Prince of Persia: The Sands of Time

Text-only Version: Click HERE to see this thread with all of the graphics, features, and links.



lordofwar

exanda kane
Yay Micheal Bay confused

exanda kane
Jake Gyllenhall has been cast as the Prince according to Empire by way of Variety. Despite various rumours about the casting, and a firm denial from Disney, he has now been cast - as a Persian.

For people who do not know, Prince of Persia is a successful (I'm judging by this being a Bruckheimer production akin to Pirates) videogame trilogy that - even for a sporadic gameplayer like me - a good bunch of fun. As said, Jerry Bruckheimer has the rights, Disney are behind it, and they have stated their intentions to build a franchise similar to Pirates of the Carribbean.

Gemma Arteton has been cast as a rival Princess who aids the Prince.

Gyllenhall is a fine actor, but I can't help but be disappointed, if not suprised, that Disney cast a caucasian Westerner and not a more arabic, and therefore risque choice, fellow. There's been some fine films come out of the former Persian states in the last ten years - and a wealth of work before that too - and it's a shame that a big coorporation can come in with an A-list actor without regard for the regions cinematic heritage.

jaden101
that combination of words never fails to make me cringe....it basically means "we're not in it for the art....we're in it for the money"

quite sad really

exanda kane
Doesn't matter. You've got to take your connosieur beret off occasionally and just enjoy the ride.

jaden101
doubt i will...it'll be total shit...thems the rules

exanda kane
It'll be pure, unadulterated, enjoyable shite.

BruceSkywalker
As long she is in skimpy clothing and a decent story, this may be a good film

BruceSkywalker
Jake as the Prince...


http://www.comingsoon.net/news/movienews.php?id=47872

The j0keR
He looks like a caveman.

Kazenji
Micheal bay to direct it

what the **** are you sure thats right ?

according to imdb and many other sites its Mike Newell.

The j0keR
It is Mike Newell. He probably got confused with Jerry Bruckheimer, since they have worked together and their movies share styles sometimes.

Kazenji
I like the look of the prince looks almost like him in the games.

Blax_Hydralisk
I thought the Prince was a bit leaner. I haven't played PoP in awhile though.

Mairuzu
Sigh...

Almighty Bauer
Originally posted by The j0keR
He looks like a caveman.
Don't you realise that that's what all Arabic princes looked like back in the 6th century? roll eyes (sarcastic)

Kazenji
UUnoO17ZJgM

they've obvisouly changed the plot......Why is it so hard for hollywood to just follow the story to the game.

siriuswriter
Uuummm.... he looks almost exactly like Orlando Bloom as Will Turner, except Jake has more chest hair and actually gets the growly thing.

MildPossession
As much as I like JG, he looks terribly miscast, like Orlando Bloom in Troy...

siriuswriter
Originally posted by MildPossession
As much as I like JG, he looks terribly miscast, like Orlando Bloom in Troy...

oh god, i know. i just want to shout through the tv :

"YOU'RE SUPPOSED TO BE A HANDSOME TROJAN MAN!!! GROW SOME CHEST HAIR!!! START WORKING OUT!!! MEAT AND POTATOES!!!"

but the tv never listens to me.

"OH, AND TRY TO NOT LOOK LIKE A GIRL WITH YOUR HAIR TIED BACK!!"

*rrr*

jaden101
Yeah...Instead othe meat and potatoes he looks like he's been gorging on meat and 2 veg.

BruceSkywalker
images from the movie...

http://www.empireonline.com/news/story.asp?NID=25420

-Pr-
Ok, i did two searches for this, and couldn't find anything, so my bad if we have one already...

Anyways:

Preview:

UUnoO17ZJgM

Images:

http://host.trivialbeing.org/up/small/prince-of-persia-20090723-prince-poster.jpg

http://host.trivialbeing.org/up/small/prince-of-persia-20090723-arterton-poster-eyes.jpg

http://host.trivialbeing.org/up/small/prince-of-persia-20090723-ben-kingsley.jpg



thoughts?

jinXed by JaNx
them people don't look persian

BruceSkywalker
this does look pretty good, but i will pass judgment after i see it

Impediment
Brokeback Prince of Persia.

Kazenji
Originally posted by -Pr-
Ok, i did two searches for this, and couldn't find anything, so my bad if we have one already...


http://www.killermovies.com/forums/showthread.php?s=&threadid=449217&highlight=title%3A%28Prince%29+forumid%3A2

Bicnarok
Originally posted by jinXed by JaNx
them people don't look persian

I agree, no similarity whatsoever with adjhimadingydad or whatever the Iranian presidents calledsmile

Peach
Originally posted by jinXed by JaNx
them people don't look persian

Nor do they in the games, really, so.

I'm more annoyed that they actually gave the Prince a name. He's just the Prince, damnit.

Mechner's involved and worked on the script, so hopefully they can't screw it up too badly.

-Pr-
Originally posted by Kazenji
http://www.killermovies.com/forums/showthread.php?s=&threadid=449217&highlight=title%3A%28Prince%29+forumid%3A2

ok, that's just weird.

Nemesis X
Disney making a Prince of Persia movie? This is either good or bad.

NemeBro
Gyllenhaal buffed up and looking masculine?

God save us all.

Nemesis X
I wonder how good this movie would be if the director for Pirates of the Caribbean was directing this.

NemeBro
Wut.

No really, where did that come from? no expression

Nemesis X
Originally posted by NemeBro
Wut.

No really, where did that come from? no expression

To tell you the truth, I have no idea. no expression

BruceSkywalker
First Trailer

MildPossession
Yeah saw it earlier today, it looks fun and JG in muscle mode again. smile

And who cares if they don't look like they're Persian or whatever, it's based on a video game with supernatural elements from what I can remember(last time I played a Prince of Persia game was in the early 90s), not a documentary/historical genre film...

Blinky
Disney... that's it --- you know it'll be shit.

One cliche' happy ending coming up.

HAHAHAHA - At Ben Kingsley trying to look evil/bad-ass.

Neo_Version 7
Is this Disney's attempt at a new franchise on par with The Pirates of the Carribean series? Unless there's a break-out character like Captain Jack Sparrow, I do not see it happening.

He does not need a name. He is just the prince.

Kazenji
Seems like they changed the story.....................what else is new with these video game movies.

SnakeEyes
Looks pretty shitty. Might be fun though.

AndrewJose
Can be good ,but i do not think they will keep the power of game in movie.

island-is-stone
I just hope that the video directors is not destroying the franchise. Just like the game creators makes bad movie games is the same but reverse for movie directors.

Dusty
Looks like fun to me.

jayce78
Isn't this the one that that has Jake Gyllenhaal in it that looks like he just came from a gay porn set?









Epic Winner!!!!!!

AsbestosFlaygon
Jake Gyllenhaal? Poor choice.

Kazenji
Poor choice i don't think so..... especally from the two reviewers that i watched even they too thought it was weird at first

both of them gave this film 3 and half stars....and these two are usually against movies based on video games.

Emma718
I think Jake looks great as the Prince and YES i have played the game.
It comes out in Australia next Thursday, so i can't say what the film is like.

Jgaler
Well watching some trailer seems really good movie. I had not played game yet but seems like I am desperate to watch such movies. I watch trailer of game even and show a game once my friend was playing. I hope that everything a king can do what is there in game like jumping from one pillar to another and so LOL.

xJLxKing
I'm looking forward to watching this. I never played the game so I doubt I'll care if they make it good or bad. Hopefully, I don't waste my money

Peach
Okay, so I saw the movie yesterday. I'll preface this with the fact that the Prince of Persia series is one of my favorite game series and that Sands of Time ranks in my top ten favorite games of all time. Also, I very rarely ever go see movies in the theater (last time I did was last summer when Half-Blood Prince came out, and I saw it in the theater because it was a date <3).

It's not a perfect movie, that's for certain. It, however, is definitely a good movie and worth seeing, in my opinion.

It manages to not fall into the pit that most video game movie adaptations do, in trying to faithfully follow a story and failing at everything. Well, that's because they don't try and follow the story exactly. The script was worked on by Jordan Mechner, who created the series, and while it loosely follows the plot of the Sands of Time game, it is its own plot, set up in the same style of Sands of Time, including the Grand Rewind, that pulls elements mostly from SoT but also from all of the PoP games (and even a bit that was straight from Assassin's Creed - Leap of Faith for the win big grin).

Well, as I said, it wasn't a perfect movie, and there were a few things about it that I thought could have been done better or differently. The plot felt a bit disjointed, and seemed to jump around a bit. It certainly didn't flow as smoothly as it could have. Dastan and Tamina definitely are good counterparts to SoT Prince and Farah, or 08 Prince and Elika, but there was less of the snarky banter between the two that I love so much from the games. Their relationship seemed a bit jerky and didn't seem to build up quite so nicely, but that could have simply been because the movie was (obviously) shorter than the games. However, on the flip side, as the movie takes place over the span of weeks (as opposed to a single day like the SoT game), there's also a bit more realness to the relationship.

The Sand Chamber - awesome scene. Nice way to try and incorporate some of the standard PoP puzzles into the movie. However, it felt rather out of place and just shoehorned in, because there was nothing else like that anywhere else in the movie. It was just like, bam, cross this, you've reached the Sandglass. I hesitate to say they should have omitted the sequence entirely, but I think they should have at least attempted to include a bit more along those lines. Also, there were none of the traditional traps that are so prevelant in the games.

Minor nitpick, but I was hoping for more of a traditional hourglass, like in SoT, for the Sandglass. At first I was just like "Hmmm, giant shiny crystal thing, okay...oh, it's the Sandglass. Nothing wrong with it, and it does fit the explanation about the Sands that Tamina gives, but still. Also, while I think the point where the Grand Rewind stopped was probably the best they could work with, plot-wise, as it gives Dastan a reason to be able to meet Tamina and return the dagger, I wonder if they could have been able to do it to before they attacked Alamut. Probably not, though, since they also still needed to 'reveal' the traitor and everything.

All of the references to the games, though...damn. I had a lot of fun picking them out, and I'm sure I've missed a bunch still, too. Dastan is a mix of SoT Prince and 08 Prince, being born a common person - a street orphan - who was then adopted by the king and became a prince, though with no royal blood. His attitude and personality is a mix of the two though he runs closer to SoT Prince, I think. His normal clothing/armor is very much based off of WW Prince; there's a scene traveling in the desert where he's clad more like 08 Prince. Tamina is pretty much a combination of Farah and Kaileena as far as her plot role goes, though some of Elika's personality is there as well.

Those who use the Dagger to rewind time are shown with the same sort of tattoos that the Dark Prince had while using it. One of the Hassansins uses two daggertail whips to fight. There's the Leap of Faith early on that I mentioned that was straight out of AC. The end, from when they reached the Sandglass, was straight from the end of SoT. There's a bit fairly early on where Dastan tries running up and flipping off of a wall and falls flat on is back, a nice nod to when you failed to do something acrobatic in the games. They even managed to work in a few 'boss' fights, which were nicely done, though no large creatures or Sand Monsters. In fact, there was - as of yet - no consequences to using the Dagger. However, as it's going to be a multi-movie series, the appearance of the tattoos on those using it could easily be some sort of foreshadowing and I hope they go with it.

And I must say - they did a great job of making all of the acrobatics and wall running and jumping and stuff look realistic. It's not as smooth and perfect as it is in the games - but that works to its advantage. A real person attempting that stuff isn't going to be as smooth as a video game character.

So this managed to get freaking huge, and I'm sure I've left things out. Overall, though, I thought it was rather a good movie. Personally I thought it was pretty great, and is by far the best video game adaptation yet. Who knows where they're going to go with it, but they certainly surpassed my expectations with this first one.

~JP~
I saw it yesterday and it was great fun I thought! smile

Rogue Jedi
Does Jake take it in the butt?

REXXXX
What an original and inspiring question, RJ. Keep on topic, please.

BlackZero30x
i went to see it and i thought it was actually pretty good...obviously it varied from the game but i thought it did so in an ok manner.

Peach
Well, it was supposed to vary from the games. They purposely made it so that it did not closely follow any of them.

Liberator
Originally posted by SnakeEyes
Looks pretty shitty. Might be fun though.

Yeah I was thinking the same thing. It has potential to be a bit of a laugh :P

dadudemon
Originally posted by BlackZero30x
i went to see it and i thought it was actually pretty good...obviously it varied from the game but i thought it did so in an ok manner.

Cool.


Imma see it Thursday.

Kazenji
Originally posted by Peach
Well, it was supposed to vary from the games. They purposely made it so that it did not closely follow any of them.

Yeah they had to change the experience from an Interactive one

juliustheimpale
it wasn't that bad, but it wasn't that good either. since he's got all the jump-off-building moves down, i wonder if tobey wouldve done a better job...

Peach
Oh, good lord, no.

dadudemon
Movie was alright. I felt "blah" about it.


6 out of 10.



Some of the acting sucked. Sheik Amar's character sucked: every "funny" line was painful to watch from him.

Pretty much every fight scene was that horribly executed cinematography that zooms in waaaaay the **** too close and is annoying to watch. It's a lazy technique used to make the fights seem faster/better because the choregraphy of the fights is a bit lame compared to, say, Hong Kong Kung Fu flicks. Even some of the fights ended up looking really stupid as the editing overlapped to the "pause" segment. (In a choreographed fight, there are "segments" to a fight. After the actors execute one segment, they pause, stop, and reset for the next "segment".)

Some of the effects did not seem to integrate very well with the live action shots, but it was good at others.

Gemma Arterton was certainly welcome on the screen. smile But she got annoying. To the movies credit, she was supposed to be this high and mighty, spoiled b*tch whiny princess, so I was fine with that and I was probably supposed to be annoyed with her.




Major props to Jake Gyllenhaal for putting on a sizable amount of muscle and getting into excellent shape for this film. That's dedication to your job. I hope that he takes a comic book role, some time in the future. I'd like to see the characters in comic book movies look more like their comic book counterpoints.


Plot was alright. It was absurdly easy to follow which I think detracted from it. There was no suprise. At least they could have made the "traitor" portion harder to guess...or at least dropped suble and intelligent hints (other than one) to indicate who the traitor was. That would at MOST make it worth watching more than once.

roughrider
It's shaping up as the second bomb of the summer, following Robin Hood.
A weak $30 million opening for a holiday weekend; down to $13 million the next. Franchise is toast, like The Golden Compass.
Doesn't matter how well it does overseas; an American financed film bombs in North America, that's it.

The Nuul
Only Bay can pull off the big CGI movies and have no plot or shitty plot.

I have very little hopes for this movie and put is around the same level as Clash.

felixstyras
Well having played all the games I can honestly say I didn't know what to think when I found out that Jake gyellenhaal would be playing dasdan in the film. Well as always Jake impressed me at his fullest and the film was a fantastic piece of work. I expected it to be once I knew Jerry bruckhiemer was the producer and once again he impressed me.

Kazenji
Originally posted by roughrider
It's shaping up as the second bomb of the summer, following Robin Hood.


Considering Robin Hood is actually a good movie if you can get over "Robin Hood should be this or that way from the past movies".

Originally posted by roughrider

A weak $30 million opening for a holiday weekend; down to $13 million the next. Franchise is toast, like The Golden Compass.
Doesn't matter how well it does overseas; an American financed film bombs in North America, that's it.

it might matter how much does worldwide just take a look at Batman Begins Batman Begins grossed world wide $372,710,015 compared to the sequel which was higher.

alex28
the movie is much like the game but there is some changes that make it movie otherwise the way of jump shows that it is game

roughrider
Originally posted by Kazenji
Considering Robin Hood is actually a good movie if you can get over "Robin Hood should be this or that way from the past movies".



it might matter how much does worldwide just take a look at Batman Begins Batman Begins grossed world wide $372,710,015 compared to the sequel which was higher.

Critical consensus of Robin Hood on Rotten Tomatoes is that it's a miss - every film of the Star Wars PT amassed more positive reviews than it has. Maybe you like it: that's fine. I'm talking about popular opinion, backed up by the box office.

Batman Begins got outstanding reviews, and did nearly $150 million of it's worldwide total in North America. It could have been even bigger, but Warner Bros. was satisfied they had erased the stink of Batman & Robin, and got people to realize this was a new beginning; they were ready to come in droves for The Dark Knight after that.

Compare Prince Of Persia with The Golden Compass. It did quite well overseas, but it grossed a shockingly low $70 million in North America. For a studio that was looking to duplicate what they did with The Lord Of The Rings, this was a first round knockout. That's what's happening right now with POP.
Perception is huge. Remember Godzilla in 1998? Though it managed to eventually turn a profit worldwide, it did less than half of what they expected in North America, and was critically hated. No American franchise after that.

A franchise can try again some day after a disastrous debut, but it can take years, even decades of waiting (Dune, Judge Dredd etc.)

Kazenji
Originally posted by roughrider
Critical consensus of Robin Hood on Rotten Tomatoes is that it's a miss - every film of the Star Wars PT amassed more positive reviews than it has. Maybe you like it: that's fine. I'm talking about popular opinion, backed up by the box office.


Well most of the things i've read from reviewers for Robin Hood is that they were expecting Errol Flynn type movie again...colourful and all that sort of thing.

K.Diddy
erm I heard this movie sux

roughrider
Originally posted by Kazenji
Well most of the things i've read from reviewers for Robin Hood is that they were expecting Errol Flynn type movie again...colourful and all that sort of thing.

I haven't seen it, but there is some precedent for what they were trying. A good film from the 1970's - Robin & Marian - has Sean Connery playing Robin in middle age, in the holy land with Little John assisting an increasingly deranged King Richard (Richard Harris); they get arrested and finally shipped back to England, where he locks horns again with the Sheriff (Robert Shaw), bemused at how Robin can't seem to stop playing the outlaw game & how they are both too old for this.
Connery was practically the same age as Russell Crowe is now, playing Robin. And he was making fun of himself then, with his creaky limbs.

Peach
This thread isn't about Robin Hood.

And if you want to talk about Rotten Tomatoes? Go on there, look up Prince of Persia, and compare the score given by critics to the score from the community. There is a huge - almost 50 point - discrepancy.

Having read a lot of critic reviews of Prince of Persia, most of them seem clear that they either 1) did not pay any attention to the movie whatsoever, 2) went into it determined to dislike it, or 3) both. Ebert's review is an amazing example of #3. Considering that Ebert hates anything video game related, and has stated they are a waste of time and not art and dismisses them and anything related with no knowledge of the medium whatsoever, I'd say anyone that takes his review of this movie seriously is an idiot.

So this is one movie where I'd say it's smart to ignore the critics. Because every person I know who has seen it, has said it was at least good, and most I know have said it was great or amazing.

roughrider
Originally posted by Peach
This thread isn't about Robin Hood.

And if you want to talk about Rotten Tomatoes? Go on there, look up Prince of Persia, and compare the score given by critics to the score from the community. There is a huge - almost 50 point - discrepancy.

Having read a lot of critic reviews of Prince of Persia, most of them seem clear that they either 1) did not pay any attention to the movie whatsoever, 2) went into it determined to dislike it, or 3) both. Ebert's review is an amazing example of #3. Considering that Ebert hates anything video game related, and has stated they are a waste of time and not art and dismisses them and anything related with no knowledge of the medium whatsoever, I'd say anyone that takes his review of this movie seriously is an idiot.

So this is one movie where I'd say it's smart to ignore the critics. Because every person I know who has seen it, has said it was at least good, and most I know have said it was great or amazing.

And apparently, very few of them are going to see it at the theatre, from it's weak performance.

Kazenji
Originally posted by Peach


And if you want to talk about Rotten Tomatoes? Go on there, look up Prince of Persia, and compare the score given by critics to the score from the community. There is a huge - almost 50 point - discrepancy.

Having read a lot of critic reviews of Prince of Persia, most of them .

And its also the highest rating for a Movie based on a game.

dadudemon
Originally posted by Peach
Having read a lot of critic reviews of Prince of Persia, most of them seem clear that they either 1) did not pay any attention to the movie whatsoever, 2) went into it determined to dislike it, or 3) both. Ebert's review is an amazing example of #3. Considering that Ebert hates anything video game related, and has stated they are a waste of time and not art and dismisses them and anything related with no knowledge of the medium whatsoever, I'd say anyone that takes his review of this movie seriously is an idiot.

So this is one movie where I'd say it's smart to ignore the critics. Because every person I know who has seen it, has said it was at least good, and most I know have said it was great or amazing.

I don't like Ebert as a movie reviewer. The only time our opinions match up on films are when they are truly horrendous piles of shit.


That said, POP is certainly worth a watch and is better than the average summer film, for sure. It's just not that great, either.

jinXed by JaNx
Originally posted by roughrider
Critical consensus of Robin Hood on Rotten Tomatoes is that it's a miss - every film of the Star Wars PT amassed more positive reviews than it has. Maybe you like it: that's fine. I'm talking about popular opinion, backed up by the box office.

(Dune, Judge Dredd etc.)


Nah, Robin Hood is aces. I really don't think many people expected, Robin Hood to be a blockbuster though. It doesn't have the same ingredients of a blockbuster, ie, director, actors and budget. The main complaint i saw with most of the reviews on, Robin hood was directed towards, Russel Crowe and not because he is an odd choice for an English character but because most people either love or hate him. I also saw that many people were complaining because they wanted more action.

It's definitely a good movie though. Russel Crowe is my favorite actor and although he gave a great performance and even though, Ridley Scott made his presence work im still surprised by his casting.



Prince of Persia was balls, just awful.

jvalentine
I enjoyed playing the game version than seeing the movie. It was awful.

______________________________________________

Dish TV

ADarksideJedi
I might see this movie but not sure if I want to waste money seeing it if it is horrible.One to Ten how was the movie?

Kazenji
7/10 from me.

RE: Blaxican
This is a great movie, IMO. I really enjoyed it; probably the second best movie I've seen so far (behind Kick-Ass). I'd give it an 8/10. The only reason I wouldn't give it a 10/10 (honestly that's how much I enjoyed it), is because it definitely had flaws, most of which Dadudemon has already pointed out: lame fighting choreography and an easy to forsee plot. I'm willing to forgive the plot being predictable because imo the story was excellent. There may not have been a good twist, but, I felt that just about every point in the story clicked, so well! The pacing was good and the underlying motifs for the characters were implemented well without being too preachy. I felt that even though the "twist" was easy to predict, it wasn't really meant to surprise you, and that was something that I kind of appreciated.

Also, this is the only movie I have ever seen where the "LOL bring everybody back to life" retcon actually worked and didn't feel cheesy.

All in all I liked the story, the dialogue was good, I liked all the characters, and the scenes were all very well done. Sands of Time, imo, is pretty much the best video game adaptation that's been made so far, and is good enough to stand up as an actual movie movie.

So, good stuff.

I think it's a good thing that the movie isn't making too much cash though, imo. I don't think they could do anything other then ruin it if they made sequels.

EDIT- Oh, one other "flaw". Gemma Arterton was gorgeous in this. In the scenes that included her I was too busy staring at her boobs to focus on what was actually going on.

roughrider
Originally posted by jinXed by JaNx
Nah, Robin Hood is aces. I really don't think many people expected, Robin Hood to be a blockbuster though. It doesn't have the same ingredients of a blockbuster, ie, director, actors and budget. The main complaint i saw with most of the reviews on, Robin hood was directed towards, Russel Crowe and not because he is an odd choice for an English character but because most people either love or hate him. I also saw that many people were complaining because they wanted more action.

It's definitely a good movie though. Russel Crowe is my favorite actor and although he gave a great performance and even though, Ridley Scott made his presence work im still surprised by his casting.



Prince of Persia was balls, just awful.

Crowe, Scott & company all wanted to make a second Gladiator film.
When they found they couldn't, they just decide to make this as a close substitute. Didn't work - and I'm a fan of them both.

ADarksideJedi
For what I read it seen to be liked so I guess I will go see it.

alex28
I've seen this movie this is the good movie i seen this movie online you can also download this movie

I-Drop
Was better than any other VG movie I've ever seen. GREAT film.

alex28
the prince of persia is the good movie

S_W_LeGenD
Originally posted by alex28
the prince of persia is the good movie
I agree. The movie is good and worth watching.

Very few game based adaptations result in good movies.

Rogue Jedi
Just saw it, not bad. Jake Gyllenhal was good in it.

The Nuul
This was meh.

ADarksideJedi
I still have to rent it.When does it come out on Dvd?

Robtard
Was pure shit, yet another film I'm glad I didn't pay for.

K.Diddy
beer I'm just waiting for the dvd,I'm in no hurry too see it at all.

chrisbarina
Perhaps they should make an improvement to the next casting of actors on the next film. Pretty awful for a great plot.

Newjak
Finally saw this movie.

I liked it.

Kazenji
http://www.kotaku.com.au/2010/10/the-prince-of-persia-movie-could-have-been-like-this/

typical hollywood get something perfect and then they do "necessary changes"

The Nuul
This movie sucked hard.

RE: Blaxican
you said that already

Rogue Jedi
I liked it.

The Nuul
Originally posted by RE: Blaxican
you said that already

The first one was a meh, this time is a sucks.

Kazenji
I too also enjoyed would've been even better if they used the orignal script without the changes.

Ladies_Man_666
I loved that movie. Very entertaining for me.
And Ben Kingsley was awesome.

K.Diddy
beer Seen this last night,Hated it, Might improve on a second viewing though,but I found the plot too hard to follow,and the Action scenes moved a bit too fast which made it even more difficult to figure out what was going on,Like I said,it might be a movie I need to watch again,but for now 4/10

Rogue Jedi
I liked it, but hey, bewbz.

Kazenji
Possibly would've been even better if they did'nt make changes to the origina lscript.

Text-only Version: Click HERE to see this thread with all of the graphics, features, and links.