Click HERE to see this thread with all of the graphics, features, and links.

i didn't mind moonraker it had it's moments but i didn't like the space battle at the end.
for me the movies people seem to like and i don't would have to be
Quantum of Soclist (what a piece of crap, hadn't been to a movie where i looked at my watch so many times for a while)
licence to kill (any bond movie where revenge is the motivation sucks ie QOS)
the world is not enough (pierces worst by far)

Originally posted by darthmaul1
i didn't mind moonraker it had it's moments but i didn't like the space battle at the end.
for me the movies people seem to like and i don't would have to be
Quantum of Soclist (what a piece of crap, hadn't been to a movie where i looked at my watch so many times for a while)
licence to kill (any bond movie where revenge is the motivation sucks ie QOS)
the world is not enough (pierces worst by far)

I totally agree with you when it comes to QOS. I really didn't like that film, but in saying that I don't know many people who did.

well here at this site,it would be the Pierce Brosnan films.In real life I find most people agree with me that he just plain sucked as Bond but here at THIS site I have found many people that worship him to no end saying he was the best Bond ever or second best after Connery.

Originally posted by Wanderer11
I totally agree with you when it comes to QOS. I really didn't like that film, but in saying that I don't know many people who did.

Funny the impression i got from people here is they liked QOS.
as for pierce being the best bond? no i don't think so Connery is the best and then i would say pierce and roger are a tie for now, have to wait and see what Craig can do in the other ones.

Originally posted by darthmaul1
Funny the impression i got from people here is they liked QOS.
as for pierce being the best bond? no i don't think so Connery is the best and then i would say pierce and roger are a tie for now, have to wait and see what Craig can do in the other ones.

I hope Craig can become a great Bond, but if they keep giving him rubbish like QOS he will have his work cut out.

well unlike Brosnan,he is a good actor so there is hope.lol.

Originally posted by Mr Parker
well unlike Brosnan,he is a good actor so there is hope.lol.

Brosnan is a far better actor than Craig.

Originally posted by Mr Parker
well unlike Brosnan,he is a good actor so there is hope.lol.

There is hope, but I have a bad feeling that he will not be remembered as a good Bond.

Originally posted by Zoom
Brosnan is a far better actor than Craig.

No way.was doing cartwheels when they got smart and let Brosnan go and did not bring him back.

Originally posted by Mr Parker
No way.was doing cartwheels when they got smart and let Brosnan go and did not bring him back.

You must be the only person in the world to think that way. Brosnan was a great Bond and a better actor than the pretender who is now in the role.

Originally posted by Wanderer11
There is hope, but I have a bad feeling that he will not be remembered as a good Bond.

I'm sure that he will be - despite all the criticisms of "QOS", most reviews still seemed to praise his performance. I think he's definitely up there with the best of the Bonds in the general public's perception ...

And in answer to the title of the thread, I've never been a big fan of "OHMSS" - I think that Lazenby did a decent job in the role, but for some reason the film has always left me cold; perhaps I just find it too depressing?

I can't more details for bond movies.But i like this concept.This tittle is familier for everyone.

GoldenEye & Goldfinger

Both aren't neccessarily bad. They just aren't great. Overrated is the term.

I was never a big fan of Tomorrow Never Dies.

Originally posted by The Power
I was never a big fan of Tomorrow Never Dies.

I thought that was Pierces best.

They were always wanting Pierce after Moore, but he couldn't get out of his remington steel contract.

Originally posted by Wanderer11
There is hope, but I have a bad feeling that he will not be remembered as a good Bond.

well he is so miscast in the part in the first place having a balding receding hairline with grey hair so yeah Im sure your right.lol.I couldnt believe he was only 40 when he took on that role,he looks 10 years older.what i think is really funny though is they let Brosnan go saying that he had become too old for the role yet Moore was much older than Brosnan was when He left Bond and he got to leave on his OWN terms.The reality is Brosnan was so bad they finally realised that and did not want to hurt his feelings so they made up that excuse.

Originally posted by Mr Parker
well he is so miscast in the part in the first place having a balding receding hairline with grey hair so yeah Im sure your right.lol.I couldnt believe he was only 40 when he took on that role,he looks 10 years older.what i think is really funny though is they let Brosnan go saying that he had become too old for the role yet Moore was much older than Brosnan was when He left Bond and he got to leave on his OWN terms.The reality is Brosnan was so bad they finally realised that and did not want to hurt his feelings so they made up that excuse.

You are the only Bond fan I have ever come across who has such bad things to say about Brosnan.

Originally posted by Zoom
Brosnan is a far better actor than Craig.

http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_f3SZ5Tu916o/SsFCnjXeyzI/AAAAAAAANxs/3VpBMuALLB4/s400/implied-facepalm.jpg

Daniel Craig gives a new definition to the term wooden.

I didn't really care for Casino Royale. Although I think a lot of that has to do with the fact that Daniel Craig just isn't convincing in the role.

Tomorrow Never Dies.

I have always like Tomorrow Never Dies.

some people on here have said they love the lazenby movie,I myself hate it.

On her majestys secret service.