Click HERE to see this thread with all of the graphics, features, and links.

Originally posted by Grinning Goku
CHICAGO -- The principal of Spring Grove Elementary School was in a Wisconsin jail Tuesday night on charges of sexually abusing a 16-year-old girl.

Daniel Markofsky, 47, of Richmond, was caught over the weekend in Glendale, Wis., at a Super Motel 8 with two teen sisters, 15 and 16, according to police.

Police alleged Markofsky and the two girls were smoking marijuana, drinking alcohol and watching pornographic material. The sisters were from the Milwaukee area, according to police.

The Chicago Tribune reported that on Saturday a Glendale police officer knocked on the door of his room after smelling marijuana, according to the report. The report said Markofsky answered wearing a shirt and boxer shorts.

Neighbors near the school in Spring Grove were shocked by the news and feel Marckofsky should not remain as the principal.

"You wonder how long that kind of stuff has been going on with the kids," said Jamie Mason, a neighbor in Spring Grove. "I don't think any man should have the authority to be around kids when he does stuff like that."

The school did not wish to comment on the case.

A closed-door school board meeting was scheduled for 7 p.m. Wednesday at Nippersink School in Richmond, according the Chicago Tribune.


Woah...

Man we've got some sick ass people in this world, that's all I have to say.

Originally posted by Kelly_Bean
Man we've got some sick ass people in this world, that's all I have to say.

Indeed. I don't like these ass people you speak of. hmm

Doin it with underage girls is like ridina moped..fun until your friends catch you doin it.

Originally posted by KidRock
Doin it with underage girls is like ridina moped..fun until your friends catch you doin it.

"If there's grass on the field, play ball."

Originally posted by KidRock
Doin it with underage girls is like ridina moped..fun until your friends catch you doin it.

16 is only two years away from 18.

And it's legal in most of the world.

Guy is probably chill as hell, wish he was my principal, he coulda hooked me up with some hot young wet holes.

whats the best thing about doing a 13 year old girl? You can flip her over and pretend shes a 13 year old boy...

Originally posted by KidRock
whats the best thing about doing a 13 year old girl? You can flip her over and pretend shes a 13 year old boy...


eeeeeeewwww





What is the best part about having sex with eighty five year olds? There are eighty of them.

16 is the legal age where I'm from, I have had sex with lots of 16 year old, there's nothing wrong with it, But an old man having sex with one is disturbing

Originally posted by dadudemon
Indeed. I don't like these ass people you speak of. hmm
Shaddap.

Originally posted by Kelly_Bean
Shaddap.

"Lodged up more than one ass."

kthanxbye

This man gets extra style points because they were sisters.

What a lucky bastard.

a friend of mine was 33 when he started seeing a 16 year old...he's now 37 and she's 20 and they're married...he got some stick at the time but nobody really gives a shit anymore

Sixteen's legal here, maybe he should think of relocating.

I don't see anything wrong with it. I agree there are too many sick ass people in the world, that want people to lose their jobs for trivial bullshit like that.

-Bardock42

There is something terribly wrong when a 47 year old man wants to have sex with a 16 year old child. I hope he becomes someones butt buddy while in jail.

Probably won't go to jail.

Damn, this dude is cool as hell, wish I had role models like that in my life.

Originally posted by Sanctuary
I don't see anything wrong with it. I agree there are too many sick ass people in the world, that want people to lose their jobs for trivial bullshit like that.

-Bardock42

Biased much?

"Police alleged Markofsky and the two girls were smoking marijuana, drinking alcohol and watching pornographic material."

Originally posted by Robtard
Biased much?

"Police alleged Markofsky and the two girls were smoking marijuana, drinking alcohol and watching pornographic material." Like I said, cool as hell.

THE. MAN.

Originally posted by Robtard
Biased much?

"Police alleged Markofsky and the two girls were smoking marijuana, drinking alcohol and watching pornographic material."

What's wrong with ganj, booze and porn?

The answer starts with N and ends with othing.

Originally posted by chillmeistergen
What's wrong with ganj, booze and porn?

Nothing in of itself.

When you're supplying it to someone else's underage kids though, that's a problem.

Originally posted by Dark-Jaxx
Like I said, cool as hell.

Grow up.

Originally posted by Robtard
Nothing in of itself.

When you're supplying it to someone else's underage kids though, that's a problem. Like they didn't already have it lol.

Originally posted by Dark-Jaxx
Like they didn't already have it lol.

Durr... durr... durr.

Originally posted by Robtard
Nothing in of itself.

When you're supplying it to someone else's underage kids though, that's a problem.

We don't for a fact that he supplied it though. Plus, in my opinion, sixteen is old enough to make the decision to dabble in drug and alcohol use.

I'd really need to know the full facts before I gave a full opinion on the man though.

Originally posted by chillmeistergen
We don't for a fact that he supplied it though. Plus, in my opinion, sixteen is old enough to make the decision to dabble in drug and alcohol use.

I'd really need to know the full facts before I gave a full opinion on the man though.

There is the chance that he didn't, true. But he was part of it. I did too at that age, (younger actually) but if some other adult other than my parents had been part of it, I can see why they'd be furious at the person.

Well, the hotel room (and porn) was most likely his doing, as was the alcohol.

i think i might want to be a high school principal

Originally posted by Schecter
i think i might want to be a high school principal Why?

Originally posted by Schecter
i think i might want to be a high school principal

http://i.cnn.net/cnn/2002/SHOWBIZ/Movies/11/15/actor.arrested/story.jeffrey.jones.jpg

He was busted for being a pederast.

Originally posted by Robtard
http://i.cnn.net/cnn/2002/SHOWBIZ/Movies/11/15/actor.arrested/story.jeffrey.jones.jpg

He was busted for being a pederast. Lol funny movie.

Originally posted by Robtard
Biased much?

"Police alleged Markofsky and the two girls were smoking marijuana, drinking alcohol and watching pornographic material." A-and?

Just because the law and you somehow decided that 16 year olds can't do that, doesn't really make it wrong if they want to, now does it? So, yeah, I would say you are quite biased towards the close minded conventional moral understanding.

He should get in trouble for not doing anal with them.

Originally posted by Grinning Goku
Woah...
Sounds like a real pimp.

Originally posted by Sanctuary
I don't see anything wrong with it. I agree there are too many sick ass people in the world, that want people to lose their jobs for trivial bullshit like that.

-Bardock42
You're not Bardock.

Also, we have several felonies on our hands here.

1. Statutory rape.
2. Using a controlled substance.
3. Serving alcohol to minors.

Originally posted by Zeal Ex Nihilo
You're not Bardock.

Also, we have several felonies on our hands here.

1. Statutory rape.
2. Using a controlled substance.
3. Serving alcohol to minors.

All not harmful to anyone but consenting (not legal term) people or yourself, if at all.

I think the point that Robtard made is fine. He wasn't saying that all those things are factually, objectively wrong. He was simply reiterating the fact that more happened in this case than simply underage sex, since the sex was all that was being discussed.

Originally posted by BackFire
I think the point that Robtard made is fine. He wasn't saying that all those things are factually, objectively wrong. He was simply reiterating the fact that more happened in this case than simply underage sex, since the sex was all that was being discussed. Somehow I doubt that. But if so, then yes, all those acts were awesome, not just the underage sex, thank you for reminding us, Rob.

Yes, we know you like underage sex. Pedo-german. Sorry, that was redundant.

Originally posted by Bardock42
Just because the law and you somehow decided that 16 year olds can't do that, doesn't really make it wrong if they want to, now does it?

They cant exactly declare 'given consent' in a court, being that a 15 year old was involved as well. You cant just excuse the law in favor of 'personal freedoms'.

Originally posted by Outbound
They cant exactly declare 'given consent' in a court, being that a 15 year old was involved as well. You cant just excuse the law in favor of 'personal freedoms'. Oh I can. I never claimed it wasn't illegal what was going on. Just no one got harmed that didn't want it. The law is without a doubt doing more harm to the people involved than their actions did.

Ok, wasnt sure how you were coming across before.

Originally posted by Bardock42
Oh I can. I never claimed it wasn't illegal what was going on. Just no one got harmed that didn't want it. The law is without a doubt doing more harm to the people involved than their actions did. So what's your cut off age? 8? 5?

If a kid wants something you should just give it to them right? Regardless of age?

What's the cut off age for you? if an infant makes grabbing motions toward a bottle of alcohol, give it to them, right?

And why would you chose the age you do as the cut off point? Why not a year ealier? Why not a year later?

Originally posted by Creshosk
So what's your cut off age? 8? 5?

If a kid wants something you should just give it to them right? Regardless of age?

What's the cut off age for you? if an infant makes grabbing motions toward a bottle of alcohol, give it to them, right?

And why would you chose the age you do as the cut off point? Why not a year ealier? Why not a year later?

I'd prefer an individual basis. Or none at all.

But yeah, 15 year olds should be responsible for their own shit, really.

Originally posted by Bardock42
I'd prefer an individual basis. Or none at all. Good man.

Originally posted by Bardock42
But yeah, 15 year olds should be responsible for their own shit, really. Is there an age where you feel that the majority of people in that age aren't capable of making these sort of decisions?

Originally posted by Creshosk
Good man.

Is there an age where you feel that the majority of people in that age aren't capable of making these sort of decisions?

Yeah. Most under 60 probably. But I don't really like making intrusive laws just cause the majority of people are idiots.

Though, to be more friendly and answer the aim of your questions, I assume most under 12 have not enough understanding or interest to want that.

Originally posted by Bardock42
A-and?

Just because the law and you somehow decided that 16 year olds can't do that, doesn't really make it wrong if they want to, now does it? So, yeah, I would say you are quite biased towards the close minded conventional moral understanding.

Silly German.

Originally posted by Robtard
Nothing in of itself.

When you're supplying it to someone else's underage kids though, that's a problem.

Originally posted by Robtard
Silly German. How else would underage kids get it? DUH.

Originally posted by Zeal Ex Nihilo
You're not Bardock.

Also, we have several felonies on our hands here.

1. Statutory rape.
2. Using a controlled substance.
3. Serving alcohol to minors.
It was Bardock, he forgot to log out of my account. slide

Originally posted by Bardock42
How else would underage kids get it? DUH.

I took booze from my dad's liquor stash, my friend took buds from his dad's marijuana stash. DUH.

Edit: Older siblings are also a plus.

Originally posted by Robtard
I took booze from my dad's liquor stash, my friend took buds from his dad's marijuana stash. DUH.

Edit: Older siblings are also a plus. Yeah, but wouldn't it have been much easier if your Headmaster would have provided you with it as well?

Originally posted by Bardock42
Yeah, but wouldn't it have been much easier if your Headmaster would have provided you with it as well?

Easier, yes/possibly.

Right of him to do it, especially with him being in a position of power with the student-teacher dynamic (and without the parents consent), no.

Originally posted by Robtard
Easier, yes/possibly.

Right of him to do it, especially with him being in a position of power with the student-teacher dynamic (and without the parents consent), no. Well, I disagree on that. I think if a 15 year old wants to watch porn and smoke marijuana they should very well go ahead.

Originally posted by Bardock42
Well, I disagree on that. I think if a 15 year old wants to watch porn and smoke marijuana they should very well go ahead.

Is that a strawman?

Because that isn't my argument.

Originally posted by Robtard
Is that a strawman?

Because that isn't my argument. Well, it might be a different topic. But that's still what I think about it.

I also think that anyone that wants to provide marijuana and porn to a 15 year old girl that's willing should be allowed to.

Better?

Originally posted by Bardock42
Well, it might be a different topic. But that's still what I think about it.

I also think that anyone that wants to provide marijuana and porn to a 15 year old girl that's willing should be allowed to.

Better?

Why not the alcohol?

Originally posted by Robtard
Why not the alcohol? Cause alcohol is evil. And should be illegal for everyone.

If you're going to be the self-appointed viceroy Rand, that is an extremely odd thing to say.

Originally posted by Robtard
If you're going to be the self-appointed viceroy Rand, that is an extremely odd thing to say. I know, it was obviously satirical in nature. I'd obviously include alcohol.

Most people hit puberty at about 13 and to say they can't be responsible or control themselves within a year is like giving them the keys to the car and a box of condoms. I think people should be deemed as adults at about 14 or 15 in all seriousness but not many mommies out there want to see their 14-15 daughter getting reamed by an old man. It's all a matter of reality and when you want it to set in imo.

Originally posted by Heat_Vision
Most people hit puberty at about 13 and to say they can't be responsible or control themselves within a year is like giving them the keys to the car and a box of condoms. I think people should be deemed as adults at about 14 or 15 in all seriousness but not many mommies out there want to see their 14-15 daughter getting reamed by an old man. It's all a matter of reality and when you want it to set in imo.

the santa clause smilie was all too appropriate for your statement.

Originally posted by dadudemon
the santa clause smilie was all too appropriate for your statement. agreed