Click HERE to see this thread with all of the graphics, features, and links.

Maybe those two Russian Fighters were Transformers. As you said, "more then meets the eye!"

as usual, thanks for the link

Link: Here

Personally i like the Transformer's theory.

Originally posted by {{QS}}
Link: Here

Personally i like the Transformer's theory.

Sounds plausible..

it's not like the Russians would use bombers to spy, let alone stand launch a full scale attack with just two bombers, so them being transformers is actually pretty logical...

Well that or the pilots just got way off target.

they're just prick waving.

wtf?

yes! Russia is going to go into economic collapse again and starve all its people

ooooooo... big bad ruskie army!!! lol

(unfortunatly their military ties to china are stronger than ever :/)

Quite disturbing. I completely agree with what the British government did. No foreign party should be allowed to assasinate British citizens on home turf.

well this is obviously all a lie.
after all bush clearly stated that he could look into putin's soul and knows he's a good man of faith. the liberals must have a hand in this.

Originally posted by Schecter
after all bush clearly stated that he could look into putin's soul and knows he's a good man of faith.

That didn't really happen, did it?

-dubya

http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2001/06/20010618.html

It makes me feel safe relying on the superpowers of a retarded monkey

you just have to believe

Originally posted by smoker4
It makes me feel safe relying on the superpowers of a retarded monkey

Well we have been doing the same thing for over 200 years, it's just that this one takes the cake.

Originally posted by 2D_MASTER
Well we have been doing the same thing for over 200 years, it's just that this one takes the cake.

This one shits in the cake then eats it

Originally posted by Schecter
-dubya

http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2001/06/20010618.html

it is from 2001... but still...

So, I say that the American people should sue GW for gross negligance.

its january 2008 that mr bush is done? 09?

Originally posted by inimalist
it is from 2001... but still...

So, I say that the American people should sue GW for gross negligance.

its january 2008 that mr bush is done? 09?

Elections are in November 08, he'll be gone in January 09.

Originally posted by Lana
Elections are in November 08, he'll be gone in January 09.

that will be good, hopefully

there is an entire generation of people (myself included) who have really only been aware of politics through the Bush years (I'd have been 15-16 when he was elected in). It will be nice to get to experience a different type of America.

If there's going to be another "Cold War", even though the first one technically never really ended, we need to gather some DNA and clone another Reagan.

The Russians have never changed! They're the same old hardline Reds who scrubbed up to get The West's money and a lead into the markets and then showed their true colours. And Putin is KGB through and through.

Their hardline communists just the same only now they put on a smile on the world media stage and sport Armani suits.

My idea's still the best ermm

Originally posted by Schecter
as usual, thanks for the link

Ever heard of Google, or are you knew to the internet?

Giving one link could in some situations focus on one media outlet, source etc and biast the information being given.

best to search yourself and find alternative info before believing a thread and commenting. Thats what I do anyway

takes at least a day for google to crawl sites for updated info. so you are wrong.


so maybe you should quit making lameass excuses and learn to reference the source.

Originally posted by Schecter
takes at least a day for google to crawl sites for updated info. so you are wrong.


so maybe you should quit making lameass excuses and learn to reference the source.

"no no, he's got a point"

-Krunk's, little angel from the Emperor's New Groove.

Bicnarok, in all fairness, your posts seem to be good. I can see your point but why not post a link to an article and then let others find more information on it? Do you honestly think that they will look up a reference for it? Anyway, you can could also say Schecter is the lazy one for not looking it up as well but that is more of a stretch than you simply leaving it out of the "main thread" post.

what a load of BS crap, Norwegian air force have done that job for ya three times now since Thursday........RAF just fueled their jetplanes thats all the brits did

RAF is such a shitty thing. Luftewaffle sounds much better.

Originally posted by Schecter
takes at least a day for google to crawl sites for updated info. so you are wrong.

so maybe you should quit making lameass excuses and learn to reference the source.

I found the Times site in 5 seconds under google, so Your wrong.

maybe you should stop being a total utter wassack and stop looking for little things to complain about, sad pathetic offspring of a rancid camel.

ok, get the tear buckets, we need to bail this thread out because someone cant reference a source

i know its difficult to do...copying and pasting a url *grunt* *pant*

Originally posted by Schecter
ok, get the tear buckets, we need to bail this thread out because someone cant reference a source

i know its difficult to do...copying and pasting a url *grunt* *pant*

We need to bail you out of the Dunces corner, yeh get that pointed hat off and learn to use the internet. Foolish individual.

Originally posted by Bicnarok
I found the Times site in 5 seconds under google, so Your wrong.

maybe you should stop being a total utter wassack and stop looking for little things to complain about, sad pathetic offspring of a rancid camel.

And its been 2 days since the story was posted.Schecter said it only took a day so he's still right.