Click HERE to see this thread with all of the graphics, features, and links.

boy i feel so lucky to live in a free country.

http://cbs2.com/local/nipples.piercings.rings.2.686169.html



dont you feel safe now? TAKE DAT TERRA'STS!!!

Pliers? Just yank that shit out with the hands.

so? I was told to remove my belt big ****ing deal

Originally posted by anaconda
so? I was told to remove my belt big ****ing deal

you are obviously mentally impaired far beyond the capacity for rational debate, given your inability to read and think. good day sir.

look whos talking

Originally posted by anaconda
so? I was told to remove my belt big ****ing deal




Next time read the thread first? hmm

ever dawned on you that we did and found it like a oh (in a British(read English accent)) Oh blimey the world must stop cause some yankee chick got stopped because the security system picked up on some metal. Aware of strict security bond to flying maybe the girl could have prevented this by removing the items detected before the check in. The fact that it didnt detect her belly button ring well the system is surly ****ed. Make sure you really have a good life insurance before flying in the states and excuse airline security for doing their job annoying bastards that they are

what if she pierced more intimate than nipples

Originally posted by anaconda
ever dawned on you that we did and found it like a oh (in a British(read English accent)) Oh blimey the world must stop cause some yankee chick got stopped because the security system picked up on some metal. Aware of strict security bond to flying maybe the girl could have prevented this by removing the items detected before the check in. The fact that it didnt detect her belly button ring well the system is surly ****ed. Make sure you really have a good life insurance before flying in the states and excuse airline security for doing their job annoying bastards that they are
Oh, okay. I was just giving you the benefit of the doubt. My apologies.

And what about the fact that the men were snickering as she did it?

Originally posted by anaconda
ever dawned on you that we did and found it like a oh (in a British(read English accent)) Oh blimey the world must stop cause some yankee chick got stopped because the security system picked up on some metal. Aware of strict security bond to flying maybe the girl could have prevented this by removing the items detected before the check in. The fact that it didnt detect her belly button ring well the system is surly ****ed. Make sure you really have a good life insurance before flying in the states and excuse airline security for doing their job annoying bastards that they are It being an absolutely worthless job in the way they do it now, I kinda take issues with it.

And no one is saying the world has to stop turning. But it is the topic of the thread, and though probably not quite comparable to the Holocaust or the Inquisition it is bullshit.

thats what you get when Playboy is considered a porn mag and apology accepted and keep your bulldog(bardock) in a leash

bullshit what? the thread or .................?????

Note to self: avoid Lubbock, Texas.

yeah well wouldnt avoid Texas in general be the best for the , well...............

Originally posted by anaconda
bullshit what? the thread or .................????? Making her take off a nipple ring. What's she's going to do with it? Strangle the flight crew? What...was it a green lantern nipple ring?

to enter through the sensors she had to remove them, if not well bye bye flight regardless dangers that a nipple ring might involv

Originally posted by anaconda
to enter through the sensors she had to remove them, if not well bye bye flight regardless dangers that a nipple ring might involv She did not. She could enter the sensors with them. That happened, she told about the nipple ring and offered to show it to a female security guard. That is more than sufficient (as their policy states as well)...for her to have to remove the piercing (with the aid of tools, while being ridiculed by the staff, against the policy of the security) is certainly out of line. No argument about that.

Originally posted by anaconda
ever dawned on you that we did and found it like a oh (in a British(read English accent)) Oh blimey the world must stop cause some yankee chick got stopped because the security system picked up on some metal. Aware of strict security bond to flying maybe the girl could have prevented this by removing the items detected before the check in. The fact that it didnt detect her belly button ring well the system is surly ****ed. Make sure you really have a good life insurance before flying in the states and excuse airline security for doing their job annoying bastards that they are

I disagree with with one of your points.

"Hamlin said her piercings have never set off an airport metal detector." She didn't know that that would happen.

I see your point and even side with security to a certain degree on this one. I almost got the beat down because I had an empty foil gum wrapper in my shirt pocket. I had no idea it was there and it was my fault for causing the problem.

However, at the point Hamlin offered to allow the female security guard to verify that they were piercings, that should have been MORE than acceptable. At the point they rejected that offer, I totally disagree with their actions.

piercings is made of metal, you are, at least where I come from that any thing made of metal will set of the detector.

Point is that one piece of metal can hide another piece, to be sure you have to remove the source that they belived set it of to be sure there werent any more

Originally posted by anaconda
piercings is made of metal, you are, at least where I come from that any thing made of metal will set of the detector.

Point is that one piece of metal can hide another piece, to be sure you have to remove the source that they belived set it of to be sure there werent any more

B-because she might hide a gun under the skin of her breast?

Originally posted by anaconda
piercings is made of metal, you are, at least where I come from that any thing made of metal will set of the detector.

Point is that one piece of metal can hide another piece, to be sure you have to remove the source that they belived set it of to be sure there werent any more
What is she going to hide in her nipples/boobs that could threaten the plane?

no just because that little piece of metal might prevent the detector to detect an alleged weapon that doesnt have a lot of metal in it yeat leathal as hell, you should know it is from your neighbour country (your country of origin) and its an awesome piece of equipment

Originally posted by anaconda
no just because that little piece of metal might prevent the detector to detect an alleged weapon that doesnt have a lot of metal in it yeat leathal as hell, you should know it is from your neighbour country (your country of origin) and its an awesome piece of equipment One that could be hidden within a breast as the surface would have been expected by the female security personal as offered by the woman in question?

Have you really read the article, just wondering cause you portray a severe lack of understanding of it.

no it prevent detetection of other pieces same material regardless


my understanding of it is fine the, just because i dont have sympathy with the woman dont mean I dont understand it. You act as it just one way to side with this story of this unfortunate women`s story, well so if we are into lack certain things maybe a realty tune up would do for you Fritz to make up lack of certain things

That's just ****ing retarded. The next thing you know, you won't be allowed to carry your ex-girlfriends fingernails around in a nylon sack. For shame.

Originally posted by anaconda
no it prevent detetection of other pieces same material regardless

How? How would a bare inspected breast be able to hide a potentially harmful weapon unde one nipple piercing?

Originally posted by anaconda
my understanding of it is fine the, just because i dont have sympathy with the woman dont mean I dont understand it. You act as it just one way to side with this story of this unfortunate women`s story, well so if we are into lack certain things maybe a realty tune up would do for you Fritz to make up lack of certain things

It is just one way. You don't have to feel sympathy. But if the article is accurate you have to accept that they overstepped their boundaries and exposed her to increased embarrassment and shame for no apparent reason. It's nothing you can really argue about. If you deny it that's your choice, but you are factually wrong. Their ****ing handbook itself says so. So, sorry if I am going to state that you are full of crap playing the tough "I don't feel sorry for the woman" badass, it doesn't change the facts, "Olaf".

because the detection would senter on the breast in stead of well other places on the body , they would focus on that area cause thats where it beeped, today certain weapons hardly give a beep, placed right a real beep draw the atention away

their means of need to detect responded, who cares if she was deposed to personal embarrassment, fact is certain object will respond to detectors. If persons are so ****ing stupid and not taking that into consideration its upon them not the one who try to prevent certain actions that people can have a safe flight, if they overstep these small self explained measures they have only themselves to blaim, oh and Olaf is Swedish by the way, quite not where Im from ...........Kraut

Originally posted by anaconda
because the detection would senter on the breast in stead of well other places on the body , they would focus on that area cause thats where it beeped, today certain weapons hardly give a beep, placed right a real beep draw the atention away

Funny how their security policies disagree with your evaluation.

Originally posted by anaconda
their means of need to detect responded, who cares if she was deposed to personal embarrassment, fact is certain object will respond to detectors. If persons are so ****ing stupid and not taking that into consideration its upon them not the one who try to prevent certain actions that people can have a safe flight, if they overstep these small self explained measures they have only themselves to blaim, oh and Olaf is Swedish by the way, quite not where Im from ...........Kraut


The female TSA agent used a handheld detector that beeped when it passed in front of Hamlin's chest, the Dallas-area resident said.

Hamlin said she could not remove them and asked whether she could instead display her pierced breasts in private to the female agent. But several other male officers told her she could not board her flight until the jewelry was out, she said.

"If you are selected for additional screening, you may ask to remove your body piercing in private as an alternative to a pat-down search," the site says.

Hamlin would have accepted a "pat-down" had it been offered, Allred said.


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Olaf_I_of_Norway and knowing is half the battle.

Originally posted by anaconda
because the detection would senter on the breast in stead of well other places on the body , they would focus on that area cause thats where it beeped, today certain weapons hardly give a beep, placed right a real beep draw the atention away

their means of need to detect responded, who cares if she was deposed to personal embarrassment, fact is certain object will respond to detectors. If persons are so ****ing stupid and not taking that into consideration its upon them not the one who try to prevent certain actions that people can have a safe flight, if they overstep these small self explained measures they have only themselves to blaim, oh and Olaf is Swedish by the way, quite not where Im from ...........Kraut


fail

or as you would likely spell: fayl

Originally posted by anaconda
piercings is made of metal, you are, at least where I come from that any thing made of metal will set of the detector.

Point is that one piece of metal can hide another piece, to be sure you have to remove the source that they belived set it of to be sure there werent any more

Not everything made of metal will set off sensors. I always wear earrings, regularly wear a necklace, and my old glasses were wire-framed. None of which ever set off a single sensor.

Nipple rings are gross anyway. hanuts

This isn't as funny as the guy that was jacking off on a plane.

Originally posted by Quiero Mota
This isn't as funny as the guy that was jacking off on a plane.

You didn't notice? Its the same women, dude.

yeah and we have had kings called Oscar as well and wikipedia doesnt even agree on how his name was spelt "and the legitimacy of his claim to the throne. Snorri Sturluson claims in Olav Tryggvson's saga " ending with a v or f? In our language which is very similare to the Danish and Swedish yet different, in the names like this one we have different spelling of it.

dont confuse your ways with mine


again they pick up certain things and fail to see other things which again leads to say that these sencors aint fail proof, yet they getting better though

that was quite funny yes

Originally posted by anaconda
yeah and we have had kings called Oscar as well and wikipedia doesnt even agree on how his name was spelt "and the legitimacy of his claim to the throne. Snorri Sturluson claims in Olav Tryggvson's saga " ending with a v or f? In our language which is very similare to the Danish and Swedish yet different, in the names like this one we have different spelling of it.

And that changes that you are called Olaf, how?

Originally posted by Quiero Mota
This isn't as funny as the guy that was jacking off on a plane.

i didnt find it funny at all. i mean, i didnt post this to be pissy and whiney and say "oh the poor poor woman" etc. just to point out an example of the erosion of our civil liberties, and how what we demanded in terms of airline security and what we got are two different things. (however if you want comedy, picture bin laden dragging a 500 pound suitcase by in the background as these idiot thugs are preoccupied harassing an obviously harmless person.)

pronunciation of the letter, quite distinguish difference between v and f in our language, the Swedes adapted Olaf, Norwegian and Danes went with Olav

Originally posted by anaconda
pronunciation of the letter, quite distinguish difference between v and f in our language, the Swedes adapted Olaf, Norwegian and Danes went with Olav

Fair enough, Olav, then. And it was still out of line and unreasonably cruel.

well they just handled according to what they were suposed to do, a change in the regulation and such maybe, but as of now. Well sorry to say they did as instructed to do

Originally posted by anaconda
well they just handled according to what they were suposed to do, a change in the regulation and such maybe, but as of now. Well sorry to say they did as instructed to do They did not though. They went contrary to their regulation. On top of it being ridiculous. So...yeah.

according to TSA they did, but this brought an awareness to that the procedures needs to be changed in the future

Originally posted by anaconda
according to TSA they did, but this brought an awareness to that the procedures needs to be changed in the future

Yeah, making it clear they were out of line here.

still handled according to procedure

Originally posted by anaconda
still handled according to procedure Just that not.

according to TSA who is the authority on this they did, regardles of how you feel about it

Originally posted by anaconda
according to TSA who is the authority on this they did, regardles of how you feel about it According to the text they are investigating. According to their website they did not.

TSA HOMEPAGE


From that article:
It appears that the Transportation Security Officers involved properly followed procedures in that incident. They rightly insisted that the alarm that was raised be resolved. TSA supports the thoroughness of the Officers involved as they were acting to protect the passengers and crews of the flights departing Lubbock that day.
kind of say they did

well im relieved that their internal investigation determined that they were right. case closed.

Originally posted by anaconda
TSA HOMEPAGE


From that article:
It appears that the Transportation Security Officers involved properly followed procedures in that incident. They rightly insisted that the alarm that was raised be resolved. TSA supports the thoroughness of the Officers involved as they were acting to protect the passengers and crews of the flights departing Lubbock that day.
kind of say they did

Fair enough, they determined they were correct (big surprise there). Though that wasn't in the article. Also, really doesn't make what they did better. She should take it to the courts, especially considering that the TSA is ****ing nonsense anyways.

In my country you are told while picking up the ticket and on signs that anything that can be detected by senors must be removed, that includes piercings and the likes.
With better information situations like this could be avoided, taking into consideration the fact that passengers follow them tough

Originally posted by anaconda
In my country you are told while picking up the ticket and on signs that anything that can be detected by senors must be removed, that includes piercings and the likes.
With better information situations like this could be avoided, taking into consideration the fact that passengers follow them tough True, also if those ridiculous security standards didn't exist situations like this could be avouded.

in today situation we need these security standards, sadly but even so, too many nutcases out there

yes, cant be too careful in these troubled times of women smuggling tittie bombs onto planes

Originally posted by anaconda
in today situation we need these security standards, sadly but even so, too many nutcases out there I strongly disagree. We don't need to put our sanitary items in bags and store them away in our luggage, we don't need to not bring out coke on a plane, we don't need to remove our jewelery, we don't need to be anally raped in case we hid an uzi in our ass. It's authoritarian government bullshit gone mad. In fact, what we need, to make flying once again safe for everyone, is a requirement for every ****ing passenger to carry a gun on the plane, we, sadly, are going in the opposite direction.

Originally posted by Bardock42
. In fact, what we need, to make flying once again safe for everyone, is a requirement for every ****ing passenger to carry a gun on the plane, we, sadly, are going in the opposite direction.

are you sure thats a good idea? you do realize that just one mistakenly discharged firearm can depressurize the cabin and quite possibly kill everyone on board, right?

Originally posted by Schecter
are you sure thats a good idea? you do realize that just one mistakenly discharged firearm can depressurize the cabin and quite possibly kill everyone on board, right? Yeah, but we did stick it to the terrorists.

indeed. deprive them of the pleasure. you have swayed me.

could poke the captain in the eye with the stiff nipple.......

Originally posted by Schecter
indeed. deprive them of the pleasure. you have swayed me. No, but seriously, I am all for private airport security. It's probably in the best interest of the companies to not have their planes hijacked. But at the same time a private approach would make sure that shit like this would not happen and that security personal would include the actual risk in their thinking instead of just mindlessly harrass everyone.

Like OBL security LTD

Originally posted by anaconda
Like OBL security LTD

Why not?

I would like to make the destination of the flight

Originally posted by anaconda
I would like to make the destination of the flight Which would be equally if not better secured if it was private security.

im sick of the talk of 'these troubled times'. in fact i would say that since 9/11 airlines are much safer if not completely safe from hijacking. before 9/11, hijack victims would cooperate with hijackers since in most cases they would eventually be returned home safely. now since that is apparently not the case people will not cooperate and will most certainly retaliate. imho the only real threat to airline security at this point would come in the form of explosives. i would wager good money that we will never again see an airline hostage situation.

I would accept that the heightened security at the airlines was necessary if:

Every time journalists tried to sneak something clearly labeled "Nuclear device" onto a plane, they weren't successful.

As it is, with heightened security, airports are no better at stopping the dangerous things from getting onto planes, but yes, do needlessly harass regular people.

I have both my nipples pierced, one has a 6 gauge ring in it, so it would almost assuredly set off a hand held detector. I can understand them needing to pat it down or be shown it, but ya, no way they could "hide" something else. The only reasons that taking out the piercings before the security check should be needed is if they are putting me in a MRI machine.

Why are people even arguing? The security were douchebags to the woman; I hope she gets compensated for her embarrassment and discomfort.

Originally posted by Zeal Ex Nihilo
douchebags

REPORTED!

Sorry, I meant to say "f*ggots."

lol

She overreacted.

Originally posted by Sam Z
She overreacted.
Clearly.

i think they should give the pilots guns, or hire armed security for the actual planes, instead of focusing all their attention on making it more of a hassle for everyone to even enter the airport. obviously still have to have reasonable security at the gate to look for explosives and weapons but, at the end of the day if the airline personnel are armed the terrorists aren't going to be doing any hijacking with a boxcutter.

and this woman was obviously mistreated.

Originally posted by red g jacks
and this woman was obviously mistreated.
Only a feminazi like you would say something like that.

actually what i meant to say was, props to the airport security for keeping their pimp hand strong.

That's better.

"she could instead display her pierced breasts in private to the female agent"

Hot.

I wonder if a guy would be forced to remove his dick ring? mmm

Originally posted by Dark-Jaxx
"she could instead display her pierced breasts in private to the female agent"

Hot.

I wonder if a guy would be forced to remove his dick ring? mmm

I wonder if a guy could choose the female agent to display his dick ring to.

Originally posted by Bardock42
I wonder if a guy could choose the female agent to display his dick ring to.
That's sexual harassment.

Yes, which is why i wonder whether he'd be allowed to. Duh.

a guy could make the claim that he isn't comfortable showing his dick to another dude, i know a lotta niggas who would feel that way so really it's the airline's duty to provide a female dickring inspector to keep their customers happy and comfortable.

and the use of the word niggas is necessary how?

Originally posted by anaconda
and the use of the word niggas is necessary how? Nigga please.

lol

I only read the first page and a half, who else besides Anaconda is an idiot?

My mother has steel pins in her lower-spine; they've set off the detectors on occasion. She is taken to a private room and a female security guard uses the handheld detector to confirm that she indeed has metal in her spine and isn't a 68 year old terrorist trying to sneak in a gun or bomb in her anus.

I have to take off my shoes now... everyone does.....

What about a weeny ring?

Originally posted by Deja~vu
What about a weeny ring?

They typically do not set off metal detectors.

I've always wondered why they still sell bottles of whiskey etc, in the duty free sections of airports. Surely, any terrorist worth their salt could make a Molotov cocktail out of one and throw it anywhere on the plane.

Nice going, you just gave Abdul Islamic Jihad the perfect plan.

On a recent trip to Canada, some guy asked to check my backpack at the x-ray conveyor thing.

Obviously I obliged, it always seems to happen, I guess because I carry a lot of wires in my backpack from various electronic devices (iPod, chargers for stuff). Anyway, this supposed "security" guy was apologising to me, overly apologetic.

It just made me think, had I not been fine with it, I could have given him a real hard time and probably got on without being checked.

It's weird. "I'm sorry for doing my job.".

-AC

Originally posted by Adam_PoE
They typically do not set off metal detectors.

Speaking from experience?

Originally posted by Alpha Centauri
On a recent trip to Canada, some guy asked to check my backpack at the x-ray conveyor thing.

Obviously I obliged, it always seems to happen, I guess because I carry a lot of wires in my backpack from various electronic devices (iPod, chargers for stuff). Anyway, this supposed "security" guy was apologising to me, overly apologetic.

It just made me think, had I not been fine with it, I could have given him a real hard time and probably got on without being checked.

It's weird. "I'm sorry for doing my job.".

-AC


He was apologizing so much because after he looked in your bag, it embarrassed the hell out of him. It was the various bottles of personal lubricant, the Magnum condoms, and the hand cuffs.

Originally posted by dadudemon
Speaking from experience?




He was apologizing so much because after he looked in your bag, it embarrassed the hell out of him. It was the various bottles of personal lubricant, the Magnum condoms, and the hand cuffs. Awful delivery.

Originally posted by Robtard
Nice going, you just gave Abdul Islamic Jihad the perfect plan.

Actually, because its contains alcohol, I doubt Abdul Islamic Jihad will touch it.

Originally posted by dadudemon
Speaking from experience?


He probably is.

Originally posted by Quiero Mota
Actually, because its contains alcohol, I doubt Abdul Islamic Jihad will touch it.


lol

a little tangental, but I remember a doc. on illegal smuggling in central Asian (Muslim) nations. There was a hut where this guy had pounds of hash and opium just sitting out, like, he was showing them off. He motions for everyone to huddle in so he can open this secret compartment in the floor, and hidden in a blanket under the house was a bottle of brandy or something.

Originally posted by Quiero Mota

He probably is.

Adam has a Prince Albert.

I knew a guy once who had his ripped out in a pickup BBall game.

Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
I knew a guy once who had his ripped out in a pickup BBall game.

Tell us the whole story....please? Sounds like a good one.

Originally posted by dadudemon
Tell us the whole story....please? Sounds like a good one.

The story involves cock, figures you want to hear more.

Originally posted by Robtard
The story involves cock, figures you want to hear more.

Every is gay, right?

Considering that woman have to be wearing bio suits just to board planes, this doesn't surprise me

Originally posted by dadudemon
Every is gay, right?

What?

If you were trying to say "everyone", then no, everyone isn't gay, much to your chagrin.

Originally posted by dadudemon
Speaking from experience?

Originally posted by Robtard
Adam has a Prince Albert.

Originally posted by Adam_PoE
****

Originally posted by Robtard
What?

If you were trying to say "everyone", then no, everyone isn't gay, much to your chagrin.

I was mocking you. Everyone seems homosexual to you and anything they say has a homosexual connotation to it.





Didn't we have this conversation before and we ended up with me getting pwnt in an insult fest.......again?

Originally posted by Adam_PoE


Is it for decoration or does it have its "benefits"?

lol

if a prince albert wont set off the alarm, I am very curious about the hardware this woman must have had.

Originally posted by inimalist
lol

if a prince albert wont set off the alarm, I am very curious about the hardware this woman must have had.


Right. Didn't you say you had a fairly large piercing in one of your nipples?

Originally posted by dadudemon
I was mocking you. Everyone seems homosexual to you and anything they say has a homosexual connotation to it.

Didn't we have this conversation before and we ended up with me getting pwnt in an insult fest.......again?


Not everyone, mainly you and a few others.

Probably.

Originally posted by dadudemon
Right. Didn't you say you had a fairly large piercing in one of your nipples?

depends on your def of large

I have a 6 gauge in one and a 14 (iirc) in the other


http://content.answers.com/main/content/wp/en-commons/thumb/6/63/300px-Body_Piercing_Taper_Set.jpg

from the little I know of piercing, a PA should be more metal than a 6 gauge hoop

Originally posted by inimalist
depends on your def of large

I have a 6 gauge in one and a 14 (iirc) in the other


http://content.answers.com/main/content/wp/en-commons/thumb/6/63/300px-Body_Piercing_Taper_Set.jpg

from the little I know of piercing, a PA should be more metal than a 6 gauge hoop

I "hear" 16 and or 18 is like a plain old ear piercing.

Edit- If it wasn't too personal, I would ask you to post a picture of it. (Maybe even get a bate in.)

whatever I have in my right, 14-16, is the standard for nipples

I'm sure it differs by body part

Originally posted by inimalist
whatever I have in my right, 14-16, is the standard for nipples

I'm sure it differs by body part

reread my post....I edited it.


Also, "the standard for nipples" sounds sexy for some reason....hmm

Originally posted by Adam_PoE


Ha, I guessed correctly. I feel like Indiana Jones in the Last Crusade.

Does that do anything for your receiving partner?

Originally posted by Robtard
Does that do anything for your receiving partner?

DAMNIT! Why didn't I think to ask that? hmm

Originally posted by dadudemon
Is it for decoration or does it have its "benefits"?

Originally posted by Robtard
Does that do anything for your receiving partner?

It is "decorative" for me, but "beneficial" for my partners.




Originally posted by inimalist
whatever I have in my right, 14-16, is the standard for nipples

I'm sure it differs by body part

Nearly all body piercings are performed with a 14 gauge needle.




Originally posted by inimalist
from the little I know of piercing, a PA should be more metal than a 6 gauge hoop

I currently have a 6 gauge, stainless steel circular barbell.

Originally posted by dadudemon
DAMNIT! Why didn't I think to ask that? hmm

Because you were to busy mastubating over the thought of it to type?

Originally posted by Adam_PoE
It is "decorative" for me, but "beneficial" for my partners.

There was a study done that found that a "prince albert" does nothing for a female partner...I have only known Hetero/bi-sexual men to have the prince albert...

I learned something new today.

Originally posted by Robtard
Because you were to busy mastubating over the thought of it to type?

What is the word I am looking for.....


SARCASM!!! 313

Don't lie, the "word" you're looking for is as always, "cock".

Originally posted by Robtard
Don't lie, the "word" you're looking for is as always, "cock".

Sorry, I couldn't read what you said.....


too....busy....."mastubating"... http://i191.photobucket.com/albums/z238/dadudemon/widegrin.jpg