ragesRemorse
Is their a solid premise leading to a true conclusion, or are all conclusions, conditional to the premise?
P then Q, the conclusion is P. However, If P then Q, Q then follows P resulting in the conclusion of Q.
With P then Q, is there ever a premise leading to a final undoubted conclusion? I am only questiong something that Lewis Carroll already has. Are conditional premises's a flaw in philosophical logic?
P then Q, the conclusion is P. However, If P then Q, Q then follows P resulting in the conclusion of Q.
With P then Q, is there ever a premise leading to a final undoubted conclusion? I am only questiong something that Lewis Carroll already has. Are conditional premises's a flaw in philosophical logic?