Click HERE to see this thread with all of the graphics, features, and links.

Which one do you like better?

3

3 but only by a hair.

I like Both but I though spider-man 3 was to long and some part didn't look like they fit well and I am a person that is mostly neutral about thing like this but I give spider-man 3 4 out of 10 most times I give a 5 out of 10, It just didn't give me the feel like the other 2.

3.....come on......it had venom

for about 10 minutes

well both because 3 had venom and 2 had a better plot.

3 harry kicked ass

3

SM3

SM2 was the best! And had the best fight scene ever...the fight on the train...classical

Originally posted by steverules
SM2 was the best! And had the best fight scene ever...the fight on the train...classical

I couldn't have said it better my self.

3 because of the Sandman & Venom.

Exactly. The main thing that made Spiderman 3 better than those other two movies was the inclusion of Venom.

Yeah, & I find the Sandman a little better than Doc Ock.

Both kicked ass.

Yeah, they did. I liked the way the Sandman was portrayed in 3 but I still feel that he should've truly been a badguy instead of being a guy who isn't actually bad but has done something bad.

If Sandman was a true villain in Spiderman 3, then he would have followed the trend of the previous villains and die at the end of the movie. The only reason why he didn't die at the end of Spiderman 3 was because he committed those crimes just to get money in order to pay for his daughter's condition.

Originally posted by Ultimate Hulk43
Yeah, they did. I liked the way the Sandman was portrayed in 3 but I still feel that he should've truly been a badguy instead of being a guy who isn't actually bad but has done something bad.

Ya, but remember, Sandman wasn't truely a Villain in the comics either. Just misguided. He teamed up with Spiderman multiple times. He even retired from crime and saves spidermans life from either the sinister 6 or another supervillain team.

The team included Beetle, Electro, Hydroman, Boomerang, and two other people.

Either way, the Sandman returning would be nice. He could help Spider-Man fight against the Lizard or whoever is going to be the next villain.

Originally posted by Yoshi Fanatic
If Sandman was a true villain in Spiderman 3, then he would have followed the trend of the previous villains and die at the end of the movie. The only reason why he didn't die at the end of Spiderman 3 was because he committed those crimes just to get money in order to pay for his daughter's condition.

That's true but I find it stupid how Sam kills off EVERY villain in EVERY Spider-Man movie. That's the main reason why I don't think that it's likely for Venom to return.

Yeah, but it was confirmed that Venom will be returning...

When was it confirmed?

A couple of weeks ago. I can't think of the name of the website, but Sam Raimi stated that a villain who, supposedly, died in Spiderman 4 will be returning in Spiderman 4. We know for a fact that Harry Osborn isn't coming back. That means that Eddie Brock is returning.

Yeah, Harry isn't coming back because he died a hero & not a villain. So, yeah, Venom has a 99.9% chance of returning now due to that statement. Some dude said that the Lizard may be appearing in Spider-Man 4 & the day Sam Raimi confirms him as a villain, I'm going to be so amped for Spider-Man 4. I'll probably follow the movie until it's released in theaters. I'll be sure to see it in theaters if the Lizard is a main villain.

I doubt the Lizard would have a whole movie to himself. There would have to be another villain in that movie: Venom.

Originally posted by Yoshi Fanatic
A couple of weeks ago. I can't think of the name of the website, but Sam Raimi stated that a villain who, supposedly, died in Spiderman 4 will be returning in Spiderman 4. We know for a fact that Harry Osborn isn't coming back. That means that Eddie Brock is returning.

No he didn't...

An unnamed acter said his character who supposedly died in Sm3 might not be dead. James Franco said his character was done for. There where 2 people who died in that movie. Put two and two together and its obvious its Venom/Eddie Brock.

Sam Raimi never said anything.

Oh, well Venom is still returning...

Originally posted by Yoshi Fanatic
I doubt the Lizard would have a whole movie to himself. There would have to be another villain in that movie: Venom.


I don't doubt it because the Lizard is a very popular Spider-Man villain with a lot of history with Spider-Man.

He doesn't have what it takes to be he main villain of a movie. How boring would it be for Spiderman to spend the whole movie looking for a cure for Dr. Connors?

Lol, he doesn't have what it takes? That's the most ridiculous comment I've heard all night. The Lizard is a very popular Spider-Man villain that really deserves his own movie. Don't let your biased judgement of Venom cloud the fact that the Lizard is a popular Spider-Man villain.

Originally posted by Yoshi Fanatic
He doesn't have what it takes to be he main villain of a movie. How boring would it be for Spiderman to spend the whole movie looking for a cure for Dr. Connors?

Their would also be multiple fight scenes, and his family would tie into it even more if Lizard found out who Spidey was. Spiderman would also be trying to stop his usual paster plan of taking over the world, and its been shown in the comics that he could and would have if Spidey hadn't stopped him. Lizard is one of the few bad guys in marvel who could take over the planet. That kind of crap is up there with Doom and Magneto.

Venom, Doc Ock, Green Goblin or even the kingoin can't take over the planet, but the Lizard can. Theirs more than enough story there for lizard.

Exactly. Venom isn't the only one capable of holding his own in a Spider-Man movie. Just look at how Spider-Man 1 & Spider-Man 2 turned out.

Yeah, I guess you're right. I guess the Lizard could be a possible villain in a Spiderman movie.

Now that I think of & as much as I hate to admit it, we MIGHT NOT see Venom because they said they might be using both the Lizard & Kraven in Spider-Man 4. Unless Sam has an interesting & brillant way of weaving all three of them into one movie, they shouldn't all be in Spider-Man 4. If they all are in one movie, it better not turn out to be the next "Batman & Robin" movie.

I can't see Kraven in a Spiderman movie, at all. The movie would have to take place in a jungle or something...

I liked Spidey 3 better than 2. But just cuz of the fight scenes lol..

Originally posted by Yoshi Fanatic
I can't see Kraven in a Spiderman movie, at all. The movie would have to take place in a jungle or something...


Not if they do something similar to what happened in the animated series.