Click HERE to see this thread with all of the graphics, features, and links.

MarvelKnight Vs. Barker

Judge: The Red

Render

Criteria: Double KMC Regulations. Must Include Opponent's Name Somewhere In The Sig. NO Animation.

Deadline: Two Weeks From Time Posted In First Post. NO Extensions.

Good Luck Gentlemen.

That render is sick!

I don't like cartoon ninja renders. crackers

13


Also, brb another red/dark/gold sig

Late post: Haermm, oh shi, I hope that by "Double" regulations you meant we had up to 1080x300, 100kb.

Here's my sig.

Barker's Entry

http://i190.photobucket.com/albums/z68/PersonFromDownUnder/the-world-will-know-2.jpg

MarvelKnight's Entry

http://i190.photobucket.com/albums/z68/PersonFromDownUnder/ninja-sig.gif

Give me about 20 minutes to judge.

Barker

+ Use of Render
+ Use of color to go along with the render
+ Background layer
- Use of opponent's name. Hard to find
- Typo of ignite awesome

MarvelKnight

+ Use of render
- Color
- Background layer
+ Opponent's name
+ No typos

I have to give this one to Barker. I believe he made better use of the render in his sig. Don't get me wrong, your sig is awesome too MarvelKnight. All your sigs are, but Barker better met the standards of the duel.

Barker

Hmm I'm not seeing Marvelknight in Barker's sig

Originally posted by Da Pittman
Hmm I'm not seeing Marvelknight in Barker's sig It's there Pittman. Really tiny. Look at the top rectangle. It's sideways all the way to the left.

Originally posted by The Red
It's there Pittman. Really tiny. Look at the top rectangle. It's sideways all the way to the left. That sneaky Baker Bear, I had to stick my nose to the screen to see it

Originally posted by Da Pittman
That sneaky Baker Bear, I had to stick my nose to the screen to see it That's why he got a minus for the Name usage. Hard to find.

Originally posted by The Red
Barker

+ Use of Render
+ Use of color to go along with the render
+ Background layer
- Use of opponent's name. Hard to find
- Typo of ignite awesome

MarvelKnight

+ Use of render
- Color
- Background layer
+ Opponent's name
+ No typos

I have to give this one to Barker. I believe he made better use of the render in his sig. Don't get me wrong, your sig is awesome too MarvelKnight. All your sigs are, but Barker better met the standards of the duel.

Barker

Good match, Barker.

No points for color, Red....? I disagree. But oh well.

Originally posted by Marvelknight
Good match, Barker.

No points for color, Red....? I disagree. But oh well. I felt like it didn't go with the render itself. I feel like it should have been darker, more dreary. After all, the render is of an assassin.

Originally posted by The Red
I felt like it didn't go with the render itself. I feel like it should have been darker, more dreary. After all, the render is of an assassin.


Maybe next time...

Originally posted by Marvelknight
Maybe next time... I decided that, I might as well be a judge. I've forever tried in vain making sigs, but I'm just no good. So, anytime you need a judge, just let me know.

Cool. Short duel. I thought I was a goner when I saw yours (this morning) Marvel.


Also, Ignigte.

Originally posted by Barker
Cool. Short duel. I thought I was a goner when I saw yours (this morning) Marvel.


Also, Ignigte.

I was thinking the same, when you posted yours. Too bad I lost, I'm 2-0, now. But it was a good win on your part. Maybe we can have a rematch.

Originally posted by Barker
I don't like cartoon ninja renders. crackers

13


Also, brb another red/dark/gold sig

That's an amazing signature.

Originally posted by Da Pittman
That sneaky Baker Bear, I had to stick my nose to the screen to see it
As long as Baker bear did is and not Barker your safe right? haermm

Originally posted by BakaXero
As long as Baker bear did is and not Barker your safe right? haermm