Click HERE to see this thread with all of the graphics, features, and links.

insight into the man that is david icke. maybe newcomers can get to see some of his stuff before jumping on the ignorant bandwagon

great british hero
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=18tRLhMMnNc&feature=related

brilliant speech
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZBJKCz6Xhzs

predictions he made
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8sbs4vRXycE

how we are controlled
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=12j1_rKbUUM

most effective mind manipulation
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=82iQeHCabJU&feature=related

icke talking about {b]reporters (repeaters)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MoXkTg-Uoz4&feature=related

icke - prison religions
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FsndEjU1TdY

icke on the world banking system
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LnCjYagqtMo

problem reaction solution
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Au1CLDMP90I

reptilian agenda
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bf0o4TkoObo

why do always go straight to the "people who dont believe him are ignorant" angle?

Originally posted by jaden101
why do always go straight to the "people who dont believe him are ignorant" angle?


Reasons:

1. Being Defensive.

2. Preemptive strike against anyone who makes a post about how nuts Icke is.

3. Both.

no. i meant people who say things about him like 'he said he was jesus' or anything that the paper has falsely parroted. a lot of people think they know everything about him because they read some article in the paper. Ive seen it so many times on here and people they can judge him without:

1) not even bothering to look into the evidence he brings forward
2) not even bothering to check out his work
3) both

but the paper says he is crazy so he must be.

Originally posted by Deano
no. i meant people who say things about him like 'he said he was jesus' or anything that the paper has falsely parroted. a lot of people think they know everything about him because they read some article in the paper. Ive seen it so many times on here and people they can judge him without:

1) not even bothering to look into the evidence he brings forward
2) not even bothering to check out his work
3) both

but the paper says he is crazy so he must be.

but neither do you though...you just accept that what he says is fact without bothering to go and research the evidene to see if it's valid...and this is a common aspect throughout the conspiracy theorists posts (not just you but most of the people on this thread)...they see a video on youtube that claims to show a conspiracy at work...which throws alot of "facts" at the viewer and people believe it without bothering to check

a recent example is katsu in the "fire doesn't burn paper" thread saying that no remains of the plane were found etc etc...no doubt he got this "fact" from some other conspiracy theorist and due to his want or need to believe it he never questioned it or validated it himself

granted...Icke puts up a far better sounding argument than the likes of people on this forum when touting conspiracy theories but it doesn't make his "facts" and more valid

i dont accept anything he says as fact. i like him because he sees the world like me. he is much better than alex jones and all the rest. icke is the only one who doesnt have a rigid belief system to defend.

Originally posted by Deano
i dont accept anything he says as fact. i like him because he sees the world like me. he is much better than alex jones and all the rest. icke is the only one who doesnt have a rigid belief system to defend. Can I just say, for one who doesn't accept his videos as facts, you sure do post most of his videos along with how much you like him. Surely, if I said I like red wood, and post lots of different types of red wood, you would assume that all the wood I posted, I liked, or that I like all red wood.

Maybe you wouldn't be looked at as a tool or idiot (not trying to sound offensive here, really sorry) if you voiced your opinion on Icke along with posting Icke's opinion, because "Icke's videos, I love Icke" does sound very biased and naive. Maybe tell us the stuff about Icke you like, tell us a bit more about how you view him, and maybe talk for yourself in the future? After all, you are Deano, not David Icke.

ive address this countless times before. i can speak for myself. many of ickes views are my views and if he can explain things better than i can i will post some of his stuff.

you know my opnion of icke. its like a broken record on here at times

I watched them and hes nuts.

Has he been tested for anything before? I'm deadly serious.

care to comment properly? what do you find nuts. im interested