Click HERE to see this thread with all of the graphics, features, and links.

If you could change the username of the member above you, what would you choose?

Lord Sorgo

Yes, I went there. Again.

Originally posted by Slay
Lord Sorgo

Yes, I went there. Again.

Hahahaha

Otaku

Birdcock42

Originally posted by Slay
Lord Sorgo

Yes, I went there. Again.

Gay.


Instead of slay. sly

Originally posted by Slay
Birdcock42 Gay

42Bardock

Congo Dood

Originally posted by Bardock42
Gay
Reported for prejudice, and making sobbistic comments, towards people who have different sexual preferences.

Slaynus

Originally posted by Slay
Reported for prejudice towards people who have different sexual preferences.

Don't worry, I was all over you for the false accusation!

Prove I have prejudice towards people with different sexual preferences. I said "Gay" as in happy.

Originally posted by Smiter
Congo Dood


Smither

Knäckebröd
Originally posted by ~Da Moose~
Slaynus
It would be funny, if it wasn't for the fact that I made that one up myself.

Da Spoose.

Slaynus is gaynuss.

Originally posted by ~Da Moose~
Slaynus is gaynuss.

~Da goose~

Da Spoose Scares Children of Reproducing.

If that fits.

Originally posted by Slay
Da Spoose Scares Children of Reproducing.

If that fits.

Wow....

Slayer

Wäsä Knäckebröd

Originally posted by ~Da Moose~
Wow....

Well, that's what a spoose does...

Originally posted by Slay
Wäsä Knäckebröd

Well, that's what a spoose does...

Michaela

Jurgen

Jean-Jeacques Teh Canadian

Timothy McVeigh

Bradock Pitt

i am moosey hear me roar
http://i47.photobucket.com/albums/f153/Q2neptune13/thmoose.gif

Problematic_Dood

Cherubim XIII

Originally posted by Problem_Child
i am moosey hear me roar
http://i47.photobucket.com/albums/f153/Q2neptune13/thmoose.gif

I like that.

Surgicallyurs

HI I PIX ARMIES

Spelljammer hmm

Masrix.

Originally posted by Seraphim XIII
Masrix.

Sorg...ermm e...

Sorge.

Misk

Gaptain Gaynard

Originally posted by Vinny Valentine
Sorg...ermm e...

Sorge.
I went there already. Copycat.

Originally posted by Slay
Gaptain Gaynard


I went there already. Copycat. Sloy

Originally posted by ~Da Moose~
I like that.
i even picked put a kick ass avvy for it

Originally posted by Problem_Child
i even picked put a kick ass avvy for it

Say that one more time?

Spooseface

Originally posted by Captain Maynard
Sloy
Gaynard James Keenan

Originally posted by ~Da Moose~
Say that one more time?
what? i am moosey hear me roar? or the avvy part?

sledge

drewbiefan

Curved Happyness.

Colonel Lanyard

Originally posted by Symmetric Chaos
drewbiefan
LOL nice one

C-Metric-K-Oz = symetric chaos

Ms. California = soin2cal

Already Done

http://www.killermovies.com/forums/showthread.php?s=&threadid=378393

Party Pooper

Originally posted by Problem_Child
what? i am moosey hear me roar? or the avvy part?

Nvm, I went back, re-read it, figured out the typo. Sorry. It's cool though, can I use it?

the big bounce


liking your names for me

Moose: ~Da Quadrupedal Member of the deer family Cervidae~

soin2cal: Cali Girl

Oddlust

love actually

Originally posted by Strangelove
Already Done

http://www.killermovies.com/forums/showthread.php?s=&threadid=378393

No, sorry. This is distorting the username; Not completely changing it. There's a difference.

Nope it definitely isnt.

Originally posted by Vinny Valentine
Sorg...ermm e...

Sorge.

Masrix.

Originally posted by Seraphim XIII
No, sorry. This is distorting the username; Not completely changing it. There's a difference. They're close enough that a merge wouldn't be inappropriate

And if you look at a majority of the posts in that thread, they do exactly what this thread does

distort = to change

Originally posted by Strangelove
Moose: ~Da Quadrupedal Member of the deer family Cervidae~



Haha....wow...I think that needs to be profiled.

Originally posted by ~Da Moose~
Haha....wow...I think that needs to be profiled.

Originally posted by Strangelove
They're close enough that a merge wouldn't be inappropriate

And if you look at a majority of the posts in that thread, they do exactly what this thread does


This is true, but it should not. His thread is a change, this is a distortion. They're two different things. Sorry.

Originally posted by Seraphim XIII
This is true, but it should not. His thread is a change, this is a distortion. They're two different things. Sorry. Originally posted by Smiter
distort = to change I'm not doing this to be mean or because it's you. This is a duplicate thread, and I'm going to report it as such

Originally posted by Strangelove
I'm not doing this to be mean or because it's you. This is a duplicate thread, and I'm going to report it as such

It's not a duplicate thread. I'm sorry, but you're incorrect.

Whoa, you quoted Smiter on distortion = change? I'm dissapointed. They're two different animals.

Distortion = Slighty twisting something from it's true self.
Change = Is to make something completely differential.

Originally posted by Seraphim XIII
It's not a duplicate thread. I'm sorry, but you're incorrect.

Whoa, you quoted Smiter on distortion = change? I'm dissapointed. They're two different animals.

Distortion = Slighty twisting something from it's true self.
Change = Is to make something completely differential. Well I disagree with you, and I've reported the thread

and distort is a synonym of change

Originally posted by Strangelove
and distort is a synonym of change

Not according to Rogets or American Heratige.

Originally posted by Strangelove
Well I disagree with you, and I've reported the thread

and distort is a synonym of change


Distortion is different than change. That's why they're two different meanings and two different definitions. Distort is to slighty twist, change is an overhaul.

Good for you.

Originally posted by Symmetric Chaos
Not according to Rogets or American Heratige. Those dictionaries are bunk anywayOriginally posted by Seraphim XIII
Distortion is different than change. That's why they're two different meanings and two different definitions. Distort is to slighty twist, change is an overhaul.

Good for you. If you have to spend energy defending the originality of your thread, it's not original

Originally posted by Strangelove
Those dictionaries are bunk anyway

Any human being who knows anything about logic or has basic comprehension of the english language will tell you that Distort does not equal change. That's retarded.

Originally posted by Strangelove
Those dictionaries are bunk anyway

Then its good I'm using Roget's thesaurus not their dictionary.

Originally posted by Seraphim XIII
Any human being who knows anything about logic or has basic comprehension of the english language will tell you that Distort does not equal change. That's retarded. maybe = was a bit much, but they are equatable to having the same generic meaning. To distort something, you have to change it.

And don't make assumptions about my intelligence or comprehension of the English language or I'll report you for bashing

Originally posted by Strangelove
If you have to spend energy defending the originality of your thread, it's not original

Faulty logic. Any random can come out of nowhere and begin to go against an original thread. According to your logic, this makes any original thread that has been attacked or questioned unoriginal.

Nice.

Originally posted by Strangelove
maybe = was a bit much, but they are equatable to having the same generic meaning. To distort something, you have to change it.

And don't make assumptions about my intelligence or comprehension of the English language or I'll report you for bashing

No, you don't. To distort something, you have to distort it. Logically, it could be said that it doesn't needed to be changed because it's merely being twisted.

They're two different things. You need to get over it.

I didn't make an assumption.

Originally posted by Seraphim XIII
Faulty logic. Any random can come out of nowhere and begin to go against an original thread. According to your logic, this makes any original thread that has been attacked or questioned unoriginal.

Nice. You make a mistake in your 'logic' there. It's not about the person doing the questioning. It's the person being questioned. If you have to waste time and energy defending the originality of your thread, then it's not original

Originally posted by Seraphim XIII
I didn't make an assumption. So what you're saying is that you were subtly making a point that you think I'm of inferior intelligence. Nice. Reported.

My cat's breath smells like poop.

Originally posted by Strangelove
You make a mistake in your 'logic' there. It's not about the person doing the questioning. It's the person being questioned. If you have to waste time and energy defending the originality of your thread, then it's not original

No, I didn't. You're directly appealing to ignorance here, A logical fallacy among them. By your logic, ANY THREAD THAT GETS ATTACKED, including those that are original, are simply unoriginal. Time and energy are exerted when a post is made, so that is where your logic kicks in. Any thread that gets attack or criticized is unoriginal, according to your logic. It's very simple. You should know this. Don't just debate semantics to defend yourself, it's ridiculous.

Originally posted by Strangelove
So what you're saying is that you were subtly making a point that you think I'm of inferior intelligence. Nice. Reported.

You have no evidence supporting that I directly insulted your intelligence. Based on a possible assumption you may be trying to destroy my thread, I'm going to ignore you for now.

Originally posted by Seraphim XIII
No, I didn't. You're directly appealing to ignorance here, A logical fallacy among them. By your logic, ANY THREAD THAT GETS ATTACKED, including those that are original, are simply unoriginal. Time and energy are exerted when a post is made, so that is where your logic kicks in. Any thread that gets attack or criticized is unoriginal, according to your logic. It's very simple. You should know this. Don't just debate semantics to defend yourself, it's ridiculous. No, you are making a fatal mistake. Any thread can be attacked for being stupid, spam, or just a waste of time. That in and of itself is not unoriginal. A thread can be attack and still original. I'm not speaking of any thread just being attacked in general. I'm talking about threads having their originality questioned. And this is usually black and white. If you have to spend time and energy defending your threads originality, then it's not original.

Originally posted by Seraphim XIII
You have no evidence supporting that I directly insulted your intelligence. Based on a possible assumption you may be trying to destroy my thread, I'm going to ignore you for now. Like I said in the beginning, I wasn't doing this to be mean to you. I didn't care at all that is was your thread. It's a duplicate thread.

Originally posted by Seraphim XIII
You have no evidence supporting that I directly insulted your intelligence. Based on a possible assumption you may be trying to destroy my thread, I'm going to ignore you for now.
How you you manage to get yourself into an argument in every thread you go into? srug

Originally posted by Strangelove
No, you are making a fatal mistake. Any thread can be attacked for being stupid, spam, or just a waste of time. That in and of itself is not unoriginal. A thread can be attack and still original. I'm not speaking of any thread just being attacked in general. I'm talking about threads having their originality questioned. And this is usually black and white. If you have to spend time and energy defending your threads originality, then it's not original.

No, it can't be. Not by your logic. You said that if TIME + ENERGY is exerted into the defense of a thread, it cannot be original. This goes for any thread, deemed original or not, IF WE PLAY BY YOUR LOGIC.

You slip up each time with this:



If a random person walks into a thread and insults it or questions it, it's unoriginal. ANY THREAD. That is what your logic plays on. If you have to defend it, it is automatically deemed unoriginal. That's faulty logic, Strangelove. Sorry, but it is.

The bottom line is distortion and change are different, making this thread differential. It's not a duplicate so just ... Get over it!

I'll brb later. I have a lunch meeting.

Originally posted by Seraphim XIII
No, it can't be. Not by your logic. You said that if TIME + ENERGY is exerted into the defense of a thread, it cannot be original. This goes for any thread, deemed original or not, IF WE PLAY BY YOUR LOGIC.

You slip up each time with this:



If a random person walks into a thread and insults it or questions it, it's unoriginal. ANY THREAD. That is what your logic plays on. If you have to defend it, it is automatically deemed unoriginal. That's faulty logic, Strangelove. Sorry, but it is.

The bottom line is distortion and change are different, making this thread differential. It's not a duplicate so just ... Get over it!

I'll brb later. I have a lunch meeting. What is your purpose here?

Originally posted by -X-Dr.Gonzo-X-
What is your purpose here?

I don't mind Strangelove coming in here and sharing his opinion, but if he's going to say something that is wrong, like Distort = Change and the faulty logic, I'm going to dispute it. Simple.

Anyways, I've got to leave. I'll see you guys later.

No hard feelings, Strangelove. I still wuv you.

Originally posted by Seraphim XIII
No, it can't be. Not by your logic. You said that if TIME + ENERGY is exerted into the defense of a thread, it cannot be original. This goes for any thread, deemed original or not, IF WE PLAY BY YOUR LOGIC.

You slip up each time with this:



If a random person walks into a thread and insults it or questions it, it's unoriginal. ANY THREAD. That is what your logic plays on. If you have to defend it, it is automatically deemed unoriginal. That's faulty logic, Strangelove. Sorry, but it is.

The bottom line is distortion and change are different, making this thread differential. It's not a duplicate so just ... Get over it!

I'll brb later. I have a lunch meeting. You're saying the same thing over and over again as if it's supposed to make sense. It doesn't. You're wrong. This is a duplicate thread. And thanks to your constant need for an argument, it will likely be closed instead of merged. Congrats.

Originally posted by Strangelove
You're saying the same thing over and over again as if it's supposed to make sense. It doesn't. You're wrong. This is a duplicate thread. And thanks to your constant need for an argument, it will likely be closed instead of merged. Congrats.

Nice retort. Don't worry, I still wuv you, Strangelove.

Originally posted by Seraphim XIII
Nice retort. Don't worry, I still wuv you, Strangelove.

Originally posted by Barker
How you you manage to get yourself into an argument in every thread you go into? srug

In this case it seems like Strangelove was just being a jerk.

Originally posted by Symmetric Chaos
In this case it seems like Strangelove was just being a jerk.

Don't call Strangelove a jerk. That's stupid. Thanks for defending me, but Strangelove was merely commenting and sharing his opinion on what he thinks is right and what should be done.

Originally posted by Symmetric Chaos
In this case it seems like Strangelove was just being a jerk. No. I was reporting a duplicate thread and Seraphim just had to make an argument out of it.Originally posted by Seraphim XIII
Don't call Strangelove a jerk. That's stupid. Thanks for defending me, but Strangelove was merely commenting and sharing his opinion on what he thinks is right and what should be done. Thank you for being somewhat civil

Originally posted by Strangelove
No. I was reporting a duplicate thread and Seraphim just had to make an argument out of it.Thank you for being somewhat civil

No problem, but shit! I've gotta go!

See you all later.

Originally posted by Strangelove
No. I was reporting a duplicate thread and Seraphim just had to make an argument out of it.

srug

You could have just dropped it and lets the Mods sort it out rather than arguing with Seraph.

Originally posted by Symmetric Chaos
srug

You could have just dropped it and lets the Mods sort it out rather than arguing with Seraph. Well you're right about that, but continuing to defend my point in an argument that I didn't start does not make me a jerk

Originally posted by Strangelove
Well you're right about that, but continuing to defend my point in an argument that I didn't start does not make me a jerk

I had to correct the Distort = Change thing.

Originally posted by Strangelove
Well you're right about that, but continuing to defend my point in an argument that I didn't start does not make me a jerk

Yeah . . . (I liked this thread I hope the mods merge it or someone bumps the otherone)

I quite dislike this fellow.

Originally posted by Seraphim XIII
I had to correct the Distort = Change thing. not to be mean, but don't you have to be somewhere?

And you made your point admirably, but the threads are still the same

Originally posted by Symmetric Chaos
Yeah . . . (I liked this thread I hope the mods merge it or someone bumps the otherone) bumped

Originally posted by Strangelove
not to be mean, but don't you have to be somewhere?

And you made your point admirably, but the threads are still the same I'm with the Strange on this one. smartass

Originally posted by Symmetric Chaos
In this case it seems like Strangelove was just being a jerk.
Don't call Strangelove a jerk. That's stupid. Thanks for defending him, but Strangelove was merely commenting and sharing his opinion on what he thinks is right and what should be done.

StrangeGlove

"oh this isnt my glove!"

tongue_ss

Originally posted by Barker
Don't call Strangelove a jerk. That's stupid. Thanks for defending him, but Strangelove was merely commenting and sharing his opinion on what he thinks is right and what should be done.
Don't call Strangelove a jerk. That's stupid. Thanks for defending him, but Strangelove was merely commenting and sharing his opinion on what he thinks is right and what should be done.

Originally posted by Slay
Don't call Strangelove a jerk. That's stupid. Thanks for defending him, but Strangelove was merely commenting and sharing his opinion on what he thinks is right and what should be done. Deja vu shock

*thows hands up defensively*

Hey guys I already apologized . . .

duster

Originally posted by Symmetric Chaos
*thows hands up defensively*

Hey guys I already apologized . . . well you didn't apologize so much as say "Yeah. . . . . . " but apology accepted

Fine then.

Sorry Strangelove.

Originally posted by Symmetric Chaos
Fine then.

Sorry Strangelove. Accepted again ermm

I agree with Strangelove. and Serph, you do seem to get in allot of arguements.

AnotherBrickInTheWall

My wii

LATE EDIT

strangelove and seraphim XIII are arguing, now there's a shocker

Originally posted by LifeInSepia
LATE EDIT

strangelove and seraphim XIII are arguing, now there's a shocker http://i95.photobucket.com/albums/l145/42Strangelove/ohyou.jpg

Strangehate

Myweiner.

SoopySnuffer

Hairclipso

Gemsco

Schmiter.

Pimpediment.


sly

Originally posted by Seraphim XIII
Pimpediment.


sly

sweet!

SeraphimXIV, or HIV for short. SerapHimXIV

ExistInMonochrome

Uncle Buck

Originally posted by ~Da Moose~
Uncle Buck ...

Duh Mus bag

Originally posted by Uneeklyconfused
...

Duh Mus bag

Uneeklycoherent.

Sorg Lord

Originally posted by Eclipso
Sorg Lord

Elclitso?

Sorgahim

Lips

Originally posted by Eclipso
Sorgahim

u lose, gday sir

Diaphram XIII

=Fried Biker=

Astronomical event that occurs when one celestial object moves into the shadow of another-o

Distorted and dysfunctional sexual intercourse. laughing

Paper Clipso.

Energetic Humper

Gimpediment

Sheriff Him 31

Impedimental

Sphincter 13.

Bark-at-the-Mooner

Corker.

Still a duplicate thread, by the by ermm

Weird Affectionado

Originally posted by Seraphim XIII
If you could change the username of the member above you, what would you choose?

This is a Duplicate Thread.

And you go on about how its to Distort but you ruined yourself and whole logic in the argument because in your opening sentence you use the word Change.

This isn't an Attack at you, its just me telling you, that you made a mistake.

So stop getting all preachy and up-tight about it Seraphim.

Vincent Cocotti Vega Brown

Originally posted by Vinny Valentine
This is a Duplicate Thread.

And you go on about how its to Distort but you ruined yourself and whole logic in the argument because in your opening sentence you use the word Change.

This isn't an Attack at you, its just me telling you, that you made a mistake.

So stop getting all preachy and up-tight about it Seraphim.

You're wrong. I didn't ruin my logic. If you're going to come in here and confront me about this, try doing it correctly. I made a mistake of DICTION, son. I meant to place distort there, but instead, I placed change there. You're way off. Oh, the irony.

Anyhow, It's simply not a duplicate because change and distort are two different animals. Just like similie and metaphor; A simile is a sub type of what a metaphor is, but they're TWO DIFFERENT THINGS.

GOI.

Originally posted by Seraphim XIII
You're wrong. I didn't ruin my logic. If you're going to come in here and confront me about this, try doing it correctly. I made a mistake of DICTION, son. I meant to place distort there, but instead, I placed change there. You're way off. Oh, the irony.

Anyhow, It's simply not a duplicate because change and distort are two different animals. Just like similie and metaphor; A simile is a sub type of what a metaphor is, but they're TWO DIFFERENT THINGS.

GOI. You're dumb.

Originally posted by Seraphim XIII
You're wrong. I didn't ruin my logic. If you're going to come in here and confront me about this, try doing it correctly. I made a mistake of DICTION, son. I meant to place distort there, but instead, I placed change there. You're way off. Oh, the irony.

Anyhow, It's simply not a duplicate because change and distort are two different animals. Just like similie and metaphor; A simile is a sub type of what a metaphor is, but they're TWO DIFFERENT THINGS.

GOI. Originally posted by Strangelove
If you have to spend energy defending the originality of your thread, it's not original

Originally posted by Seraphim XIII
You're wrong. I didn't ruin my logic. If you're going to come in here and confront me about this, try doing it correctly. I made a mistake of DICTION, son. I meant to place distort there, but instead, I placed change there. You're way off. Oh, the irony.

Anyhow, It's simply not a duplicate because change and distort are two different animals. Just like similie and metaphor; A simile is a sub type of what a metaphor is, but they're TWO DIFFERENT THINGS.

GOI.



Can you go into one thread anywhere on this forum and not cause an argument?

Seriously.

Look :

Main Entry: distort
Part of Speech: verb
Definition: falsify
Synonyms: alter, angle, belie, bend, bias, buckle, bull, change, collapse, color, con, contort, cook, crush, curve, deceive, decline, deform, deteriorate, deviate, disfigure, doctor*, fake, fudge*, garble, gnarl, knot, lie, mangle, melt, misconstrue, misinterpret, misrepresent, misshape, pervert, phony up*, sag, scam*, slant, slump, snow*, torture, trump up*, twist, warp, whitewash*, wind, wrench, writhe

hmm