Click HERE to see this thread with all of the graphics, features, and links.

okay there is absolute zero and thats how cold can possible get.

now is there an absolute hot?
the hottest possibly can get?
or can you reach infinit levels of hotness?

There is the Plank Temperature.

That might be what you're looking for.

Originally posted by Colossus-Big C
the hottest possibly can get?
or can you reach infinit levels of hotness?

253000000000000000000000000000000 (2.35*10^32) degrees Fahrenheit. Beyond this point quantum physics and relativity suggest that each atom in the heated object will collapse into a black hole.

In a multiverse you can have an infinit tempature, but in this universe there is a limit.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Planck_temperature

Originally posted by Shakyamunison
In a multiverse you can have an infinit tempature, but in this universe there is a limit.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Planck_temperature no such thing as a multiverse

why do you think that?

Originally posted by Colossus-Big C
no such thing as a multiverse

Then you must solve the information paradox.

also if plank temperature is all heat in the universe. the universe must be finit or else the plank temperature would be infinit

Originally posted by Colossus-Big C
also if plank temperature is all heat in the universe. the universe must be finit or else the plank temperature would be infinit

That is not what the Planck temperature is.

Originally posted by Wild Shadow
why do you think that? how did the multiverse come into being?

it would only exist if people time traveld and spawned new universes

Originally posted by Red Nemesis
That is not what the Planck temperature is. i was misinformed then

Originally posted by Colossus-Big C
how did the multiverse come into being?

it would only exist if people time traveld and spawned new universes

That is an inappropriate question. It suggests an element of time. Time does not exist, as we know it, in the multiverse.

Originally posted by Colossus-Big C
how did the multiverse come into being?

it would only exist if people time traveled and spawned new universes


from a rapid expansion caused by an unknown catalyst from a higher plane of existence hyperspace.


simply our beginning was a direct result of something ending or interacting with our reality.

our inability to explain our creation does not mean ppl were directly involved in our own creation by a time paradox.

you want a factual statement no one can give you one.

Originally posted by Wild Shadow
from a rapid expansion caused by an unknown catalyst from a higher plane of existence hyperspace.
. god

Originally posted by Colossus-Big C
god

Which god?

Originally posted by Shakyamunison
Which god?

All of them!

Originally posted by Colossus-Big C
how did the multiverse come into being?

it would only exist if people time traveld and spawned new universes

Colossus-Big C, try this...

Imagine two universes, both just like our universe. One universe started 13 billion years ago, and the other one started right now. The only difference between these universes is that time is running backward as respect to each other. That would mean the universe that started right now was 13 billion years old when the other universe came into existence. Which universe came first?

Originally posted by Shakyamunison
Which god? a truley omnipotent one, and the only that really exist.
which ever one this is

him.
http://www.reflectionsinthenight.com/grey_aliens_files/image002.jpg

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PKtpjRbZ2AY

Originally posted by Colossus-Big C
a truley omnipotent one, and the only that really exist.
which ever one this is

Why?

Originally posted by Shakyamunison
Colossus-Big C, try this...

Imagine two universes, both just like our universe. One universe started 13 billion years ago, and the other one started right now. The only difference between these universes is that time is running backward as respect to each other. That would mean the universe that started right now was 13 billion years old when the other universe came into existence. Which universe came first? none, but the plane of existance came first

Originally posted by Shakyamunison
Colossus-Big C, try this...

Imagine two universes, both just like our universe. One universe started 13 billion years ago, and the other one started right now. The only difference between these universes is that time is running backward as respect to each other. That would mean the universe that started right now was 13 billion years old when the other universe came into existence. Which universe came first?

You just told us.

Originally posted by Wild Shadow
him.
http://www.reflectionsinthenight.com/grey_aliens_files/image002.jpg

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PKtpjRbZ2AY i dont think god has a physical form and if he created one i doubt he would choose to look like that to humanity

Originally posted by Colossus-Big C
none, but the plane of existance came first

There is no plane of existence in my story. Only two universes exist in this multiverse, and the multiverse is a product of the two universes.

Originally posted by Colossus-Big C
i dont think god has a physical form and if he created one i doubt he would choose to look like that to humanity

But you just gave "him" a physical form.

Originally posted by Shakyamunison
But you just gave "him" a physical form. how did i do that?

Originally posted by Colossus-Big C
how did i do that?

Him!

why would god follow ur expectation or ur definition?

gawd isnt a cosmic cube that obeys ur whims and wishes,...

why couldnt god have a frail weak body or be formless a cloud of energy?

Originally posted by Shakyamunison
There is no plane of existence in my story. Only two universes exist in this multiverse, and the multiverse is a product of the two universes. they came to existance a way unconcievable to us because we use time to describe start and end and there was no time before it so there were always there but its just unconcievable to describe an origion.....

Originally posted by Colossus-Big C
they came to existance a way unconcievable to us because we use time to describe start and end and there was no time before it so there were always there but its just unconcievable to describe an origion.....

And that is why asking about time, as in respect to a multiverse, is an inappropriate question.

Originally posted by Wild Shadow
why would god follow ur expectation or ur definition?

gawd isnt a cosmic cube that obeys ur whims and wishes,...

why couldnt god have a frail weak body or be formless a cloud of energy? if hes not onipotent hes not god though.

Originally posted by Colossus-Big C
if hes not omnipotent hes not god though. not all gods are omnipotent and some would even question the omnipotence and omniscience of the current popular god of the main stream religions.


your creator is ur creator no matter what you expect or think.

might as well tell your parents they are not your parents b/c they dont look like you or they are not what you expect them to be even though they gave birth to you.


what of these higher plane of existence beings gave us life by genetic manipulation or even in creating this universe and their race name was Yahweh, what would you say to that?

Originally posted by Shakyamunison
Him! thing? that can create or be a him...

Originally posted by Wild Shadow
not all gods are omnipotent and some would even question the omnipotence and omniscience of the current popular god of the main stream religions.


your creator is ur creator no matter what you expect or think.

might as well tell your parents they are not your parents b/c they dont look like you or they are not what you expect them to be even though they gave birth to day.


what of these higher plane of existence beings gave us life by genetic manipulation or even in creating this universe and their race name was Yahweh, what would you say to that? would be better if i say creater then and not describe him?

also the yahweh part is possibile atleast

Originally posted by Colossus-Big C
thing? that can create or be a him...
If no physical form, then no sex... dur...

Originally posted by Symmetric Chaos
Actually he is the generic pronoun for a living thing in English.

The phrase "he who hesitates is lost" refers to men, women, unichs, hermaphrodites, aliens, gods, animals, computers . . .

Feminists (evil, nasty feminists) have been trying to change that for decades but it still persists.

Stupid English. They probably thought women were just vessels for their sperm to become a baby.

Originally posted by Symmetric Chaos
Actually he is the generic pronoun for a living thing in English.

The phrase "he who hesitates is lost" refers to men, women, unichs, hermaphrodites, aliens, gods, animals, computers . . .

Feminists (evil, nasty feminists) have been trying to change that for decades but it still persists.
Blame that on a lack of any common use genderless substitute, which english woefully lacks... i'd much rather be using "ip" if more than .0001% of english speakers knew the word.