AngryManatee
Coal Plants are some of the largest producers of man-made Carbon Dioxide emissions. With the recent advances in nuclear power such as pebble-bed reactors, and fuel reprocessing which extends the usage of nuclear fuel and decreases the amount of radioactive waste, and also future possibilities such as torroid fusion reactors (will be able to produce much much MUCH more energy than today's fission reactors), which will emit negligible radiation, and possibly no radiation if they can effectively switch from tritium-deuterium fuel mixtures to deuterium-deuterium, do you think we should be switching more to nuclear power, and alternative energy sources such as wind turbine fields and wave-motion generators to supplement it? A third of the US is powered by nuclear already, so why not go all the way?