Click HERE to see this thread with all of the graphics, features, and links.

You should watch this. It's very long but well worth it.

that guy is retarded.

Also, very boring video

Sounds like a fanboy is mad because Episode II sucked.

Aren't we all?

Originally posted by JediRobin23
that guy is retarded.

Also, very boring video

I'm sorry but your penis and by extension your right to an opinion appears to have been cancelled. Would you care to try another sexual organ?

Hilarious video btw.

Originally posted by Nephthys
I'm sorry but your penis and by extension your right to an opinion appears to have been cancelled. Would you care to try another sexual organ?

Hilarious video btw.

my right to an opinion is never cancelled. No, I do not require another organ

How is that video hilarious?

It's insightful and witty.

Somebody went through all that trouble to make a review that long?

Incredible how a movie made for entertainment purposes only manages to eat away at someone.

I was disappointed with Spider-Man 3. To me, it was a mega letdown and finale to the first 2 films, which were magnificant. But, at the end of the day, it is what it is, entertainment. The fact that I didn't like Spider-Man 3 means one thing only....I didn't bother to spend my money on it, and moved on with my life. lol

To be honest I already knew it, but really, as harsh as this may sound, I almost enjoyed more this review then the movie itself...

Originally posted by Sith Master X
Somebody went through all that trouble to make a review that long?

Incredible how a movie made for entertainment purposes only manages to eat away at someone.

I was disappointed with Spider-Man 3. To me, it was a mega letdown and finale to the first 2 films, which were magnificant. But, at the end of the day, it is what it is, entertainment. The fact that I didn't like Spider-Man 3 means one thing only....I didn't bother to spend my money on it, and moved on with my life. lol

Its called being a critic.

No... actually, it's called not having a life when you have to make a 9 part series bitching because someone is looking into things a little too much.

One of his basic arguments for the movie being runied is because there's kids in it with lightsabers....uh..yeah. I guess every movie ever made with kids in it completely sucks. And what were those kids in Attack of the Clones supposed to be doing, cartwheels?

Oh well. I guess I don't have a life either if I bothered to watch the review. I'll admit, it was funny, but he looks into things way too much.

He even ripped apart Avatar...so yeah, you can basically make any film look stupid when you rant about it sounding drunk at the same time.

Seriously....Lucas has been so stereotyped as a fat lazy slob that cares about nothing but himself. There's no way he could just be be a filmmaker who enjoys visual story telling and makes movies as a hobby.

Honestly, you know this much is true. Take for example, Toy Story 3. That very same movie could have been directed by George Lucas and turned out exactly that way you saw it in the theaters, but because of the stereotype associated with Lucas, that film would be loathed instead of loved. I could see the comments now...

"A Spanish dancing Buzz???? A fat pink bear as the Villian??? A Barbie and Ken love story!!???? A weird clown dude and a character named Pricklepants?????? Dear goodness, Lucas sure knows how to ruin my childhood."

Oh but no...those things were all o.k because the credits said "Directed by Lee Unkrich."

Just look at Indiana Jones for crying out loud. 1-3 were great...and who gets praised and credited for that? Oh, Steven Speilberg! The 4th one wasn't quite up to par....so who get's blamed for that....oh, not Steven...it was....it was....Geroge Lucas!!! Shame on you.

I'll just pretend that it wasn't Steven's choice to shoot the Mayan crap in front of a green screen rather than on location because he wanted to be closer to his family. I'll blame it on George instead. Aliens. Ha! Who makes a movie about Aliens anyway? No film has ever been made about Ailens before! Crazy Lucas!

Well, yeah you're right. Spielberg is as much to blame as Lucas on Indy 4...

However, Indy 4 is much more along the lines of the SW prequels than it is to movies like Munich, Catch me if You Can, The Terminal. (Okay, there was War of th Worlds as well... ;-). But surely, Spielberg has shown himself to be more versatile in his last 4 flicks than Lucas. And Indy movies were always very much Lucas' films as well...

So I do blame Lucas mostly, and Spielberg for going along so (apparantly) easy.

i think mebbe jedi robbin and Sith Master X missed the point. Its a comedy piece. And hilarious. How can you not find that funny?

Originally posted by truejedi
i think mebbe jedi robbin and Sith Master X missed the point. Its a comedy piece. And hilarious. How can you not find that funny?

Bingo.

Not to mention him "not having a life" and making these reviews, is making him MONEY. The crew from Red Letter Media now have a weekly review show with MTV, all thanks to the popularity of their Star Wars reviews.

How cool... well, he succeeded I guess.

I've stated several times I thought it was funny, yes...but overally necessary? No. He might be making money now...but he sure as hell isn't making money for taking copyrighted material from LucasFilm.

I get that these movies generate discussion both positive and negative...but my god, the extent people go to to second guess everything down to the smallest of details makes me wonder what happened to people being able to suspend their belief a little bit when watching a "movie." Something that's not real.

A fair amount of those reviews is comedy, yes. I was smart enough to pick up on that. Also, an equal amount of that review was pointless b***tching.

But I just don't really know what to say anymore. It's not worth it and I really don't have the energy for it.

And again, he is a critic as well as a comedian. He makes money from this, entertains thousands of people and has fun doing it. The hell is wrong with that? And how is it more pathetic then say, bitching about it on an internet forum?



As he mentioned in his review, it takes away from the majesty and impressivness of a lightsaber if you have 5 year old kids wielding them. A lightsaber was supposed to be a weapon, not a kids toy (though that didn't stop Lucas from sellig them as such).




Except he's protected by parody laws as well as whatever anyone else is every time they make a review on anything ever.



Not really. There is some pointless bitching, but mostly he brings up intelligent points and questions imo.

Yes, I agree. He uses the b!tching to hammer his points home. And for comedic purposes of course. But the main drift of his analysis demonstrate a good insight in storytelling and the storytelling flaws of the PT.