Father Says Sons Traumatized by Lesbian Library Book

Text-only Version: Click HERE to see this thread with all of the graphics, features, and links.



Adam_PoE

StyleTime
Is Adams upset because it's a lesbian sex book, or is he upset because it's a lesbian sex book?

ragesRemorse
probably because it wasnt hustler

King Kandy
Originally posted by StyleTime
Is Adams upset because it's a lesbian sex book, or is he upset because it's a lesbian sex book?
I wondered that too.

Schecter
lolz your sons are gay

poetic justice

Puzzle
How can a 14 year old boy or a 16 year old boy be traumatized by a lesbian sex book? I prayed of finding shit like that when I was their ages.

Alliance
OMG I DEMAND JUSTICE!

CALL THE JUSTICE LEAGUE!

Schecter
Originally posted by Puzzle
How can a 14 year old boy or a 16 year old boy be traumatized by a lesbian sex book? I prayed of finding shit like that when I was their ages.

i was whacking off like a thoroughbred to hustler mags at 14. wtf. this guy is socially dooming these poor kids for like....for $20,000 which they'll likely never see.

Puzzle
Originally posted by Schecter
i was whacking off like a thoroughbred to hustler mags at 14. wtf. this guy is socially dooming these poor kids for like....for $20,000 which they'll likely never see.

It'll go toward a college education...until he realizes what all goes on at college.

Schecter
Originally posted by Puzzle
It'll go toward a college education...until he realizes what all goes on at college.

more like
"look kids, dad got a porsche! eek!"

Puzzle
Originally posted by Schecter
more like
"look kids, dad got a porsche! eek!"

A $20,000 Porsche? Where can I get one? eek!

Darth Macabre
Originally posted by Puzzle
How can a 14 year old boy or a 16 year old boy be traumatized by a lesbian sex book? I prayed of finding shit like that when I was their ages. My question is how two 14 and 16 year olds can lose sleep over this. I mean, man, have they lived under a rock all their lives?

Schecter
Originally posted by Puzzle
A $20,000 Porsche? Where can I get one? eek!

do the math on $20,000 down.
plus i never said 'new' stick out tongue
http://www.porsche.com/usa/pre-owned-vehicles/search/

win doped

xmarksthespot
Originally posted by Darth Macabre
My question is how two 14 and 16 year olds can lose sleep over this. It's actually pretty obvious. Think about it. herbwank

BackFire
Clearly the father has a confusion of terms.

Obviously, tramatized means turned on.

Symmetric Chaos
Originally posted by Puzzle
How can a 14 year old boy or a 16 year old boy be traumatized by a lesbian sex book? I prayed of finding shit like that when I was their ages.

Maybe they're gay? Either that or they're incredible sheltered.

Puzzle
Originally posted by Schecter
do the math on $20,000 down.
plus i never said 'new' stick out tongue
http://www.porsche.com/usa/pre-owned-vehicles/search/

win doped

Who the hell would buy a preowned Porsche? oh

Schecter
ninja

Puzzle
Originally posted by Schecter
ninja

*points in horror* oh

Darth Macabre
Originally posted by xmarksthespot
It's actually pretty obvious. Think about it. herbwank laughing That was gold.

Robtard
Xmarksthespot... That 'smilie' was gold.

*Over 18 to read please.

All I see is a filthy leech trying to make a quick buck. Bullshit on his sons losing sleep and being traumatized, think about it, if they were that traumatized, why did they keep on reading? I doubt the sex scene started with *"fist in pussy", they obviously had to read until it got explicit and then keep on reading.

Starhawk
Originally posted by Adam_PoE


Now see, In Canada, we have eliminated nuisance law suits like this.

xmarksthespot
roll eyes (sarcastic)

Robtard
Originally posted by Starhawk
Now see, In Canada, we have eliminated nuisance law suits like this.
I heard in Canada, they eliminated cancer and homelessness in one day.

Darth Macabre
Originally posted by Robtard
I heard in Canada, they eliminated cancer and homelessness in one day. And then free will the day after that.

xmarksthespot
I heard they reversed HIV into a virus that boosts your immune system to the point where you have superstrength and telepathy.

Robtard
They can't fly like the Chinese though... Maybe someday, maybe someday...

Edit, you gave me an idea though, they should just reverse lesbienism, that way they never have to worry about puberty age boys being traumatized due to reading or seeing pictures of hot female love.

Puzzle
I heard that in Canada even the poorest of folks have a Rolex.

xmarksthespot
And that Rolex is really a tesseract, that when fully unfolded is filled with gold and diamonds. And everybody can go in and have sexy time.

Darth Macabre
Originally posted by xmarksthespot
I heard they reversed HIV into a virus that boosts your immune system to the point where you have superstrength and telepathy. That's nothing...I heard they have a secret army of He-Men just waiting to strike. They, of course, 'manufactored' these He-Men by using the energy they would use for "nuisance suits" as a supply for their Prince Adams to call for.

Symmetric Chaos
Originally posted by xmarksthespot
And that Rolex is really a tesseract, that when fully unfolded is filled with gold and diamonds. And everybody can go in and have sexy time.

oh

Alliance
I should move to Canadia.

Starhawk
What I mean is that Law Suits like this are treated as follows:

1. Mediation: The two parties get together and discuss the legitimacy of the case and seek a resolution.

2. Arbitration: Both parties must select a third party to give their opinion on the case.

3. Pretrial Judge: An informal court appearance where a Pretrial judge (Can be a justice of the peace or something at that level) Where a ruling is made. The 2 parties have the option of rejecting the ruling and proceeding to civil court. However if the Court Judge has the same ruling as the Pretrial judge, the party that rejected the Pretrial judges ruling is penalized.

4. Civil Court

Now keep in mind steps 1-3 are paid for by the 2 parties and not the tax payers.

The other thing they have done is apportion blame. How this works is, say we use the example of someone slipping on a patch of ice on your property and suing you. Well the court actually determines the % of fault of the plaintiff and the defendant and apportions the responsibility. How this works is, say you were the plaintiff and they ruled in your favor, but determined you were about 25% at fault. You would only get 75% of your settlement.

These steps have dramatically reduced court wait time, costs, and frivolous law suits. Now if Canada can only fix up it's pathetic criminal system as well.

Lana
Originally posted by Alliance
I should move to Canadia.

Or take it over happy

Symmetric Chaos
Originally posted by Alliance
I should move to Canadia.

You don't want to do that. The US is just about ready to invade them.

Devil King
Clearly, the point is that homosexuality is a sueable offense.

But I'm not into talking points.

The over riding factor is that this guy wants money for no reason on top of the fact that his kid learned what homosexuality is. But the real factor here is parental responsability. What was this guy doing when his kids were checking out lesbian liturature from the library? Was he perhaps doing the same thing he's been doing while his kid is jerking off to lesbian porn or learning about the erection from his friends at school?

so, what is parental responsability but a parent trying to prevent his or her kid from figuring out the world in the same manner than he did? And what kind of guilt is that? Pretty ****ing deep if you ask me. And that kind of shit only comes from parents. And what is all that but the parent trying to blame the world for his or her problems? "I learned about boners from my classmate and that's why I'm gay!" It's bullshit.

There are certain measures of humanity that we can't blame on someone else. It's just a fact.

On top of all that, why would you expect a book about lesbian love NOT to be in a library? Maybe for the same reasons 99% of the American public can't pronounce the word Library correctly. HELLO! THERE ARE "R"s IN THE WORD!

Robtard
Originally posted by xmarksthespot
And that Rolex is really a tesseract, that when fully unfolded is filled with gold and diamonds. And everybody can go in and have sexy time.

How do they have a sexy time though... Canadians are truly a marvel to behold...

http://www.math.harvard.edu/archive/21b_fall_03/4dcube/4dcube.gif

Robtard
Originally posted by Starhawk
What I mean is that Law Suits like this are treated as follows:

1. Mediation: The two parties get together and discuss the legitimacy of the case and seek a resolution.

2. Arbitration: Both parties must select a third party to give their opinion on the case.

3. Pretrial Judge: An informal court appearance where a Pretrial judge (Can be a justice of the peace or something at that level) Where a ruling is made. The 2 parties have the option of rejecting the ruling and proceeding to civil court. However if the Court Judge has the same ruling as the Pretrial judge, the party that rejected the Pretrial judges ruling is penalized.

4. Civil Court

Now keep in mind steps 1-3 are paid for by the 2 parties and not the tax payers.

The other thing they have done is apportion blame. How this works is, say we use the example of someone slipping on a patch of ice on your property and suing you. Well the court actually determines the % of fault of the plaintiff and the defendant and apportions the responsibility. How this works is, say you were the plaintiff and they ruled in your favor, but determined you were about 25% at fault. You would only get 75% of your settlement.

These steps have dramatically reduced court wait time, costs, and frivolous law suits. Now if Canada can only fix up it's pathetic criminal system as well.

You do realized that a ruling has yet to be made, the judge could very well throw it and and send the money grubbing plaintiff home on his ass right?

Starhawk
Originally posted by Robtard
You do realized that a ruling has yet to be made, the judge could very well throw it and and send the money grubbing plaintiff home on his ass right?

I know that. I was just explaining why it would never be successful up here.

xmarksthespot
Originally posted by Lana
Or take it over happy You'd never succeed in doing that. Everyone there can snikt lightsabre claws from their hands.

Darth Macabre
Originally posted by Devil King
On top of all that, why would you expect a book about lesbian love NOT to be in a library? Maybe for the same reasons 99% of the American public can't pronounce the word Library correctly. HELLO! THERE'S AN "R" IN THE WORD! Hey, it could be worse; like America could have a President who says Nukular instead of Nuclear.....Oh, wait. sad

Devil King
Originally posted by Starhawk
up here.

I believe the term you're looking for is "over here".

Robtard
Originally posted by Starhawk
I know that. I was just explaining why it would never be successful up here.

Never is highly doubtful.

Starhawk
Originally posted by Robtard
Never is highly doubtful.

Almost, it really has done a terrific job of fixing the civil court system, our criminal system is still a joke though.

Robtard
Originally posted by Starhawk
Almost, it really has done a terrific job of fixing the civil court system, our criminal system is still a joke though.

Well, "almost" is a far cry from "never" and as noted, this could easily be thrown out 'down here' in back-ass, inferior to Canada 'Ameer-Ri-KA'.

Puzzle
Originally posted by Robtard
How do they have a sexy time though... Canadians are truly a marvel to behold...

http://www.math.harvard.edu/archive/21b_fall_03/4dcube/4dcube.gif

That pic is tripping me out. shock

Robtard
Originally posted by Puzzle
That pic is tripping me out. shock

Focus intently on only one bar and follow only it as it cycles, it gets less chaotic. You can see it's fairly simple and nothing more than "squares" moving in circles.

Mišt
Originally posted by Darth Macabre
My question is how two 14 and 16 year olds can lose sleep over this. I mean, man, have they lived under a rock all their lives?

"Any effort to reinstate the book will be met with legal action and protests from the Christian community," Adams stated in an email to the Morning News newspaper.

They're just religious nut jobs..

Devil King

Robtard
Originally posted by Devil King
And in many cases, that has become a stand-in for being an American citizen.

As further proof to back that unfortunate truth, how many times have we heard "America IS a Christian nation!" ranted.

Starhawk
Well you guys have let religion take over, many of your political policies. I highly doubt anyone could get elected in America if they aren't a religious person. Truth be told I'm surprised prayer is still not allowed in your public school system.

Robtard
Originally posted by Starhawk
Well you guys have let religion take over, many of your political policies. I highly doubt anyone could get elected in America if they aren't a religious person. Truth be told I'm surprised prayer is still not allowed in your public school system.

Why do we "have" to let religion take over, please do tell? Infact, letting religion take over would equate to a Theocracy and that would render the U.S. Constitution and they Bill of Rights useless.

What constitutes as a "religious person" in your book, because saying "I'm religious" and being religious are two entirely different animals.

Starhawk
Originally posted by Robtard
Why do we "have" to let religion take over, please do tell? Infact, letting religion take over would equate to a Theocracy and that would render the U.S. Constitution and they Bill of Rights useless.

What constitutes as a "religious person" in your book, because saying "I'm religious" and being religious are two entirely different animals.

What I mean is, you have banned stem cell research because the Religious right had issues about where the stem cells came from, they won't institute gay marriage also because of the Religious right.

Also, what I mean about politicians is, if one openly said they did not go to church or belong to a Religious denomination, they would not get elected in the US.

FeceMan
I'd be traumatized if I saw Rosie O having sex.

Robtard
Originally posted by Starhawk
What I mean is, you have banned stem cell research because the Religious right had issues about where the stem cells came from, they won't institute gay marriage also because of the Religious right.

Also, what I mean about politicians is, if one openly said they did not go to church or belong to a Religious denomination, they would not get elected in the US.

We have a two party system; one party doesn't get everything they want. Stem Cell isn't banned, it just can't be government funded; the private sector can still research.

Okay... That is pretty much true in most countries, your own PM Paul Martin is a Roman Catholic no?

Robtard
Originally posted by FeceMan
I'd be traumatized if I saw Rosie O having sex.

I think most lesbians would be traumatized as well.

Starhawk
Originally posted by Robtard
We have a two party system; one party does get everything they want.

Okay... That is pretty much true in most countries, your own PM Paul Martin is a Roman Catholic no?

Not sure, see its not something Canadians care about really when choosing a leader.

Robtard
Originally posted by Starhawk
Not sure, see its not something Canadians care about really when choosing a leader.

Yeah for Canada, you have proved beyond the shadow of a doubt that Canada kicks ass and America is shit.

Personally, I take everything you say with a grain of salt.

Starhawk
You take this too personally, Canada has it's issues as well.

- Pathetic Criminal Justice system
- Lackluster Social Policies.
- An inability to deal with cultural problems. (Quebec, natives)
- Political Corruption (Sponsorship scandal, The McGuinty Government)

Just don't take it too personally, learn to accept the flaws of your country and be able to laugh at yourselves.

StyleTime
Originally posted by Starhawk
Just don't take it too personally, learn to accept the flaws of your country and be able to laugh at yourselves.
He appears to recognize the flaws just fine.
Originally posted by Robtard
As further proof to back that unfortunate truth, how many times have we heard "America IS a Christian nation!" ranted.

Starhawk, Robtard is probably just weary of your constant reminders of how we Americans are supposedly clueless compared to Canadians.

Starhawk
Well then its a good thing I never said anything like that.

I pointed out flaws in your country, the same way I point out the ones in mine. The best way to enact and effect change in your nation is to get over personal pride and talk about the serious issues. Flag waving looks good on TV and people love to see their leaders do it, but it takes more to change our countries for the better.

FeceMan
Go jack off to thoughts of Harry and Draco Malfoy ****ing in the shower.

kthxbai

Starhawk
Originally posted by FeceMan
Go jack off to thoughts of Harry and Draco Malfoy ****ing in the shower.

kthxbai

Thank you for that, you should try the OTF, it's more your speed.

FeceMan
Originally posted by Starhawk
Thank you for that, you should try the OTF, it's more your speed.
No, see, by saying that, I was implying that the OTF was more your speed.

ROFLCOPTERWTFBBQPWNEDLOLOLOLZORZ

Rogue Jedi
it amuses me when members think they can tell others where to go, where to post.

Darth Macabre
Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
it amuses me when members think they can tell others where to go, where to post. We're not here to amuse you. Get out of this thread, and go post in the OTF.



no expression stick out tongue

Rogue Jedi
think i'll stay a bit. and whether you are trying to or not, you are amusing me. it is laughable.

Darth Macabre
Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
think i'll stay a bit. and whether you are trying to or not, you are amusing me. it is laughable. Laughable as in "haha funny" or laughable as in "The bad news Bears"?

Rogue Jedi
ever seen "the big lebowski?"

lord xyz
Originally posted by Alliance
OMG I DEMAND JUSTICE!

CALL THE JUSTICE LEAGUE! Wonder Woman and Hawk Girl are gay, I saw it on the internet!

Rogue Jedi
link? shifty

ADarksideJedi
I argee with the father through the father should had been with him at that time.Those sort of books should be ban from Librarys.No sex sort of book should be there at all.jm

GCG
Originally posted by ADarksideJedi
I argee with the father through the father should had been with him at that time.Those sort of books should be ban from Librarys.No sex sort of book should be there at all.jm

Yes and verbal diarrhae should be outlawed as well.

Bardock42
Originally posted by Darth Macabre
laughing That was gold. Actually it was pretty obvious.

Starhawk
Originally posted by ADarksideJedi
I argee with the father through the father should had been with him at that time.Those sort of books should be ban from Librarys.No sex sort of book should be there at all.jm

Okay if you get to have that book banned, I would like any books with religious content banned, anything preaching right wing ideology, anything written by Ann Coulter etc etc..... A public library is there so everyone can go and enjoy the books within. If a parent does not want their child to be exposed to certain books then it is their job to monitor that child and make sure it does not happen. You know I always get so entertained by you conservatives who want the government to stay out of your lives except for when it involves matters you object to.

grey fox

chithappens
Originally posted by Schecter
lolz your sons are gay

poetic justice

'Nuff said

JacopeX
How does nudity affect a child?

It never does. wink

Schecter
Originally posted by FeceMan
Go jack off to thoughts of Harry and Draco Malfoy ****ing in the shower.

kthxbai

thats hot

Dreampanther
American civil lawsuits are the laughing stock of the entire world.

Liebeck v. McDonald's Restaurants, a.k.a. the "McDonald's coffee case", is a well-known product liability lawsuit that became a flashpoint in the debate in the U.S. over tort reform after a jury awarded $2.9 million to a woman who burned herself with hot coffee. The trial judge reduced the total award to $640,000, and the parties settled for a confidential amount before an appeal was decided. The case entered popular understanding as an example of frivolous litigation.

Alliance
Originally posted by Dreampanther
American civil lawsuits are the laughing stock of the entire world.

Pretty Much.

RocasAtoll
You're forgetting the case where a burglar fell through his victim's skylight and cut his leg on a kitchen knife, sued the woman, and won.

Robtard
Originally posted by RocasAtoll
You're forgetting the case where a burglar fell through his victim's skylight and cut his leg on a kitchen knife, sued the woman, and won.

Wasn't something like that in "Liar Liar"; I think it might also be an urban legend, I could be wrong though.

Mindship

FeceMan
ROFL.

EDIT: I assume that Stud magazine is ghey sexxsorz.

inimalist

Starhawk
Originally posted by Dreampanther
American civil lawsuits are the laughing stock of the entire world.

Liebeck v. McDonald's Restaurants, a.k.a. the "McDonald's coffee case", is a well-known product liability lawsuit that became a flashpoint in the debate in the U.S. over tort reform after a jury awarded $2.9 million to a woman who burned herself with hot coffee. The trial judge reduced the total award to $640,000, and the parties settled for a confidential amount before an appeal was decided. The case entered popular understanding as an example of frivolous litigation.

This is what we are trying to do up in Canada to prevent Law Suits like this.



You think the American civil system is in bad shape? The Canadian criminal justice system is a mockery.

Robtard
LOL @ Mindships article.

Magee
LMFAO that sounds like some crappy twist at the end of a movie... Made me laugh.

RocasAtoll
Originally posted by Robtard
Wasn't something like that in "Liar Liar"; I think it might also be an urban legend, I could be wrong though.

I'm pretty sure it happened, but I can't find an article about it.

Starhawk
This whole thing makes me laugh. I mean if the father doesn't let the kid read about gay people, when the kid grows up, how's he going to know what the father wants him to hate?

Bardiel13
Originally posted by Mindship
Article by The Associated Press

Bentonville, Arkansas —The Bentonville, Arkansas man, Earl "Give It To Me" Adams, who only days before had demanded the city pay him $20,000 "for the pain and suffering of his sons after they discovered a book on lesbian sex in their local library," was arrested yesterday on assorted charges, including child endangerment.

Adams was discovered trying to slip into the city's library another book on lesbian sex, entitled The Joy of Grinding, by a different author. Subsequent investigation revealed that this book had been "published" by Adams himself, on his computer, because he later admitted, "I meant to ask for $30,000."

When police searched Adams' home for other material, they discovered several issues of Stud magazine under the boys' beds.

Is that a joke?

Rogue Jedi
probably not. people will sue you for anything today.

chithappens

Rogue Jedi
"Stud".......Is that a gay mens mag?

FeceMan
Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
"Stud".......Is that a gay mens mag?
That's what I thought, but I think it's a straight porno mag.

Rogue Jedi
not my cup of tea. the porn mag part, not the straight part.

office jesus
Originally posted by Darth Macabre
Hey, it could be worse; like America could have a President who says Nukular instead of Nuclear.....Oh, wait. sad

laughing out loud laughing out loud

office jesus

Starhawk
I think the schools in North America should have a class that teaches people that gays are just a figment of their imagination and call it the "Hey, your a dumb ass small minded hick" class. Homophobia is simply a reflection of a person's insecurity in their own sexuality.

FeceMan
Originally posted by Starhawk
I think the schools in North America should have a class that teaches people that gays are just a figment of their imagination and call it the "Hey, your a dumb ass small minded hick" class. Homophobia is simply a reflection of a person's insecurity in their own sexuality.
You're a retard.

Starhawk
Originally posted by FeceMan
You're a retard.

Seriously, thats the best response you could come up with?

FeceMan
Originally posted by Starhawk
Seriously, thats the best response you could come up with?
As is often the case, simpler is better. And, in this case, it happens to be accurate, too.

Starhawk
Originally posted by FeceMan
As is often the case, simpler is better. And, in this case, it happens to be accurate, too.

LOL, I think you just summed up how homophobics feel about intellectualism.

FeceMan
Originally posted by Starhawk
LOL, I think you just summed up how homophobics feel about intellectualism.
+1 brain turd for the day.

Starhawk
Originally posted by FeceMan
+1 brain turd for the day.

Was that supposed to make any kind of sense at all?

FeceMan
Originally posted by Starhawk
Was that supposed to make any kind of sense at all?
+2 brain turds for the day.

Want to go for three?

Starhawk
Originally posted by FeceMan
+2 brain turds for the day.

Want to go for three?

Since they are meaningless and make no sense feel free. Just so I know, do you plan to bring up any intellectual points at all?

Rogue Jedi
Originally posted by FeceMan
You're a retard.
wny dont the two of you just get married already? wink

Starhawk
Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
wny dont the two of you just get married already? wink

Why not add something intellectual to the discussion?

Alpha Centauri
He doesn't.

He does his OTF thing in the GDF so he feels less like an OTFer, it's an RJ thing.

Anyway: Does anyone here actually have a problem with lesbians?

-AC

Robtard
I certainly don't...
http://imagecache2.allposters.com/images/pic/10P/PO694~Women-Kissing-Posters.jpg

Starhawk
Originally posted by Alpha Centauri
Does anyone here actually have a problem with lesbians?

-AC

There isn't enough videos of them out there?

Alpha Centauri
I dare say this has become a very tongue-in-cheek thread.

Like lesbians.

-AC

Robtard
Originally posted by Starhawk
There isn't enough videos of them out there?

My, my counselor, dare I say:
Originally posted by Starhawk
Again this is not the OTF, do you have anything more intelligent to add?

Starhawk
The difference is, this is a nonsense case by a hypocritical religious nut. There is nothing but humor here.

Robtard
Originally posted by Starhawk
The difference is, this is a nonsense case by a hypocritical religious nut. There is nothing but humor here.

I see, you get to decide when the GDF should be humorous and when it shouldn't, you ass.

Starhawk
Originally posted by Robtard
I see, you get to decide when the GDF should be humorous and when it shouldn't, you ass.

No any decent person would never find children being abused funny.

Rogue Jedi
what about kicking midgets down stairs? is that funny?

Starhawk
Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
what about kicking midgets down stairs? is that funny?

No, of course not.

Robtard
Originally posted by Starhawk
No any decent person would never find children being abused funny.

As noted repeatedly, NO ONE found it factually funny, get that through your skull.

It's about time you stepped down and retied that moral soapbox you so lovely preach from, otherwise it will just get kicked out from under and you'll end up on your ass .

Rogue Jedi
Originally posted by Alpha Centauri
He doesn't.

He does his OTF thing in the GDF so he feels less like an OTFer, it's an RJ thing.

Anyway: Does anyone here actually have a problem with lesbians?

-AC
so they can talk about brain turds and it's all fine? funny how that rule applies to some, not all.

Alpha Centauri
The difference is that those people have contributed far more for far longer, to the GDF, than you.

You only showed up when people started questioning why you dwelled in the OTF, and you've not really contributed much beyond the odd chip-in, to any thread. The odd debate, maybe.

Anyway, I've been here and said this to you before, no need for us to go over it again.

-AC

Rogue Jedi
be careful of that chip on your shoulder.

Alpha Centauri
You let me worry about me, just concentrate on formulating those posts chock full of on topic discussion.

Anyway; What would be the reactions of anyone here who's children found a lesbian book or article?

-AC

Rogue Jedi
Originally posted by Alpha Centauri
You let me worry about me, just concentrate on formulating those posts chock full of on topic discussion.

Anyway; What would be the reactions of anyone here who's children found a lesbian book or article?

-AC
in a library? well, with all the shit on TV nowadays (the L word, real sex, yadayadayada) i would just shrug it off. at least they didn't find a used hypodermic needle in their school lunch.

Alpha Centauri
I would personally explain it, what it means, and that it's ok.

That's me.

-AC

Rogue Jedi
depends on how old they are, now that i think about it. if i have already had "the talk" with them, i'd shrug it off. if not? well, time for a sit down powpow about boobies and teetees.

Alpha Centauri
Nobody is saying you have to go in depth about cunnilingus to an 8 year old, but a simple; "Sometimes girls like other girls, like boys like girls, there's people who will tell you this is wrong, but it's not.".

If you explain it to a kid as simply as that, chances are they'll grow up with the best possible outlook on homosexuality; "They like the same sex, so?".

-AC

Starhawk
Originally posted by Robtard
As noted repeatedly, NO ONE found it factually funny, get that through your skull.

It's about time you stepped down and retied that moral soapbox you so lovely preach from, otherwise it will just get kicked out from under and you'll end up on your ass .

The topic of this thread is funny. The topic in the other thread is not. Most mature people can make the distinction.

Robtard
Originally posted by Starhawk
The topic of this thread is funny. The topic in the other thread is not. Most mature people can make the distinction.

Failed again.

Starhawk
Originally posted by Robtard
Failed again.

Sorry I didn't quite get that seeing as how you provided no counter argument nor proof of anything.

Schecter
no, he's right. you fail.

in this man's opinion his children were being perverted. yet you think perversion of children is funny, it seems, so long as in YOUR opinion its a false claim.

you fail so so hard, yet im sure you wont admit your hypocrisy. shame on you. laughing at children being corrupted and perverted. lauging at their suffering as well as the father's. shame on you!!!! i think someone who laughs at this is sick.

Robtard
Originally posted by Starhawk
Sorry I didn't quite get that seeing as how you provided no counter argument nor proof of anything.

Let's see, you take it upon yourself to critize people for foolish reasons and your only defense is "The GDF is for serious debate ", while simultaneously making jokes in the GDF; on top of that, you take it upon yourself to state as law what can be joked about and what can't. YOU FAIL.

Starhawk
Originally posted by Schecter
no, he's right. you fail.

in this man's opinion his children were being perverted. yet you think perversion of children is funny, it seems, so long as in YOUR opinion its a false claim.

you fail so so hard, yet im sure you wont admit your hypocrisy. shame on you. laughing at children being corrupted and perverted. lauging at their suffering as well as the father's. shame on you!!!! i think someone who laughs at this is sick.

I think the man's small minded reaction was funny yes. And they were not being corrupted, there is nothing wrong with homosexual culture. The father was not suffering as was later exposed.

Schecter
Originally posted by Starhawk
I think the man's small minded reaction was funny yes. And they were not being corrupted, there is nothing wrong with homosexual culture. The father was not suffering as was later exposed.

in your opinion. since they are legally children and the father has the right to enforce his own beliefs (as you pointed out) its clear that his rights were infringed upon and according to his beliefs as well as those of many others, his children were corrupted and perverted.


such a hypocrite. when your OPINION is that its not valid, a family's suffering is irrelevant, right?

Starhawk
Originally posted by Schecter
in your opinion. since they are legally children and the father has the right to enforce his own beliefs (as you pointed out) its clear that his rights were infringed upon and according to his beliefs as well as those of many others, his children were corrupted and perverted.


such a hypocrite. when your OPINION is that its not valid, a family's suffering is irrelevant, right?

Still he doesn't have the right to expect the state to eliminate the books or control the content of a public library. It may be the father's right to teach small minded ideals. But it is also his responsibility to make sure his children are exposed to the things he believes in. The state is not at fault and considering the porn stash the cops found I do find the situation funny.

Devil King
Originally posted by Starhawk
there is nothing wrong with homosexual culture.

That's because it doesn't exist.

Schecter
lol i missed that one.

Starhawk
Originally posted by Devil King
That's because it doesn't exist.

Are you being serious? If so your wrong.

Schecter
LOL!!!!!!!!!!!

Starhawk
Originally posted by Schecter
LOL!!!!!!!!!!!

Once again, thank you for proving my point.

Schecter
what, that you think you know everything? go on you homophobic stereotyper, describe the "gay culture". take notes devil king, you're supposed to be up to speed with this.

Devil King
Originally posted by Starhawk
Are you being serious? If so your wrong.

Just because you have a stereotypical definition of how gays live and who they are, doesn't mean there is such a thing as gay culture.

Schecter
Originally posted by Devil King
Just because you have a stereotypical definition of how gays live and who they are, doesn't mean there is such a thing as gay culture.


so....do you have your own christmas....kinda like quanza?

Starhawk
Originally posted by Schecter
what, that you think you know everything? go on you homophobic streotyper, describe the "gay culture". take notes devil king, you're supposed to be up to speed with this.

I never called him a homopobe. Merely they do have a culture, types of music, clothing, traditions. It's as much of a culture as the hip/hop rap culture.

And I never said I know everything, merely that I am well-educated and intellectual.

Schecter
Originally posted by Starhawk
I never called him a homopobe. Merely they do have a culture, types of music, clothing, traditions. It's as much of a culture as the hip/hop rap culture.

And I never said I know everything, merely that I am well-educated and intellectual.

LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!(x infinity)

well done dude


EL OH ****ING EL!!! laughing out loud

Starhawk
Originally posted by Schecter
LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!(x infinity)

well done dude


EL OH ****ING EL!!! laughing out loud

Well that ment nothing. Seriously the OTF is calling you....

Robtard
Originally posted by Devil King
Just because you have a stereotypical definition of how gays live and who they are, doesn't mean there is such a thing as gay culture.

Sure there is, the Gay Empire has existed for eons and it's a little known fact, it is 'they' who came up with the idea of what we know to be the "Roman Arch" and not the Romans.

Schecter
it means you are an ignorant and homophic clown whos insisting that because someone is oriented toward the same sex, they have a seperate culture. that is too ignorant to address and i feel dirty in doing so. you FAIL so hard here that read on the rectorscale in china. thats all you do is spew out your opinion as fact and call yourself an "intellectual" when really all i see is a know-it-all pompous e-clown.

<< THERE IS MORE FROM THIS THREAD HERE >>