Click HERE to see this thread with all of the graphics, features, and links.

http://youtube.com/watch?v=VKqx6lIcf9k

Watch and be warned. It contains spoilers. Watch the part where he says "I will no longer serve you"

Looks kind of like this: ermm

http://i80.imagethrust.com/t/1179743/g1.jpg

Either way, if he returns in the next Fantastic Four movie he needs to have a real body.

Originally posted by Galan007
Looks kind of like this: ermm

http://i80.imagethrust.com/t/1179743/g1.jpg

Exactly like it.

You can't really tell from that footage - too dark & compressed.
I saw his shadow in the film; I'll look closer with my second viewing.

I saw the film, he's a cloud...a big cloud obviously

Originally posted by steverules
I saw the film, he's a cloud...a big cloud obviously

What this guy said, stop making excuses for them they ****ed up pure and simple Galactus was a cloud end of.

I took the liberty of taking a screen shot of galactus, it's an outline of him I think...I am not sure, I just know that basically Galactus is indeed a cloud

Are we sure Galactus IS a cloud and not IN the cloud?

Maybe the cloud hides his spaceship and big chair. looks like they messed that up anyhows. A shame the surfer appeared to die.

I dunno, I think he's gettin his own movie isn't he?

Originally posted by Bicnarok
Maybe the cloud hides his spaceship and big chair. looks like they messed that up anyhows. A shame the surfer appeared to die.


Everyone knows The Surfer is not dead. He is getting his own film.

OMG it was a friggin cloud.

If that's Galactus then I guess Emperor Palpatine had a cameo.

http://img264.imageshack.us/img264/9043/47219991135789381a1bw4.jpg

Originally posted by DARKLORDCAEDUS
Are we sure Galactus IS a cloud and not IN the cloud? Would you please read the post and headlines? He is NOT a god damm cloud

And people please for once stop saying "WAHHHHHHH GALACTUS IS A CLOUD!!!!!" when hes NOT. READ my posts and actually PAY attention. He is IN the cloud he is NOT the cloud

FFS watch the damm video i posted and pay attention to the part where he looms over saturn.

Laurence fishburne already said theres more to the cloud which in this case is the fireball in the shape of galactus helmet

Just because we only see a cloud and part of his flaming helm in the cloud DOES NOT mean he is the cloud. Its the same as saying galactus is a ship when he is in the ship and we only get a glimpse of his boots

Originally posted by DARKLORDCAEDUS
Everyone knows The Surfer is not dead. He is getting his own film.

Whens it coming out?

You do realise even if it is the other version of galactus its from the ultimate Fantastic four

Was just about to mention when he passed Saturn you see the outline of his helmet on the planet.

Doesn't really matter when you think about it. It's Galactus. He can be anything he wants to be.

Originally posted by Validus
Doesn't really matter when you think about it. It's Galactus. He can be anything he wants to be.

Some creatures perceive him as a cloud, others don't.

shouldn't have to try that hard to see him...... it was just disappointing he wasn't clearer.

Originally posted by steverules
Whens it coming out?


I will assume next year, maybe in two years. FF2 is off to a good start so I will assume that part two will make just as much if not more than the first one.

Originally posted by SpyCspider
shouldn't have to try that hard to see him...... it was just disappointing he wasn't clearer.
Yeah you and everyone else says that now but if they had shown him everyone would've complained their asses off, just like they did with the Green Goblin, and every other villain. Trust me the cloud was perfect for him.

why does it even matter, the movie wasn't even all that good...and no we will not see galactus as his 616 self. By today's standards, that look is cartoony and dated, despite all of us liking that look. GET OVER IT

I actually think it was quiet good. Thats your openion and you are allowed to have that, I on the other hand think that the Galactus the marvel ultimate alliance made was quiet good, such a Galactus would in a movie with the right special effects get awesome, and nothing like cartoony.

Originally posted by Utrigita
I actually think it was quiet good. Thats your openion and you are allowed to have that, I on the other hand think that the Galactus the marvel ultimate alliance made was quiet good, such a Galactus would in a movie with the right special effects get awesome, and nothing like cartoony. i'm saying by today's modern standards, he'd be to "cartonny" and part of the proof is that changed the character around so drastically in the Ultimate MU. I mean come on. Let's compare with other marvel movies. No yellow Spandex on Wolvie, no Purple duds on the Goblin, you see what i'm saying? I personsally would have loved to see classic big G

Too cartoony? It's the Fantastic Four. If Fox is worried about it being cartoony, they really need to take a second look at the comic book they're working with.

Why is this such a big deal?

He's obviously IN the cloud.

Imagine never reading a F4 comic, and then seeing the "almighty planet eater" wearing a ridiculous pink and purple triangle helmet?

Marvel and DC movies aren't meant for regular comic readers, but they do however give "easter eggs" to those that do read comics - and this is one of them.
Get over it

.

Originally posted by What If...
Why is this such a big deal?

He's obviously IN the cloud.
Bingo and i agree with what you said. Though they could have made his armour black

Originally posted by What If...
Why is this such a big deal?

He's obviously IN the cloud.

Imagine never reading a F4 comic, and then seeing the "almighty planet eater" wearing a ridiculous pink and purple triangle helmet?

Marvel and DC movies aren't meant for regular comic readers, but they do however give "easter eggs" to those that do read comics - and this is one of them.
Get over it

Good lord,Delusional: A delusion is commonly defined as a false belief, and is used in everyday language to describe a belief that is either false, fanciful or derived from deception. In psychiatry, the definition is necessarily more precise and implies that the belief is pathological.

Originally posted by Redatom65
i'm saying by today's modern standards, he'd be to "cartonny" and part of the proof is that changed the character around so drastically in the Ultimate MU. I mean come on. Let's compare with other marvel movies. No yellow Spandex on Wolvie, no Purple duds on the Goblin, you see what i'm saying? I personsally would have loved to see classic big G

First you say he's outfit is to cartonny and then suddenly you want to see the Classic Galactus can you make up your mind

i think the cloud effect was pretty good,but it was aimed at movie fans not comic fans.if big g is in the third movie,the will change his armor to something darker.unfortunately casual movie fan wouldn't accept a huge purple and blue guy with forks sticking out of his head.

1) My post in no way, shape, or form, hinted towards me or my opinion being "delusional"

2) You don't even make sense. I suggest taking better english lessons, or stop trying to use psychiatric definitions because you are obviously very young and don't even understand what you are saying.

Originally posted by lordboo
i think the cloud effect was pretty good,but it was aimed at movie fans not comic fans.if big g is in the third movie,the will change his armor to something darker.unfortunately casual movie fan wouldn't accept a huge purple and blue guy with forks sticking out of his head.


Co-signed

Originally posted by What If...
Why is this such a big deal?

He's obviously IN the cloud.

Imagine never reading a F4 comic, and then seeing the "almighty planet eater" wearing a ridiculous pink and purple triangle helmet?

Marvel and DC movies aren't meant for regular comic readers, but they do however give "easter eggs" to those that do read comics - and this is one of them.
Get over it

But they could have thought about us when they made the movie

Originally posted by What If...
1) My post in no way, shape, or form, hinted towards me or my opinion being "delusional"

2) You don't even make sense. I suggest taking better english lessons, or stop trying to use psychiatric definitions because you are obviously very young and don't even understand what you are saying.

What i wrote makes perfect sense, perhaps your brain and eyes are having a hard time perceving and translating it if so please say and i will try and break it down for you.

Originally posted by Supreme being
What i wrote makes perfect sense, perhaps your brain and eyes are having a hard time perceving and translating it if so please say and i will try and break it down for you.

Thanks, but I'm not planning on taking english or psychology lessons from a 14 year old that can hardly speak english himself. Stop trying to get e-cred by attempting to sound intelligent.

Really, you're embarrassing yourself.

Originally posted by Supreme being
What i wrote makes perfect sense, perhaps your brain and eyes are having a hard time perceving and translating it if so please say and i will try and break it down for you.

No it didn't it looked like something you copied in to raise you own etos through a misplaced use of logos.

Originally posted by Utrigita
No it didn't it looked like something you copied in to raise you own etos through a misplaced use of logos.

Well it was obviously quoted and it doesn't take much to understand as its one of many definitions, if you still cant understand i can always type up any easier version for you.

Originally posted by What If...
Thanks, but I'm not planning on taking english or psychology lessons from a 14 year old that can hardly speak english himself. Stop trying to get e-cred by attempting to sound intelligent.

Really, you're embarrassing yourself.

Your extremly perceptitive for someone on the internet wow what are you 19-20? you must be the worlds youngest graphologist not to mention based on texts from the internet bravo i commend you.

Originally posted by Supreme being
Your extremly perceptitive for someone on the internet wow what are you 19-20? you must be the worlds youngest graphologist not to mention based on texts from the internet bravo i commend you.

Originally posted by Supreme being
Good lord,Delusional: A delusion is commonly defined as a false belief, and is used in everyday language to describe a belief that is either false, fanciful or derived from deception. In psychiatry, the definition is necessarily more precise and implies that the belief is pathological.

Not to seem like i am taking sides but this is actually quite understanable and preety straight forward, and no one can say i dont know shit about english considering i am british. Look guys take it to PM or i will report the both of you, and yes Galactus was a cloud end of topic.

Originally posted by sexyking
Not to seem like i am taking sides but this is actually quite understanable and preety straight forward, and no one can say i dont know shit about english considering i am british. Look guys take it to PM or i will report the both of you, and yes Galactus was a cloud end of topic. No offence but are you an idiot? The video i posted proves you wrong period, He is a burning bass in the cloud

does that mean the surf board is the ultimate nullifyer? All i remember thinking at the end of the movie was, wow, killing galactus is a really, really bad idea.

Originally posted by Darth Jello
does that mean the surf board is the ultimate nullifyer? All i remember thinking at the end of the movie was, wow, killing galactus is a really, really bad idea. Nothing indicated galactus was killed because the surfer could have teleported him some where else. Surfer is only a fraction of galactus yet he didnt die so why should galactus? The novel also did say surfer will pay a price for not letting G finish his task

Originally posted by Manslayer
Nothing indicated galactus was killed because the surfer could have teleported him some where else. Surfer is only a fraction of galactus yet he didnt die so why should galactus? The novel also did say surfer will pay a price for not letting G finish his task


I don't put to much stock in movie novelizations especially since whats in a movie novelization isn't always what you see on screen. As for Big G, he ain't dead; He will be appearing in the Silver Surfer movie.

Originally posted by Manslayer
No offence but are you an idiot? The video i posted proves you wrong period, He is a burning bass in the cloud

No offence but are you a co..sucker? You notice the no offence part holds no weight when its followed by an insult. And to answer your question no i am not i am simply calling what i saw as it is while you are speculating, and please do not throw covered up insults my way.

Originally posted by Manslayer

Nothing indicated galactus was killed because the surfer could have teleported him some where else.
You see again your speculating.

Originally posted by Manslayer
The novel also did say surfer will pay a price for not letting G finish his task

Novels arnt 100% accurate in terms of storytelling they some times have their own twist and turns.

Originally posted by sexyking
No offence but are you a co..sucker? You notice the no offence part holds no weight when its followed by an insult. And to answer your question no i am not i am simply calling what i saw as it is while you are speculating, and please do not throw covered up insults my way. Um i didnt call you an idiot. I asked if you were. If i DID call you an idiot means i am disputing you as one. Now i asked if you are an idiot because i posted a video to disprove the fact that fanboys think galactus is a cloud and im doing them a favour and you still claimed that he is a cloud. And when i asked if you were an idiot i have yet to label you one meaning you arent one... yet.

How ever i do apologise if you got offended.

By the way i am not speculating. We saw the burning mass representing galactus helm and we too saw his shadow over saturn. This isnt speculation, This is according to people who actually pay attention during the movie and right now i have the scans to completely destroy your assumption that galactus is just a cloud.

By the way laurence fishburne himself stated that there is more about galactus than the mere cloud so again you fail

Last thing to being up if he did was a cloud technically he wold be intangible and the surfer would have not even been able to harm him in any way


Originally posted by sexyking
You see again your speculating. I never defined it as canon and i'm using common sense, YES i am speculating on this part however. If surfer only has a portion of galactus power, and if he survived the cosmic blast wouldnt it be logical to assume galactus did survive because he is far superior to the surfer?


Originally posted by sexyking

Novels arnt 100% accurate in terms of storytelling they some times have their own twist and turns. This is true. However the movie also did not indicate that galactus was killed and we only assume he died and just to let you know the novel is canon and gave us the only indication to what happened to galactus.

EDIT

Originally posted by DARKLORDCAEDUS
I don't put to much stock in movie novelizations especially since whats in a movie novelization isn't always what you see on screen. As for Big G, he ain't dead; He will be appearing in the Silver Surfer movie. Yes but the movie will problably be a prequel.

And novels elaborate alot more than the movies and still is canon. Just because we dont see it on screen doesnt mean it didnt happen. Hell revenge of the sith movie spans a 1 year time line and the fil just showed us the pivotal key points. The novel how ever elaborated much more

Originally posted by Manslayer
Um i didnt call you an idiot. I asked if you were. If i DID call you an idiot means i am disputing you as one. Now i asked if you are an idiot because i posted a video to disprove the fact that fanboys think galactus is a cloud and im doing them a favour and you still claimed that he is a cloud. And when i asked if you were an idiot i have yet to label you one meaning you arent one... yet.

How ever i do apologise if you got offended.

By the way i am not speculating. We saw the burning mass representing galactus helm and we too saw his shadow over Saturn. This isnt speculation, This is according to people who actually pay attention during the movie and right now i have the scans to completely destroy your assumption that galactus is just a cloud.

By the way laurence fishburne himself stated that there is more about galactus than the mere cloud so again you fail

Last thing to being up if he did was a cloud technically he wold be intangible and the surfer would have not even been able to harm him in any way


I never defined it as canon and i'm using common sense, YES i am speculating on this part however. If surfer only has a portion of galactus power, and if he survived the cosmic blast wouldnt it be logical to assume galactus did survive because he is far superior to the surfer?


This is true. However the movie also did not indicate that galactus was killed and we only assume he died and just to let you know the novel is canon and gave us the only indication to what happened to galactus.

Yes i did take offense to your question it was simply absurd and frankly extremely stupid. Now i think its time we got some clarity on this first of that shadow we saw that was the cloud simple as. Do you know why the cloud looked like a helmet because Tim Story did it that way its called appealing and pleasing a wider target audience thats why you saw the helmet pattern on Saturn, thats why you saw a flaming helmet in the cloud a sort of homage to the Galactus known in the comics.

There's no doubt in my mind Tim Story would have been all for the Galactus known to us comic fans as he himself is a fan of the comics but you have to realise that Avid Arad and the suits are in control and what they say goes. You also mention scans that would destroy my "assumptions" please post them.

Originally posted by sexyking
Yes i did take offense to your question it was simply absurd and frankly extremely stupid
No it wasnt stupid because despite all the given evidence you still claim he is a cloud especially when so many people noticed he wasnt and disproved what you said.

Again it wasnt an insult as i asked you the question
Originally posted by sexyking

. Now i think its time we got some clarity on this first of that shadow we saw that was the cloud simple as.
Prove it because if it was a cloud which it isnt, it would not have casted such a smooth pattern shadow and guess what, clouds do not really cast solid shadows as compared to tangible objects which in this case the shadow was perfectly casted

http://img521.imageshack.us/img521/2719/galactus2cy7.jpg

^. There you go, and again IF he was really a cloud then the director would have potrayed him just as a simple cloud moving through space thus eliminating the need to even shape the cloud into galactus
Originally posted by sexyking

Do you know why the cloud looked like a helmet because Tim Story did it that way its called appealing and pleasing a wider target audience thats why you saw the helmet pattern on Saturn, thats why you saw a flaming helmet in the cloud a sort of homage to the Galactus known in the comics.
No, its because 1) galactus by him self being potrayed would look stupid


2) They added clouds to make him more of a mystery

3)Surfer referred to galactus as a "he" and clouds dont have genders do they? This obviously indicates that galactus is physical and sentient
Originally posted by sexyking

There's no doubt in my mind Tim Story would have been all for the Galactus known to us comic fans as he himself is a fan of the comics but you have to realise that Avid Arad and the suits are in control and what they say goes. You also mention scans that would destroy my "assumptions" please post them. And they dont reveal everything before a movie... as lucas did for star wars. As sam raimi did for spiderman 3.

Oh the scans?
http://img524.imageshack.us/img524/9183/galactus02ik0.jpg

And even if that wasnt his physical body that could be a burning mass,fireball or just fires which is obviously different from a cloud, a retard can notice this

Here you go and i can quote alot of people who agreed that galactus wasnt just a cloud

Dude i can qoute alot of people that said the holocaust didn't happen either but that doesn't mean that they are right. He was blantelty a debris cloud in the movie. Star constellations are given names and genders etc. but that doesn't mean there sentitent does it? If it was there intention to show a big hulking dude walking through space they would of done it ok.

They did it for the mystery yes and for realism every galactus fan know's that he appears as a different thing to each species anyway.

Originally posted by GGS
Dude i can qoute alot of people that said the holocaust didn't happen either but that doesn't mean that they are right. He was blantelty a debris cloud in the movie. Star constellations are given names and genders etc. but that doesn't mean there sentitent does it? If it was there intention to show a big hulking dude walking through space they would of done it ok. The thing is galactus is sentient in the movie as surfer stated that they um made a deal? which would a require communication ? And obviously you cannot communicate with a force of nature weather verbally or telepathically

Again clouds dont cast perfect shadows and if galactus was just a cloud the surfer would have referred to him as "it" through out every conversation

Originally posted by Manslayer
No it wasnt stupid because despite all the given evidence you still claim he is a cloud especially when so many people noticed he wasnt and disproved what you said.

Again it wasnt an insult as i asked you the question
Prove it because if it was a cloud which it isnt, it would not have casted such a smooth pattern shadow and guess what, clouds do not really cast solid shadows as compared to tangible objects which in this case the shadow was perfectly casted

http://img521.imageshack.us/img521/2719/galactus2cy7.jpg

^. There you go, and again IF he was really a cloud then the director would have potrayed him just as a simple cloud moving through space thus eliminating the need to even shape the cloud into galactus

No, its because 1) galactus by him self being potrayed would look stupid


2) They added clouds to make him more of a mystery

3)Surfer referred to galactus as a "he" and clouds don't have genders do they? This obviously indicates that galactus is physical and sentient
And they don't reveal everything before a movie... as lucas did for star wars. As sam raimi did for spiderman 3.

Oh the scans?
http://img524.imageshack.us/img524/9183/galactus02ik0.jpg

And even if that wasnt his physical body that could be a burning mass,fireball or just fires which is obviously different from a cloud, a retard can notice this

Here you go and i can quote alot of people who agreed that galactus wasnt just a cloud

This is ridiculous and i am not even going to bother anymore as it seems you don't want to listen, to me this topic is dead this thread is dead and good day to you sir.

Yes but Silver Surfer isn't a human being is he where as in the movie us humans would see it as a force of nature seeing our minds would never have seen anything like galactus before. He could of been stood there in all of his campish purple glory but because of the pure scope of him we wouldn't be able to comprende it hence our mind would translate it into best what we could understand.

Go see JLA/AVENGERS for Superman's better explanation of how the mind translates what happens into something you can understand.

Originally posted by GGS
Yes but Silver Surfer isn't a human being is he where as in the movie us humans would see it as a force of nature seeing our minds would never have seen anything like galactus before. He could of been stood there in all of his campish purple glory but because of the pure scope of him we wouldn't be able to comprende it hence our mind would translate it into best what we could understand.

Go see JLA/AVENGERS for Superman's better explanation of how the mind translates what happens into something you can understand.

The point is theres more to the cloud about galactus, Now we obviously saw a burning mass which is what firey? Fire and clouds are 2 completely different things and even fire itself cannot cast a shadow over saturn since it gives off its own light. This again indicates that galactus was in his physical form but the movie didnt show that..

Thats all. He is IN the cloud and if he was the cloud itself why would the surfer bother to even fly into it and not infront of it?

Originally posted by WrathfulDwarf
OMG it was a friggin cloud.

If that's Galactus then I guess Emperor Palpatine had a cameo.

http://img264.imageshack.us/img264/9043/47219991135789381a1bw4.jpg

Hey Doom was 1000x better in this one than the first

Originally posted by Manslayer
The point is theres more to the cloud about galactus, Now we obviously saw a burning mass which is what firey? Fire and clouds are 2 completely different things and even fire itself cannot cast a shadow over saturn since it gives off its own light. This again indicates that galactus was in his physical form but the movie didnt show that..

Thats all. He is IN the cloud and if he was the cloud itself why would the surfer bother to even fly into it and not infront of it?



True true

I saw it for the second time last night - and I definitely saw his helmet & face this time; outlined in fire & smoke. It's the shot just as the Surfer is calling up all his energy to push him away, and is about to release it. Galactus had an expression of anger; look.

Originally posted by roughrider
I saw it for the second time last night - and I definitely saw his helmet & face this time; outlined in fire & smoke. It's the shot just as the Surfer is calling up all his energy to push him away, and is about to release it. Galactus had an expression of anger; look.


True true

Originally posted by Grimm22
Hey Doom was 1000x better in this one than the first Yeah I know, in that pic, it showed Doom for who he truly is.

I am Disappointed in how they portrayed Galactus though. But hey, what are ya going to do. They tried making the movie as realistic as possible.

Either way, I expect to see his entire body in the Silver Surfer prequel/spin-off movie. He should resemble his Marvel: Ultimate Alliance counterpart. That'd probably help him to look less corny.

Originally posted by Ultimate Hulk43
Either way, I expect to see his entire body in the Silver Surfer prequel/spin-off movie. He should resemble his Marvel: Ultimate Alliance counterpart. That'd probably help him to look less corny. Yup and make his armour black for uber badassesness like darth vader.

Well in the ROTSS movie you can see galactus glowing right arm and right leg if you look closely

Making his armor black instead of purple could be interesting & a step towards making Galactus actually look badass.

Not to piss of anyone. I think that Galactus may have in fact been in his weakest form, and being so hungry and weak he may have converted himself into a cosmic cloud. Or I don't think Galactus is in a cloud, because I'm sure there trying not to make a giant man walk on Earth since that may seem a bit TOO unrealistic. People actually found this being smart as hell.

Having an entity that can eat planets & convert that energy into power is as unrealistic as it gets.....

Why the **** was this bumped.