Deano
.....david icke newsletter
Hello all ...
One of the songs that really struck me when I was a kid in the early 1960s was Little Boxes, written by Malvina Reynolds and sung by Pete Seeger. The 'boxes' referred to in the lyrics were not so much the houses that we live in, as some may have thought at first hearing. The real meaning of 'boxes' were the mind-prisons to which people succumb.
I found this version on YouTube for those who are too young to remember it ... click here ...
I was only ten when the recording was first released, but I took to its message immediately. It is such a simple song, but a profound summary of the robotic society to which most people acquiesce and surrender their uniqueness, their infinity.
Society declares the rules for what constitutes 'success' and the population clamours to be 'successful' on the system's terms. Under this mindset you cannot be successful unless that 'success' is externally acknowledged and so to 'succeed' you have to tick a box that the system - therefore most people programmed by the system - acknowledges as being 'successful'. This almost always equates to money, possessions and a 'good job' - lawyer, judge, doctor, businessman, or 'someone famous'.
This is the box marked 'conformity' and 'programmed aspirations' and there is a vast factory turning them out in their hundreds of millions to satisfy supply and demand, or rather, program-demand-supply.
But what I have just described is only one box in the system's megastore. They come in all shapes, sizes and colours, and some are even transparent to hide the fact that they are boxes at all.
http://www.davidicke.com/oi/extras/07/december/box2.jpg
All this came to mind this week when I heard what some of those who run my website forum have to put up with from what I will call the 'box-swappers'. These are the most deluded of all people because they are so totally programmed that they think they are 'out of the box' when they have simply exchanged one for another. There is none so deluded as the prisoner who thinks he's free. Such people are everywhere, but they seem to be most blatant in the conspiracy 'research' arena.
I heard what has been happening to some people working on the David Icke Forum in the same week that our website went down three times in one day as a result of an attack from an IP address, which we have now traced, and the week when we were told that increasing numbers of 'workplace' computer systems are banning Davidicke.com because it is a 'racial hate' site.
Of course, anyone going anywhere on my website will see that the very suggestion is insane, as with the airport computers and others which have blocked access to Davidicke.com because it is a 'pornography site'.
These are exactly the sort of lies and misrepresentation that you would expect from those in authority, and those manipulating authority, who have no desire for people to have access to information that offers another view of world events.
But they are not the only people working for the system - so are many who claim to be 'exposing' or 'challenging' the system. I say 'claim' because these are box-swappers at the most extreme end of box-swapping.
It turns out that Sean, our webmaster, and his family have been the subject of considerable abuse from other 'conspiracy' forums and sites with some people, in Sean's words, 'trying to dig as much dirt as possible' and post it on other websites. These 'other websites' claim to be exposing the global conspiracy because, of course, they are 'out of the box'.
What is Sean's 'crime' that must be punished by such abuse? To spend his days ensuring that my information is communicated most effectively on the Web and to give masses of people the opportunity through the forum to communicate with each other and share information.
Wow, pass that guillotine.
http://www.davidicke.com/oi/extras/07/december/box3.jpg
There are many other examples of the box-swappers' capacity for bile, abuse and infantile nonsense.
John, a volunteer moderator on the David Icke Forum, was phoned at home by one of these people and the caller, who blocked his number, played down the phone a recording of a researcher chap in Canada called Alan Watt, who seems to be the hero of many of these people. It tied up John's phone for half-an-hour, but fortunately the idiot the other end was paying for the call. I would not be surprised if it took him several hours to work that out.
Alan Watt tells anyone who will listen that I work for British Intelligence. I asked him to send me all the evidence he had to support this ludicrous assertion and I would post it on my website unedited. He did not reply. Another chap in the UK called Craig Oxley repeated the Watt claim on a website called the Unhived Mind, yes 'un', and I made him the same offer: send me all the evidence and I'll post it unedited.
Oxley ended up writing an apology for the fact that he had no evidence to support what he said. But it didn't take long before he had rebooted back to default status and he announced that he had 'declared war' on me. This is a man who says he wants the world to be peaceful. I trust these guys are doing pantomime this Christmas because otherwise they have missed their calling.
Moderator John described other consequences for giving his time to make the David Icke Forum possible:
'There's the fake myspace page that I can't get myspace to remove; the trolling of the comments on my Google videos; Googlevid wont accept video uploads from me anymore, but won't tell me why (they just don't respond to emails). Then there's the impersonation on Godlike productions, the JREF forum, and probably other places I don't know about.
The constant accusations of working for "them", of being a "Zionist shill" (especially from the NPT crowd); the internet mockery; people using pictures of me as their avatars to insult me (and others; the photo-shopped piss-takes ... the list goes on and on and on.
It seems to me the main point is that when you stand up for yourself and refuse to go along with the herd, and also refuse to stop expressing yourself and your opinion, sooner or later this kind of "conspiratainment" trolling is going to target you.'
'There's the fake myspace page that I can't get myspace to remove; the trolling of the comments on my Google videos; Googlevid wont accept video uploads from me anymore, but won't tell me why (they just don't respond to emails). Then there's the impersonation on Godlike productions, the JREF forum, and probably other places I don't know about.
The constant accusations of working for "them", of being a "Zionist shill" (especially from the NPT crowd); the internet mockery; people using pictures of me as their avatars to insult me (and others; the photo-shopped piss-takes ... the list goes on and on and on.
It seems to me the main point is that when you stand up for yourself and refuse to go along with the herd, and also refuse to stop expressing yourself and your opinion, sooner or later this kind of "conspiratainment" trolling is going to target you.'
http://www.davidicke.com/oi/extras/07/december/box4.jpg
John concludes with the very point I want to stress this week:
'Becoming more aware that those with power lie to hold onto their power does not, in itself, do anything to take one above the "sheep-think" level: that requires finding courage and being willing to take the pain of looking at oneself unflinchingly, in order to accept, forgive and love oneself for who one is, and start to make progress beyond.'
Exactly. The conspiracy 'exposure' arena is awash with those who have simply moved boxes. One of these guys who now attacks me said that it was reading my information that first 'woke' him up. But it didn't, that's the sad thing.
It didn't 'wake him up' because he hasn't woken up. There is a universe of difference between becoming intellectually aware of the conspiracy and waking up. They are not necessarily the same thing and, while they can be, often they are not.
The conspiracy field is full of sheep who have left one shepherd and found themselves another. It is full of 'repeaters' who just repeat what someone else has said - the same as with mainstream journalists and the masses who allow the television to tell them what to think.
Hello all ...
One of the songs that really struck me when I was a kid in the early 1960s was Little Boxes, written by Malvina Reynolds and sung by Pete Seeger. The 'boxes' referred to in the lyrics were not so much the houses that we live in, as some may have thought at first hearing. The real meaning of 'boxes' were the mind-prisons to which people succumb.
I found this version on YouTube for those who are too young to remember it ... click here ...
I was only ten when the recording was first released, but I took to its message immediately. It is such a simple song, but a profound summary of the robotic society to which most people acquiesce and surrender their uniqueness, their infinity.
Society declares the rules for what constitutes 'success' and the population clamours to be 'successful' on the system's terms. Under this mindset you cannot be successful unless that 'success' is externally acknowledged and so to 'succeed' you have to tick a box that the system - therefore most people programmed by the system - acknowledges as being 'successful'. This almost always equates to money, possessions and a 'good job' - lawyer, judge, doctor, businessman, or 'someone famous'.
This is the box marked 'conformity' and 'programmed aspirations' and there is a vast factory turning them out in their hundreds of millions to satisfy supply and demand, or rather, program-demand-supply.
But what I have just described is only one box in the system's megastore. They come in all shapes, sizes and colours, and some are even transparent to hide the fact that they are boxes at all.
http://www.davidicke.com/oi/extras/07/december/box2.jpg
All this came to mind this week when I heard what some of those who run my website forum have to put up with from what I will call the 'box-swappers'. These are the most deluded of all people because they are so totally programmed that they think they are 'out of the box' when they have simply exchanged one for another. There is none so deluded as the prisoner who thinks he's free. Such people are everywhere, but they seem to be most blatant in the conspiracy 'research' arena.
I heard what has been happening to some people working on the David Icke Forum in the same week that our website went down three times in one day as a result of an attack from an IP address, which we have now traced, and the week when we were told that increasing numbers of 'workplace' computer systems are banning Davidicke.com because it is a 'racial hate' site.
Of course, anyone going anywhere on my website will see that the very suggestion is insane, as with the airport computers and others which have blocked access to Davidicke.com because it is a 'pornography site'.
These are exactly the sort of lies and misrepresentation that you would expect from those in authority, and those manipulating authority, who have no desire for people to have access to information that offers another view of world events.
But they are not the only people working for the system - so are many who claim to be 'exposing' or 'challenging' the system. I say 'claim' because these are box-swappers at the most extreme end of box-swapping.
It turns out that Sean, our webmaster, and his family have been the subject of considerable abuse from other 'conspiracy' forums and sites with some people, in Sean's words, 'trying to dig as much dirt as possible' and post it on other websites. These 'other websites' claim to be exposing the global conspiracy because, of course, they are 'out of the box'.
What is Sean's 'crime' that must be punished by such abuse? To spend his days ensuring that my information is communicated most effectively on the Web and to give masses of people the opportunity through the forum to communicate with each other and share information.
Wow, pass that guillotine.
http://www.davidicke.com/oi/extras/07/december/box3.jpg
There are many other examples of the box-swappers' capacity for bile, abuse and infantile nonsense.
John, a volunteer moderator on the David Icke Forum, was phoned at home by one of these people and the caller, who blocked his number, played down the phone a recording of a researcher chap in Canada called Alan Watt, who seems to be the hero of many of these people. It tied up John's phone for half-an-hour, but fortunately the idiot the other end was paying for the call. I would not be surprised if it took him several hours to work that out.
Alan Watt tells anyone who will listen that I work for British Intelligence. I asked him to send me all the evidence he had to support this ludicrous assertion and I would post it on my website unedited. He did not reply. Another chap in the UK called Craig Oxley repeated the Watt claim on a website called the Unhived Mind, yes 'un', and I made him the same offer: send me all the evidence and I'll post it unedited.
Oxley ended up writing an apology for the fact that he had no evidence to support what he said. But it didn't take long before he had rebooted back to default status and he announced that he had 'declared war' on me. This is a man who says he wants the world to be peaceful. I trust these guys are doing pantomime this Christmas because otherwise they have missed their calling.
Moderator John described other consequences for giving his time to make the David Icke Forum possible:
'There's the fake myspace page that I can't get myspace to remove; the trolling of the comments on my Google videos; Googlevid wont accept video uploads from me anymore, but won't tell me why (they just don't respond to emails). Then there's the impersonation on Godlike productions, the JREF forum, and probably other places I don't know about.
The constant accusations of working for "them", of being a "Zionist shill" (especially from the NPT crowd); the internet mockery; people using pictures of me as their avatars to insult me (and others; the photo-shopped piss-takes ... the list goes on and on and on.
It seems to me the main point is that when you stand up for yourself and refuse to go along with the herd, and also refuse to stop expressing yourself and your opinion, sooner or later this kind of "conspiratainment" trolling is going to target you.'
'There's the fake myspace page that I can't get myspace to remove; the trolling of the comments on my Google videos; Googlevid wont accept video uploads from me anymore, but won't tell me why (they just don't respond to emails). Then there's the impersonation on Godlike productions, the JREF forum, and probably other places I don't know about.
The constant accusations of working for "them", of being a "Zionist shill" (especially from the NPT crowd); the internet mockery; people using pictures of me as their avatars to insult me (and others; the photo-shopped piss-takes ... the list goes on and on and on.
It seems to me the main point is that when you stand up for yourself and refuse to go along with the herd, and also refuse to stop expressing yourself and your opinion, sooner or later this kind of "conspiratainment" trolling is going to target you.'
http://www.davidicke.com/oi/extras/07/december/box4.jpg
John concludes with the very point I want to stress this week:
'Becoming more aware that those with power lie to hold onto their power does not, in itself, do anything to take one above the "sheep-think" level: that requires finding courage and being willing to take the pain of looking at oneself unflinchingly, in order to accept, forgive and love oneself for who one is, and start to make progress beyond.'
Exactly. The conspiracy 'exposure' arena is awash with those who have simply moved boxes. One of these guys who now attacks me said that it was reading my information that first 'woke' him up. But it didn't, that's the sad thing.
It didn't 'wake him up' because he hasn't woken up. There is a universe of difference between becoming intellectually aware of the conspiracy and waking up. They are not necessarily the same thing and, while they can be, often they are not.
The conspiracy field is full of sheep who have left one shepherd and found themselves another. It is full of 'repeaters' who just repeat what someone else has said - the same as with mainstream journalists and the masses who allow the television to tell them what to think.