Click HERE to see this thread with all of the graphics, features, and links.

and so we are to harvest the knowlege of the universe. but why then whould the devil tempt the women to eat the fruit

Hmmm interesting take on that.

Originally posted by yogert
and so we are to harvest the knowlege of the universe. but why then whould the devil tempt the women to eat the fruit

the devil = the human body and it was the human body with it's eyes who tempted us to eat this fruit of knowledge, knowledge of bad and good. the whole idea was to eat the fruit, but while you eat the fruit you are mortal and die on the same sixth day, we are still on the sixth day. we are now only one hour away from the sevent day where you will receive immortallity, because you will now be able to understand the truth. one hour in biblical formula = 41,666 years.
the husband of human can be summed up as; your mind/brain and if the human body eat this fruit it is just logic that the husband (the so-called adam) also ate because the eyes are directly connected to the brain, it cant denie the food the that the eyes produce to the brain/husband.

Originally posted by debbiejo
Hmmm interesting take on that.
read Eden and also Cain and his wife Eve.

these should all be merged into one single thread

No, it's good like it is. But I'll have to read it later on. Section by section, metaphor by metaphor.

Though the water flowing out of Eden (Eve) could mean menstruation (river) that gave life.

And I have read that semen is symbolic for spirit in many pagan religions.

no, its all the same crap, it doesn't need 3 different threads

we don't need another JIA type spammer here

Originally posted by inimalist
no, its all the same crap, it doesn't need 3 different threads

we don't need another JIA type spammer here It's not the same. It's a different point of view which is what this forum is about. I've always thought the the book of Genesis was symbolic.

whatever

You scare me.

Originally posted by inimalist
no, its all the same crap, it doesn't need 3 different threads

we don't need another JIA type spammer here

please dont read it you might understand it, even worse, you might believe it.

Originally posted by inimalist
these should all be merged into one single thread

Originally posted by Goddess Kali
You have some of the most fascinating interpretations of the Bible, I wish more people would make the Bible thier own instead of following someone else's intepretation of it.

Perhaps, but you'd simply have lots more variations on irrational fundamentalism (not that that's what this is, just that it would happen a lot). I just think that less people should make the Bible their own. Understand it metaphorically based on their own interpretations (if they are interested in that sort of thing) but eliminating it as the primary and final source of how we should live our lives.

your bordering on symbolic buddhism and revelation here my man. even though i dont agree with you on the things you said. its a facinating and rather more refreshing point of view than most fundamentalist christians here take.

Originally posted by johannes
please dont read it you might understand it, even worse, you might believe it.

how wonderfully arrogant of you

you could have just linked http://johannes-erasmus.blogspot.com/

"decoding the bible: sex from heaven" well now

what dont agree with is the fact that you seem to utterly and completely believe in your interpretation as opposed to looking at it as a theory or hypothesis.

the three of knowledge always sounded to me like a rip off of YGGDRASSIL

Evangelical blog ftw!

And I'll agree with inamilist. Condescension works even less on this forum than other places. You'll lose friends fast, and people will stop reading your posts.

Originally posted by inimalist
how wonderfully arrogant of you

you could have just linked http://johannes-erasmus.blogspot.com/

"decoding the bible: sex from heaven" well now
it was ment to be a yoke, after i read your quote!

Originally posted by leonheartmm
what dont agree with is the fact that you seem to utterly and completely believe in your interpretation as opposed to looking at it as a theory or hypothesis.
the way you read it in the bible it is an hypothesis and now you see the real thing, although there are six more ways of explaining this hypothesis.

Oh great, another JIA.

johannes, why do you believe in the bible?

Interesting interpretation, but I'm not sure how you're getting "trees = senses."

I think that you're reading the story and trying to force it to fit to your interpretation.

(This isn't aimed at you, but I like how anyone who takes Genesis at face value is merely parroting what another person has told him or her.)

Ok, stop making threads on decoding the bible. Use this one now for all decoding needs.

The Tree of Life is a mottif similiar to the Cross.

Originally posted by Shakyamunison
johannes, why do you believe in the bible? Ask him in PMs. That's what I did to JIA, and I got an answer!

Originally posted by lord xyz
Ask him in PMs. That's what I did to JIA, and I got an answer!

It is a relevant question to the assumption that the thread is based on.

Originally posted by Shakyamunison
It is a relevant question to the assumption that the thread is based on. But PMs is the only way you get an answer.

Originally posted by lord xyz
But PMs is the only way you get an answer.

I am not asking this question in a personal way. I am questioning the volidity of the primous of the thread.

I don't believe the Bible asks you to believe in the Bible. Does it?

Believe in me! For I am the almighty BOOK! I smite all other BOOKS! Bow down before my great BOOKYNESS! I will destroy all for I am the BIBLE! RAAAAAAWWWWRRRRR!!!

Originally posted by debbiejo
No, it's good like it is. But I'll have to read it later on. Section by section, metaphor by metaphor.

Though the water flowing out of Eden (Eve) could mean menstruation (river) that gave life.

And I have read that semen is symbolic for spirit in many pagan religions.
indeed Eve has the meaning of life giver.

Originally posted by FeceMan
Interesting interpretation, but I'm not sure how you're getting "trees = senses."

I think that you're reading the story and trying to force it to fit to your interpretation.

(This isn't aimed at you, but I like how anyone who takes Genesis at face value is merely parroting what another person has told him or her.)
the bible is a book of symbols and if you decode the bible it must fit right through the bible at any given place like a puzle.
for instance; water is the biblical symbol for spirit, in fact any liquid is in a different manner spirit.
for instance if you read; he was baptized in/with water it has the meaning of baptizm with spirit.
if you read the bible you can try that.

Originally posted by Shakyamunison
johannes, why do you believe in the bible?
well, the things i have posted here is an example that the bible has a true meaning if we can decode or understand it, to just read the bible doesnt make sense at all, it contradics itself all the time.
the bible is a manual for the human body, it fully explains the human and his future and his past, which is essensial to understand if you want to understand yourself.
in follow up posts i hope to convince you of that.

Originally posted by johannes
well, the things i have posted here is an example that the bible has a true meaning if we can decode or understand it, to just read the bible doesnt make sense at all, it contradics itself all the time.
the bible is a manual for the human body, it fully explains the human and his future and his past, which is essensial to understand if you want to understand yourself.
in follow up posts i hope to convince you of that.

But what if the bible is not the truth, and you are just reading into the bible what you want to see?

Originally posted by Shakyamunison
But what if the bible is not the truth, and you are just reading into the bible what you want to see?

The Bible does have meanings as long as we try to put it into an objective context and understand that certainwords have double meanings as well. Furthermore, nowhere does it say in the bible that things should be taken litteraly. Infact, it says quite the opposite. Jesus purposely spoke in parables in the bible.

Originally posted by Shakyamunison
But what if the bible is not the truth, and you are just reading into the bible what you want to see?
you will be the one to decide on that, whether i just make this up or not.

Originally posted by johannes
you will be the one to decide on that, whether i just make this up or not.

I'm not talking about me; I'm talking about you. How do you know that you are not just connecting dot and using your imagination to make a story. Kind of like looking at the nights sky and making up constellations. We see them, but they are really not there.

Originally posted by DigiMark007
Perhaps, but you'd simply have lots more variations on irrational fundamentalism (not that that's what this is, just that it would happen a lot). I just think that less people should make the Bible their own. Understand it metaphorically based on their own interpretations (if they are interested in that sort of thing) but eliminating it as the primary and final source of how we should live our lives.


Yes, but I admire Johannes' aim at questioning and trying to solve the mystery of the Bible rather than simply accept someone else's fundamental intepretation of it.


I question Buddhist text all the time, and beleive only when I am convinced. that does not make me any less of a Buddhist doing so.

At least it's something new and different. I'm tired of all the old stuff.

bangin

Originally posted by johannes
the bible is a book of symbols and if you decode the bible it must fit right through the bible at any given place like a puzle.
for instance; water is the biblical symbol for spirit, in fact any liquid is in a different manner spirit.
for instance if you read; he was baptized in/with water it has the meaning of baptizm with spirit.
if you read the bible you can try that.
I don't really believe the Bible is specially coded. It seems pretty plain-as-day to me.

Originally posted by Shakyamunison
I'm not talking about me; I'm talking about you. How do you know that you are not just connecting dot and using your imagination to make a story. Kind of like looking at the nights sky and making up constellations. We see them, but they are really not there.

well yes, what you see in the sky might not exist for millions of years, you only see the light now. it could be possible to see even moving creatures on a far away planet if you have a nice telescope, but those creatures might have died millions of years ago, but the light only reach you now. the whole universe doesnt at all look the way you see it some of them might even be just a reflection of some thing else.

about the rest; well i have used the meaning of words in the bible to construct a picture of what i say. sometimes it is more than just the meaning of words, it might be a mirrored image or a riddle or a parable. in any case i only quoted from the bible and you will have to agree this is a complete new picture of what the litteral letters tells you when you read.
i have only used the bible and if you know the meaning of the words it pictures itself.
yes it is a complete new thing for the mind, for instance; what is the so-called crusifiction on a hill called Calvary or Golgotah? the word Calvary has the meaning of; place in the scull, and this place is your brain, and then this says; you were crusified in your brain/scull. i will say more about this later.
therefore; i dont look into the sky, but i decipher the words and symbols of the bible to see the true thing.

Originally posted by FeceMan
I don't really believe the Bible is specially coded. It seems pretty plain-as-day to me.

it is encoded to suit our intelligence. as we progress we CAN understand it differently. a long time ago we believed the earth to be flat, now we KNOW its not. there is a difference in believing something and knowing something. believe is to hope for something you dont yet see or understand, while knowledge is reality.

Originally posted by johannes
well yes, what you see in the sky might not exist for millions of years, you only see the light now. it could be possible to see even moving creatures on a far away planet if you have a nice telescope, but those creatures might have died millions of years ago, but the light only reach you now. the whole universe doesnt at all look the way you see it some of them might even be just a reflection of some thing else.

about the rest; well i have used the meaning of words in the bible to construct a picture of what i say. sometimes it is more than just the meaning of words, it might be a mirrored image or a riddle or a parable. in any case i only quoted from the bible and you will have to agree this is a complete new picture of what the litteral letters tells you when you read.
i have only used the bible and if you know the meaning of the words it pictures itself.
yes it is a complete new thing for the mind, for instance; what is the so-called crusifiction on a hill called Calvary or Golgotah? the word Calvary has the meaning of; place in the scull, and this place is your brain, and then this says; you were crusified in your brain/scull. i will say more about this later.
therefore; i dont look into the sky, but i decipher the words and symbols of the bible to see the true thing.

But why do you use the bible? Why not the Koran, or the Lotus Sutra?

Originally posted by johannes
it is encoded to suit our intelligence. as we progress we CAN understand it differently. a long time ago we believed the earth to be flat, now we KNOW its not. there is a difference in believing something and knowing something. believe is to hope for something you dont yet see or understand, while knowledge is reality.
The Bible is meant for today, yesterday, and tomorrow.

Originally posted by Shakyamunison
But why do you use the bible? Why not the Koran, or the Lotus Sutra?
i have studied the Koran. it is also a spiritual book saying the same but from another angle.
the koran has a different mission. christians create the new future body while Muslem create the future earth and food.

Originally posted by johannes
i have studied the Koran. it is also a spiritual book saying the same but from another angle.
the koran has a different mission. christians create the new future body while Muslem create the future earth and food.

Then you sould read the Lotus Sutra.

Or the Gnostics, Satanic Bible, Wicca world, Fredericks of Hollywood.

Originally posted by debbiejo
Or the Gnostics, Satanic Bible, Wicca world, Fredericks of Hollywood.

I was agreeing with you until Fredericks of Hollywood.

forget ALL that stuff. read the mythology of saint seiya/angel sanctuary/shin megaten/xenosaga/vertogi comics.
its a LOT more interesting than the koran or bible.


SHAKA VIRGO beats ANY god out there. OMMMM!!!!!!

Originally posted by Shakyamunison
Then you sould read the Lotus Sutra.
why do you think i must read that?

Originally posted by leonheartmm
forget ALL that stuff. read the mythology of saint seiya/angel sanctuary/shin megaten/xenosaga/vertogi comics.
its a LOT more interesting than the koran or bible.


SHAKA VIRGO beats ANY god out there. OMMMM!!!!!!
yes the bible is boring if you dont understand the symbols and images.

Originally posted by johannes
why do you think i must read that?

You seem to be into reading and interpreting important religious books. In Buddhism, the most important Sutra (teaching) of Buddha is the Lotus Sutra.

The flood was a retold story of the Black Sea flood of ~8,000 years ago.

It never happend.

Neither Noah nor his Ark existed.

Originally posted by Boris
It never happend.

Neither Noah nor his Ark existed.

Noah and the Ark maybe fictional but the flood maybe based on fact. Check this out:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_Sea_deluge_theory

Yeah but in the Bible the flood is a world wide flood.

That's probably where whoever came up with Noah got the idea from though.

Originally posted by Boris
Yeah but in the Bible the flood is a world wide flood.

That's probably where whoever came up with Noah got the idea from though.

You know what happens when people re-tale a story over and over again? Also, what does "the world" mean? If you lived back then, on the shore of the black sea, you might think "the world" was flooding too.

Originally posted by Shakyamunison
You know what happens when people re-tale a story over and over again? Also, what does "the world" mean? If you lived back then, on the shore of the black sea, you might think "the world" was flooding too.

while true.......you're negating the fact that the bible is supposedly the work of humans transcribing the word as told to them by god. Surely a god would know the world was far larger than known to the primitives of the time.

Originally posted by Evil Dead
while true.......you're negating the fact that the bible is supposedly the work of humans transcribing the word as told to them by god. Surely a god would know the world was far larger than known to the primitives of the time.

I negate that "fact" all the time.

Originally posted by Evil Dead
while true.......you're negating the fact that the bible is supposedly the work of humans transcribing the word as told to them by god. Surely a god would know the world was far larger than known to the primitives of the time.

Maybe God said "your world", meaning their small spot of land that they think is all that's out there, and just wrote down "the world", because they didn't think anything else was out there.

Originally posted by Naz
Maybe God said "your world", meaning their small spot of land that they think is all that's out there, and just wrote down "the world", because they didn't think anything else was out there.

Stilllll, the all animals part?

Originally posted by Bardock42
Stilllll, the all animals part?

Well, the bible's story is fiction.

Originally posted by Boris
It never happend.

Neither Noah nor his Ark existed.
Really?

Check these links:

LINK 1: http://www.arkdiscovery.com/noah's_ark.htm

LINK 2: Click!

LINK 3: Click!

You know, in order to accept the idea that the Flood was not a flood of water but fire, one has to accept the gobledy-gook you've already stated in that "Decoding that One Book" thread.

I wanna see EVAN ALMIGHTY


In the future that movie will be used as proof of God's existance

Originally posted by S_W_LeGenD
Really?

Check these links:

LINK 1: http://www.arkdiscovery.com/noah's_ark.htm

LINK 2: Click!

LINK 3: Click!

Wow. This is incredible evidence. Why were we withold that. It proves God's existence. Wow. I am amazed.

Originally posted by Bardock42
Wow. This is incredible evidence. Why were we withold that. It proves God's existence. Wow. I am amazed.

I have a bridge for sale.

I'm converting.

Just watch Evan Almighty.

Hli GUys!! Is there really a flood during that time of Noah?

Originally posted by vinz07
Hli GUys!! Is there really a flood during that time of Noah?

No.

*sigh*

Originally posted by Bardock42
Wow. This is incredible evidence. Why were we withold that. It proves God's existence. Wow. I am amazed.
Ignorance is not a blessing.

Also you can download and watch these videos: (Use youtubex)

Part 1: youtube.com/watch?v=2Y5ORpMTebI

Part 2: youtube.com/watch?v=SE7nN80dIw8

Originally posted by S_W_LeGenD
Ignorance is not a blessing.

Also you can download and watch these videos: (Use youtubex)

Part 1: youtube.com/watch?v=2Y5ORpMTebI

Part 2: youtube.com/watch?v=SE7nN80dIw8

You really don't believe that shit, do you?

"Archaeologist" Ron Wyatt's discoveries... LMAO.

Originally posted by xmarksthespot
"Archaeologist" Ron Wyatt's discoveries... LMAO.

Piles of rock, and wood that dates to a much younger age. Also, no one is taking into consideration that glaziers are like very slow rivers of ice. Any ship that was placed on the top of the mountain 8,000 years ago would have been deposited at the bottom long ago.

Originally posted by Shakyamunison
Piles of rock, and wood that dates to a much younger age. Also, no one is taking into consideration that glaziers are like very slow rivers of ice. Any ship that was placed on the top of the mountain 8,000 years ago would have been deposited at the bottom long ago. But the big G would have kept it there to prove his existence

Originally posted by PITT_HAPPENS
But the big G would have kept it there to prove his existence oh, I forgot.

Originally posted by xmarksthespot
"Archaeologist" Ron Wyatt's discoveries... LMAO. READ that, read that, read that. Ark of the Covenant too. Jesus's blood still on it which he did some DNA testing. Seems it's missing a chromosome. Pictures and everything on his site. Just located, if anyone wants to know, right under where the cross was, but with the earth quake, Jesus's blood dripped down onto the Ark so that later on the Jews will understand and believe. The final sacrifice actually dripped down on the Ark. Pretty convincing stuff actually, but false.

Originally posted by PITT_HAPPENS
But the big G would have kept it there to prove his existence Pfft... Galactus doesn't need to prove his existence.

Originally posted by xmarksthespot
Pfft... Galactus doesn't need to prove his existence.

I thought he meant Gravity.

Originally posted by debbiejo
READ that, read that, read that. Ark of the Covenant too. Jesus's blood still on it which he did some DNA testing. Seems it's missing a chromosome. Pictures and everything on his site. Just located, if anyone wants to know, right under where the cross was, but with the earth quake, Jesus's blood dripped down onto the Ark so that later on the Jews will understand and believe. The final sacrifice actually dripped down on the Ark. Pretty convincing stuff actually, but false. Did they have DNA to compare it too?Originally posted by xmarksthespot
Pfft... Galactus doesn't need to prove his existence.

Well if he is that stupid cloud in the movie I would say he would

Originally posted by Shakyamunison
You seem to be into reading and interpreting important religious books. In Buddhism, the most important Sutra (teaching) of Buddha is the Lotus Sutra.
well, you read something you were brought up with, although i have studied the Quo,Ran. all prophets are from God also Budha, it just serves something else important. all religions came from Christ Jesus and Jerusalem the mother of all whores. Jesus was the Lucifer to bring the light and so are you. we have to accept that aal religions have a roll to play.

Originally posted by johannes
well, you read something you were brought up with, although i have studied the Quo,Ran. all prophets are from God also Budha, it just serves something else important. all religions came from Christ Jesus and Jerusalem the mother of all whores. Jesus was the Lucifer to bring the light and so are you. we have to accept that aal religions have a roll to play.

Jesus was just a man.

Originally posted by Shakyamunison
Jesus was just a man. You for got the "con" part

Originally posted by Shakyamunison
Jesus was just a man.
yes, of-cause, just like a Mohamed and a Budhah, each having an important message. the unfortunate thing was that christians then started to worship their prophet, but with good reason although they dont understand it.
Mo Hamed told his followers, not to build or create a "heap" on a grave, meaning, not to glorify him or any dead, but instead his followers has build a mosque on top of his grave, a spiritual tower in other words, same as the followers of all other prophets, but again for good reason!!

Originally posted by johannes
yes, of-cause, just like a Mohamed and a Budhah, each having an important message. the unfortunate thing was that christians then started to worship their prophet, but with good reason although they dont understand it.
Mo Hamed told his followers, not to build or create a "heap" on a grave, meaning, not to glorify him or any dead, but instead his followers has build a mosque on top of his grave, a spiritual tower in other words, same as the followers of all other prophets, but again for good reason!!

There is no good reason.

more like the Noah flood story is a creation of a religious dude premature ejaculation

God doesn't do that.

Originally posted by debbiejo
God doesn't do that.

He, according to JIA, does not have any genitalia. However, they still call him "him". Shouldn't they call him, her?

IT IT IT IT IT IT IT IT IT IT IT.............Okay, Her.


I'll see if I can find the link.

Originally posted by debbiejo
IT IT IT IT IT IT IT IT IT IT IT.............

Do you need to have a doctor look at that?

Here's an interesting thought. If god is an IT and we are made in gods image, then we are ITS too. Only with orrises and odd protrusions...

Originally posted by debbiejo
Here's an interesting thought. If god is an IT and we are made in gods image, then we are ITS too. Only with orfuses and odd protusions...

That's IT.

I'm a genius.

Originally posted by debbiejo


I'm a genius.

I wouldn't go that far.

Well you shouldn't judge ITS, IT like that.

lawlz

I am more intelligent than 98% of this thread.

Originally posted by FeceMan
I am more intelligent than 98% of this thread.

Well...I'd hope so.

HA, I just brought it down to 96%...

My ways are not your ways, saith.....Oops, I shouldn't give it away.

Originally posted by FeceMan
I am more intelligent than 98% of this thread. There are 45 posts in this thread and I've made 2 of them so at best you're in the 95th percentile. 313

Originally posted by Shakyamunison
There is no good reason.
is there no good reason for your belief also? is your belief all in vain?

Originally posted by johannes
is there no good reason for your belief also? is your belief all in vain?

My belief is practical. It works in my life to better my life. Once it stops doing so, then I will revise my beliefs.

Originally posted by Shakyamunison
My belief is practical. It works in my life to better my life. Once it stops doing so, then I will revise my beliefs.

If...you happen...to go to Hell...will your beliefs help you then?

Originally posted by JesusIsAlive
If...you happen...to go to Hell...will your beliefs help you then?



Why would he go to hell? I doubt sayin "i luv jesus" is the instant ticket to heaven

Originally posted by Crimson Phoenix
Why would he go to hell? I doubt sayin "i luv jesus" is the instant ticket to heaven

Because he will die in his sins and thus perish.

Originally posted by JesusIsAlive
Because he will die in his sins and thus perish.

So christians who constantly sin will be ok cause they can say "its alrite, i love jesus, so its all good"

Originally posted by JesusIsAlive
If...you happen...to go to Hell...will your beliefs help you then?



If I go to hell, it will only be a short time before god lets me out.

Originally posted by JesusIsAlive
If...you happen...to go to Hell...will your beliefs help you then?

When you see us all in Heaven, will your beliefs change then?

Originally posted by Shakyamunison
If I go to hell, it will only be a short time before god lets me out. What if I don't want too?

Is someone on this forum in need of that one very special thread? What do ya think Shaky? Anyone come to mind?

Originally posted by debbiejo
When you see us all in Heaven, will your beliefs change then?

What if I don't want too?

Is someone on this forum in need of that one very special thread? What do ya think Shaky? Anyone come to mind?

Is the hell thread still around?

Originally posted by debbiejo


I thought it got moved.

http://www.killermovies.com/forums/showthread.php?s=&threadid=389506


JIA, You have been condemned to Hell for acting as god it's self and imposing as an impostor of righteousness. You must go enter and repent, no passing go, and no collecting $200.00.

Gotta just love fish after all that.

Bump to make my statistics true.

Originally posted by anaconda
more like the Noah flood story is a creation of a religious dude premature ejaculation
what is the dudes name?

Originally posted by Shakyamunison
If I go to hell, it will only be a short time before god lets me out.
you are in hell and yes it will now only be a short while before your saved by your perishable body which will stay in hell for ever. the body is called the son of perdition and is the only one to perish for your sins.

Originally posted by johannes
you are in hell and yes it will now only be a short while before your saved by your perishable body which will stay in hell for ever. the body is called the son of perdition and is the only one to perish for your sins.

you tease. I'm sure you say that to all the women you wanna get in bed with

Originally posted by Crimson Phoenix
you tease. I'm sure you say that to all the women you wanna get in bed with
yes absolutely man, but i also tell you about it and i dont want to get into your bed, do i?

Originally posted by johannes
yes absolutely man, but i also tell you about it and i dont want to get into your bed, do i?

I dunno. For all i know you might do.

Originally posted by Crimson Phoenix
I dunno. For all i know you might do.
no i dont, but think of this there is only two places, the heaven/spiritual place and the earth/phisical place. one of them has to be hell.

Originally posted by johannes
You are in hell and yes it will now only be a short while before your saved by your perishable body which will stay in hell for ever. the body is called the son of perdition and is the only one to perish for your sins.

You have an interesting point of view, but there is no self. So, how can some part of you survive extinction?

The Life energy that unmanifests will survive and return to the collective conscious will it not Shakya.

Originally posted by Versyn Gaul
The Life energy that unmanifests will survive and return to the collective conscious will it not Shakya.

Yes, but you know how my personal beliefs differ? We are already there...

Originally posted by johannes
what is the dudes name?

Gilgamesh.

Originally posted by FeceMan
Bump to make my statistics true. Your stats aren't true anymore

Originally posted by PITT_HAPPENS
Your stats aren't true anymore

Just wait until Deb posts again.

However, the bible is just a myth.

Originally posted by Shakyamunison
However, the bible is just a myth.
however, if you dont understand it, it is a boring story book.

Originally posted by johannes
however, if you dont understand it, it is a boring story book.

Very true, but there are so many interpretations.

Originally posted by Shakyamunison
Very true, but there are so many interpretations.
also true, but there can only be one truth. do you in any manner take the bible in considderation when you look at your beliefs?

Wow, another bible thumping troll who wants to preach at us. If only the people who created this website had enjoyed the forethought to give certain individuals on the forum the authority and privilege to do something about it. What a world it would be.

Originally posted by johannes
also true, but there can only be one truth. do you in any manner take the bible in considderation when you look at your beliefs?

1. The truth is relative. So, there are as many truths as there are points of view.

2. I do not read the bible now, but I used to read it, and was very knowledgeable about it. So, no would be the answer. I study the Lotus Sutra now.

Jormungandr?

Originally posted by Devil King
Wow, another bible thumping troll who wants to preach at us. If only the people who created this website had enjoyed the forethought to give certain individuals on the forum the authority and privilege to do something about it. What a world it would be.

Here is a rather better solution. If you don't like Religion forum - stay out of it. Problem solved.

The problem seems to be that you would like to use this forum to vent out your burning hatred for Christians. This is a Religion forum.
Your personal issues with Christians does not make anyone obligatory to stop discussing or even advertising Christianity.

You don't like preaching thread. Don't go into it.

Originally posted by lil bitchiness
The problem seems to be that you would like to use this forum to vent out your burning hatred for Christians.



Venting is his only contribution to the forums, and it's not only at Christians, so don't worry.


He b*tches at everybody, and to have a civil conversation with him is almost impossible.