Click HERE to see this thread with all of the graphics, features, and links.

How do you think we humen came to be, as Adam & Eve is pretty much too absurd to be true?

I believe we started out as small, molecular bacteries that evolved into fish which evolved into walking on land which then eveolved into monkeys and the caveman. How that is logically is hard to think of, but it's surely more realistic than Adam & Eve.

Originally posted by Glazier
How do you think we humen came to be, as Adam & Eve is pretty much too absurd to be true?

I believe we started out as small, molecular bacteries that evolved into fish which evolved into walking on land which then eveolved into monkeys and the caveman. How that is logically is hard to think of, but it's surely more realistic than Adam & Eve.

I agree...

darwinism. natural selection and all that. I agree as well, but if you get someone on here who is religious, they'll disagree.

Religion, sorry to say so, can NOT be used in ANY mature conversion...

It's just magiccrap...

But i have nothing against religion, i just don't wanna see it in a debate that's not religious.

Originally posted by Glazier
How do you think we humen came to be, as Adam & Eve is pretty much too absurd to be true?

I believe we started out as small, molecular bacteries that evolved into fish which evolved into walking on land which then eveolved into monkeys and the caveman. How that is logically is hard to think of, but it's surely more realistic than Adam & Eve.

You must be a sock-troll of some sorts....too funny.

Originally posted by Glazier
How do you think we humen came to be, as Adam & Eve is pretty much too absurd to be true?

I believe we started out as small, molecular bacteries that evolved into fish which evolved into walking on land which then eveolved into monkeys and the caveman. How that is logically is hard to think of, but it's surely more realistic than Adam & Eve.

There are adam and eve like figures in human history.

Originally posted by Alliance
There are adam and eve like figures in human history. True, the Bible never stated what Adam and Eve looked like. The rib thing means that Eve was made from Adam.What do you think that means?

Originally posted by Alliance
There are adam and eve like figures in human history.

at one point in the evolution of man, the reproducing population of females had been reduced to, I BELIEVE, under a dozen...

if not that low, it is something ridiculously low. Best "eve" type situation I can think of.

I tend to wonder more where those little bacteria came from.

Originally posted by Tangible God
I tend to wonder more where those little bacteria came from. Panspermia, exogenesis, acids in the primordia soup, etc.

Originally posted by Glazier
How do you think we humen came to be, as Adam & Eve is pretty much too absurd to be true?

I believe we started out as small, molecular bacteries that evolved into fish which evolved into walking on land which then eveolved into monkeys and the caveman. How that is logically is hard to think of, but it's surely more realistic than Adam & Eve.

So is the whole being a monkey that envolved into a human that is even more Absurd.Just because Adam and Eve were the first human to be on this earth does not make us all related and all that.jm

Originally posted by ADarksideJedi
Just because Adam and Eve were the first human to be on this earth does not make us all related and all that.jm Oh, my. Please correct what you just said.

What did I say?I said that it is not absurd to think that Abam and Eve were the first human on this earth and that just because of it we are related somehow.jm

Originally posted by ADarksideJedi
What did I say?I said that it is not absurd to think that Abam and Eve were the first human on this earth and that just because of it we are related somehow.jm That's not what you said. You said just because Adam and Eve were the first humans, doesn't mean we're all related. If all people are descended from two beings, then yes...yes we are all related.

I don't think it works that way at all.But I have no farther answears@Anyway got to get some sleep.Night.jm

Originally posted by ADarksideJedi
I don't think it works that way at all. Are you, or are you not, related to your birth parents?

Originally posted by ADarksideJedi
I don't think it works that way at all.But I have no farther answears@Anyway got to get some sleep.Night.jm

It does work that way....


BUT, JM is right, just because they were the first doesn't mean theywere the only ones.

Originally posted by Bardock42
It does work that way....


BUT, JM is right, just because they were the first doesn't mean theywere the only ones. Hence me saying "If all people are descended from two beings..."

To be the first means you have to be the only ones at some point.

Originally posted by Darth Macabre
"If all people are descended from two beings..."

Which is entirely impossible.

Originally posted by Adam_PoE
Which is entirely impossible. Tell that to the Bible, and all those people who believe it.

Originally posted by Darth Macabre
Tell that to the Bible, and all those people who believe it.

Like Jack Olesker.

Originally posted by Bardock42
It does work that way....


BUT, JM is right, just because they were the first doesn't mean they were the only ones.

Hey you argee with me.Please call me Jackie ok?JM

Without reading anything but the title of the thread, I am certain this has nothing to do with philosophy.

Originally posted by Darth Macabre
Are you, or are you not, related to your birth parents? pimp

Is someone going to explain how this is not possible? All these answers and yet no one explaining themselves.

Originally posted by ADarksideJedi
Hey you argee with me.Please call me Jackie ok?JM

No

Exclaim to yourself first then come back and exclaim it back!jm