Click HERE to see this thread with all of the graphics, features, and links.

What should we talk about?

LOL damn good question. Maybe the thing about Jesus being perfect. People make up so much stuff it's silly.

So maybe, what are some misconceptions about specific religions that are just simply taken as true?

Originally posted by chithappens
LOL damn good question. Maybe the thing about Jesus being perfect. People make up so much stuff it's silly.

So maybe, what are some misconceptions about specific religions that are just simply taken as true?

Hero worship over 2000 years = divine god.

Touche

weve got talented poets on the board.

Originally posted by Shakyamunison
What should we talk about?

Squirrel. One syllable or two?

31

Declaration: FeceMan finds this thread amusing both in its failed attempt at composing something akin to poetry and the amount of error contained within the aforementioned poetry.

Quotation: 1 Peter 2:22-23

Annotation: The quoted material inside the material FeceMan quoted is from Isaiah.

Quotation: 1 John :4-5

So, you go to a flawed book to try and prove a man perfect.

Originally posted by DigiMark007
Squirrel. One syllable or two?

31

Two.

Squir*rel

Originally posted by Shakyamunison
So, you go to a flawed book to try and prove a man perfect.

Flawed in what respect? The composition of a book being every liturgical genre ever manifested in the human mind, that fact that it's been a bestseller since Gutenberg, or the one about undermining a religion simply because the norm decrees?

At the very least, the teachings of the Bible are VERY flawed and inaccurate.

The book itself gets like that in the New Testament. God changing his mind on so much when God does not change is stupid.

Originally posted by chithappens
At the very least, the teachings of the Bible are VERY flawed and inaccurate.

The book itself gets like that in the New Testament. God changing his mind on so much when God does not change is stupid.

Teaching in what respect? Who is teaching? If your saying what I think you're saying, you are undermining a teaching because someone taught it wrong. Argumentum ad Logicum I can assure you those who reference the bible correctly know that it is neither a book of pure scientific/historical reliability. It is simply a work of literature that tells a story. Likewise in our society books change people. Certain books are written to change people's lives. Some are changed others are not.

I do not understand a book that promises much and asks for very little is willed to be the target of the criticism and ridicule of that of a criminal. As though the book itself is the cause of inhuman behavior. And no, a person's interpretation does not place the blame on the book. That's as if saying "the grass should be green" should be changed to the color of my green because that's how I understood the sentence to come across.