Czarina_Czarina
Since when is using a walkie talkie hi-tech? maybe in the 1980s, morelike the 1760s( that would be HI TECH, WOW in the 1700s using walkie talkies, that would be the rave), but in 2007, when plenty of comedy shows had shown little kids using wireless mics and walkie talkies to cheat...how is that hi-tech with grown adults in China (leaders in technology??) in 2007?
http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20070608/tc_nm/china_exams_dc
"Inside, they found three people, "two of them staring at a computer screen and talking into a walkie-talkie," Xinhua said."
Sometimes the head lines read with a lot more credibility then necessary, if they would have said "low-tech" it would make a lot more sense, b/c it's not hard to figure out and it's common(a child could put together something like that, it's like saying "hi-tech" b/c someone is sending info across the internet, so what?......no offense, i've used "high tech", matter of fact, i'm using hi-tech right now to send you this message, wow!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! that must mean something.
Sure, there are plenty of ways students cheat, some use paper, others look at other's work; in one school, they would speak their native language WHILE TEST TAKING, but every group has cheaters, i can't see why something that is child's play considered hi-tech. it doesn't make them look intelligent, it makes them look like cheaters.
i've used tech devices for various things (not cheating, but just general things like wireless cameras, astronomy gadgets), no one is going to call it "hi-tech" b/c it simply isn't, it's simple stuff to accomplish a goal that a child could use.
it's like saying b/c i am operating a remote control, i'm "hi-tech", wow, the credit given at times.
sorry! i just dislike headlines that are very misleading.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20070608/tc_nm/china_exams_dc
"Inside, they found three people, "two of them staring at a computer screen and talking into a walkie-talkie," Xinhua said."
Sometimes the head lines read with a lot more credibility then necessary, if they would have said "low-tech" it would make a lot more sense, b/c it's not hard to figure out and it's common(a child could put together something like that, it's like saying "hi-tech" b/c someone is sending info across the internet, so what?......no offense, i've used "high tech", matter of fact, i'm using hi-tech right now to send you this message, wow!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! that must mean something.
Sure, there are plenty of ways students cheat, some use paper, others look at other's work; in one school, they would speak their native language WHILE TEST TAKING, but every group has cheaters, i can't see why something that is child's play considered hi-tech. it doesn't make them look intelligent, it makes them look like cheaters.
i've used tech devices for various things (not cheating, but just general things like wireless cameras, astronomy gadgets), no one is going to call it "hi-tech" b/c it simply isn't, it's simple stuff to accomplish a goal that a child could use.
it's like saying b/c i am operating a remote control, i'm "hi-tech", wow, the credit given at times.
sorry! i just dislike headlines that are very misleading.