double Co-sign.

Originally posted by Micheal_Myers
Venom's appearence isnt a cameo. He is a full fledged villain of Spiderman 3.I dont really see any flaws here.So the movie wont follow the comic exactly, who cares?You guys have read the comic already!YAY!!Time for something new.The original material is there to make it more interesting, instead of reliving the same exact storyline again.

I also agree with you.

Originally posted by bakerboy
Its exactly the same mistake that people praising the movie before it comes out.

exactly.I mean come on Doctor.There actually ARE some cases where just by looking at the previews you can tell the movie is going to suck or not. Like with the first one there was enough evidence from the trailers to be able to tell it would suck.Tobeys annoying cringing voice,Mary jane being nice like gwen stacy instead of being the stuck up B!tch she was in the comics-Neither the movies OR the cartoons have ever gotten that right about her character. The power ranger green goblin costume.see there are actually times when just by looking at the previews you can tell its going to suck.The previews for the second one looked good and sure enough,the movie wasnt near as bad as the first one.This time around,the trailers look every bit as stupid as the first one did,thats not good considering its history so far.

Neither any of the Spiderman films have sucked, thats why have made a ton of money. This one will also make a ton of money.

Originally posted by DBZ MAN
You always get ignorent fans who will never be satisfied with anything because any adaptation of one single comic book is looked as as raping the character in their eyes. They should get a life and stop being a typical fan.

See this is the reason I had to stay away from the spiderman section for such a long time is to take a break from dumb posts like these.That statement is so untrue its funny.Casting Michael keaton for batman was a disgrace to the character of Batman because Bruce wayne isnt a short runt with a pudgy belly whos half bald and a receding hairline.He's tall,muscular,handsome with a full set of hair.Which is what Christian Bale is.Batman also doesnt kill people in cowardly ways like he did in those pathetic Burton Batman films which is why I really loved Batman Begins because they made a point of it in that movie that he would not kill people to bring them to justice.Thank God for Christopher Nolan.Like I said before,that idiot Sam Raimi must be good friends with that other idiot -when it comes to batman movies,Tim Burton because the same way that idiot had the joker be the killer of batmans parents,Raimi is doing the same thing having sandman be the killer of Peters parents. The best thing to happen for true spiderman fans is for them to end the man-spider franchise with spider-man 3 and restart it all over again like 10 years from now and get Nolan to come over and direct the first one ala a Spider-Man Begins. Because unlike those idiots Raimi and Burton,he cares about what the true fans want.He did for the true batman fans anyways which are the ones who did not accept those pathetic Burton Batman films.

First of all, great post Michael_Myers...

Second of all, this is like my first time in the Spidey forum, kool...

Third of all, I voted for Sandman being Uncle Ben's killer. Though Myers is right that movies should be a mix of true to comic and original material, I think that the mugger should still be the one who killed Ben. I mean, it's classic...

Fourth of all, Mr. Parker, I for once agree with you, the Goblin costume sucked pretty bad, but it worked well in the film, and that's all that matters. I mean, you wouldn't see someone trying to look menacing and strike fear in the citizens wearing a goblin Halloween mask and spandex suit, would you?

And finally, wasn't Eddie Brock a nerd in the comics? Someone you didn't like to be around? So I think Topher Grace was a pretty good casting choice, if you wanted Brock to be Parker's equal...

Mr. Parker, do you have to get on the subject of Burton Batman in a Spider-Man thread? Stay on topic! Jeez, you're like a recording...

Originally posted by Bat Dude


And finally, wasn't Eddie Brock a nerd in the comics? Someone you didn't like to be around? So I think Topher Grace was a pretty good casting choice, if you wanted Brock to be Parker's equal...


In the Ultimate series he's similar to Peter in build and whatnot, but in 616 he's much older and has a much more robust frame than Peter. My biggest complaint with Spider-Man 3: No Secret Wars origin for the symbiote

Originally posted by Spiderman_RJ
well parker i told you once this was adaption and therefor would be problably having some changes,now they were based on the directors view and on the green greed machine (avi arad) who pushed to put venom in the movie for more cash.

about the city love,dont forget that once thomas fireheart started making good publicity for spiderman and most of the city started seeing him with good eyes,that what i see in this movie,a adaptation of that without the whole mistical puma saga.

im just gonna watch this a fun factor, im a huge spider fan and can let this one go,stop being such a fanboy parker,we never will get a comic fidelity movie.my hope is in the future someone reboots the franchise a la batman begins,and by that i mean better script not aimed at 6 years children.but being sony and arad the greed bastards they are i doubt,he ruined every marvel franchise from the tv series to movies,its time for him to go.
btw long time no see you parker.

all the movies were crap,but enjoyable,they just dont have a replay factor to them cos them you start seeing how stupid the movie really is and it stop being enjoyable.
the thing that i hate most in the franchise werent the changes,but the audience this was aimed at,the first movie to me is still a teen movie,the second was a little better,i see this one will be cheesy as the first.

Its cool to see that we agree about something on these movies for once. Glad to see you finally came around to your senses on these movies RJ.,wish all these other people would as well.Unlike them,you have shown the ability to think outside of the box and for yourself and see how poorly written these movies really are.Some people just dont get it that the man-spider movie scripts are really bad-they refuse to get past the special effects which are the lone saving grace of these movies especially the second one and see how bad these scripts really are and how horribly written they are.Like you said so well,it needs to be rebooted just like batman was and started all over again -ala batman begins with scripts aimed at adults like it was instead of scripts aimed at the kiddie audience.People just dont get it that the reason the spiderman movies are so popular is because of the name spiderman alone and that kids love him so much.Everywhere i go I see kids wearing spiderman clothing al lthe time,thats not the case with batman though because he doesnt appeal to kids like spidey does.

You used to love these movies and we used to have hostile discussions all the time with each other.remember those days? Great to see you have finally come to using some sound logic and common sense these days. LOl I cant believe how you have a total 180 degree turnaround about your thoughts on the man-spider movies these days and are now thinking like me using logic and common sense.My props to ya.I could not have said it better myself.The first one was a teenage movie made for the kiddies and teenagers.The second one was better and not near as corny with a better script.Like you said,this one seems to be following the steps of the first one being as cheesy and corny as the first one.Especially with Sandman turning into a giant monster the size of King Kong.That is going to be corny as hell.

Yeah it has been a long time no see from ya.Like i said,I had to take a break from the spiderman section for a while and I have only had like maybe 5 or 6 posts here in the spiderman section in the last 6 months.Your one of the few here that have made reasonable posts on here.Thats why I had to take a break from the spiderman section for a while is because of that.

Originally posted by Bat Dude
First of all, great post Michael_Myers...

Second of all, this is like my first time in the Spidey forum, kool...

Third of all, I voted for Sandman being Uncle Ben's killer. Though Myers is right that movies should be a mix of true to comic and original material, I think that the mugger should still be the one who killed Ben. I mean, it's classic...

Fourth of all, Mr. Parker, I for once agree with you, the Goblin costume sucked pretty bad, but it worked well in the film, and that's all that matters. I mean, you wouldn't see someone trying to look menacing and strike fear in the citizens wearing a goblin Halloween mask and spandex suit, would you?

And finally, wasn't Eddie Brock a nerd in the comics? Someone you didn't like to be around? So I think Topher Grace was a pretty good casting choice, if you wanted Brock to be Parker's equal...

Mr. Parker, do you have to get on the subject of Burton Batman in a Spider-Man thread? Stay on topic! Jeez, you're like a recording...

Hey Batdude,Im amazed.I never thought I would ever see you venture over here because like you said,this is the first time you have ever posted in the spiderman section before.

Actually you only agree with me about Sandman being Uncle Bens killer because the Goblin costume in the movie was a joke it didnt work well at all.People hated that costume,they thought it was a joke him talking without his mouth moving and looking like an alien from outer space.You must have never saw the alex ross goblin costume because it looked loyal to the comic and very menacing.they should have used that.

Well I was just using Batman since he is my second favorite comicbook character as an example of how when you have a good film direcotr who understands the character and cares about what the fans want,then you can have a good comicbook movie thats loyal to the comic without stupid and unnessary changes that dont need to be made.Okay Ihow about the xmen then? I'll talk about how hollywood screwed THAT comicbook movie up. they should have called that movie Black Leather men instead of xmen.

Originally posted by AngryManatee
I think it will be an enjoyable movie. As for the man-spider business, that's just silly since the name "man-spider" would imply a spider that possessed the abilities of a man, or appearence thereof. It's silly that you people complain about it so much when the people who brought the silly little comic character into existence are cool with it.

Its not silly at all because true spiderman fans care about sony raping tio death his character like they did.We want to see SPIDERMAN on the screen.Not this phony neautered version of sonys.Actually Man-spider makes all the sense in the world because thats what he is now.It doesnt matter whether he has organic webbing,or 8 arms or looks like an 8 armed spider,in all 3 cases he is man-spider because he is a monster now.organic webbing=man-spider,chemical webbing=spider-man.The movie may be called spider-man but the REAL character on the screen is man-spider -even though most people here in this section are in denial over that,so thats why you hear man-spider 3.

Man-spider movies are dumb and I dont even really bother with them anymore. Mr parker and bakerboy are right, they ****** up the movies horribly to the point where there not even enjoyable, end of story.

I think all the movies are amazing. Non of them have topped Spiderman 1 for me at all either.

And the Goblin armor grew on me. Mr. Parker, you know the reason why they used armor right?

There was a pole on the internet asking fans if they wanted the Goblin suit to be Armor or Plasic like in comics. Armor won.

It wasn't Same Raimis fault about the suit. It was the fans.

I couldn't care less though. First time I saw the Goblin suit, you know what I noticed?

He barely had a chin. That quickly left my mind and I got back to enjoying the movies.

Seriously, would you rather see a movie version of Sins Past?

Also, this post may sound rude. Just so you know, I'm not trying to be.

Originally posted by Arachnid1
I think all the movies are amazing. Non of them have topped Spiderman 1 for me at all either.

And the Goblin armor grew on me. Mr. Parker, you know the reason why they used armor right?

There was a pole on the internet asking fans if they wanted the Goblin suit to be Armor or Plasic like in comics. Armor won.

It wasn't Same Raimis fault about the suit. It was the fans.

I couldn't care less though. First time I saw the Goblin suit, you know what I noticed?

He barely had a chin. That quickly left my mind and I got back to enjoying the movies.

Seriously, would you rather see a movie version of Sins Past?

Also, this post may sound rude. Just so you know, I'm not trying to be.

No its not rude at all.Its a mature and civilized post which is all I ask from people around here.That might be true about what you said about the armour but I can guarantee you though that they never asked the fans if they wanted the goblin to be ALL green without the purple clothing because thats the beef that most spider-man fans have and man-spider fans alike-the ones who worship those moronic organic webshooters or accept them even those fans had a beef with the goblin costume.

Oh and for the record,I dont put the blame it entirely on Raimi just so you know.Its these idiot sony producers who produce these movies only caring about the green bucks instead of the fans with their decisions they made about these movies that have ruined them for the most part.btw Whats YOUR biggest gripe that you are against in the latest man-spider movie that your against the most? which one did YOU vote for?


oh never mind.I just read your first post and saw what you dont approve of for the next movie.

Originally posted by Mr Parker
No its not rude at all.Its a mature and civilized post which is all I ask from people around here.That might be true about what you said about the armour but I can guarantee you though that they never asked the fans if they wanted the goblin to be ALL green without the purple clothing because thats the beef that most spider-man fans have and man-spider fans alike-the ones who worship those moronic organic webshooters or accept them even those fans had a beef with the goblin costume.

Oh and for the record,I dont put the blame it entirely on Raimi just so you know.Its these idiot sony producers who produce these movies only caring about the green bucks instead of the fans with their decisions they made about these movies that have ruined them for the most part.btw Whats YOUR biggest gripe that you are against in the latest man-spider movie that your against the most? which one did YOU vote for?

Me? I voted for Spiderman not being funny. I just want one joke that will make me fall to the floor rolling from the movies. I'm over anything else I've ever had. I just want one funny joke. Not something like

"Heres you change!"

Or

"Green and Gruesome" In fact, that one might not have even been in a movie. Only in the game. The severe lack in Jokes is all that gets me, but Tobey Maguire jokes won't be that funny so I should get over that one too.

EDIT: Nevermind, you know.

Originally posted by kiekan
....have you ever read a Spider-man comic, BlackC@? They've proven he can do both. Jokes work when used in moderation...

Yeah you know that and I know that but thats something Black Cat doesnt understand.She doesnt use any logic or common sense when it comes to this.Her belief is because its a spiderman movie they cant go wrong no matter WHAT they do in the movie. Like a lot of fans,as long as the name spider-man is up there,thats all that matters. Here is a perfect example of how it is just plain stupid to say that the jokes would not work in the movies like they did in the comics and cartoons because of that lame duck explanation they always come up with which is-films are a different medium than comics.

I am a huge fan of the Sean Connery/Roger Moore James Bond Movies.I especially love Roger Moores portrayel of Bond the best because he brought an added dimension to the character.Just watch the movie The Spy Who Loved me sometime.Roger Moores Bond acts just like spidey in that film.He is fighting that enemy JAWS who is like 7 feet tall and like 300 pounds of muscle and is called Jaws because he has metal teeth that can bite and break even metal.Bond is with a girl of his and he is in a van and she is driving the van trying to get them away from Jaws who is like punching the van and tearing it apart because he is so strong.

Well during all that time,the girl driver is like panicking this whole time and you can see that by her expressions on her face and her tone of voice.Well Bond is just sitting in the passengers seat the entire time calm and cool as though its nothing to him.Just a regular everyday thing and making jokes the whole time.The car is making all these strange noises because it has been ravaged so badly by Jaws so Bond says -Can it play any other toons? the lady then crashes the van trying to escape and Bond says-Women drivers.she THEN crashes the van against a wall again while trying to escape and he calmly says-Want me to drive? She then backs the van up and knocks Jaws into the wall temporarily knocking him down to the ground before escaping,and she looks over at Bond and says-Shaken But Not stirred.

That was classic because as all Bond fans know,James Bond likes his martinis Shaken But Not Stirred.hee hee.I was laughing my butt off the whole time seeing Roger Moore making jokes while his life was on the line and in danger as Bond and he acts as though it was nothing. When i saw this movie the other day with a friend of mine I said to him-you know who James Bond reminds me of the way he is making jokes when is life is in danger like this? and we simultanoulsly said-spidey.so I wish people would stop making that stupid and thoughtless comment about how film is a different medium than comics and it wouldnt work in the movies because thats one example of how it CAN work in the movies when you got a good film director.

there are some jokes on this one (LAME CHESSY ONES).
i dont remember reading anything in the past about a votation for goblin suit,thats made up unless you can prove it.they didnt even show who the villain would be or after it was revealed HOW it would look,how come you tell me they asked the fans? BS!
and the original armor they made on sketch was much better than the movie version, they should had stick with that one.

sm3 will be the greatest comic book movie ever just becouse i will be able to ENJOY SEEING VENOM DIE ,YA HEAR ME FANBOYS!? VENOMS DEATH! DIE, DEAD!

Originally posted by Spiderman_RJ

sm3 will be the greatest comic book movie ever just becouse i will be able to ENJOY SEEING VENOM DIE ,YA HEAR ME FANBOYS!? VENOMS DEATH! DIE, DEAD!

You didn't watch after the credits did you?

do you know grammar? what part of i WILL you didnt get? and besides i dont care if he "lives" he is killed and thats it!

Venom died I'm happy. Harry stole the show I think so that made me really happy..too bad he died. I did see the after credit stuff and I think it is kind of stupid..we saw Brock blow up..I don't want Venom again in 4..

Originally posted by spencerspider
Venom died I'm happy. Harry stole the show I think so that made me really happy..too bad he died. I did see the after credit stuff and I think it is kind of stupid..we saw Brock blow up..I don't want Venom again in 4..

Damn I knew I should have stayed what happened at the end of the credits?

Probably going again tonight!I WILL stay after the credits and confirm if this clip rumor is true or not.I hope to god it is because I LOVE VENOM!!!

The only flaw I saw in Man-Spider 3 was the casting. I ranted and raved on both of the first two flicks on how Tobey was an awful choice and how Raimi suffers from the same artistic 'artfag' syndrome as Tim Burton. they choose actors based openly on their looks and their stature. Although it's not exactly a bad thing, I would just like to see a single movie in which Tobey becomes Man-Spider, again, and doesn't sound...you know...bored...

The fact that adding Venom to the movie also means that FACE IT! NO MATTER WHO THE HELL YOU ARE, HAVING VENOM ON THE FILM WILL NOT PLEASE EVERYONE! I think everyone should be happy that Venom even came out, even though Raimi was so gung ho about not having anything to do with him.

Now, Sandman being Uncle Ben's killer? I did not see that coming. Seeing how in the first film, the culprit Man-Spider chases down is a balding, heavyweight mugger...

And that alone covers my thoughts about MS3.

Originally posted by bakerboy
What will be the worst thing in man spider 3? After see the trailers, its difficult because it looks like a piece of crap so big as the other two, but lets guest. Its difficult to choose between the new evils , mary jane as gwen and gwen as mary jane, venom as a cameo for the fans, sandman being uncle ben killer and the old evils like spidey not funny at all or the organics.

Sorry, i cant choose, its very difficult . I would say that the biggest mistake is the movie itself, and the direction of that idiot Sam Raimi too. Meanwhile those stupid movies will be directed by Raimi and produced by Sony, the true spider man fans wont have a true and good adaptation of the marvel spiderman comics that make justice to such a culture icon.

I'm alittle confused on the Gwen Stacy being MJ part, what do you mean?

Originally posted by Scythe
The only flaw I saw in Man-Spider 3 was the casting. I ranted and raved on both of the first two flicks on how Tobey was an awful choice and how Raimi suffers from the same artistic 'artfag' syndrome as Tim Burton. they choose actors based openly on their looks and their stature. Although it's not exactly a bad thing, I would just like to see a single movie in which Tobey becomes Man-Spider, again, and doesn't sound...you know...bored...

The fact that adding Venom to the movie also means that FACE IT! NO MATTER WHO THE HELL YOU ARE, HAVING VENOM ON THE FILM WILL NOT PLEASE EVERYONE! I think everyone should be happy that Venom even came out, even though Raimi was so gung ho about not having anything to do with him.

Now, Sandman being Uncle Ben's killer? I did not see that coming. Seeing how in the first film, the culprit Man-Spider chases down is a balding, heavyweight mugger...

And that alone covers my thoughts about MS3.



I'm alittle confused on the Gwen Stacy being MJ part, what do you mean? I think he means as in the comics. In the comics Gwen was the girl next door, not Mary Jane. Mary Jane was the party girl who drank alot and was never the ( Quote unquote) good girl.

Originally posted by Spiderman_RJ
do you know grammar? what part of i WILL you didnt get? and besides i dont care if he "lives" he is killed and thats it!

Sorry I didn't notice the first person narrative in your sentence with all the caps in it. I'm not so sure my grammar has anything to do with that based on your response

Originally posted by spencerspider
Venom died I'm happy. Harry stole the show I think so that made me really happy..too bad he died. I did see the after credit stuff and I think it is kind of stupid..we saw Brock blow up..I don't want Venom again in 4..

Ya. I hope Venom is really dead. They also said someone who appears dead may not be dead. God, I hope they mean Harry. I don't want go three movies without Harry or any other Osborn. He hasn't even gotten Married to Liz yet and had Normie. He cant die just yet.

Originally posted by Big Sexy
I think he means as in the comics. In the comics Gwen was the girl next door, not Mary Jane. Mary Jane was the party girl who drank alot and was never the ( Quote unquote) good girl.

Ah, I see.

Harry is dead. There is no questioning that.

This whole movie is dead, the whole franchise sucks...EVERYTHINGS WRONG WITH DAMN F**KING FILM. LONG live BATMAN!! For god sake , batman was pratically in this movie . I feel like im taking crazy pills people, cant you SEe how suckY all these damn , 911 propaganda flicks were? SPIdERMAN 3!! he wasnt even IN it for 2 flippin hours!!!.

EMO SPIDERMAN EMOO F*****KIN SPIDERMAN!!! UAGHHHHH!!
its making me sick enough to be reminded of that with your signiture there blackC@!
IT was dorky, embarassing, ughH everyone one of them were dorks!! tobey maguire , im gonna piss on his grave when hes dead. Im just saying and yelling everything you people are thinking, and dont got the guts to say by now, you're IN denial!! DONT HOPE FOR ANOTHER ONE , fOR Gods sake and everything thats holy on this damn planet. how could you want another ONE, id rather piss a cactus through my dick hole, then pray to these cash cow, raimi sucking assholes to make another abomination of spiderman.

And aunt may is still a bLUmbering old goose hag, im surprised venom didnt eat her. WHY CANT VENOM , SPIDERMAN, GOBLIN, KING GOBLIN, THE GOBLIN KING, ......Who else....um...sandman, keep their god damn MASKIES ON!!!!!!!!!!!! when I saw venom for the first time yo!, im like...oh shitz there he is , in all his glory, but then ...yes....you knew it too...that 70s show nerd gotta show his damn dorky ****ing face again, to remind me that oh yeah, he just took a bloody crap all over my favorite spidey villian. Im gonna have to rename this movie, as i do to all crappy films ive seen in the last 2 years. this movie, for me, is now dubbed

SpiderDorks 3
spiderman goes emo

end of story





.............and no im not drunk......... BUT I WISH I WAS!! I need the precious rum to help me forget this pile of buffalo DIARREA!!!

Spiderman 3 kicks ass!

Just so you know, Raimi already confirmed there is going to be a Spidey 4, 5, and 6.

LONG LIVE SPIDERMAN!!!

Two good friends of mine saw it yesterday, and now, knowing their opinion, i know something, THE BIGGEST MSITAKE ITS THE MOVIE ITSELF. the movie was a total crap, even worse than the first two.

I've always seen the franchise as a worthy summer action flick. Never a true to the comics branching storyline.

Originally posted by bakerboy
Two good friends of mine saw it yesterday, and now, knowing their opinion, i know something, THE BIGGEST MSITAKE ITS THE MOVIE ITSELF. the movie was a total crap, even worse than the first two.

The first two was amazing.

Topher Grace as Brock.

He was pathetic. The whole character was lame. And don't get me started on him teaming up with Sandman.

oh yah,the whole lets be friends deal......and how did venom know about markos daughter if spiderman never heard from her?
how could venom had guessed that?HUGEST FLAW EVER!
just like how peter after slaping mj decides to PUT ON the suit he found to be turning him bad to BROOD on a church tower...why would you put on something you knew is turning you into something "horrible"? then for the first time the simbionte tries to attach permanently,just out of coincidence...and it goes and goes......

Originally posted by Arachnid1
Spiderman 3 kicks ass!

Just so you know, Raimi already confirmed there is going to be a Spidey 4, 5, and 6.

LONG LIVE SPIDERMAN!!!

Yeah i bet hes gonna need all those shi**y movies , to explain all the damn plot holes, that im not even interested in at this point. You know before i saw the movie, i glanced at a few forums here. And i started seeing words like "lame" , " much potential but failed", "things that made this movie bad" etc. But the one that got my attention the most right before i left was ," First half is amazing, second half is appalling". And when i was watching it, the first half at least. I said wow this one might be better then those other 2, but no.....the second parker swifted his hair to the side, like that emo kid on southpark. I knew something terrible just happened. And when parker...........parker...parker parker parker. I think that name was tossed around more then friggin spiderman. Anyways, when James Dean and parker dueled it out, i wasnt sure who i was rooting for. Did anyone else feel this way? I mean parker is a dweeb, but now an emo dweeb? verses a character, who was portrayed darkly in the correct form. Peter just deserved to have his ass kicked at that point, especially with him standing there all hot topic status , pissed, closed fist, scrunched up nose blah blah. All the errors of this movie are just floatin in my subconsious and i cant even articulate it , even in text form.

that is all

....ps I will say this though, the other great thing about this movie, were the trailers before hand. I pray on Kurt cobains grave, that Pirates 3 completly owns. And thats saying alot, shit even that harry potter movie looked kick ass. And so did across the universe, but im sure theres a forum for that.

First off I liked the movie. I think having 2 villains was a mistake. Venom alone couldve been scripted perfectly for the whole movie and they couldve explored more of the Sandman's back story, motivations and go further into his daughters sickness. By having both of them I think it something away from each one of them and tried to fix it with the "team up".

I didnt think id give a squat about the sandman, while watching this movie in the works. But when i saw the movie, and how it started off introducing him, and all the character development that was going on. Especially the awesome and strangely beautiful meloncholy that was going on , when his genes spliced with the sand chromosomes. I thought they would do a decent job of portarying him like the previous villians. In short, making me give a squat. But then we just start seeing less and less of him, and they completly ditched his story. Its like a literal change of plot , while the movies rolling. Like someone through in a different half assed spiderman movie, now focusing mainly on the symboite saga. GOD , i know that raimi was sticking to his guns about his hatred towards venom. But they got him to make a symboite movie anyways! I think this will forever bother me, because we are now stuck with these spiderman movies. Itll be like 30 generations later when they decide to make another one im sure. They had the oppurtunity to make a great symboite spiderman movie, in the quality that matches the other decent films. BUT NO, they diffently pulled an xmen 3 on this one.

Originally posted by Arachnid1
The first two was amazing.

yeah.amazing as in amazingly horribly written.

Kirstin Dunnst signing twice = biggest mistake IMO.

Originally posted by doctorstrongbad
Kirstin Dunnst signing twice = biggest mistake IMO.

I was hopping she would fall when she was coming down the stairs the first time she was singing (if thats what you can call that horror).

Originally posted by doctorstrongbad
Kirstin Dunnst signing twice = biggest mistake IMO.

what do you mean by that on her signing twice?

Originally posted by Mr Parker
what do you mean by that on her signing twice?

He means "singing" .She sung twice, the first time in her play and then at the end of the movie.

Originally posted by the_satan32
He means "singing" .She sung twice, the first time in her play and then at the end of the movie.

Yeah I tried to edit it, but it was giving me problems.

Was I the only one who thinks she can't sing?

You know the thing is she has proven she CAN act.a lot of people say she was really bad in the films and she was a horrible MJ since she acted much more like gwen stacy and hardly anything at all like MJ.But I put the blame on that on Raimis direction and the screenwriting because when she is not doing Raimis work and doing someone elses,she has proven she can act because in MAN-SPIDER 2 when she was doing that play-which is a classic by the way,she was impressive in that role because that was a play and it wasnt Sam Raimi's and sonys spider-man.

i have seen the movie and it isnt as good as the others WHICH WERE GOOD because of 3 villains not giving the villains enough time for their caracter to evolve

Originally posted by fredstawill
i have seen the movie and it isnt as good as the others WHICH WERE GOOD because of 3 villains not giving the villains enough time for their caracter to evolve

All the fans begged for Venom so I can see why they put him in. I would of stuck with one bad guy per film, but thats just me.

why are people complaining about dusnt singing? it was obviously a professional singer and dunst was lip mimic,i went to the movie prepared to have my ears go deaf,but the singer actually sings nice,you guys just have a bad taste for music or none at all,the lyrics song were stupid though.

Originally posted by doctorstrongbad
Kirstin Dunnst signing twice = biggest mistake IMO. You do get that she was supposed to be bad at singing right? I mean, I'm not saying that she sung badly on purpose, but no one expected you to be entertained by her singing.

That's why she was fired.


It was a plot point.

so spiderman RJ,what did YOU think was the biggest betrayal in MAN-SPIDER 3?

I think that the biggest mistake its the whole movie. If they let sam raimi and sonny doing those crappy movies, it will be a shame for the true true spiderman fans.

I mean: venom cameo, the butler confession, mary jane singing( dunst is a good actress, but not in these crappy movies), sandman being uncle ben killer, tobey crying and doing travolta and billy joel impersonator, terrible script, etc. Too much for a movie. This could be as bad as batman and robin.

Originally posted by bakerboy
I think that the biggest mistake its the whole movie. If they let sam raimi and sonny doing those crappy movies, it will be a shame for the true true spiderman fans.

I mean: venom cameo, the butler confession, mary jane singing( dunst is a good actress, but not in these crappy movies), sandman being uncle ben killer, tobey crying and doing travolta and billy joel impersonator, terrible script, etc. Too much for a movie. This could be as bad as batman and robin.

Nothing can be as bad as Batman and Robin.

Originally posted by Mr Parker
so spiderman RJ,what did YOU think was the biggest betrayal in MAN-SPIDER 3?

oh you meant this one,the script plain and simple,it was obviously they had some material that was supressed in order for the simbiont F* fest appear on the screen,if i had to name i would say AVI ARAD!
this movie would obviously be sandman and harry but no,lets get me some money,venom someone?

ignoring this and focusing on what the movie showed, i would say lack of character development, they were....just there,the bugler scene resumes that perfectly.this movie should had been called lethal coincidences instead of spiderman 3,everything just happens out of coincidence.

even though goofy and arrogant ,peter with simbiont was part of the context in the movie,the simbionte made peter let loose for the first time,and well....its peter so his let loose (in the movies) is like that.(not that i liked)

the second biggest betrayal was the simbionte saga, i mean,the main ticket seller of this movie and the center of all merchandising was spiderman in his black suit,and then venom (or maybe first venom and then spider black suit),and spider in black suit got less screen time then venom!!! WTH!!!
it was REALLY like this
scene 1 :spiderman finds the simbiont and goes whorraaaaaah...the scene last 26 s.
scene 2: peter and doc connors are analizing the simbiont

!?!?!?!?!!?!?!! that was it?that was a slap in the face.biggest betrayal.

"This movie sucked my Spider-balls"

Originally posted by Arahan
"This movie sucked my Spider-balls"

Spiders have balls?

Originally posted by Arahan
"This movie sucked my Spider-balls"

All of you haters obviously play with yourselves at night. It really ticks me off when people whine and complain about a movie just because it didn't meet their high expectations. Let's be serious, Sam Raimi made what he thought would be a masterpiece and succeeded tremendously. Spiderman 3 was a great movie. It had a lot of action and the right amount of drama in it. The only disappointment in the whole movie would be the fact that Venom, supposely, got blown up by the pumpkin bomb. It was a unfair way to get rid of a very popular character. For all we know, Eddie Brock could have survived the blast. Harry Osborn did, so why not Brock? Overall, the movie was excellant. Rather than critcizing Sam Raimi's hard work for childish reasons, why don't you people shut up and get a life!

Originally posted by Yoshi Fanatic
All of you haters obviously play with yourselves at night. It really ticks me off when people whine and complain about a movie just because it didn't meet their high expectations. Let's be serious, Sam Raimi made what he thought would be a masterpiece and succeeded tremendously. Spiderman 3 was a great movie. It had a lot of action and the right amount of drama in it. The only disappointment in the whole movie would be the fact that Venom, supposely, got blown up by the pumpkin bomb. It was a unfair way to get rid of a very popular character. For all we know, Eddie Brock could have survived the blast. Harry Osborn did, so why not Brock? Overall, the movie was excellant. Rather than critcizing Sam Raimi's hard work for childish reasons, why don't you people shut up and get a life!

1. Not everyone hated the movie so don't direct it at everyone who posted in this thread.

2. Eddie died because he wasn't bonded with the symbiote. He was a normal person. The same would have happened if a bomb blew up in front of you. Harry on the other hand, had super powers.

3. From what I hear, there was a rib cage on the ground, so eddie is dead and we still don't know if the symbiote is weak against fire so maybe the symbiote is just weak right now and it will come back after. Maybe it will bomd to eddie brock Sr. who gets its info and gets revenge for his son on Spiderman.

Originally posted by Yoshi Fanatic
All of you haters obviously play with yourselves at night. It really ticks me off when people whine and complain about a movie just because it didn't meet their high expectations. Let's be serious, Sam Raimi made what he thought would be a masterpiece and succeeded tremendously. Spiderman 3 was a great movie. It had a lot of action and the right amount of drama in it. The only disappointment in the whole movie would be the fact that Venom, supposely, got blown up by the pumpkin bomb. It was a unfair way to get rid of a very popular character. For all we know, Eddie Brock could have survived the blast. Harry Osborn did, so why not Brock? Overall, the movie was excellant. Rather than critcizing Sam Raimi's hard work for childish reasons, why don't you people shut up and get a life!

typical post of a MAN-SPIDER FAN. always accusing people who hate the movies of whining and telling them they need to get a life just because some of us like to see good quality movies.thats real logical but typical for a man-spider fan. this folks is obviously a kid seeking attention.do not feed him.

Originally posted by Mr Parker
typical post of a MAN-SPIDER FAN. always accusing people who hate the movies of whining and telling them they need to get a life just because some of us like to see good quality movies.thats real logical but typical for a man-spider fan. this folks is obviously a kid seeking attention.do not feed him.

Pathetic. Only a comic book geek would get all mad about a movie that doesn't have the exact details as the comic book itself. I would like to see you do a better job than Sam Raimi. You know what? If you hate Sony's Spiderman so much, then why did you join this forum? Since this forum is all about Sony's Spiderman, then I would guess that you wouldn't join since you don't like it. Rather than staying around with your little "Man-Spider" rants, why don't you just leave?

And I wish Mr Parker and all the other people who complain about the organic web shooters would shutup. You must hate the movies AND the comics now because he has organic web shooters in the comics now too. Personally I think mechanical web shooters are lame. If you have the powers of a spider why wouldn't you have natural webbing. Mr Parker, you make me laugh.

organics are more lame because realistically the webbing would shoot out of his ass.and organics are stupid because any idiot like flash thompson could become spiderman now with organics.and actually I stopped reading spiderman years ago when they commited the bigger sin having him get married to that whore mary jane.

If you hate the whole Spiderman franchise so much, then why do you participate in this forum? You must have nothing else to do with your life...

Hey I wouldnt have even bothered to have post if he hadnt mentioned my name.you cant expect to mention someones name and then expect them to not come back to address it..use some logic and common snse for once in your life.and for your information,if you had bothered to read through these posts on this thread,you would have seen where someone was talking to me and mentioned to me-Hey Mr Parker its been a long time since we talked.ever think that he might have said that because until recently I hadnt even been in the spiderman section posting for over half a year?

bwt,hope you had fun talking to yourself in that previous post you made before this one because thats EXACTLY what you did. nobody even bothered to read it.I know I sure didnt.

The biggest mistake of Spider-man 3 is that Venom never says, "WE are Venom."

oooooo...this fellas got a good point. I loved that about Venom...That's why they call it a symbiote...hello people!!!

Anyway, I hated the fact that they killed Harry Osburn AND Eddie Brock. Stop with the killing of characters you overzealous-writing bastards!!!

I am telling the 100% truth: Many of us here on killermovies.com could have written a better script for Spiderman 3. I know a lot of you would disagree but I know we could have. Give me $250 millions dollars and I will give you one of the best movies ever made in every category by leaps in bounds. (I am 100% dead serious about that.)

Also, Topher Grace was a very poor character selection for Eddie Brock. Eddie Brock is a pumped up jock, not a skinny geek. (I like Topher he is a good actor and a nice guy...yeah, that's right peeps, Topher and I are on a first name basis...you best buhleedat.)

I dunno, Topher did a great job playing Eddie. Besides Topher did gain about 30 pounds of muscle just to do the movie. Also Harry dies in the comic so they should kill him off. His movie death was A LOT better then his comic death. But I would just add one line to the movie. See my last post for line I would add to the movie.

Overall it was a great movie but it could have used improvements. Like with the Sand Man, why did they wait 2 years before telling Peter and Aunt May that someone else killed Uncle Ben?

Originally posted by ESB -1138
I dunno, Topher did a great job playing Eddie. Besides Topher did gain about 30 pounds of muscle just to do the movie. Also Harry dies in the comic so they should kill him off. His movie death was A LOT better then his comic death. But I would just add one line to the movie. See my last post for line I would add to the movie.

Overall it was a great movie but it could have used improvements. Like with the Sand Man, why did they wait 2 years before telling Peter and Aunt May that someone else killed Uncle Ben?

He really gained that much weight? Holy POOP!! he must have weighed like a couple of pounds to start with! JK

Sure, Topher did a great job acting, I have nothing wrong with his acting...he didn't look the part of Eddie Brock. A 220 pound 6'2" muscular man would have looked the part of Eddie Brock.

Originally posted by Mr Parker
Hey I wouldnt have even bothered to have post if he hadnt mentioned my name.you cant expect to mention someones name and then expect them to not come back to address it..use some logic and common snse for once in your life.and for your information,if you had bothered to read through these posts on this thread,you would have seen where someone was talking to me and mentioned to me-Hey Mr Parker its been a long time since we talked.ever think that he might have said that because until recently I hadnt even been in the spiderman section posting for over half a year?

bwt,hope you had fun talking to yourself in that previous post you made before this one because thats EXACTLY what you did. nobody even bothered to read it.I know I sure didnt.

If you didn't bother to read my post, how did you respond without knowing what I was talking about???
What was the reason for you to continue your "Man-Spiderman" posts in this forum after you took your six month absense? You should know by now that nobody likes you...

Originally posted by ESB -1138
The biggest mistake of Spider-man 3 is that Venom never says, "WE are Venom."

I saw no mistakes in SPIDERMAN 3

I agree. Spiderman 3 may not have been the perfect movie, but it was still great. I can't wait for it to come out on DVD..

You know, Parker, I don't think you realise that saying "They screwed the organics up!" is EXACTLY the same as saying "I didn't get what I want."

You've had your cry, move on. Webshooters suck.

Yes, webshooters do suck.

they only suck if your a man-spider fan like Black Cat is for example which obviously you are as well and obviously were never a spider-man fan.

You know what, Mr. Parker? You seem to love being the offbrand of this forum discussion. You are the ONLY person making such a big deal about organics. You are also the ONLY person that has "Man-Spiderman" in almost every post that you've made. You should have enough intelligence and wisdom by now to know that none of us care...