Originally posted by Mr Parker
btw,I only know the dog is back because the user name comes up obviously.To prove my earlier point,I would bet my life savings that dog actually addressed me in his first post and actually posted to me am I right or am i right? give me an answer.if you dont,your avoiding that I make a good point and cant admit it. If I am right and he addressed me-AGAIN that just proves what I have saying all along that he's desperate for my attention since I have him blocked from my view.
You will always be the joke of this forum because your grammar and typing skills are, to put it mildly, entertaining. And you will always be the joke of this forum because of your continual cheerleading and illogical ramblings. But most of all, you will always be the joke of this forum because you are pathetic and a truly stupid liar.
You claim that you don't read my posts (which I know you are doing now...gotcha) yet refer to them on multiple occasions. I will use examples all from another thread to prove my point.
Examples taken from :
http://www.killermovies.com/forums/446833_1-the-assassination-of-jfk-jr
Apr 7th, 2007 05:40 PM
Originally posted by KharmaDog
Just a thought,the Kennedy family is one of the most corrupt families in american history. Who's to say that if he had of run for president and won that he wouldn't have been as big of an ass as all of his predecessors?
Five minutes later you post:
Apr 7th, 2007 05:45 PM
Originally posted by Mr Parker
exactly.well said.
If you ignore my posts, how can you agree with me 5 minutes after I posted a point?
8 days later
Originally posted by Mr Parker
Thats why unlike Kharma Dog, I WILL occassionally take you off my ignore list and listen to you because unlike Kharma Dog,you occassionaly make good points like the last paragraph.
What a short memory. Regard the previous example where you not only acknowledge my post, but agree with the point.
Originally posted by Mr Parker
your the one who is ignorant about bill clinton being a corrupted president---(within the same paragraph)---- at least Grand Moff unlike you and Kharma knows how to debate without insulting.
I just love the irony of that post.
Originally posted by Mr Parker
Yeah its hysterical that the kid says YOUR walking toward a ban with every step after HE got warned by a mod recently for bashing a member for creating guess what? a conspiracy thread in the conspiracy section of all places.
His logic is so stupid its pathetic.He goes and attacks people for making conspiracy threads in the conspiracy section because he is so afraid of the truth about them like 9-11 and the Kennedy assassination,ect..pitiful. Bakerboy dont bother with those two losers Lord Xyz and kharma dog anymore,they are not worth it.
That post is a gem for multiple reasons. The first is that once again you reference my posts (which you don't read). The second is that you completely pervert anything that you read to fit your own demented agenda. Thirdly, you constantly insult members and chastise them for insulting others, then you follow it up with a few more insults.
Lastly, you have the gall to post crap like this.......
Originally posted by Mr Parker
you also conviently ignored how Lord -like he always does in a debate-wouldnt even take me up on my challenge
and...
Originally posted by Mr Parker
No YOU ignore MY posts which prove you wrong all the time,you couldnt even refute my last post I just posted.
AND.........
Originally posted by Mr Parker
By the way.Unlike you,when someone challenges me to look at information they have where they think they are right and can prove me wrong,"I" do look at their information
Yet have not offered the same consideration, to J-Beowulf, that you try to demand from others when he made this post on Apr 20th, 2007 06:53 PM
Originally posted by J-Beowulf
Name three (3) scientists and experts out of those thousands, and provide a link where they say, clearly, that the buildings could not have fallen after the impacts.
By the way, he has made that same request, multiple times and as recently as Jun 27th, 2007, yet you still avoid direct debate with him. As you avoid direct debate with me on any subject.