Click HERE to see this thread with all of the graphics, features, and links.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SnmBBB8-Q28&mode=related&search=

Ok, thank GOD this had never showed up in the film, really. If this scene had ever entered in the movie i would just get off the room i ask my money back...

Originally posted by kamhal
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SnmBBB8-Q28&mode=related&search=

Ok, thank GOD this had never showed up in the film, really. If this scene had ever entered in the movie i would just get off the room i ask my money back...


Is this a real scene or a facsimile?

Are there any cut scenes that are general good ?(i.e. better than the PT on average)

Originally posted by DARKLORDCAEDUS
Is this a real scene or a facsimile?

It is a deleted scene.

This never happened, the scene where Obi-Wan and Anakin confront General Grievous on the bridge is its replacement.

Originally posted by kamhal
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SnmBBB8-Q28&mode=related&search=

Ok, thank GOD this had never showed up in the film, really. If this scene had ever entered in the movie i would just get off the room i ask my money back...

Isn't this also on the Star Wars: Revenge of the Sith DVD. I will check mine and find out.

It is.

There really wasn't nothing wrong with that scene.

Originally posted by exanda kane
Are there any cut scenes that are general good ?(i.e. better than the PT on average)

In AOTC: The scene @ Padme's parents house should have never been cut.

In ROTS: The scenes where the rebellion is formed should have never been cut.

This brings up this point. Why can't we watch SW with the deleted scenes back in?

Originally posted by Alliance
In ROTS: The scenes where the rebellion is formed should have never been cut.
Quoted for truth.

And eh, I didn't find the scene with Grievous killing a Jedi to be all that bad. >.> At least not bad enough for me to want to leave the room and ask my money back...

It would have actually been nice to have a female Jedi acknowledged and Grievous' "famed" Jedi kill count shown on film.

Originally posted by DARKLORDCAEDUS
There really wasn't nothing wrong with that scene.

Problem is that it is too long. They had to shorten the movie so they changed the scene to the bridge scene.

Well, also it wouldn't work too well with what happened in the Clone Wars cartoons. Remember that Grievous left Shaak Ti tied up and she was later found by Mace Windu.

Originally posted by Darth Hord
Problem is that it is too long. They had to shorten the movie so they changed the scene to the bridge scene.

Maybe if Lucas would atcually give the time to properly address the incredibly complex plots he's presenting...the movies would be better...instead of defining an arbitrary "this is too long" point.

Originally posted by Council#13
Well, also it wouldn't work too well with what happened in the Clone Wars cartoons. Remember that Grievous left Shaak Ti tied up and she was later found by Mace Windu.

That is EU though, it doesn't always fit with the movies. Movies=law.

Originally posted by General G
That is EU though, it doesn't always fit with the movies. Movies=law.

Pretty much except for deleted scenes like this which are not cannon. Especially since Shaak Ti is going to be in Star Wars: The Forced Unleashed videogame

Originally posted by Darth Hord
Problem is that it is too long. They had to shorten the movie so they changed the scene to the bridge scene.


Yes but GL still could found some way to put the scene in. I liked that scene after I watched it.

Originally posted by General G
That is EU though, it doesn't always fit with the movies. Movies=law.

But yet they allow grievious to have his coughing and spattering from what happens in the clone wars thing.