Deano
..Double Bubble
http://www.davidicke.com/oi/extras/08/july/july01.jpg
..Double Trouble
Hello all ...
Standing in the 'Big Brother' by-election this month gave me valuable insights into many things, but perhaps nothing was more blatant than to experience at close hand the 'Bubble People' who, at least in theory, administer and report 'the system'.
They live in a closed-circuit 'world' which looks in on itself and cannot see anything beyond the pea-sized limitations of its own perception of possibility. Humanity in general lives in these reality bubbles, but when you experience politicians and the vast majority of journalists it takes on a whole new level of intensity.
They are what you might call the 'Double-Bubbles'.
When I decided to stand in the election I knew that I was agreeing to face still more ridicule in the media, especially the national media, because, so often, the 'higher' you go in the 'communication' hierarchy the denser their bubbles become.
There are exceptions and I met one, yes one, among all the 'journalists' covering the election, but it's the rule I can tell you after nearly 20 years working in the media and another nearly 20 being 'reported' by it.
http://www.davidicke.com/oi/extras/08/july/july02.jpg
You're a journalist, aren't you?
I mentioned a few weeks ago in the newsletter how I had to present my information in baby-steps to students at the 'elite' Oxford University when I could give everything I could to supposedly 'ordinary' members of the public at events like the Brixton Academy. The difference: an open mind.
The 'ordinary' people who attend my talks, read my books and watch the DVDs have made a conscious decision, sometimes subconscious when they come across them 'by accident', that they want to know what I am saying. Given that the information is challenging to say the very least compared with 'normal' reality, they have shown by that very decision that they have a mind which is open to other possibility.
They might not agree with, or accept, every word, and nor should they if it doesn't feel right to them, but they are open to looking at what is being said before making a judgement. It is this state of mind that has always advanced the human experience because they look at things as they are, not as their pre-conceived idea - the bubble - tells them they are.
So many of the great inventors, discoverers and visionaries have been ridiculed as 'crazy' or dismissed as 'the devil' before they were shown to be right - often long after they left this world.
They could see what the Bubble People could not see and, given that the Bubbles refuse to investigate beyond the norms that control them, history records the open-minds as 'people ahead of their time'.
But they're not. It is nothing to do with 'time' and everything to do with the size of the perception bubble that dictates the imprisoned reality. Burst the bubble, move the point from which you observe reality, and what seems crazy to the Bubble People appears plainly obvious to those 'ahead of their time'.
As the ancient Greek philosopher, Socrates, is supposed to have said: 'Wisdom is knowing how little we know'. Those are the words of an open mind.
http://www.davidicke.com/oi/extras/08/july/july03.jpg
Open minds are easy to spot in a world of uniformity
Open-minded people would make great journalists - real journalists - but they would never be employed by the media corporations that dominate the mainstream communications (indoctrinations) industry. They want only the Double-Bubbles who will 'report' the world as those controlling the corporations wish the people to see it.
It is an 'information' dictatorship that originates with the Shadow People we never see; comes down through the corporations, like General Electric, who officially own the media; and continues on to the chief executives, editors and producers, and finally to the 'journalists' and presenters.
If anyone in the pyramid steps out of line in terms of what they report and how they report it, they soon experience the consequences. But in all except rare cases this is not even necessary.
The real censorship is self-censorship, either by knowing the consequences for crossing 'the line', or by thinking that the line is how the world really is. The latter are the Double-Bubbles' and they have always dominated the journalistic profession, though more so than ever before today, it would appear.
It is no accident that so many of the leading 'journalists' and current affairs presenters and editors are products of the programming machine we call the elite universities, like Oxford and Cambridge or the so-called Ivy League universities in the United States.
Before they even begin to 'report' the world for the global masses they go through a long and powerful mind-manipulation programme (called a 'good education') to implant their perception of reality. They might be of the political 'left', 'centre' or 'right', but it doesn't matter because they are all 'system people'. They might want to tinker with the details of the system (more tax, less tax), but they don't see it for what it really is - an enslavement machine and reality suppressor.
I have come across a long stream of such people in the last 20 years from newspapers, radio and television and, while there have been honourable exceptions, the norm has been akin to having a conversation with a wall (apologies to walls, by the way).
I presented the foundations of the global conspiracy and the interconnected nature of the 'Big Brother' society to journalists at a news conference during the by-election, but you would never believe it when you saw how most of them reported what I said.
One of the Double-Bubbles in attendance was Quentin Letts, the political columnist on the UK national, the Daily Mail, which, ironically, covers many Big Brother-type stories, but refuses to connect the dots so the real picture can be seen.
http://www.davidicke.com/oi/extras/08/july/july04.jpg
Letts has had a classic system indoctrination at the Roman Catholic-controlled Bellarmine University in Kentucky, Trinity College, Dublin, and Jesus College, Cambridge. While his columns are often cynical about politics, as anyone observing it for long would be, he dutifully records reality in the image that the Daily Mail demands. If he didn't, of course, he wouldn't be there for long.
He sat watching my presentation, part listening, part reading a newspaper, and after nearly an hour of me putting the puzzle pieces together to reveal Big Big Brother, Mr. Letts could summon just one question: words to the effect of 'How much money have you raised for your election fund?' That was it.
The following day in his paper he dismissed what I had said in one line: 'It's nonsense, of course.'
What he meant was that his bubble could not conceive that what I said could in any way be true and therefore it must obviously be nonsense. Once again what is really possible is mistaken for the limits of what Bubble People perceive to be possible.
Letts would have said the same about those who suggested that the earth was round. 'Nonsense, of course', he would have written with his quill pen.
How much time has Letts spent researching the subject? Zero. How much time will he now devote to seeing if it's true? Zero. This is the most powerful force behind the suppression of information by the mainstream media - self-censorship and the Double-Bubble reality.
http://www.davidicke.com/oi/extras/08/july/july05.jpg
Don't tell me, Daily Mail, right?'
I met another 'journalist' at the election count when she came over to ask me some questions. What struck me immediately was her stunning lack of knowledge about me or anything else.
'How long are you going to continue standing in all these elections?', she said, just as a BBC radio presenter called Clive Anderson had informed his listeners that I stood in all such elections.
Yet this was the first time I had ever stood and it will be the last. Even something as basic as that can be turned from first-time standing to always standing when passed through the filter of mainstream 'journalism'. The ignorance of these people is truly remarkable, but then they think 'research' is reading the morning papers and watching the newsroom television.
And what that means is that all their information, their perception of reality, comes from within the bubble that they all occupy. Thus, the bubble reality is constantly confirmed and strengthened and, to them, becomes all-consuming.
The woman 'journalist' at the election count asked me what I was saying about how the world was controlled. Given that it was way past midnight, I said that she should read one of my books.
'Oh, but they're too long, I would never read that', she said , when a friend offered her a book for free. 'Give me some bullet points'.
I said that if I gave her bullet points she would then ask me for the evidence.
'That's right', she said.
'But the evidence is in the book and you say you would never read it, right'.
'Yes', she confirmed, 'I wouldn't read it'.
'So what is the point of talking to you at all?'
No answer.
The exchange reminded me of that old saying:
'You cannot bribe or twist the great British journalist, but seeing what they will do unbribed, there's no reason to.'
http://www.davidicke.com/oi/extras/08/july/july01.jpg
..Double Trouble
Hello all ...
Standing in the 'Big Brother' by-election this month gave me valuable insights into many things, but perhaps nothing was more blatant than to experience at close hand the 'Bubble People' who, at least in theory, administer and report 'the system'.
They live in a closed-circuit 'world' which looks in on itself and cannot see anything beyond the pea-sized limitations of its own perception of possibility. Humanity in general lives in these reality bubbles, but when you experience politicians and the vast majority of journalists it takes on a whole new level of intensity.
They are what you might call the 'Double-Bubbles'.
When I decided to stand in the election I knew that I was agreeing to face still more ridicule in the media, especially the national media, because, so often, the 'higher' you go in the 'communication' hierarchy the denser their bubbles become.
There are exceptions and I met one, yes one, among all the 'journalists' covering the election, but it's the rule I can tell you after nearly 20 years working in the media and another nearly 20 being 'reported' by it.
http://www.davidicke.com/oi/extras/08/july/july02.jpg
You're a journalist, aren't you?
I mentioned a few weeks ago in the newsletter how I had to present my information in baby-steps to students at the 'elite' Oxford University when I could give everything I could to supposedly 'ordinary' members of the public at events like the Brixton Academy. The difference: an open mind.
The 'ordinary' people who attend my talks, read my books and watch the DVDs have made a conscious decision, sometimes subconscious when they come across them 'by accident', that they want to know what I am saying. Given that the information is challenging to say the very least compared with 'normal' reality, they have shown by that very decision that they have a mind which is open to other possibility.
They might not agree with, or accept, every word, and nor should they if it doesn't feel right to them, but they are open to looking at what is being said before making a judgement. It is this state of mind that has always advanced the human experience because they look at things as they are, not as their pre-conceived idea - the bubble - tells them they are.
So many of the great inventors, discoverers and visionaries have been ridiculed as 'crazy' or dismissed as 'the devil' before they were shown to be right - often long after they left this world.
They could see what the Bubble People could not see and, given that the Bubbles refuse to investigate beyond the norms that control them, history records the open-minds as 'people ahead of their time'.
But they're not. It is nothing to do with 'time' and everything to do with the size of the perception bubble that dictates the imprisoned reality. Burst the bubble, move the point from which you observe reality, and what seems crazy to the Bubble People appears plainly obvious to those 'ahead of their time'.
As the ancient Greek philosopher, Socrates, is supposed to have said: 'Wisdom is knowing how little we know'. Those are the words of an open mind.
http://www.davidicke.com/oi/extras/08/july/july03.jpg
Open minds are easy to spot in a world of uniformity
Open-minded people would make great journalists - real journalists - but they would never be employed by the media corporations that dominate the mainstream communications (indoctrinations) industry. They want only the Double-Bubbles who will 'report' the world as those controlling the corporations wish the people to see it.
It is an 'information' dictatorship that originates with the Shadow People we never see; comes down through the corporations, like General Electric, who officially own the media; and continues on to the chief executives, editors and producers, and finally to the 'journalists' and presenters.
If anyone in the pyramid steps out of line in terms of what they report and how they report it, they soon experience the consequences. But in all except rare cases this is not even necessary.
The real censorship is self-censorship, either by knowing the consequences for crossing 'the line', or by thinking that the line is how the world really is. The latter are the Double-Bubbles' and they have always dominated the journalistic profession, though more so than ever before today, it would appear.
It is no accident that so many of the leading 'journalists' and current affairs presenters and editors are products of the programming machine we call the elite universities, like Oxford and Cambridge or the so-called Ivy League universities in the United States.
Before they even begin to 'report' the world for the global masses they go through a long and powerful mind-manipulation programme (called a 'good education') to implant their perception of reality. They might be of the political 'left', 'centre' or 'right', but it doesn't matter because they are all 'system people'. They might want to tinker with the details of the system (more tax, less tax), but they don't see it for what it really is - an enslavement machine and reality suppressor.
I have come across a long stream of such people in the last 20 years from newspapers, radio and television and, while there have been honourable exceptions, the norm has been akin to having a conversation with a wall (apologies to walls, by the way).
I presented the foundations of the global conspiracy and the interconnected nature of the 'Big Brother' society to journalists at a news conference during the by-election, but you would never believe it when you saw how most of them reported what I said.
One of the Double-Bubbles in attendance was Quentin Letts, the political columnist on the UK national, the Daily Mail, which, ironically, covers many Big Brother-type stories, but refuses to connect the dots so the real picture can be seen.
http://www.davidicke.com/oi/extras/08/july/july04.jpg
Letts has had a classic system indoctrination at the Roman Catholic-controlled Bellarmine University in Kentucky, Trinity College, Dublin, and Jesus College, Cambridge. While his columns are often cynical about politics, as anyone observing it for long would be, he dutifully records reality in the image that the Daily Mail demands. If he didn't, of course, he wouldn't be there for long.
He sat watching my presentation, part listening, part reading a newspaper, and after nearly an hour of me putting the puzzle pieces together to reveal Big Big Brother, Mr. Letts could summon just one question: words to the effect of 'How much money have you raised for your election fund?' That was it.
The following day in his paper he dismissed what I had said in one line: 'It's nonsense, of course.'
What he meant was that his bubble could not conceive that what I said could in any way be true and therefore it must obviously be nonsense. Once again what is really possible is mistaken for the limits of what Bubble People perceive to be possible.
Letts would have said the same about those who suggested that the earth was round. 'Nonsense, of course', he would have written with his quill pen.
How much time has Letts spent researching the subject? Zero. How much time will he now devote to seeing if it's true? Zero. This is the most powerful force behind the suppression of information by the mainstream media - self-censorship and the Double-Bubble reality.
http://www.davidicke.com/oi/extras/08/july/july05.jpg
Don't tell me, Daily Mail, right?'
I met another 'journalist' at the election count when she came over to ask me some questions. What struck me immediately was her stunning lack of knowledge about me or anything else.
'How long are you going to continue standing in all these elections?', she said, just as a BBC radio presenter called Clive Anderson had informed his listeners that I stood in all such elections.
Yet this was the first time I had ever stood and it will be the last. Even something as basic as that can be turned from first-time standing to always standing when passed through the filter of mainstream 'journalism'. The ignorance of these people is truly remarkable, but then they think 'research' is reading the morning papers and watching the newsroom television.
And what that means is that all their information, their perception of reality, comes from within the bubble that they all occupy. Thus, the bubble reality is constantly confirmed and strengthened and, to them, becomes all-consuming.
The woman 'journalist' at the election count asked me what I was saying about how the world was controlled. Given that it was way past midnight, I said that she should read one of my books.
'Oh, but they're too long, I would never read that', she said , when a friend offered her a book for free. 'Give me some bullet points'.
I said that if I gave her bullet points she would then ask me for the evidence.
'That's right', she said.
'But the evidence is in the book and you say you would never read it, right'.
'Yes', she confirmed, 'I wouldn't read it'.
'So what is the point of talking to you at all?'
No answer.
The exchange reminded me of that old saying:
'You cannot bribe or twist the great British journalist, but seeing what they will do unbribed, there's no reason to.'