Click HERE to see this thread with all of the graphics, features, and links.

How the hell does this still go on?

http://www.whileseated.org/photo/003244.shtml

This is odd.

80 years for what exactly? I seem to not have quite understood.

That is ridiculous that sounds like some pants from the 1920's!

What the hell? That's seriously messed up...

I wish I was the all-powerful mediator for everything.

white america

I've never understood racial policies in America and when they try to explain it at school I think thank god I wasn't coloured in America in the 1920's. I REALLY don't understand why the colour of someones skin means ANYTHING?

he looka lika man

Are people scared to discuss this or something? I see topics much, much more facetious and idiotic, when mentioning racism, get more attention.

This is fairly recent news.

Yes I am far to scared to discuss this or just maybe its that I dont care.

Sigh, by scared I mean not willing to acknowledge because "racism does not exist anymore/ the government would not do that" kinda goes out the window.

Geez, cut me some slack on the context ass.

Anyone think they will actually allow these guys to go free?

80 years? In my country maximum sentence is 25 years, then life in prison, with a possibility to get out after 25 if you behave well. I never understood sentencing someone for 100 years or stuff like this- cruel and unreasonable.

Well this country is weird like that though. You can get as much time in prison for killing a person as you can for carrying around over an ounce of cocaine (federal offense).

Shrug

I also do not understand why non-adult people are sentenced to life in prison, while they are not even allowed to drink alcohol or drive...

It's stuff like this that makes me glad there is a "North" and "southern" states. All the trash like that DA tend to hang out in the South

I'm gonna guess sarcasm but that was still a weird comment

Yes, it was sarcasm.

I guess those Yankees just don't care to help out anymore

Eh. I'm safe here in California, where the Mexicans literally outnumber the White people now. I'm safe as safe can be.

Prick.

I'm sure you guys have heard about the case so far but if not heres a link.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jena_Six

What do you guys think should happen? How do you feel?

I feel that your link-fu needs a little work.

http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,1660787,00.html

So a group of teenagers were planning to beat and hang another teen.. and yet the charges were reduced from attempted murder to aggrivated assault because someone cried that the arrests and charges were racially motivated?

Here comes the Czarina to work this thread over...

I already made a topic on this and no ones gives a ****. Sad really to just avoid current news actually happening.

These types of things go beyond the south but whatever. Czarina burned everyone out on race so it will never be addressed.

http://www.killermovies.com/forums/f11/t462370.html

Originally posted by chithappens
Jena 6
How the hell does this still go on?

http://www.whileseated.org/photo/003244.shtml

First I thought this was the latest porn movie. Then I realized it was a half-assed news article. Why did the author leave it at "a fight broke out?" What the hell happened that would bring up these charges? Details, please, not some "Well, you know, this fight broke out, and now everyone's on death row...." I'm willing to create my own judgment, just give me both sides. I already know the white kids were scumbags, now what else happened?


One thing I do know is this: If the black kids were the beaters or the beat-ees, either way Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton will be there.



Originally posted by Lord Melkor
I also do not understand why non-adult people are sentenced to life in prison, while they are not even allowed to drink alcohol or drive...
Why are middle-aged adults charged with murder? After all, they're not allowed to collect Medicare or get the senior price at Golden Corral. Isn't it obvious that one thing directly leads to the other?

Originally posted by chithappens
Anyone think they will actually allow these guys to go free?

Yea, they should throw the book at those guys and let the whites kids whom hung nooses over tree branches and stared this whole thing off scott free.

w/e. I hear it's this event will start a new civil rights movement the scale of '65. It'll be an interesting witness, as the situation unfolds.

22 years in PRISON for a "jump"?

Attempted murder my ass

FREE THE JENA SIX.

No JUSTICE

Don't SLEEP

whois jena?

Originally posted by Creshosk
http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,1660787,00.html

So a group of teenagers were planning to beat and hang another teen.. and yet the charges were reduced from attempted murder to aggrivated assault because someone cried that the arrests and charges were racially motivated?

Where did you get that the accused were planning on "Hanging" anybody?

Selective reading?

When was the last time YOU heard of ANYBODY getting 22 years for a "jump"?

MURDER caries a minimum of 5 years and a maximum of 32 years.

ATTEMPTED MURDER caries a 40% reduction that corresponds with the APPROPRIATE murder charge depending on the tier (i.e. 40% of 5 or if it is extreme enough 40% of 32).

The Attempted Murder weapon?

A shoe. Not a steel toe boot. Not a Timberland. Not the sharp church shoes. More like a Nike, or a Rebok.

Black fist in the air.

FREE THE JENA 6

No JUSTICE,
Don't SLEEP

Originally posted by Spliffman
whois jena?

EXACTLY.

Shame on the National media.

Big up Micheal Baisden.

Turn on the news (cnn) if you want to know.

They're FINALLY giving this story coverage.
(Though only after the word got out that the Black people were comming.)

Originally posted by chillmeistergen
Prick.



EDIT-

AND FREE OJ TOO! .. sorta!

Originally posted by Spliffman
whois jena?

She is an acromyn. It stands for J.oin the E.ndagred N.egro A.ssociation.

I wasn't aware we're an endangered species now.

Originally posted by FistOfThe North
She is an acromyn. It stands for J.oin the E.ndagred N.egro A.ssociation.

omg lol im a n.egro too

Originally posted by Blax_Hydralisk
I wasn't aware we're an endangered species now.

You didn't? With the given rate of what's going on in the Black community in the U.S. The culture is gonna end up imploding in on itself cause no one wants to wake the fcuk up.

Originally posted by FistOfThe North
You didn't? With the given rate of what's going on in the Black community in the U.S. The culture is gonna end up imploding in on itself cause no one wants to wake the fcuk up.

waaa waaa waaaaaa

too bad they werent a bunch of white kids or you would find it funny.

People at my school were wearing black for the whole Jena 6 thing... After learning what it was, I will now put my thoughts on it out there...

I do not condone racism... No matter what happened, RACISM IS WRONG AND IS (SHOULD BE) A CRIME

However, I also do not condone assault... No matter what happened, ASSAULT IS A CRIME

As you can see, I do not take a side in this whole thing... Both sides are wrong in this situation... The white kids deserve to be expelled, but the black kids do also... Both black and white are wrong in this situation... Both hated, and both must answer for their deeds (Though I respect the African Americans more because they had a peaceful sit in)... To me, this isn't about "White Power" or "Black Power", this is about two groups doing morally wrong deeds... I don't know about you guys, but I think both groups deserve any punishment they got/get... And if either side went unpunished, THEN we have a problem...

Originally posted by Schecter
waaa waaa waaaaaa

too bad they werent a bunch of white kids or you would find it funny.

w/e man.

If the situation was reversed i'd still be infuriated that some kids were friken facing life in prison for beating up a provocateur.

And it's messed up that that kid got beat up (and it's not funny). But c'mon on. Something clearly smells bad in this case, even you should see it.

Originally posted by Bat Dude
People at my school were wearing black for the whole Jena 6 thing... After learning what it was, I will now put my thoughts on it out there...

I do not condone racism... No matter what happened, RACISM IS WRONG AND IS (SHOULD BE) A CRIME

However, I also do not condone assault... No matter what happened, ASSAULT IS A CRIME

As you can see, I do not take a side in this whole thing... Both sides are wrong in this situation... The white kids deserve to be expelled, but the black kids do also... Both black and white are wrong in this situation... Both hated, and both must answer for their deeds (Though I respect the African Americans more because they had a peaceful sit in)... To me, this isn't about "White Power" or "Black Power", this is about two groups doing morally wrong deeds... I don't know about you guys, but I think both groups deserve any punishment they got/get... And if either side went unpunished, THEN we have a problem...
That's why I support "Gray Power".

Originally posted by FistOfThe North
w/e man.

If the situation was reversed i'd still be infuriated that some kids were friken facing life in prison for beating up a provocateur.

And it's messed up that that kid got beat up (and it's not funny). But c'mon on. Something clearly smells bad in this case, even you should see it.

this case pisses me off plain and simple, just as it would piss me off if the race cards were reversed. just the same as i would feel if a black man was on video being arrested for no good reason and tasered while subdued. thats what makes me a better person than you.

Originally posted by Schecter
this case pisses me off plain and simple, just as it would piss me off if the race cards were reversed. just the same as i would feel if a black man was on video being arrested for no good reason and tasered while subdued. thats what makes me a better person than you.

?

Didn't I just say if it were the other way around it'd madden me also.

And like i wouldn't get pissed if i saw injustice. And with that tasered kid, i wished that the outcome was different of course cause i believe they used unnecessary force and on the heels of violating the 1st amendment (the worst things you can do) but if your alluding to my saying I chuckled at that tasered student when he said "Don't tase me bro! ZAP! Ow ow ow!" then I'll let you know if he was anyone else i would've giggled about it too cause he was clearly asking for it and was overly dramatic about it. Not cause he was White.

Hell he probably got zapped cause he called the chick actually holding the taser "bro".

lol

All jokes aside your not the better person cause those same things would piss me off too.

You're racist, y'know.

Originally posted by The Grey Fox
You're racist, y'know.


Ok..why? Cause it's easy being a sh*thead spouting out diarrhea like that around. Well, you do have to push a little but it's simple relatively.

I'm not arguing with a member of the KKK.

Originally posted by The Grey Fox
I'm not arguing with a member of the KKK.

haha w/e

You're a deluded individual. Anyway, it's checkout time.

Peace.

Originally posted by FistOfThe North
She is an acromyn. It stands for J.oin the E.ndagred N.egro A.ssociation.

Hahaha...that had to be funniest thing I've seen today.

So this is why all those people were obstructing traffic when I was just driving up the street a little while ago. Waving their signs and yelling and shouting.

They were annoying.

I had no idea Racism was THIS BAD. I knew it was still upon us, but to this extent???

An ALL WHITE TREE???

NOOSES?????

ALL WHITE JURY???

UNFAIR TRIAL??????

WHITE person only got simple BATTERY CHARGES?????

How rude.

Ignorance really is bliss.

Anata wa wakarimasu ka.....

Originally posted by Robtard
That's why I support "Gray Power".

Im in the "assault needs to be punished, but 80yrs?" camp.
Also that mentality around the trees/nooses...?
What was that really meant to achieve..?
It was always gonna end in tears.

Although I still get sick of cases where the alleged racism is really reached for to make a case, this looks more serious and if its gone down as reported, it stinks and I can see why it has caused a movement.. especially in a place globally known (rightly or wrongly) for its racism.

In both cases it was wrong but beating someone like they did was wrong also.I don't care what color they are,They should be punished.Consider this being a southern state I am not surprise that this is a big thing here.jm

Originally posted by FistOfThe North
w/e man.

If the situation was reversed i'd still be infuriated that some kids were friken facing life in prison for beating up a provocateur.

And it's messed up that that kid got beat up (and it's not funny). But c'mon on. Something clearly smells bad in this case, even you should see it.

I agree, teen fights shouldn't result in a life sentence, but what if the teen was racist? (pls see the link b4 responding, as it sheds light on the perspective)...and the noose isn't cool ONLY b/c of the history....if there was witch burning in VA, and on Halloween, someone put out propane near the yard or homes or area of known witches, that'll mean something to them, and in Europe, a lot of ppl were hung or burned, it wasn't only witches, so, it could happen to ANY group. the noose was a bit of a joke to the ones who felt the history was over-with, I can believe that, but to the ones who are living in a segregated area, I can understand that they wouldn't take it as a joke. Did the guy deserve to be beat up? No. I think it was a revenge fight anyway (one kid was beat up by a white kid, and tension was building over the fact that the black kid lost, words were exchanged, a noose was placed by a tree...and the rest was totally crazy), I don't guess that the noose was directly related to the fight but the noose was an agitator based on both the history and the recently hot conflict.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/15755620/

Originally posted by miss_swann
I've never understood racial policies in America and when they try to explain it at school I think thank god I wasn't coloured in America in the 1920's. I REALLY don't understand why the colour of someones skin means ANYTHING?

I can try to explain it, but it may not make sense...

Remember, when you were 3? years old, you grouped all colors alike, and learned that just b/c you see a yellow crayon doesn't mean you can eat it like a yellow banana. And in the 1st? grade, you learn that there are differences in items, such as texture, character, statics and dynamics of an item (things move or stay the same, you learn it b4 the 1st grade, that's just arbitrary)..

you basically already learned to group things that are similar by function, group fruits together and crayons together, but you would never continue to place a yellow crayon where you place your banana simply b/c they have the same color...

the reason why there is strong racism by COLOR is b/c of this really basic mentality that color=function, which is back to the 3 year old or 1st grade idea of separating by color.... but culture has a strong relationship with function, and culture is DYNAMIC (in some cases) and in not necessarily related to the individual within the color, b/c color doesn't equal function, culture equals function. And even if you or I dislike a culture, it doesn't make it static, cultures can and do change in time.

that's the best i can do (i don't do "name calling", etc.)

Originally posted by Zeal Ex Nihilo
Here comes the Czarina to work this thread over...

Did you notice how long I stayed way, I read your comment but decided to just keep my distance from this topic for a day...

Originally posted by Czarina_Czarina
I agree, teen fights shouldn't result in a life sentence, but what if the teen was racist? (pls see the link b4 responding, as it sheds light on the perspective)...and the noose isn't cool ONLY b/c of the history....if there was witch burning in VA, and on Halloween, someone put out propane near the yard or homes or area of known witches, that'll mean something to them, and in Europe, a lot of ppl were hung or burned, it wasn't only witches, so, it could happen to ANY group. the noose was a bit of a joke to the ones who felt the history was over-with, I can believe that, but to the ones who are living in a segregated area, I can understand that they wouldn't take it as a joke. Did the guy deserve to be beat up? No. I think it was a revenge fight anyway (one kid was beat up by a white kid, and tension was building over the fact that the black kid lost, words were exchanged, a noose was placed by a tree...and the rest was totally crazy), I don't guess that the noose was directly related to the fight but the noose was an agitator based on both the history and the recently hot conflict.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/15755620/

Where are you people getting this stuff?

Timeline:

Black kid asks admin if he can sit under the "White Tree"

Admin says "sit wherever you want."

Days latter nooses were hung.

Students were suspended by admin, only to have the suspention overturened by the school board.

Black students organised a sit-in under the "White Tree".

Black student jumped at an offcampus party.
(not permitted to file charges)

Two black youths chased by stire owner w/ shotgun.
The children disarm the man and are charged with theft of a fire arm.

The "victim" is walking in the hallway and says something "slick" to the young man that was beaten off campus.

The "victim" comeneced to get that ass whipped.

the fight is stopped, the boy is taken to the hospital and is released hours after his "Life threatening" ordeal and attends a "social function"

Days latter the DA shows up at a school funtion and tells the "everybody" that he can "Change their lives with a stroke of his pen."

Charges are filled against 6 African-American students.

It should be noted that it is an ODD coincidence that the 6 charged were also the so called leaders and most vocal at the sit in.

M. Bell has been in JAIL for a year now. And untill recently was facing a possible 22 years behind bars.

All 6 were charged with Attempted Murder.

It should also be noted that the Admin (the one that let him sit under the tree) was fired.

The Tree and stump were removed the town says they did it because it was a "lightning rod".
But, I know they did it because all them black folk were comming and they KNEW that their first stop was gonna be that tree.

No Justice

Don't sleep

Damn. Why can't the south (on both sides) let go of the past. It sucks. Hard.

All this unessecary nonsense over skin color is retarded. Both sides lose big. Getting along would be so beneficial in so many ways. Financially, socially and they don't wanna do it. Dumb. No wonder the south has a reputation for being stupid.

Yeah. I agree. It's is strange though earlier you were expressing racist and anti-black points of view.

Apperently, one of the boys charged, was already on a probation in regards to another account of battery on a separate occasion which according to federal prosecutor indicates that the punishment will be harsher.

The boy was convinced of four other batteries including the one which he was on probation for.

Federal prosecutor, apparently just said, that the hanging of the nooses and the battery are two separate incidents.

Obviously the charges are extreme which ties with failing of US justice system, which includes institutionalized racism.

Hey. Your sigs messed up, the picture's just a question mark.

Originally posted by The Grey Fox
Hey. Your sigs messed up, the picture's just a question mark.

Are you using internet expolier? If so, you can't see the letters. Its just written in Cyrillic.

Originally posted by The Grey Fox
Yeah. I agree. It's is strange though earlier you were expressing racist and anti-black points of view.

Post what you thought I wrote that was anti-black racism.

Do you always blabber senselessly and into a down-sydrome stupor just to get a reaction outta people?

lol guy you need a cup of Shut the F*ck Up, y'know.

Calm Down. You said that all white people would be happy when O.J. Simpson was arrested. I'm going now so if you post back to me, you lose.

Originally posted by lil bitchiness
Are you using internet expolier? If so, you can't see the letters. Its just written in Cyrillic.

I can see the greek letters, but there are two '?' (as in 'Picture not found') next to each side.

Originally posted by BlueDMighty
The "victim" comeneced to get that ass whipped.

funny

anata wa wakarimasu ka.....

Originally posted by BlueDMighty
Where are you people getting this stuff?

Timeline:

Black kid asks admin if he can sit under the "White Tree"

Admin says "sit wherever you want."

Days latter nooses were hung.

Students were suspended by admin, only to have the suspention overturened by the school board.

Black students organised a sit-in under the "White Tree".

Black student jumped at an offcampus party.
(not permitted to file charges)

Two black youths chased by stire owner w/ shotgun.
The children disarm the man and are charged with theft of a fire arm.

The "victim" is walking in the hallway and says something "slick" to the young man that was beaten off campus.

The "victim" comeneced to get that ass whipped.

the fight is stopped, the boy is taken to the hospital and is released hours after his "Life threatening" ordeal and attends a "social function"

Days latter the DA shows up at a school funtion and tells the "everybody" that he can "Change their lives with a stroke of his pen."

Charges are filled against 6 African-American students.

It should be noted that it is an ODD coincidence that the 6 charged were also the so called leaders and most vocal at the sit in.

M. Bell has been in JAIL for a year now. And untill recently was facing a possible 22 years behind bars.

All 6 were charged with Attempted Murder.

It should also be noted that the Admin (the one that let him sit under the tree) was fired.

The Tree and stump were removed the town says they did it because it was a "lightning rod".
But, I know they did it because all them black folk were comming and they KNEW that their first stop was gonna be that tree.

No Justice

Don't sleep


The other fight happened before asking to sit near or next to the tree. I think it's sad.

Originally posted by The Grey Fox
lol guy you need a cup of Shut the F*ck Up, y'know.

Calm Down. You said that all white people would be happy when O.J. Simpson was arrested. I'm going now so if you post back to me, you lose.



You're an official idiot. 1st off, how is that anti-Black, 2ndly, i loved how you didn't add the fact that I said I was joking afterwards. And 3rdly, your a coccksmoker for being who you are in here: A defenseless provocateur that got owned unnecessarily like that hospitalized J.e.n.a. kid.

Lock em up and throw away the key, misfits to society.

Originally posted by KidRock
Lock em up and throw away the key, misfits to society. And why are they "misfits to society"?

anata wa wakarimasu ka.....

Originally posted by InnerRise
And why are they "misfits to society"?

anata wa wakarimasu ka.....

I THINK YOU KNOW WHY...

Originally posted by KidRock
I THINK YOU KNOW WHY...

Would you consider the noose hanger/s misfits? Meaning the White kid/s?

Originally posted by FistOfThe North
Would you consider the noose hanger/s misfits? Meaning the White kid/s?

No, they are just kids being kids FotN.

Originally posted by KidRock
No, they are just kids being kids FotN. You know you're racist when you're YOU.

anata wa wakarimasu ka.....

Originally posted by InnerRise
You know you're racist when you're YOU.

anata wa wakarimasu ka.....

anata wa wakarimasu ka..nt understand your bullshit.

Originally posted by KidRock
No, they are just kids being kids FotN.

If Kids spray painted 3 Swasticas (sp) on or in a school
were the ratio was 85% reformed Nazis' kids and 15% Jewish kids

Would THAT be considered a "Prank"

or

A "Hate Crime"?


The Jena 6 were "just being kids" when they whipped that other kids ass.

emotions and raging hormones and such.

DAMN THAT RAP MUSIC

But, I guess it's all fun and games.
Till you beat up a White kid.

No JUSTICE

Don't SLEEP

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jena_Six

I'm going to assume that this is far more accurate than some retard's blog.

Originally posted by BlueDMighty
If Kids spray painted 3 Swasticas (sp) on or in a school
were the ratio was 85% reformed Nazis' kids and 15% Jewish kids

Would THAT be considered a "Prank"

or

A "Hate Crime"?


The Jena 6 were "just being kids" when they whipped that other kids ass.

emotions and raging hormones and such.

DAMN THAT RAP MUSIC

But, I guess it's all fun and games.
Till you beat up a White kid.

No JUSTICE

Don't SLEEP

The noose is problematic, an agitator. HOWEVER, they were not just being kids, b/c the one that was beat up was unconscious, that's not kid fight, not when 6 ppl gang up on him, they could have killed him. the noose was SUGGESTIVE, i can't tell ppl how to act in certain situations, b/c they are male, they are teens, they are in the south, they already had a fight in which one of the guys lost a fight and was heckled by the victim b/c he lost a fight to a white guy, from what i understand, and i may not understand it, after the victim heckled the black guy who lost to a fight, ....someone asked permission to sit by that tree, the noose was placed...and that kid who heckled the black kid for losing a fight was ganged up and beaten to the point of being unconscious, he could have died.

the issue is intent,

1. did they intend to kill someone with the noose?

2.did the kids intend to kill someone in a fight?

is the first one solely suggestive and a prank? is the second one equal, even though the second one included physical violence?

no matter the race or gender, how can anyone expect a person to survive being ganged up by 6 men of any color. i mean, even the issue of the female victim that was held against her will, she didn't have a choice, when 6 ppl are ganging on you, how can you escape? it's not good.

i doubt it was premeditated, i think this was all hormonal, male fights, lose of a fight, heckling, noose, segregated, and a gang of a fight.

Originally posted by The Grey Fox
I'm going now so if you post back to me, you lose.

Originally posted by FistOfThe North
You're an official idiot. 1st off, how is that anti-Black, 2ndly, i loved how you didn't add the fact that I said I was joking afterwards. And 3rdly, your a coccksmoker for being who you are in here: A defenseless provocateur that got owned unnecessarily like that hospitalized J.e.n.a. kid.

'1st off', Essentially, you lost.

'2ndly', Surely you must have realised I wasn't being serious.

'And 3rdly', 'owned unnecessarily'? I think you'll find all you said was that I was a 'cock-smoker'... how the hell is that owned? Also, according to you, if I was owned 'unnecessarily', then you were rash and stupid in your decision and hit the Nuke Button instantly the second someone annoys you in any way.

The only 'owned' one here IS the Jena kid so go quiet.

It's not just about beating up a kid, it's about continuing to beat him even after he lost consciousness.

why are people defending these pieces of trash?

ok....some white kids did some racist shit.....not funny in the least, but it did not endanger the life of anyone. This is America....you have the right to be ignorant if you so please, you have the right to be biggoted......and yes, you have the right to be outright racist. You have the right to go running down the street calling every black man you see a "n-gger"........they do not have the right to kill or attempt to kill you for it.

in retalliation.......6 guys decide to beat on 1 guy to the brink of death? The intention of these kids is pretty clear. Okay..2 guys beating on the white kid could be concieved as a "fight" (because the one guy was obviously so big of a p-ssy he felt he couldn't beat up the kid himself). When 6 guys get together to pummel one person of any color, the intention is clear. They are not trying to win a fight...to knock someone down and be the last one standing. They are trying to inflict serious injury without giving the other kid a chance to even fight back. They continued to beat the guy after he was unconcious. I believe that makes their intention very clear.......as the guy was unconcious, he couldn't feel pain at that point. Their agenda was not to win a fight or give this guy pain. They wanted him severely injured....and they did it, almost killing him. They deserve what they get.

the south is full of clear water trash. but in the end i think the jena6 kids will get set free 20 years for a school fight thats bs.

Originally posted by Evil Dead
why are people defending these pieces of trash?

ok....some white kids did some racist shit.....not funny in the least, but it did not endanger the life of anyone. This is America....you have the right to be ignorant if you so please, you have the right to be biggoted......and yes, you have the right to be outright racist. You have the right to go running down the street calling every black man you see a "n-gger"........they do not have the right to kill or attempt to kill you for it.

in retalliation.......6 guys decide to beat on 1 guy to the brink of death? The intention of these kids is pretty clear. Okay..2 guys beating on the white kid could be concieved as a "fight" (because the one guy was obviously so big of a p-ssy he felt he couldn't beat up the kid himself). When 6 guys get together to pummel one person of any color, the intention is clear. They are not trying to win a fight...to knock someone down and be the last one standing. They are trying to inflict serious injury without giving the other kid a chance to even fight back. They continued to beat the guy after he was unconcious. I believe that makes their intention very clear.......as the guy was unconcious, he couldn't feel pain at that point. Their agenda was not to win a fight or give this guy pain. They wanted him severely injured....and they did it, almost killing him. They deserve what they get.

cosigned

Originally posted by mighty adam
the south is full of clear water trash. but in the end i think the jena6 kids will get set free 20 years for a school fight thats bs.

the place the incident occurred has nothing to do with the crime. A gang of kids almost killed another kid. so if the guys had used handguns it would be silly that they get prison for trying to kill this guy in a "school fight"?

Originally posted by Evil Dead
why are people defending these pieces of trash?

ok....some white kids did some racist shit.....not funny in the least, but it did not endanger the life of anyone. This is America....you have the right to be ignorant if you so please, you have the right to be biggoted......and yes, you have the right to be outright racist. You have the right to go running down the street calling every black man you see a "n-gger"........they do not have the right to kill or attempt to kill you for it.

in retalliation.......6 guys decide to beat on 1 guy to the brink of death? The intention of these kids is pretty clear. Okay..2 guys beating on the white kid could be concieved as a "fight" (because the one guy was obviously so big of a p-ssy he felt he couldn't beat up the kid himself). When 6 guys get together to pummel one person of any color, the intention is clear. They are not trying to win a fight...to knock someone down and be the last one standing. They are trying to inflict serious injury without giving the other kid a chance to even fight back. They continued to beat the guy after he was unconcious. I believe that makes their intention very clear.......as the guy was unconcious, he couldn't feel pain at that point. Their agenda was not to win a fight or give this guy pain. They wanted him severely injured....and they did it, almost killing him. They deserve what they get.

Some might say it's a "Hate Crime", the 6 on 1 beating beyond unconciousness.

Originally posted by Evil Dead
the place the incident occurred has nothing to do with the crime. A gang of kids almost killed another kid. so if the guys had used handguns it would be silly that they get prison for trying to kill this guy in a "school fight"? i do understand what your saying but. if 6 white kids beat up 1 black kid would they face 20 in jail NO!! thats why its bs race is coming into play on this shit.

Originally posted by mighty adam
i do understand what your saying but. if 6 white kids beat up 1 black kid would they face 20 in jail NO!! thats why its bs race is coming into play on this shit.

It was more than just "beat up".

Yes, I think they would face assault charges, it would also be labeled a "Hate Crime".

Originally posted by Robtard
It was more than just "beat up".

Yes, I think they would face assualt charges, it would also be labeled a "Hate Crime". get the fck out of here white's have done far worst to blacks and other races in school and faced no jail time.

Originally posted by mighty adam
get the fck out of here white's have done far worst to blacks and other races in school and faced no jail time.

Yes, it has happened in the past... how do those injustices make this one "right" though?

Oh, if 6 "white" kids assualted a "black" kid; almost killing him, they would be faces charges. It would almost certainly be labeled a "Hate Crime", which carriers extra punishment(s).

Originally posted by Robtard
Yes, it has happened in the past... how do those injustices make this one "right" though?

Oh, if 6 "white" kids assualted a "black" kid; almost killing him, they would be faces charges. It would almost certainly be labeled a "Hate Crime", which carriers extra punishment(s). i wish i could said if 6 white kids did this they would get jail time but sadly they wouldn't why cuz they are white anyone who dose not believe it are lieing to themself

Originally posted by mighty adam
i wish i could said if 6 white kids did this they would get jail time but sadly they wouldn't why cuz they are white anyone who dose not beleive it are lieing to themself

FoTN's protege?

Originally posted by Robtard
FoTN's protege? ... so what are you trying to say? i don't knoe fotns are too many others on this forum but i do you race plays a big part in how you get treated here in the usa.

Originally posted by mighty adam
i wish i could said if 6 white kids did this they would get jail time but sadly they wouldn't why cuz they are white anyone who dose not believe it are lieing to themself

No if 6 White kids did that to a Black kid they'd be charged with a hate crime. Then people would make all manner of effigies about them and try to hold the kids up as example of why White people are evil. After that they'd be completely ostracized by much of society and forced to fall in with people that hate Blacks and actually become racists.

And if you don't believe that you probably are either lying to yourself or are too vested in a racial identity (be it white, black, hispanic, asian etc) to accept that there are very few places left anywhere that a person can get off from nearly killing someone no matter what they look like.

Originally posted by mighty adam
... so what are you trying to say? i don't knoe fotns are too many others on this forum but i do know race plays a big part in how you get treated here in the usa.

Originally posted by Symmetric Chaos
No if 6 White kids did that to a Black kid they'd be charged with a hate crime. Then people would make all manner of effigies about them and try to hold the kids up as example of why White people are evil. After that they'd be completely ostracized by much of society and forced to fall in with people that hate Blacks and actually become racists.

And if you don't believe that you probably are either lying to yourself or are too vested in a racial identity (be it white, black, hispanic, asian etc) to accept that there are very few places left anywhere that a person can get off from nearly killing someone no matter what they look like. i have only heard about this from the news up here in CT. but on the news they said it was just a gang beating they never said the boy was that badly beaten. you got any links were i can see him or read up on this more. cuz i really don't believe he was hurt that bad.

Originally posted by mighty adam
i have only heard about this from the news up here in CT. but on the news they said it was just a gang beating they never said the boy was that badly beaten. you got any links were i can see him or read up on this more. cuz i really don't believe he was hurt that bad.

Perhaps thats my error. I got the impression that kid was severely hurt.

Nonetheless, my point stands. The factor that race plays is not so all encompassing as some people want it to be, nor is it is simple as "white kids get off, black kids go to the clink".

Originally posted by Symmetric Chaos
Perhaps thats my error. I got the impression that kid was severely hurt.

Nonetheless, my point stands. The factor that race plays is not so all encompassing as some people want it to be, nor is it is simple as "white kids get off, black kids go to the clink". i only have to ask you this do blacks/hispanic get treated fairly when it comes to the law like how white people do?

Originally posted by Symmetric Chaos
Perhaps thats my error. I got the impression that kid was severely hurt.

Nonetheless, my point stands. The factor that race plays is not so all encompassing as some people want it to be, nor is it is simple as "white kids get off, black kids go to the clink".
He was severely beaten; he suffered a concussion and loss of vision in one eye for three weeks, according to his court testimony. Sounds like an "assault" to me.

Of note... he wasn't one of the "noose hangers", he was friends with one of them.

Originally posted by mighty adam


In your opinion/views, what punishment (if any) should these "six face, and why?

Originally posted by Robtard
He was severely beaten; he suffered a concussion and loss of vision in one eye for three weeks, according to his court testimony. Sounds like an "assault" to me.

Of note... he wasn't one of the "noose hangers", he was friends with one of them.

from what i heard, the white kid was friends with one of the guys and heckled one guy for losing a one-on-one fight to a white kid...

i don't know if it's the way they (meaning both or either race) handle conflict and resolve conflict that keeps it mostly segragated, if he was friends with one of them, it must not have been that segragated.

Originally posted by Czarina_Czarina
from what i heard, the white kid was friends with one of the guys and heckled one guy for losing a one-on-one fight to a white kid...

i don't know if it's the way they (meaning both or either race) handle conflict and resolve conflict that keeps it mostly segragated, if he was friends with one of them, it must not have been that segragated.

...and assaulting a "heckler" is still a crime.

What?

Originally posted by Robtard
...and assaulting a "heckler" is still a crime.

What?

wow, i am not "for" that kid getting beat up, i hope you can read that much, if you put the mentality in your head that "cc is REALLY DARK OR MIXED-BLACK, AND THEREFORE, SHE THINKS JUST LIKE THEM" then you are going to be wrong about me every time. i've stated this so many times, i do not like racial-group think. and yes, i comment about black CULTURE at one point, but b/c of the problems and attacks that i've had, i realized we aren't in a free speech society, we are in a mafia society, and you can't just speak words, that kid knows that too, words cause some groups to do things....and i'm not stating one group over the other....i was in a church in the south (many years ago), and i commented about the democratic party, the sunday school teacher would always sell his party during sunday school, and i made a comment, and he threatened me, he pulled me to the side & told me i would never find a job in aerospace in jacksonville b/c of what i said. words can cause ppl to lose connections, be blackballed, etc. it's not only racial. and we were in church, it wasn't even a bad statement, i only mentioned jimmy carter and that's when he was upset at me. so some ppl have power to cause another to lose their job; others maynot have that power, but could use physical violence to demonstrate, the only good thing about avoiding violence is the fact that you maybe able to phsycially move forward (but there is also trama or emotional trama with that kind of threat)...so these things aren't good, and if you are suggesting that i am "for" that kind of abuse on that kid or any kid, you don't undersand me at all.

(sorry, i ran out of time to edit the first post above) btw, i'm not a democrat, that's why that entire issue in jacksonville was such an ironic event. and just b/c i'm not a democrat doesn't mean i won't speak up if something is happening to hilary or obama; why? well, b/c we are all Americans first, and politics LAST.


this country was built on a variety of arguments, but the biggest or the one on the top (if you think in terms of hierarchy) is the argument about rebel vs. obedient.

with rebel vs/ obedient, as a nation, we rebelled against the mother country (benefit). yet, those who were obedient to their religion, became very rich, simply b/c the religion required frugal spending, hard work, and family. ironically, there was an inner conflict that mirrored the national issue of independence, and that was the southern slaves and the old south; the old south wanted no part of the union, rebel. and the slaves wanted no part of their masters, rebel (and when i mean slaves, i am not only talking about those from africa, i'm tired that, (and there were plenty of white surfs who couldn't own land, and women couldn't own land) slaves were also native indian and there were slaves brought from china to build the railroads, and there were whites who were forced to work in debtors camp or by virtue of their family name, weren't able to own property, etc. and there were free blacks and indians who had problems with the ability to own property and vote w/o feeling threatened)...all of this stuff was REBEL vs. OBIEDENT. as both parties involved in either rebelling or obeying, feels as if they are rewarded for it.

if you understand that this argument is an ongoing energy in this country, then it makes sense as to why some whites may think a black conservative is weird, or a black/minority person thinking black conservative is strange or a sell out or white-washed. and it would also make sense why there are whites/blacks (vis versa, order of b/w doesn't matter) who are for rebellion at any means, just for the sake of it, b/c both think that it was beneficial, as a nation to escape being over taxed, and as a country when it came to slavery. and there are those who think that obedience offers the benefit, so there are both blacks/whites who think that any black rebel or white rebel are troublesome, meaning, there is not value to rebel, yet, that's what afforded this country it's independence, and that's what afforded the freedom of a slave-caste. Not only that, obedience seemed to reward the family and finances, so, there are those who would question a black/minority for not following a more conservative route which is beneficial to society as far as family values and finances as far as being conservative in spending and working hard. And again, the rebels wonder why would a white person be involved with such as strong since of control, as if they are putting themselves in a slave like system, in order to have fringe benefits, when they wouldn't want to be part of the mother-england's version of control, so we go around and around.

and there is another issue, if you think of algebra as a bunch of terms, and each terms are related to social issues, so, let's take race, race is a term, but depending on the person, that term may equal to zero, meaning, it's not important to them, and if someone wanted to control them, they would need to think outside of race, and since that's more sophisticated, most systems of control (on any level and in any racial group think) would prefer us to think in terms of "race", as it's simple to control ppl after that point.

so, here's an example of terms in algebra: (just for a quick review: everything in between the + sign is a term)

xy+zab+ab+Xyb+yba=C_sub1 or CURRENT SOCIAL ISSUE FOR PERSON or GROUP

if xy= race, and race doesn't matter, the new equation is:

zab+ab+Xyb+yba=C_sub2 or CURRENT SOCIAL ISSUE FOR PERSON or GROUP

if you want to control that person, or balance both equations, you now have to figure a way to control or amplify those other terms (how can we get C_sub1=C_sub2). get it?

Show of hands. Anyone read that?

Originally posted by mighty adam
... so what are you trying to say? i don't knoe fotns are too many others on this forum but i do you race plays a big part in how you get treated here in the usa.

Yeah, like when you're black you get privileges, specific scholarships, Affirmative Action and handouts.

And when you're white you get "hate crime" tacked on to your charge if you ever commit a crime and if your a celebrity you better watch what you say unless you want to be branded a racist and be fired from your job, unless of course your black..then you're just a freedom fighter.

Originally posted by Robtard
...and assaulting a "heckler" is still a crime.

What?

Originally posted by Czarina_Czarina
wow, i am not "for" that kid getting beat up, i hope you can read that much, if you put the mentality in your head that "cc is REALLY DARK OR MIXED-BLACK, AND THEREFORE, SHE THINKS JUST LIKE THEM" then you are going to be wrong about me every time. i've stated this so many times, i do not like racial-group think. and yes, i comment about black CULTURE at one point, but b/c of the problems and attacks that i've had, i realized we aren't in a free speech society, we are in a mafia society, and you can't just speak words, that kid knows that too, words cause some groups to do things....and i'm not stating one group over the other....i was in a church in the south (many years ago), and i commented about the democratic party, the sunday school teacher would always sell his party during sunday school, and i made a comment, and he threatened me, he pulled me to the side & told me i would never find a job in aerospace in jacksonville b/c of what i said. words can cause ppl to lose connections, be blackballed, etc. it's not only racial. and we were in church, it wasn't even a bad statement, i only mentioned jimmy carter and that's when he was upset at me. so some ppl have power to cause another to lose their job; others maynot have that power, but could use physical violence to demonstrate, the only good thing about avoiding violence is the fact that you maybe able to phsycially move forward (but there is also trama or emotional trama with that kind of threat)...so these things aren't good, and if you are suggesting that i am "for" that kind of abuse on that kid or any kid, you don't undersand me at all.

(sorry, i ran out of time to edit the first post above) btw, i'm not a democrat, that's why that entire issue in jacksonville was such an ironic event. and just b/c i'm not a democrat doesn't mean i won't speak up if something is happening to hilary or obama; why? well, b/c we are all Americans first, and politics LAST.


this country was built on a variety of arguments, but the biggest or the one on the top (if you think in terms of hierarchy) is the argument about rebel vs. obedient.

with rebel vs/ obedient, as a nation, we rebelled against the mother country (benefit). yet, those who were obedient to their religion, became very rich, simply b/c the religion required frugal spending, hard work, and family. ironically, there was an inner conflict that mirrored the national issue of independence, and that was the southern slaves and the old south; the old south wanted no part of the union, rebel. and the slaves wanted no part of their masters, rebel (and when i mean slaves, i am not only talking about those from africa, i'm tired that, (and there were plenty of white surfs who couldn't own land, and women couldn't own land) slaves were also native indian and there were slaves brought from china to build the railroads, and there were whites who were forced to work in debtors camp or by virtue of their family name, weren't able to own property, etc. and there were free blacks and indians who had problems with the ability to own property and vote w/o feeling threatened)...all of this stuff was REBEL vs. OBIEDENT. as both parties involved in either rebelling or obeying, feels as if they are rewarded for it.

if you understand that this argument is an ongoing energy in this country, then it makes sense as to why some whites may think a black conservative is weird, or a black/minority person thinking black conservative is strange or a sell out or white-washed. and it would also make sense why there are whites/blacks (vis versa, order of b/w doesn't matter) who are for rebellion at any means, just for the sake of it, b/c both think that it was beneficial, as a nation to escape being over taxed, and as a country when it came to slavery. and there are those who think that obedience offers the benefit, so there are both blacks/whites who think that any black rebel or white rebel are troublesome, meaning, there is not value to rebel, yet, that's what afforded this country it's independence, and that's what afforded the freedom of a slave-caste. Not only that, obedience seemed to reward the family and finances, so, there are those who would question a black/minority for not following a more conservative route which is beneficial to society as far as family values and finances as far as being conservative in spending and working hard. And again, the rebels wonder why would a white person be involved with such as strong since of control, as if they are putting themselves in a slave like system, in order to have fringe benefits, when they wouldn't want to be part of the mother-england's version of control, so we go around and around.

and there is another issue, if you think of algebra as a bunch of terms, and each terms are related to social issues, so, let's take race, race is a term, but depending on the person, that term may equal to zero, meaning, it's not important to them, and if someone wanted to control them, they would need to think outside of race, and since that's more sophisticated, most systems of control (on any level and in any racial group think) would prefer us to think in terms of "race", as it's simple to control ppl after that point.

so, here's an example of terms in algebra: (just for a quick review: everything in between the + sign is a term)

xy+zab+ab+Xyb+yba=C_sub1 or CURRENT SOCIAL ISSUE FOR PERSON or GROUP

if xy= race, and race doesn't matter, the new equation is:

zab+ab+Xyb+yba=C_sub2 or CURRENT SOCIAL ISSUE FOR PERSON or GROUP

if you want to control that person, or balance both equations, you now have to figure a way to control or amplify those other terms (how can we get C_sub1=C_sub2). get it?

I like how you managed to make "assaulting a heckler is a crime into"

Something about bow he's a racist living in a mafia controlled society where the only way to "physically move forward" is through violence. But you're not a Democrat. And religious mirrors are controlling obedient white surfers . . .




. . .




Wait, what the ****?

Originally posted by Symmetric Chaos
I like how you managed to make "assaulting a heckler is a crime into"

Something about bow he's a racist living in a mafia controlled society where the only way to "physically move forward" is through violence. But you're not a Democrat. And religious mirrors are controlling obedient white surfers . . .




. . .




Wait, what the ****?

Ok, outlines again:

CRIME:It's wrong to beat a kid unconscious, regardless of race. I remember a crime report of a woman who killed her husband b/c he cheated. {Now mind you, marriage doesn't mean ownership, it's means you have the license to sue them for breaking vows and exclusive (sexual) mutual-rights. If you kill your spouse, the courts aren't going to excuse it unless it's to save your own life, b/c you don't OWN your spouse, ownership = possession=right to take the life of a person.} She ran over him, after killing him, she continued to run over him more then 10 times. That kind of action is weighed very heavily in court.

TACTICS: I am stating that there are many ways to control ppl, some use violence and others use blackballing threats, depending on the kind of access and if they can get away with it.

MOTIVATION: Regarding the "mafia", yeah, the mafia reminds me of ppl who are into master/slave games, they value family so much, they kill each other if a person doesn't behave, and they use thug tactics, bully tactics to control those within their clan, yet, rewarding those who follow with gifts/pirks.

POLITICS: The overall issue in this country defaults to politics, and even this Jena-6 issue has "spilled" into the political arena. I am equating our struggle b/t those who "obey" and those who "rebel" as an energy or argument that has been around since the begining of this country.

MYSELF: I don't have to be a democrat to question how things are done, I don't have to be chinese to question china. I don't have to be african to quesiton africa. I'm not Japanese, and I have questioned Japan. I'm not European, I don't have to be Europea to question Europe. Yet, I am American first and formost, and i do question america, we need these questions, we need to reflect.

Racial group think reminds me of the mafia, as they try to take ownership of a person based on surface color, ownership meaning they think they have the right to dictate your life and end your life, and no one outside the surface color questions it b/c they also think in terms of racial-group think. the ones who don't are the ones who will question it, and those are the ones who will figure out what happened. there are whites who care about ppl in general, and may find out something happened where someone died, and will try to help out, but the ones who want that person dead will try to default to race and tell everyone in that racial-mafia to keep quiet, so the crime is never solved. it happens vis versa, if a black person or minority finds a crime or someone who is dead and they are white, and if they cared about ppl in general, but was harrassed b/c they are told to "stay in their place"..what do you think the racial group thinkers are trying to accomplish? censorship, control, dominion, possession, master/slave.

Babble.

Originally posted by chillmeistergen
Babble.

it's up 2 u 2 translate, isn't it?

Nah, I'd rather say narrate.

Originally posted by BlueDMighty


Black fist in the air.

FREE THE JENA 6

No JUSTICE,
Don't SLEEP Racist.

I've stretched and had my No dose.

Let's get it.

Originally posted by Evil Dead
why are people defending these pieces of trash?

ok....some white kids did some racist shit.....not funny in the least, but it did not endanger the life of anyone. This is America....you have the right to be ignorant if you so please, you have the right to be biggoted......and yes, you have the right to be outright racist. You have the right to go running down the street calling every black man you see a "n-gger"........they do not have the right to kill or attempt to kill you for it.

Note:

Calling me a "n-gger" (I can tell you say it) is alot like talkin about my Mom. It'll get your ass whipped, but not murdered.

However,

Showing me a "NOOSE" is like showing me your gun.
If I can, I'll kill you before you can round up the posse.

That's instinct.



Originally posted by Evil Dead
in retalliation.......6 guys decide to beat on 1 guy to the brink of death? The intention of these kids is pretty clear. Okay..2 guys beating on the white kid could be concieved as a "fight" (because the one guy was obviously so big of a p-ssy he felt he couldn't beat up the kid himself). When 6 guys get together to pummel one person of any color, the intention is clear. They are not trying to win a fight...to knock someone down and be the last one standing. They are trying to inflict serious injury without giving the other kid a chance to even fight back. They continued to beat the guy after he was unconcious. I believe that makes their intention very clear.......as the guy was unconcious, he couldn't feel pain at that point. Their agenda was not to win a fight or give this guy pain. They wanted him severely injured....and they did it, almost killing him. They deserve what they get.

ENTIRELY FALSE.

The beating happened MONTHS after the noose incident.

Which started the whole thing.

Most life threatening injuries leave you HOSPITALISED for a period of time.

Not released a few hours latter and attending a "Social" function.

As far as them "getting what they deserve",

If you don't know the facts, check youtube or CNN

If you still feel that way then

holler bidack

We'll "talk"

No JUSTICE

Don't SLEEP

Originally posted by Czarina_Czarina
from what i heard, the white kid was friends with one of the guys and heckled one guy for losing a one-on-one fight to a white kid...

Again, that is NOT what happened.

That "one-on-one" fight happened at a "private" party, and involved a 22 year old White Male attacking an unarmed black Highschool student with a bottle.

Charges were filed on the Highschoolers behalf and he was not permitted to make a statement.
The 22 year old "gentleman" was charged with simple battery and was given probation.

Weeks later at a gas station on the "black" side of town, a White highschool student said he "felt" threatened (not WAS, but FELT)by two black youths at the store.

At which point he went to his Truck and returned with his shotgun.

The boys wrestled the shotgun away from the kid and ran.

They were latter charged with theft of a fire arm, and battery.

Check youtube, and CNN they have the WHOLE story.

No JUSTICE

Don't SLEEP

gew-talk'n bout my mamma, bambeno?

http://www.stuffemal.com/dolls_animal_figures/mafiawolf_prod.jpg

Originally posted by Creshosk
Racist.



Damn straight.

If putting my BLACK FIST in the air makes me a racist

I'll be dat, I'll be dat, I'll be dat, I'll be dat, I'll be dat

And **** anybody that reps their hood and not their People.

For shame

Originally posted by BlueDMighty
Again, that is NOT what happened.

That "one-on-one" fight happened at a "private" party, and involved a 22 year old White Male attacking an unarmed black Highschool student with a bottle.

Charges were filed on the Highschoolers behalf and he was not permitted to make a statement.
The 22 year old "gentleman" was charged with simple battery and was given probation.

Weeks later at a gas station on the "black" side of town, a White highschool student said he "felt" threatened (not WAS, but FELT)by two black youths at the store.

At which point he went to his Truck and returned with his shotgun.

The boys wrestled the shotgun away from the kid and ran.

They were latter charged with theft of a fire arm, and battery.

Check youtube, and CNN they have the WHOLE story.

No JUSTICE

Don't SLEEP


what makes me wonder if the black-teen was assaulted with a bottle as a result of talking to a white female? seriously. usually, in teen fights, it's related to uncontrolled sex-hormones, regressive sexual tension is my best guess.

if he was at a majority "white" party, and he's a teen, he's going to be interested in the females (unless he's gay), and teen-boys usually fight over girls, and vise versa. most teen fights are about sexual competition. hence the reason for needing adult supervision b/c teens can't handle emotions and sexual tension with/o violence or uncontrolled issues, simply b/c of peer pressure, drinking, sexual-tension or bravado, etc.

so, maybe he was the object of interest or demonstrated interest, and then that person attacked him, i doubt it was a random attack, it could have been, but i suspect there was a motive for doing so, and i suspect it's related to sex (even if they claim it was over territory or an item/car...the ends-means is about showing it off or displaying it for sexual competition...so when teens of the same race or opposite race fight over 'THINGS', it's usually somehow related to a female).

Originally posted by Czarina_Czarina
what makes me wonder if the black-teen was assaulted with a bottle as a result of talking to a white female? seriously. usually, in teen fights, it's related to uncontrolled sex-hormones, regressive sexual tension is my best guess.

if he was at a majority "white" party, and he's a teen, he's going to be interested in the females (unless he's gay), and teen-boys usually fight over girls, and vise versa. most teen fights are about sexual competition. hence the reason for needing adult supervision b/c teens can't handle emotions and sexual tension with violence or uncontrolled issues, simply b/c of peer pressure, drinking, sexual-tension or bravado, etc.

so, maybe he was the object of interest or demonstrated interest, and then that person attacked him, i doubt it was a random attack, it could have been, but i suspect there was a motive for doing so, and i suspect it's related to sex.

All that is ENTIRELY possible.

But again,
the attacker was 22 years of age and had a bottle.

Originally posted by BlueDMighty
All that is ENTIRELY possible.

But again,
the attacker was 22 years of age and had a bottle.

{just curious} the attacker was at a teen party? or was the teen at an adult party?

why is a 22 year old man going to a teen party? sorry, maybe it's still an issue of man+teen in the south, if so, then that's just part of the culture down there....he couldn't have had that many options in females to hit him with a bottle, how much would you like to bet? he was getting no where with the females, that is a reason for someone like him to hit another person, it's not RIGHT, but it's a reason or motive for him hitting a person with an object. jealousy.


i mean, 22 years old is college age, why would a college aged man attend a teen party? he maybe mad b/c he sees it as the teen is "takiing" one of his own, but someone else could say the same about him, why is he dipping below the adult age, he's also taking away from some other male who is younger then him. if this is true, it's all selfishness and jealousy. if he is going to put restrictions about race, someone else can put restrictions on age, it's all a matter of perspective anyway. but most college aged ppl aren't dating ppl in high school.

from what i heard, most in that town aren't educated passed the 6th grade, that education isn't important. maybe that's why they placed blacks or minorities in the school, so at least, ppl will start taking their education seriously, but instead, someone burned down the school, and both races are blaming each other. so, yeah, when ww3 comes, i wouldn't doubt it if our leaders just do an about-face, and go underground, you guys are a bunch of shits (and that's race-aside). deal with it.

Oh no.

They are legion.

This shit is so annoying.

I'm not sure any of you actually looked into this enough to actually know what happened in depth.

The black kids did not just beat that guy's ass cause he hackled one of them one afternoon. This is over a span of time in which a lot of things happened.

People want to say race does not matter and words are just words. Not really true. Sex is sex but there is more than biology that goes into that - more often than not, someone is catching feelings and the other is just getting theirs (if we are talking pre-martial sex).

Black people get affirmative action and some of you seem really pissed about it. This would ignore a lot of things about society. Yeah there are a lot of white people getting screwed also, but they mean just as much as any person with no capital. Race is just a distraction for the "have nots."

I really wish people would just get over themselves.

I've never understood the people that say things like 'words are words', it really is pathetic. Most of these people people lack any intellectual depth, and do not see the impact of the connotation that accompanies certain words.

Originally posted by chillmeistergen
I've never understood the people that say things like 'words are words', it really is pathetic. Most of these people people lack any intellectual depth, and do not see the impact of the connotation that accompanies certain words.

How about the connotation of bits of string?

It's because the money ticket talks and can buys lobbiest/judges and lawyers to the freedom train. Jump on board if you have a ticket.

Originally posted by chillmeistergen
I've never understood the people that say things like 'words are words', it really is pathetic. Most of these people people lack any intellectual depth, and do not see the impact of the connotation that accompanies certain words.

To a degree, yes, you are right. Also, (insults) words do not have power, unless you allow them too. If I called you a "n!gger", you probably wouldn't care. Why? You'd probably say, because I am not black and I never faced the racial repression, which that word is associated with.

Guess what, no black person alive today, with the exception of some senior citizens who call still recall Jim Crow and the Civil Rights movement did either. If the word "n!gger" has some magical sway of oppression over people by itself, then blacks should be the first to stop using it.

Granted, I don't use the word either because the sole existence of the word is too harm/insult, but seriously, the word has no power unless the ones at the receiving end empower it. Same goes for Cracker, kike, WOP, spick, chink etc.

There's a HUGE difference between a black person referring to another black person who is a friend as their "nigga" and a white person calling a black person a "n!gger."

That said, if black people are okay with using it in a friendly fashion, then they shouldn't have any problem with a white person doing so as well, if they do, then they themselves shouldn't use it either b/c it holds the same meaning whether friendly or derogatory when coming out of either a white or black person's mouth.

In no way, shape or form should the word be used derogatorily, no matter white or black.

anata wa wakarimasu ka.....

I wasn't referring to the word "nigga".

Yeah, what I said.

Well you said blacks should be the first to stop.

Surely you weren't referring to the world "n!gger" when saying blacks should stop using the word as if we have blacks going around calling each other "n!ggers" in a derogatory manner.

Because that's not the problem.

Not what you said.

anata wa wakarimasu ka.....

Originally posted by InnerRise
Well you said blacks should be the first to stop.

Surely you weren't referring to the world "n!gger" when saying blacks should stop using the word as if we have blacks going around calling each other "n!ggers" in a derogatory manner.

Because that's not the problem.

Not what you said.

anata wa wakarimasu ka.....

Yes, I did.

Yes, I was, I in fact, said "n!gger", which is the word I am referring to. I have personally seen it myself; I am certain others have too.

See above, the word in fact is used by blacks to other blacks; derogatorily.

Yes, what I said.

Originally posted by Robtard
To a degree, yes, you are right. Also, (insults) words do not have power, unless you allow them too. If I called you a "n!gger", you probably wouldn't care. Why? You'd probably say, because I am not black and I never faced the racial repression, which that word is associated with.

Guess what, no black person alive today, with the exception of some senior citizens who call still recall Jim Crow and the Civil Rights movement did either. If the word "n!gger" has some magical sway of oppression over people by itself, then blacks should be the first to stop using it.

Granted, I don't use the word either because the sole existence of the word is too harm/insult, but seriously, the word has no power unless the ones at the receiving end empower it. Same goes for Cracker, kike, WOP, spick, chink etc.


chilli has tried to insult me for a long time, if i allowed words to bother me, i would have been like this but, i tend to be like this so words, ugly fugly words...what can we do with them but not take ownership of the thoughts of others unless it causes lose of income, bad reputation, etc.

i had an interesting thing happen to me while in college. i had two college roommates that were cheerleaders (how the heck did that happen, i don't know, i would have preferred geeks for roommates), anyway, one was born in Hungry. so, the one that's part-hungarian, she had a view on what it means to be "dark", and she tried to push that on me and i would just ignore her, as she was never around dark skinned ppl, so how would she know who i should be or how i should think. so, one day, she invites a black guy over and they turn up a rap song that kept saying the word n!gger over and over and over. they both just looked at me, studying my reaction, i was in the kitchen and just was amazed at her and him. i looked thru that black guy as if he was glass, and i looked at her as if she was trash, and i walked away. i expect more from her, b/c we are in the same house, so that was very foolish on her part, but she already knew my reaction, i doubt she would have done that to a real live n*gger, trust me, she knows the difference. and for the black guy, i felt like he doesn't know me, so why would he participate in doing something to someone he doesn't know. she had issues anyway. i caught her smoking a drug one day, i know that's the college experience, but she took some sort of ownership of the college, and assumed someone like "me" didn't belong. i wished we were never roommates, not b/c of her skin color, but b/c of her mentality.

Originally posted by Robtard
Yes, I did.

Yes, I was, I in fact, said "n!gger", which is the word I am referring to. I have personally seen it myself; I am certain others have too.

See above, the word in fact is used by blacks to other blacks; derogatorily.

Yes, what I said. When I said "not what you said", I'm referring to the fact that what I said is not what you said.

2 completely different things as you even pointed out yourself. You were referring to blacks using it derogatorily towards other blacks.

I wasn't it.

And I'm just saying that it's not as crucial a problem as white people going around using it derogatorily.

You don't hear about black on black prejudice on the news and that's not even what this thread is about.

I just don't see the point in even bringing that to light in THIS THREAD to try and further one's stance on the matter.

It's not as if we have Black people that use it derogatorily going around and telling other white people, who think the same way they do about other black people, to stop using it b/c it offends them when they're just as prejudice as well.

What you said really only applies to blacks who don't use it derogatorily, but in a friendly manner, who don't like white people using it whether derogatorily or non derogatorily.

(God I'm tired of that word now)

Anata wa wakarimasu ka.....

Originally posted by BlueDMighty
Damn straight.

If putting my BLACK FIST in the air makes me a racist

I'll be dat, I'll be dat, I'll be dat, I'll be dat, I'll be dat

And **** anybody that reps their hood and not their People.

For shame Actually I'd say its more of the "Free the kids who nearly beat someone to death because they're black and their victim was white." Attitude you're taking.

Originally posted by chithappens
I'm not sure any of you actually looked into this enough to actually know what happened in depth.

The black kids did not just beat that guy's ass cause he hackled one of them one afternoon. This is over a span of time in which a lot of things happened.

People want to say race does not matter and words are just words. Not really true. Sex is sex but there is more than biology that goes into that - more often than not, someone is catching feelings and the other is just getting theirs (if we are talking pre-martial sex).

Black people get affirmative action and some of you seem really pissed about it. This would ignore a lot of things about society. Yeah there are a lot of white people getting screwed also, but they mean just as much as any person with no capital. Race is just a distraction for the "have nots."

I really wish people would just get over themselves. And any of that justifies 6 people beating another nearly to death?

Originally posted by Creshosk
Actually I'd say its more of the "Free the kids who nearly beat someone to death because they're black and their victim was white." Attitude you're taking.

And any of that justifies 6 people beating another nearly to death?



I would like to know what the rage was about, b/c like the story about the lady who ran over her husband for cheating, she killed him but kept running over the body 10x {and again, when i think of marriage, i don't think of ownership, no one owns you, your spouse doesn't own you to hurt your life, not by killing or poising or witchcrat or hitting you, if they try to hurt you that way, it becomes an issue of the law b/c that person doesn't own you, they are not your property}, she was in a rage, what was that about?

back to jena....what's the MAJOR issue? it's not about some simple fight, there's something else that was brewing. 6 ppl, it was as if they were using him to vent. why was it 6ppl? i would like to know if the rage is about being segragated? the laws? if that's really the issue, then i don't know, lousianna, my God. I heard things about Louisanna, most of my life, it's not good.

better laws ???

Originally posted by InnerRise
When I said "not what you said", I'm referring to the fact that what I said is not what you said.

2 completely different things as you even pointed out yourself. You were referring to blacks using it derogatorily towards other blacks.

I wasn't it.

And I'm just saying that it's not as crucial a problem as white people going around using it derogatorily.

You don't hear about black on black prejudice on the news and that's not even what this thread is about.

I just don't see the point in even bringing that to light in THIS THREAD to try and further one's stance on the matter.

It's not as if we have Black people that use it derogatorily going around and telling other white people, who think the same way they do about other black people, to stop using it b/c it offends them when they're just as prejudice as well.

What you said really only applies to blacks who don't use it derogatorily, but in a friendly manner, who don't like white people using it whether derogatorily or non derogatorily.

(God I'm tired of that word now)

Anata wa wakarimasu ka.....

What in the world are you talking about...

Chill brought up 'the connotations of certain words'; that is what I was addressing and making a point about. If you were not referring to anything of that nature, why directly reply to my post with something irrelevant, Czarina has cornered that market; we don't need competition.

Originally posted by Robtard
What in the world are you talking about...

Chill brought up 'the connotations of certain words'; that is what I was addressing and making a point about. If you were not referring to anything of that nature, why directly reply to my post with something irrelevant, Czarina has cornered that market; we don't need competition.

thanks

(ran out of time again, sorry)...

I had a situation happen many years ago in Orlando.

I went to a club (with my brother), and there was suppose to be a raper there (he never showed up). Well, there was an issue with overcrowding and the lack of a clear exit, some reported that our exit was locked....something happened and everyone had to leave. But b/c it was so packed, we were like slow moving herds (made me feel uncomfortable to be in that situation, one panic attack and ppl could be killed).

All of the sudden, we were at a stand still, but, some of us could see what was going on outside, there was a black kid outside, and there were cops, the cops were sicking the dogs on the kid. Once my brother and I saw that, I whispered to him, asking to get the tag number of the cop car and start logging information. We were still in a stand still. I noticed others saw it too, and there was one white guy there, I remember thinking to him, trying to pychically tell him to RUN, and I kept repeating that in my head, and he heard me, and he sneered at me and I started to pray. A fist, I saw a fist in the air, and I reached out to stop it, but someone held back my hand, it was my brother (and he was a wrestler, 7% body fat, he's much more stronger then I), and he dragged me away, I don't even recall how we were able to push through the crowd, but I know that kid was getting beat up. When we walked passed the cops, they were so focused on controlling this kid with the dog, I couldn't tell them anything, I tried to let them know that something bad is happening inside. My brother kept me by the arms (strong hold) and moved me along. He said that I would have been beat up with that white kid if I would've caught the fist. I don't know. I do not enjoy t!t-for-tats or any kind of group fights, even as a kid, it's not a spector sport, it wasn't when i saw the black kid being bitten by the dogs, and it wasn't when i saw the white kid being beaten up inside that club. it's a t!t-for-tat game, but it costs lives. I don't like racial group thinking, I know ppl want others to be in that mentality, but it hurts our country.

I really believe that the reason why they hurt that white kid is b/c they felt that going thru the legal channels wouldn't work, or it would just be a way of tracking ppl down or harassing the witnesses, etc. I think they truly felt that there wouldn't be justice for that kid that was being hurt by those dogs biting him.

And my prayers have been for the white kid inside the club, AND for the black kid that was getting bit by the dogs. the kid inside the clud had no idea they were going to hurt him, and I felt it wasn't good, it was a bad vibe before the fight, it wasn't good. That was the last time I went out to that kind of environment.

All that did was remove one white kid from trusting minorities, mainly blacks. It really is a cause for segregation, even though the intent was t!t-for-tat, the result is that it reinforces segregation, and the troublesome issues with the legal system never gets addressed.

Originally posted by Robtard
FoTN's protege?

I'll assume that you were kidding. I was never that wild. It just seemed so to everyone else.

Originally posted by KidRock
Yeah, like when you're black you get privileges, specific scholarships, Affirmative Action and handouts.

And when you're white you get "hate crime" tacked on to your charge if you ever commit a crime and if your a celebrity you better watch what you say unless you want to be branded a racist and be fired from your job, unless of course your black..then you're just a freedom fighter.

Hey. Blame the historical footing your forefathers took. They didn't think of the lasting effects of their legacy. And this "black privilege" you talk about is microscopic in comparison to planetary sized white privilege.

The popular belief is that whites got a long head start with they way they brutally did it. It's almost like they cheated. Yet with all that power some whites still b*tch about "blacks get this and that, no fair" when the way it was originally done by whites was "no fair" also.

And the thing with if whites say anything they're branded racist it's because, unfortunately, and historically, racism and whiteness were/are synonymous in alot of people's mind in the U.S.

And that's to bad. Racism still lingers and i wish i didn't but it still does and it's probably just as bad as ever. It's just hidden.

Originally posted by Creshosk
Actually I'd say its more of the "Free the kids who nearly beat someone to death because they're black and their victim was white." Attitude you're taking.


In the spirit of "racial unity",

I thought it a better position to take than the

"Lock the White kids up too" one.

Query:

If two white kids can be arrested in Alexandria for driving through the crowd of protesters with nooses displayed in their truck and be charged for insighting a riot (amongst other things),

Why haven't charges been brought against the three white kids that hung nooses on school property?

This being such a "tight" community and all, why did those kids have thier expultion lifted and changed to "in-school" suspension by the school board?

Why would the DA take time out of his day to go and threaten the "student" (we knew who he was talking to) body?

Why would a 22 year old man get battery and probation after attacking a High schooler with a bottle (i.e. a deadly weapon)?

Why set bail for the Jena 6 at $90,000, when the average income for the people that live there is $40,000?

If it was just a prank and there was NO ratial tention, how do you explain the "White" tree?

How do you explain them cutting it down, even going so far as to remove the stump?

At the end of the day you have 6 black kids being made an example of.

They're trying to say "Stay in your place"

But I'm saying Mugh**** Dat.

No JUSTICE

Don't SLEEP

Originally posted by KidRock
Yeah, like when you're black you get privileges, specific scholarships, Affirmative Action and handouts.

And when you're white you get "hate crime" tacked on to your charge if you ever commit a crime and if your a celebrity you better watch what you say unless you want to be branded a racist and be fired from your job, unless of course your black..then you're just a freedom fighter.

Affirmative Action hurts JUST as many qualified Black people, by creating a "First come" "first serve" environment.

The word Quota contradicts the "equality for everyone" spirit of the action.

I'm black. I want to make a come up. I'm sick & tired of being sick & tired.

Tell me of these "Special Privileges" you speak of (Is it anything like White privilege?). If so, I've been doin this all wrong apparently, and am indeed missing out on my Blackness.

To what "Hand outs" do you refer?

do you mean like:

Handing out Jail time?

Handing out Police brutality and excessive force?

Handing out Voter Suppression?

Handing out discrimination?

Handing out misinformation?

Handing out Civil Rights?

Handing out Jim Crow?

Handing out guns?

Handing out bullets?

Handing out drugs (cocaine, crack, and heroine)?

Handing out ropes?

Handing out the shackles?

Handing out whips?

Handing out "cruises"?

Handing out Disease?

Handing out reservations?

Originally posted by BlueDMighty
In the spirit of "racial unity",

I thought it a better position to take than the

"Lock the White kids up too" one.

Query:

If two white kids can be arrested in Alexandria for driving through the crowd of protesters with nooses displayed in their truck and be charged for insighting a riot (amongst other things),

Why haven't charges been brought against the three white kids that hung nooses on school property?

This being such a "tight" community and all, why did those kids have thier expultion lifted and changed to "in-school" suspension by the school board?

Why would the DA take time out of his day to go and threaten the "student" (we knew who he was talking to) body?

Why would a 22 year old man get battery and probation after attacking a High schooler with a bottle (i.e. a deadly weapon)?

Why set bail for the Jena 6 at $90,000, when the average income for the people that live there is $40,000?

If it was just a prank and there was NO ratial tention, how do you explain the "White" tree?

How do you explain them cutting it down, even going so far as to remove the stump?

At the end of the day you have 6 black kids being made an example of.

They're trying to say "Stay in your place"

But I'm saying Mugh**** Dat.

No JUSTICE

Don't SLEEP

Bro dont bother talking to Creshock hes a complete waste of time. I didnt have anything better to do and I was looking through the Wolverine vs Spiderman you got all these people telling him to quit with his logical fallacy and his latin terminology. Save yourself the bother and quit talking to him because it aint going to go anywhere.

Originally posted by Alfheim
Bro dont bother talking to Creshock hes a complete waste of time. I didnt have anything better to do and I was looking through the Wolverine vs Spiderman you got all these people telling him to quit with his logical fallacy and his latin terminology. Save yourself the bother and quit talking to him because it aint going to go anywhere.

Fair enough cousin.

How did the people in GB react to what was happening in the states?

Did you guys see it in the news or did you have to learn about it on-line?

The national media only got involved here when talks of a protest began on the Michael Baisden Radio Show.

Originally posted by BlueDMighty
Fair enough cousin.

How did the people in GB react to what was happening in the states?

Did you guys see it in the news or did you have to learn about it on-line?

The national media only got involved here when talks of a protest began on the Michael Baisden Radio Show.

You know what it seems kinda quiet. I heard about it on TV but apart from that it dont get that much coverage.

I swear if I go to America I aint going down South any mother***** calls me boy or *****......im gonna have to try very hard not to get violent.

Originally posted by Alfheim
You know what it seems kinda quiet. I heard about it on TV but apart from that it dont get that much coverage.

I swear if I go to America I aint going down South any mother***** calls me boy or *****......im gonna have to try very hard not to get violent.

True enough

After doing some more background reading I think im even more clearer on what happened here. What ive noticed on this thread is that you have white people complaining about how if a 6 white people jumped a black guy and beat him there would be no end to it. Im starting to think that some of you people are racist because ive noticed there is trend on this forum that whenever something bad happens to black people they try and deny it and make it like its no big deal.

There are people on this forum saying that if black people did this to white people there would be no end of it I dunno man sounds like rubbish to me:

1. Do you realise that there was already racial tension before the incident and that most of the time blacks and white were seperated?

2. Dont you think its ****ed up that the black kid has to ASK permission to sit uunder the tree in the first place. So waitwaitwaitwait....he had to actually ****ing ask permission? I dunno man if you guys used your head alarm bells should have started going off at this point....oh well nevermind if black people were to beat up white you'd never hear the end of it.

3. You are aware that the kids didnt even get expelled? Hey nevermind though its only bits of string. Hey wait aminute where is Lousiana? Oh wait its in the deep south...wait werent lyncings going on there until the 1960s? I dunno man arent the 1960S quite recent? So basically what your ****ing tell me is that its just a bit of string? Get the **** out of here! Hell black people in that area might have relatives that might have been lynched.

4. Before the white kid got beaten up didnt black students get beaten up? Hey its a shame that people get hurt and all that but you know tempers fly.

But you know the best evidence to prove that if black kids beat up a white kid there would be no end to it is this:

5. Why were they put in front of an all white jury?

6. Why was the bail put so high?


Get the **** out of here.

Originally posted by BlueDMighty
In the spirit of "racial unity",

I thought it a better position to take than the

"Lock the White kids up too" one.

Query:

If two white kids can be arrested in Alexandria for driving through the crowd of protesters with nooses displayed in their truck and be charged for insighting a riot (amongst other things), They should also be charged with attempted vehicular homicide especially if they hurt anyone.

Originally posted by BlueDMighty
Why haven't charges been brought against the three white kids that hung nooses on school property?Were they able to find exatly who did it? I can think of disorderly conduct as the bare bones minimalist.. Conspiracy to commit murder comes to mind.

Originally posted by BlueDMighty
This being such a "tight" community and all, why did those kids have thier expultion lifted and changed to "in-school" suspension by the school board? Would you want those psychopaths roaming free? At least this way they still have to go to school so for a time, their whereabout will be known.

Originally posted by BlueDMighty
Why would the DA take time out of his day to go and threaten the "student" (we knew who he was talking to) body?

Why would a 22 year old man get battery and probation after attacking a High schooler with a bottle (i.e. a deadly weapon)?

Why set bail for the Jena 6 at $90,000, when the average income for the people that live there is $40,000? Usually to make sure that bail cannot be met. It's no different than in other places.. at least around here.

Originally posted by BlueDMighty
If it was just a prank and there was NO ratial tention, how do you explain the "White" tree? Keep in mind that I personally do not aprove of such nonsense. I'm merely objecting to treating this like "just because of the color of their skin, they should have their actions overlooked". IT doesn't mater what color their skin is to me.

Originally posted by BlueDMighty
How do you explain them cutting it down, even going so far as to remove the stump?/quote] Idiots who don't know how to deal with problems so they shift blame... Though in this case it seems like a parent taking a toy away from infants who were fighting over it.

Originally posted by BlueDMighty
At the end of the day you have 6 black kids being made an example of.

They're trying to say "Stay in your place" And you seem to think that they should be freed after beating someone nearly to death?

Originally posted by BlueDMighty
But I'm saying Mugh**** Dat.

No JUSTICE

Don't SLEEP Yes, free criminals (not due to race, but due to actions) just because of their race! Fight the power! Instead of harsher treatment for whites in areas like that, let's have lesser treatments for black criminals!

W00t for anarchy. durw00t

Originally posted by Alfheim
After doing some more background reading I think im even more clearer on what happened here. What ive noticed on this thread is that you have white people complaining about how if a 6 white people jumped a black guy and beat him there would be no end to it. Im starting to think that some of you people are racist because ive noticed there is trend on this forum that whenever something bad happens to black people they try and deny it and make it like its no big deal.




You're full of shit... where's this anti-Black trend? If there's any racist B.S. trend in KMC, it's the "whites deserve what they get because of past injustices to blacks" rabble-rant, which we see often in these boards whenever something racial happens.

"Get the **** out of here."

Originally posted by Robtard
You're full of shit... where's this anti-Black trend? If there's any racist B.S. trend in KMC, it's the "whites deserve what they get because of past injustices to blacks" rabble-rant, which we see often in these boards whenever something racial happens.

I never said that though did I..right so that makes me not full of ****

Originally posted by Robtard

"Get the **** out of here."

Your the one who was complaining about how if white kids beat up a black kid there would be no end to it. Your the one with a porblem not me. If you cant even see that its ****ed that the kid had to even ask to sit under the tree in the firstplace then you got a probelm, then you start spouting some crap like "oh if it were white kids onto black it would have been different" when the evidence indicates otherwise.

Also if you say its a piece of string ( I know somebody else said that and not you)either your a racist or an idiot....do I have to break this **** down for you.

Originally posted by Alfheim
I never said that though did I..right so that makes me not full of ****

Ummm... you in fact did say, you 'think there's a trend':

Originally posted by Alfheim
Im starting to think that some of you people are racist because ive noticed there is trend on this forum that whenever something bad happens to black people they try and deny it and make it like its no big deal.

That's certainly not my quote.

Originally posted by Alfheim Your the one who was complaining about how if white kids beat up a black kid there would be no end to it. Your the one with a porblem not me. If you cant even see that its ****ed that the kid had to even ask to sit under the tree in the firstplace then you got a probelm, then you start spouting some crap like "oh if it were white kids onto black it would have been different" when the evidence indicates otherwise.

Also if you say its a piece of string either your a racist or an idiot....do I have to break this **** down for you.

No, I in fact wasn't the one saying that. I said, 'if it was six White kids who beat up a Black kid, they would be charged with assault too, on top of that, it would most likely be labeled a "hate crime".' It was also in direct response to MightyAdams rant about "if it was White kids, they wouldn't be charged at all". Go back and reread what I actually said, knee-jerker.

I agree it's ****ed up, there shouldn't be any "Whites only", "Blacks only", "Inuits only" etc. public places. That is besides the point though, regardless of how much of a racist ******* that kid may or may not have been, assaulting someone is a crime.

No, the noose is insulting, it's purpose is to insult and demean. Besides the point again, though. You don't have the right be physically assault someone over an insult; that is a fact.

Originally posted by Robtard
Ummm... you in fact did say, you think there's a trend:



That's certainly not my quote.

Yeah I did say that. What I didnt say was that white people should be punished for white sins.

Originally posted by Robtard

No, I in fact wasn't the one saying that. I said, 'if it was six White kids who beat up a black kid, they would be charged with assault too, on top of that, it would most likely be labeled a "hate crime".' It was also in direct response to MightyAdams rant about "if it was White kids, they wouldn't be charged at all". Go back and reread what I actually said, knee-jerker.

Well the point im trying to make is that you seem to have implied that basically white people would get treated just the same way as black people, right? But all the evidene in this case indicates that the black people got the short straw. Did any white people get accused of commiting a hate crime, correct me if im wrong.

Originally posted by Robtard

I agree it's ****ed up, there shouldn't be any "whites only", "blacks only", "Inuits only" etc. public places. That is besides the point though, regardless of how much of a racist ******* that kid may or may not have been, assaulting someone is a crime.

No, the noose is insulting, it's purpose is to insult and demean. Besides the point again, though. You don't have the right be physically assault someone over an insult; that is a fact.

Er you do reaslise its not that simple you do realise there were fights before this white kid got beaten up, so its not just a simple matter of beating seombody up over an insult. You do realise that dont you?