Click HERE to see this thread with all of the graphics, features, and links.

As far as I'm concerned, there are only 2 Bonds, Moore and Connery. They both have there good points, but in the end I have to give it to Moore. I think he is the more convincing of the 2. The rest are wannabe's.

Moore has always been my favourite. I like Connery as well, but I grew up watching Moore and that is why he is my fav.

Sean Connery. The very first "Bond. James Bond" from Dr. No cannot be topped no matter who helms the lead role

Originally posted by shaanewarne
As far as I'm concerned, there are only 2 Bonds, Moore and Connery. They both have there good points, but in the end I have to give it to Moore. I think he is the more convincing of the 2. The rest are wannabe's.

exactly,very well said. Moore and Connery are the only true James Bonds to ever grace the screen,the others are wannabe's who ruined his imiage.Great to see someone else out there who sees the truth on this issue.

Originally posted by Zoom
Moore has always been my favourite. I like Connery as well, but I grew up watching Moore and that is why he is my fav. [/QUOTE

yeah same here.I liked Connery and enjoyed watching him as well but since I grew up with Roger Moore,he was the one I really liked the best of the two.I liked his sarcasm remarks he always made.He was really funny.

The people who think that Brosnan was the best and people have come on here before and said that,or think he was second best after Connery,are people who cant spot horrible acting when its right there in front of them. Brosnan just plain sucked.

1.Craig
2.Lazenby
3.Connery
4.Moore
5.Dalton
6.Brosnan

Originally posted by Darth Martin
1.Craig
2.Lazenby
3.Connery
4.Moore
5.Dalton
6.Brosnan

Whoa there's a list that is screwed up.

1. Connery
2. Moore
3. Brosnan
4. Dalton
5. Craig
6. Lazenby

I grew with Moore but still like Connery more, and Brosnan was good at least he had humor just like the first 2. but Craig's movies have next to no humor. They have to bring back Q and the gadgets

I cannot seperate Connery and Moore. For me they were both perfect in the role and will always be the two people I imagine when thinking about James Bond.

Originally posted by darthmaul1
Whoa there's a list that is screwed up.

1. Connery
2. Moore
3. Brosnan
4. Dalton
5. Craig
6. Lazenby

I grew with Moore but still like Connery more, and Brosnan was good at least he had humor just like the first 2. but Craig's movies have next to no humor. They have to bring back Q and the gadgets



yeah putting Craig and Lazenby ahead of Connery and Moore is definetely a list thats screwed up. Craig is so miscast as Bond its a joke,Bond doesnt have a receding hairline like Craig does. I like your list except the only change I would make is switch Craig and Brosnan around putting Craig at 3 and Brosnan at 6 cause Craig is a much better actor.Its not Craigs fault that the movies are serious,he could do comedy if they let him,its just they decided to go into a serious direction when Craig came on.

Originally posted by Mr Parker
yeah putting Craig and Lazenby ahead of Connery and Moore is definetely a list thats screwed up. Craig is so miscast as Bond its a joke,Bond doesnt have a receding hairline like Craig does. I like your list except the only change I would make is switch Craig and Brosnan around putting Craig at 3 and Brosnan at 6 cause Craig is a much better actor.Its not Craigs fault that the movies are serious,he could do comedy if they let him,its just they decided to go into a serious direction when Craig came on.

I just wish they would go back to the gadgets and Q and jokes, if i want to watch a more serious bond movie i'll watch bourne.

I have given it a great deal of thought and have decided that Connery is the best Bond. You just cannot beat the introduction scene in Dr.No. For me it sets the standards for all the other Bonds.

1. Connery
2. Lazenby
3. Dalton
4. Brosnon
5. Craig
6. Moore

I put Moore at the bottom because his Bond strayed further than any of the other's from Flemming's, otherwise he had a lot of entertianment value albeit while being unconvincing as a super sleuth.

Lazenby and Dalton were closer to Flemming's Bond than the others (it's too bad they only have 3 films between them). Craig isn't far off from the original himself but his films have been plagued by a post DAnD funk.

Originally posted by Wanderer11
I cannot seperate Connery and Moore. For me they were both perfect in the role and will always be the two people I imagine when thinking about James Bond.

yeah I totally agree and could not have said it better myself. Like you said,they were both perfect in the role and they will also always be the two people I imagine when thinking about James Bond as well.The others are just wanna be imposters.

1. Connery
2.Dalton
3.Craig
4.Brosnon
5.Moore
6.Lazenby

Connery is in my opinion the true James Bond. Stylish, sophisticated, and very prim. The new Bond is far to gritty, doesn't have the same type of charm and suave as Connery had.

Originally posted by Liberator
Connery is in my opinion the true James Bond. Stylish, sophisticated, and very prim. The new Bond is far to gritty, doesn't have the same type of charm and suave as Connery had.

And doesn't have the humor either.
I don't understand they get a wonderful actor (John Clesse) to replace the orginal Q and only use him in 2 movies???
WTF

Originally posted by darthmaul1
Whoa there's a list that is screwed up.

1. Connery
2. Moore
3. Brosnan
4. Dalton
5. Craig
6. Lazenby

I grew with Moore but still like Connery more, and Brosnan was good at least he had humor just like the first 2. but Craig's movies have next to no humor. They have to bring back Q and the gadgets

Allankles and Batman 136's list is also really screwed up putting Moore at the bottom when like myself and someone else said,Connery AND Moore were both perfect in their roles as Bond.

their just upset that Connery left even though they will never admit that,Bond fans like them never do.

I think the title goes Connery. For me he had everything you could ever want from an actor portraying Bond.

1- Connery / Moore / Brosnan
2- Lazenby / Dalton
3- Craig

I liked them all. Too bad that almost every Brosnan Bond sucked, that Moore had some that sucked hardcore too, that Lazenby had only one movie, and that Craig play it too much "badass".

1. Connery
2. Brosnan
3. Dalton
4. Craig
5. Moore
6. Lazenby

Moore is appalling.

Moore's cool if you except what they were trying to do. He's no Craig but at his best he could possibly match Connery and Lazenby. His main problem was age. He has a few really fun entries though.

Yeah I guess i can now understand why people dont warm to Moore now.When he did The Spy Who Loved Me you could tell he started to age and look a little too old for the part and it was his next movie MoonRaker where the movies started getting corny with some slapstick which kinda got away from the more serious Connery Bond films.

When he was still young and looked the part in The Man With The Golden Gun and Live And Let Die,the movies were more like the Connery films and stayed away from that.In that timeframe when he was young and the movies were still serious,he was every bit as good as Connery.I'll give the Moore bashers some slack on their bashing of him from Moonraker on but they have no room to say he wasnt at least close to equaling Connery in those two early films.

good point.makes me understand more why a lot of people put Moore towards the bottom.I still mainstain though he would never get placed at the bottom if he was the first actor to play the role when the movies were really serious and he was REALLY young back then.Im sure you know that Moore was actually their first choice but he was already committed to The Saint tv show so they went with Connery.Many people familiar with the Bond novels over the years said they thought Moore fit the part more so than Connery which was why he was their first choice.

Fate turned Moores way when Connery refused to continue the role.as we know,the rest after that was history.

Timothy Dalton has always been my favourite:

1. Timothy Dalton
2. Daniel Craig

The others I don't mind, but prefer these two over all.

Originally posted by MildPossession
Timothy Dalton has always been my favourite:

1. Timothy Dalton
2. Daniel Craig

The others I don't mind, but prefer these two over all.

thanks for stopping by,I was thinking about sending you a pm to post about your choices.was curious on what they were.Dalton first and Craig second huh? interesting.

I do enjoy watching them all and have a favourite Bond film from each except Brosnan. But those two I adore as the character and I believe their presentation of the character is closest out of the lot to how Fleming made him in the books.

Originally posted by MildPossession
I do enjoy watching them all and have a favourite Bond film from each except Brosnan. But those two I adore as the character and I believe their presentation of the character is closest out of the lot to how Fleming made him in the books.

heh heh.awesome to hear that about Brosnan. I totally agree with you about Dalton.I was so happy when he was the one that ended up replacing Moore in the beggining as Bond and ticked off big time when Brosnan took over.

I wish Dalton could have continued as Bond for the next four films Brosnan did.When it was announced that Craig was taking over for Brosnan I made a thread called HOORAY NO MORE PIERCE BROSNAN AS JAMES BOND.

Originally posted by Mr Parker
heh heh.awesome to hear that about Brosnan. I totally agree with you about Dalton.I was so happy when he was the one that ended up replacing Moore in the beggining as Bond and ticked off big time when Brosnan took over.

I wish Dalton could have continued as Bond for the next four films Brosnan did.When it was announced that Craig was taking over for Brosnan I made a thread called HOORAY NO MORE PIERCE BROSNAN AS JAMES BOND.

I like Dalton in The Living Daylights, but Licence to Kill was crap.
For me I was so happy when Brosnan was picked, and enjoyed all his movies except for the world is not enough. i like Craig too but his last film sucked and was one of the worst bond movies ever.
which for me the worst ones are
QOS
LTK
O
TWINE

You liked Die Another Day over World Is Not Enough... DAD is considered one of the worst Bond films ever by a lot of people and obsessive Bond fans.

As for Quantum of Solace, I went into that viewing it as the second half of Casino Royale, not a film on its own. I enjoyed it more because of that. Quantum of Solace was the action packed second half for me.

Originally posted by MildPossession
You liked Die Another Day over World Is Not Enough... DAD is considered one of the worst Bond films ever by a lot of people and obsessive Bond fans.

As for Quantum of Solace, I went into that viewing it as the second half of Casino Royale, not a film on its own. I enjoyed it more because of that. Quantum of Solace was the action packed second half for me.

Thats funny cause i have heard the opposite that WINE is one of the worst bond films. (Denise Richards as a nuclear scientist? LOL)
and i just about feel asleep in QOS.

Brosnan at the top, no one can beat his epicness in my opinion.

For me I would have to say that Roger Moore just shades it. Connery is a very close second though.

Originally posted by ChocolateCake
For me I would have to say that Roger Moore just shades it. Connery is a very close second though.

cool. looks like were on the same page.

Originally posted by Mr Parker
cool. looks like were on the same page.

Well, I grew up watching more of the Moore Bond films so I guess that has had an impact on my decision.

again they never would say that if he was the FIRST Bond. they'll deny it but its true.

He wasn't the first bond though. It's only natural to think the orginal is best, there is nothing wrong with thinking that.

I simply didn't like Moore as bond... He was in some of the better Bond films but not because of his performances, I thought he was well below par. If you don't agree then that's fine.. You could think he was the best but I wouldn't get on your back about it. A lot of people don't like Moore's Bond and their opinions are just as valid as yours.

Great series because the more serious notes Ian Fleming, Daniel Craig's debut was different than the previous installments, despite the flaws of the film was refreshingly updated.

I am a huge fan of Sean Connery and for me he is the best Bond. I think that Brosnan comes a close second though.

If we look at the best bond character than I would definitely go with all time and the great pierce brosnan. He Completely fits in the bond character as per my view. He is good and best actor as he has done many other films too.

Originally posted by Mr Parker
When he was still young and looked the part in The Man With The Golden Gun and Live And Let Die,the movies were more like the Connery films and stayed away from that.In that timeframe when he was young and the movies were still serious,he was every bit as good as Connery.I'll give the Moore bashers some slack on their bashing of him from Moonraker on but they have no room to say he wasnt at least close to equaling Connery in those two early films.

His movies were never serious. Let's get that out of the way first. This was the single biggest problem with Moore era. His looks was the second biggest problem. You are correct in stating in his first two outings he looked fine. I've stated this before. If you could take that face and build and digitally replace it throughout the resat of his tenure it would be neat. Especially in the films FYEO, OP, and AVTAK.

But his looks wasn't going to change how he played the character. Bond to me was nailed by Connery in the first 4 films, Lazenby, and Craig's two outings. The rest are sub-par to me. Moore has his moments but for the most part can't sustain it enough for an entire film to compete with these three.

I'm not saying Connery is perfect. He isn't, but in his first four entries he was damn good.

1.Craig
2.Connery
3.Lazenby

Lazenby is wonderful as Bond and so was his film, but I'm not sure I can give him the benefit of the doubt over four great performances from Connery.

Originally posted by Darth Martin
His movies were never serious. Let's get that out of the way first. This was the single biggest problem with Moore era. His looks was the second biggest problem. You are correct in stating in his first two outings he looked fine. I've stated this before. If you could take that face and build and digitally replace it throughout the resat of his tenure it would be neat. Especially in the films FYEO, OP, and AVTAK.

But his looks wasn't going to change how he played the character. Bond to me was nailed by Connery in the first 4 films, Lazenby, and Craig's two outings. The rest are sub-par to me. Moore has his moments but for the most part can't sustain it enough for an entire film to compete with these three.

I'm not saying Connery is perfect. He isn't, but in his first four entries he was damn good.

1.Craig
2.Connery
3.Lazenby

Lazenby is wonderful as Bond and so was his film, but I'm not sure I can give him the benefit of the doubt over four great performances from Connery.

I'm sorry but Daniel Craig is by far the worst of the Bond's. I know people say that he is true to Fleming's blueprint, but he just does cannot act in my opinion. I have always thought that Dalton did a far better job of portraying Fleming's Bond than any of the others.

facepalm

The worst? Doesn't act?

Originally posted by Darth Martin
facepalm

The worst? Doesn't act?



If you honestly think that Craig is the best and can act I don't think you can have actually watched his two movies.

http://blogs.uscannenberg.org/roselle_chen/obama%20staredown.JPG

Originally posted by Darth Martin
His movies were never serious. Let's get that out of the way first. This was the single biggest problem with Moore era. His looks was the second biggest problem. You are correct in stating in his first two outings he looked fine. I've stated this before. If you could take that face and build and digitally replace it throughout the resat of his tenure it would be neat. Especially in the films FYEO, OP, and AVTAK.

But his looks wasn't going to change how he played the character. Bond to me was nailed by Connery in the first 4 films, Lazenby, and Craig's two outings. The rest are sub-par to me. Moore has his moments but for the most part can't sustain it enough for an entire film to compete with these three.

I'm not saying Connery is perfect. He isn't, but in his first four entries he was damn good.

1.Craig
2.Connery
3.Lazenby

Lazenby is wonderful as Bond and so was his film, but I'm not sure I can give him the benefit of the doubt over four great performances from Connery.

In The Man With The Golden Gun and with Live and Let Die,he was serious in those films,it wasnt till The Spy Who Loved Me where he started to play it with some humor in it when he started winking at the girl in the helicopter chasing him and grinning widely to get Jaws to grin so he would open his mouth so he could snatch his metal teeth. with that metal attracter rig.

That was why i always preferred Moore over Connery cause he provided an added dimension to his character joking around when his life was in danger and when he delivered the jokes,he would like wink his eye when he did indicating he got the joke,where Connery was dry in his delivery soudning like he didnt really catch the joke. Conney was good in his own way and so was Moore.Like I have said before,they are really the two best actors to have played the role,others are just a buncn of wanna be Bonds.

I agree. Moore has his GREAT moments and in some ways stands out alone with his humor. But he often goes too over the top.

In TSWLM when he winks at Naomi in the helicopter it's utter brilliance. But all of the scenes with Jaws are terrible.

I thought Moore was wonderful in the scene at his home in LALD where he's had a one night stand with this braud, trying to hide here as M and Moneypenny come over for a visit.

He looked relatively young and had great wit about him.

However, LALD suffers from Sherrif Pepper and the that dreadful boat chase scene that runs on far too long. It was awesome seeing Moore's Bond react with blacks though.

Ay man, for $20, I'll take you to a Ku Klux Klan cookout. Then the camera fades to Bond looking uncomfortable. Great stuff. His "not afraid in the moment of death" act rules in the scene where he is introduced to Tee Hee and Mr.Big. That scene kicks ass.

Originally posted by Darth Martin
I agree. Moore has his GREAT moments and in some ways stands out alone with his humor. But he often goes too over the top.

In TSWLM when he winks at Naomi in the helicopter it's utter brilliance. But all of the scenes with Jaws are terrible.
I thought Moore was wonderful in the scene at his home in LALD where he's had a one night stand with this braud, trying to hide here as M and Moneypenny come over for a visit.

He looked relatively young and had great wit about him.

However, LALD suffers from Sherrif Pepper and the that dreadful boat chase scene that runs on far too long. It was awesome seeing Moore's Bond react with blacks though.

Ay man, for $20, I'll take you to a Ku Klux Klan cookout. Then the camera fades to Bond looking uncomfortable. Great stuff. His "not afraid in the moment of death" act rules in the scene where he is introduced to Tee Hee and Mr.Big. That scene kicks ass.

I have to agree. I thought that the scenes with Jaws were fine.

Can't stand Jaws. One of the poorest decisions by EON.

Originally posted by Darth Martin
Can't stand Jaws. One of the poorest decisions by EON.

totally disagree.He was easily his most dangerous villians Bond ever fought right up there with Oddjob.either one of those two you could argue was the most dangerous one he faced.its just they screwed him up in Moonraker having him turn good at the end betraying his evilness like they did is what I did not like about Jaws.But he was an exception and great villain and one of his all time classics in The Spy Who Loved Me though.

Jaws was FAR from the most dangerous villain Batman has faced. Oddjob was a far superior henchman than Jaws. He was a martial artist, was more durable as far as blunt force went(Jaws could take more damage such as falls, debris, etc.), stronger, and had a viable long range attack. Not to mention he was intelligent.

Jaws came straight out of a saturday morning cartoon. He was there for comic relief. Oddjob was a badass that Bond wanted absolutely no part of. Bond basically tooled Jaws in TSWLM every time, incapacitating Jaws momentarily, and escaping him. Bond only defeated Oddjob once, and it was with a cliche.

"Easily his most dangerous villain?" Please......Red Grant was probably Bond's most dangerous opponent with Oddjob coming in second place. Scaramanga springs to mind as well as Alec Treveylan.

Jaws was a good henchman but he wasn't a dangerous villain.

I thought he was horrible. It would have been better if he weren't so stupid. He's my second biggest gripe about TSWLM.

Originally posted by Darth Martin
Jaws was FAR from the most dangerous villain Batman has faced. Oddjob was a far superior henchman than Jaws. He was a martial artist, was more durable as far as blunt force went(Jaws could take more damage such as falls, debris, etc.), stronger, and had a viable long range attack. Not to mention he was intelligent.

Jaws came straight out of a saturday morning cartoon. He was there for comic relief. Oddjob was a badass that Bond wanted absolutely no part of. Bond basically tooled Jaws in TSWLM every time, incapacitating Jaws momentarily, and escaping him. Bond only defeated Oddjob once, and it was with a cliche.

"Easily his most dangerous villain?" Please......Red Grant was probably Bond's most dangerous opponent with Oddjob coming in second place. Scaramanga springs to mind as well as Alec Treveylan.

one that Batman faced? uh thats crazy.you think Bond wanted any part of Jaws? get real.and You better look at jaws strength again in those movies.picking up the car like he did in the spy who loved me and breaking those metal beams apart on the moonraker ship? no ordinary average joe could accomplish a feat like that.

Jaws had Bond in the clutches of death on that train and would have been another victem of his if not for the fate of lady luck being on his side being able to be fortunate enough to be close enough to that lamp to grab and smash it and temporarily disable jaws by electrocuting his teeth.If that lamp isnt there,Bond is a dead man. Bond wanted no part of Jaws either after that,he knew how dangerous he was.Thats why he tricked him by smiling getting Jaws to do so as well and lower that metal attracter like a magnet.He wanted no part of him.

Why do you think he got on that cable car wire in Moonraker and sailed the way down on it with Miss Goodnight? After he was able to get him in that cable car the way he did,he didnt want to wait around for him to get out so he could tangle with him again,he wanted no part of him is why they were so anxious to get off that cable car while they could.

and I dont know who Alec Treveylan is,must of been from the Brosnan Bond movies which i have only seen once.I hate Brosnan remember? but Red Grant more dangerous than those two? please get real.He is just a normal human being not anywhere near as dangerous as those two are.Thats one of the reasons TSWLM is my favorite Bond movie of them all because Jaws was such a dangerous villain.

sorry those two are easily the most dangerous over Red Grant.

Originally posted by Darth Martin
I thought he was horrible. It would have been better if he weren't so stupid. He's my second biggest gripe about TSWLM.

See I think that by making him stupid he was slightly mnore believeable. If you look at Oddjob he almost seems inhuman, but Jaws feels very human in my opinion.

Nope. Red Grant is the most dangerous villain to Bond in the series. Watch FRWL. He completely had Bond at his mercy on the train.

Jaws is superhumanly strong, sure. But I tend to point towards Oddjob crushing that golf ball into dust as being more impressive than lifting a car and whatnot. Schwarzenegger could have done that.

Treveylan is the villain in GoldenEye. He was a former MI6 Double-O agent believed to be killed in action. He went by "006". Friend of Bond's.

Jaws in all right, but he is not a great Bond villain by any means.

Jaws was never meant to be taken seriously. He is one of the fun bad guys like Odd Job.

Oddjob is miles more fun than Jaws.

Personally I have always felt that Oddjob was rather boring.

That's fine. Everyone has different tastes.

Like most fans I was gutted when they announced that he would not be returning. But on reflection I would prefer just about anyone to Daniel Craig. The guy is just a horrid actor.


since this is where this discussiong belongs is right here. Guess what Zoom? Just because YOU were gutted when it was announced that Brosnan would not be returning,that doesnt mean that most fans were.

Also you want to talk about a horrid actor? that would be Brosnan.Its so obvious they let him go because they realised his acting was so bad and they made a mistake.I mean come on,their explanation they used to let him go was that he was too old yet he was a lot younger than Moore was when Moore retired from the Bond films.

They just used that explanation because they did not want to hurt his feelings for the REAL reason they let him go which is they finally realised he was a bad actor and a change was neccessary.thank god they got rid of him and brought in Craig.anybody is an improvement over Brosnan.

I wouldn't know if Brosnan is a good actor or not because I'm not too familiar with him outside of the four Bond films he's done. However, he is the worst 007 for me. It's not that he's horrible, it's just that the other 5 are better than him......and he's not all that close.

Originally posted by Darth Martin
I wouldn't know if Brosnan is a good actor or not because I'm not too familiar with him outside of the four Bond films he's done. However, he is the worst 007 for me. It's not that he's horrible, it's just that the other 5 are better than him......and he's not all that close.

my mom used to watch Remington Steele once in a while when I was little and he was just horrible on that show just as he was in the Bond films.He is a really bad actor.not believeable at all.totally agree that all five are better than him and he is not even close.

Originally posted by Mr Parker
Like most fans I was gutted when they announced that he would not be returning. But on reflection I would prefer just about anyone to Daniel Craig. The guy is just a horrid actor.


since this is where this discussiong belongs is right here. Guess what Zoom? Just because YOU were gutted when it was announced that Brosnan would not be returning,that doesnt mean that most fans were.

Also you want to talk about a horrid actor? that would be Brosnan.Its so obvious they let him go because they realised his acting was so bad and they made a mistake.I mean come on,their explanation they used to let him go was that he was too old yet he was a lot younger than Moore was when Moore retired from the Bond films.

They just used that explanation because they did not want to hurt his feelings for the REAL reason they let him go which is they finally realised he was a bad actor and a change was neccessary.thank god they got rid of him and brought in Craig.anybody is an improvement over Brosnan.

I think that you will find that there was a big outcry when Brosnan was dropped. If you are going to have these conversations at least have the sense to do the appropriate research.

there is no way Craig is better than Brosnan. The guy cannot act to save his life.

sorry but their wasnt.that would be you thatneeds to do research.yeah Brosnan cant act to save his lfe,that is correct.

Originally posted by Mr Parker
sorry but their wasnt.that would be you thatneeds to do research.yeah Brosnan cant act to save his lfe,that is correct.

I think you will find that I am right. There were big protests within the public and the media. Do you even know what you are talking about?
Brosnan is one of the best all round actors to have played Bond and for you to think otherwise just shows that you incredibly ignorant.

Originally posted by Zoom
I think you will find that I am right. There were big protests within the public and the media. Do you even know what you are talking about?
Brosnan is one of the best all round actors to have played Bond and for you to think otherwise just shows that you incredibly ignorant.

There was a little bit of an outcry, but it soon died away so it is time that you got over it.

Originally posted by Zoom
I think you will find that I am right. There were big protests within the public and the media. Do you even know what you are talking about?
Brosnan is one of the best all round actors to have played Bond and for you to think otherwise just shows that you incredibly ignorant.

No it just shows how incredibly ignotant you are that you think he is a good actor let alone one of the best Bonds ever.thats priceless and its funny how you make things up when your beaten also. as seen below here in this link.case closed,end of story.Zoom defeated.

http://www.cinematical.com/2010/06/15/daniel-craig-replaces-pierce-brosnan-as-james-bond-again/

see the part where it says there wasnt a huge outcry of fan opposition?

as they say in Chess,Checkmate.half of the Bond fans were eager to see him go.That magazine is an unbiased magazine,they report things the way they are. Nice to see how you make up things to try and prove your not wrong instead of accepting defeat.

sorry the truth hurts you that Brosnan is the worst Bond actor ever and couldnt act to save his life.. bye. "waves."

Originally posted by Mr Parker
No it just shows how incredibly ignotant you are that you think he is a good actor let alone one of the best Bonds ever.thats priceless and its funny how you make things up when your beaten also. as seen below here in this link.case closed,end of story.Zoom defeated.

http://www.cinematical.com/2010/06/15/daniel-craig-replaces-pierce-brosnan-as-james-bond-again/

see the part where it says there wasnt a huge outcry of fan opposition?

as they say in Chess,Checkmate.half of the Bond fans were eager to see him go.That magazine is an unbiased magazine,they report things the way they are. Nice to see how you make up things to try and prove your not wrong instead of accepting defeat.

sorry the truth hurts you that Brosnan is the worst Bond actor ever and couldnt act to save his life.. bye. "waves."

Oh dear, you seem to be under the impression that one source makes concrete proof. I happen to remember all the articles in the press and the protests outside Pinewood Studios. So as you say checkmate!

The fact that you don't like Lazenby and OHMSS just proves that your opinions on all things Bond related are worthless.

To think that Craig is in anyway a better actor than Brosnan is absurd. I can only assume that you don't watch many movies.

Originally posted by ChocolateCake
There was a little bit of an outcry, but it soon died away so it is time that you got over it.

amen to that.Some people take it so personal that an actor they liked is not that good an actor.sheesh.guess the truth hurts. yeah there wasnt much of an outcry as I just proved.Like I said,im sure the truth hurts him though.

Originally posted by Mr Parker
amen to that.Some people take it so personal that an actor they liked is not that good an actor.sheesh.guess the truth hurts. yeah there wasnt much of an outcry as I just proved.Like I said,im sure the truth hurts him though.

It is not the truth so it cannot hurt and you didn't prove anything.

I could not have said it better myself.Connnery and Moore are by far the two best actors to have Played James Bond easily .They are the only real actors to play the role.They became James Bond.The others are wanna be pretenders.
here is the link.

I have always preferred Connery in the role but I don't really think that any of them have been bad.

I choose pierce brosnan and roger moore,a dn also dainel craig....
I like them as james bond.

Don't know why there's so much Brosnan hate going on in here. Personally, I have enjoyed most of his non-bond movies, Dante's Peak is a pretty good movie...

Anyhow, onto topic. My favourite bond is indeed Brosnan, simply because GoldenEye was the first Bond movie I ever saw and still remains my favourite (Also, it has Sean Bean in it...'nuff said).

To list them in order;

1. Brosnan
2. Moore
3. Connery
4. Dalton
5. Lazenby (I think OHMSS is way too underrated though and he was in no way a bad Bond IMO...and remember, if not for some bad advice he would have been Bond in many more movies)
6. Craig (I don't hate him as Bond, just find him the most boring)

If we look at the best bond character than I will certainly go with all time and the great pierce brosnan. He is absolutely fits in the bond character as per my view. He is good and best actor as he has done many other films too.

Sean Connery closely followed by Daniel Craig.

I liked Moore a bit better than Connery, but God did he play in some awful movie. On the other hand, Connery have more classics than the others under the belt.

I love pierce brosnan as a bond 007. Pierce Brosnan entered show business as a teenager on the run, with a circus fire-eater. He received little more than usual experience of a member of an experimental laboratory in London before his stage debut in the 1976 production of Wait Until Dark. The band is at the heart of Pierce Brosnan, James Bond himself, who has agreed to star centaur Chiron, one of today, Obi-Wan Kenobi, who mentors young Percy and prepares for battle.

Well, If we look at the nature of the dressing as I will certainly go all the time and a great Pierce Brosnan. He is perfectly suited to the nature of the links to in my opinion. He is good and the best actor because he has done acting in too many other films.

I was.

Originally posted by eliaslyn
Well, If we look at the nature of the dressing as I will certainly go all the time and a great Pierce Brosnan. He is perfectly suited to the nature of the links to in my opinion. He is good and the best actor because he has done acting in too many other films.

except he was horrible as Bond though.