Click HERE to see this thread with all of the graphics, features, and links.

Women have weaker bones than men because of a lack of calcium.

http://img392.imageshack.us/img392/4448/demononemr0.png

I drink milk, biatzch. 13

You have a weaker mind than me because of a lack of sex. sly

sly

ORLY?

Yes.

Oh, that and http://images.killermovies.com/forums/user_sigs/1/3/customsig_68913_H4.gif

Originally posted by Barker
You have a weaker mind than me because of a lack of sex. sly
meaning none?

lookaround

i refuse to acknowledge the truth!

Originally posted by JaehSkywalker
i refuse to acknowledge the truth!
R u shur? gun2313

I's fortifyd wif calciyum.

Originally posted by Kongu Dude
R u shur? gun2313

try me.

The roof is on ice, not fire! FFS!

Black people have a higher risk of getting Type 1 Diabetes evillaugh

Originally posted by Seraphim XIII
Women have weaker bones than men because of a lack of calcium.

http://img392.imageshack.us/img392/4448/demononemr0.png

I can't drink milk.

Originally posted by Barker
Yes.

Oh, that and http://images.killermovies.com/forums/user_sigs/1/3/customsig_68913_H4.gif

Oh You! 131

Women have weaker bones and they lose calcium because they bleed monthly.

The speed of thought is about 30 m/s pitt_shifty

Originally posted by Bloigen
Speed of Poo = 0.04 m/s

Originally posted by ThePittman
The speed of thought is about 30 m/s pitt_shifty


I'd say a good 40 MPH for those behind.

sly

Originally posted by Seraphim XIII
I'd say a good 40 MPH for those behind.

sly

40mph is quicker then 30mph. And kongu dude burns at 300 degrees farenheit

Originally posted by LifeInSepia
40mph is quicker then 30mph. And kongu dude burns at 300 degrees farenheit Both are slower than 30 m/s

Originally posted by ThePittman
Both are slower than 30 m/s
http://media.urbandictionary.com/image/large/pwnt-31487.jpg

Originally posted by ThePittman
Both are slower than 30 m/s

All three are slower than 299,792,458 m/s ermm

Originally posted by AOR
All three are slower than 299,792,458 m/s ermm That is much slower than the speed of dumb

Originally posted by ThePittman
That is much slower than the speed of dumb

You have to remember such speed is being debated into existance. Only because we don't want to go through every scientific text book and correct that "there is no thing fast than light" ermm

Originally posted by LifeInSepia
40mph is quicker then 30mph. And kongu dude burns at 300 degrees farenheit

Um ... 30 m/s = 65 MPH.

My point was to say it was less and in MPH.

Originally posted by Seraphim XIII
I'd say a good 40 MPH for those behind.

sly

Fail.

65 miles per hour = 29.0576 m/s


Fail.

LOL, Edit.

Originally posted by Barker
65 miles per hour = 29.0576 m/s


Fail.
I learned rounding in grade three.

Fail.

There's a huge difference between 65 MPH and 67.11 MPH.

Originally posted by Barker
There's a huge difference between 65 MPH and 67.11 MPH.

Actually 2.11 isn't a huge difference ermm

Originally posted by Seraphim XIII
Um ... 30 m/s = 65 MPH.

My point was to say it was less and in MPH.



Fail. Actually 67.1080888... MPH

Originally posted by Barker
No.

There's a huge difference between 65 MPH and 67.11 MPH.

just to let u knowz...

65 MPH = 29.06 MPH

Roundage = 29.1

Originally posted by AOR
Actually 2.11 isn't a huge difference ermm


.9 Isn't a big difference. Ha! Ha!

FOILED.

Originally posted by AOR
Actually 2.11 isn't a huge difference ermm
If you go 65 MPH for 24 hours, you go 1560 miles.

If you go 67.11 miles for 24 hours, you go 1610.64 miles.

That's more than 70 miles. haermm

A ton of bricks weighs the same as a ton of feathers

Originally posted by Seraphim XIII
just to let u knowz...

65 = 29.06

Roundage = 29.1

I have no idea how I came up with 67.11. srug

But I'm more right than you. haermm

Originally posted by Barker
If you go 65 MPH for 24 hours, you go 1560 miles.

If you go 67.11 miles for 24 hours, you go 1610.64 miles.

That's more than 70 miles. haermm

True dat, but 2.11 isn't a hug difference. This much is true. Perhaps in the subtraction of other larger numbers you get something like 14,872,769 than that would be a hug that would be a huge difference.

That's not what what we're debating here 13

Originally posted by Barker
I have no idea how I came up with 67.11. srug

But I'm more right than you. haermm

Sure you are.

Originally posted by ThePittman
A ton of bricks weighs the same as a ton of feathers

And if a brick and a feather are dropped at the same time in a vacuum, both will land at the exact same time

Originally posted by AOR
True dat, but 2.11 isn't a hug difference. This much is true. Perhaps in the subtraction of other larger numbers you get something like 14,872,769 than that would be a hug that would be a huge difference.

That's not what what we're debating here 13
Zing. 131


hug
Originally posted by Seraphim XIII
Sure you are.
Yes.

Originally posted by AOR
True dat, but 2.11 isn't a hug difference. This much is true. Perhaps in the subtraction of other larger numbers you get something like 14,872,769 than that would be a hug that would be a huge difference.

That's not what what we're debating here 13 Well if you were flying to a different planet, would you want them to be 2.11 off on their calculations?

Originally posted by Barker
Zing. 131


hug

I wuv you vin

Originally posted by ThePittman
Well if you were flying to a different planet, would you want them to be 2.11 off on their calculations?

2.11 what? Inches, meters, light-years? The number 2.11 from zero is not a hug difference. Especially since he said that the number 2.11 not 2.11 meters/miles/light-years/etc. was a huge difference.

You allz idoits 13

Originally posted by ThePittman
Well if you were flying to a different planet, would you want them to be 2.11 off on their calculations?

The point is: No one is flying to a different planet.

Lol?

Originally posted by AOR
I wuv you vin
party34
Originally posted by Seraphim XIII
The point is: No one is flying to a different planet.

Lol?
petpet

Originally posted by Barker
party34

dance

Originally posted by AOR
2.11 what? Inches, meters, light-years? The number 2.11 from zero is not a hug difference. Especially since he said that the number 2.11 not 2.11 meters/miles/light-years/etc. was a huge difference.

You allz idoits 13 In any calculation that needed to be exact a 2.11 difference would be huge no matter the reason. Would you want you doctor giving you medicine being this far off, getting paid less or if you were taking a math test do you think your teacher would accept you being 2.11 off on your answer?

Originally posted by ThePittman
In any calculation that needed to be exact a 2.11 difference would be huge no matter the reason. Would you want you doctor giving you medicine being this far off, getting paid less or if you were taking a math test do you think your teacher would accept you being 2.11 off on your answer?

The point is: We're not taking a math test and a teacher isn't judging the answers on the test.

Lol?


A 2.11 difference in speed is not a huge difference.

You're comparing test scores and dosages of medicine to speed. Is this some joke?

Originally posted by Seraphim XIII
The point is: We're not taking a math test and a teacher isn't judging the answers on the test.

Lol?


A 2.11 difference in speed is not a huge difference.

You're comparing test scores and dosages of medicine to speed. Is this some joke? Must you make a big deal out of everything? The original problem here is that you calculated incorrectly. And somehow that evolved into a discussion of how significant the difference was between your incorrect calculation and the correct one. Regardless, you were wrong.

30 m/s=66.96 mph
65 mph=29.057 m/s

Problem solved.

Originally posted by ThePittman
In any calculation that needed to be exact a 2.11 difference would be huge no matter the reason. Would you want you doctor giving you medicine being this far off, getting paid less or if you were taking a math test do you think your teacher would accept you being 2.11 off on your answer?

Your right, but you see now your classifying the number. When you say 2.11 cc's more, or 2.11 meters more, or 2.11 lightyears more, than yes that number (in relations to the new difference found) your right is a pretty big difference. Especially if you're looking for accuracy in an answer.

However, you are chaning the face of the original debate. I say the number 2.11 from zero isn't a "huge" difference in comparison to infinity (all possible differences). Because were 2.11 may not be in meters, cc's, lightyears, or percentage, it will always be a number

13