The Jet Fuel Of Tyranny ..... Hypocrisy

Text-only Version: Click HERE to see this thread with all of the graphics, features, and links.



Deano

Deano
http://www.davidicke.com/oi/extras/2011/March/012.jpg
These peace prizes are such fun - who do I bomb next?'

Obama, this man of 'peace' and 'freedom', is another war-monger president who has overseen an incredible assault on the most basic freedoms of Americans and visitors to his country in the name of 'fighting terrorism'.

So it is from the very depths of hypocrisy that Obama seeks to free under the guise of 'diplomatic immunity' a professional American terrorist working for US intelligence in Pakistan and arrested after shooting dead two Pakistanis.

Raymond Davis shot the men when they pulled their motorcycle alongside the car he was driving in Lahore on January 27th. He says they were armed and he acted in self-defence, but he fired ten shots and got out of his car to shoot one of the men twice in the back as he ran away. Some reports say they were members of Pakistani Intelligence who were on to Davis, but this is unconfirmed.

A group of unidentified Americans in another car sought to rescue him as a crowd gathered and they ran over and killed a third Pakistani before the crowd intervened and ensured Davis was arrested.

Obama responded, as usual, with an outrageous lie by calling Davis 'our diplomat in Pakistan' and claiming that he was therefore immune from prosecution in Pakistan because of this.

http://www.davidicke.com/oi/extras/2011/March/013.jpg

It subsequently emerged that Davis is a CIA agent - hence the guns, maps, make-up kit, telescopes and long-range radio in his car - and some reports claim he is an employee of Xe, the notorious 'private security' firm formerly known as Blackwater, which acts as a private army of mercenaries for the United States government.

This is the same United States that condemns the use of mercenaries by Colonel Gaddafi - 'Mercenaries and thugs have been turned loose to attack demonstrators', Hillary Clinton shrieked this week.

(By the way, some media reports say that the Israeli (Mossad) arms distribution company, Global CTS, has provided more than 50,000 African mercenaries to support Gaddafi who apparently pays the company $2,000 a day for each one while the men themselves get $100. This is the Israel that Clinton cannot wait to praise, defend and eulogise.)

The mysterious Americans who tried to rescue Raymond Davis, a 36-year-old former special forces soldier, were also almost certainly CIA. Pakistani officials say that they were armed and lived at the same house as Davis.

The government of the 'Land of the Free', which claims to promote a free media across the world, pressured its own 'free' 'journalists' to suppress the story that Davis was a CIA operative. The lapdog media dutifully agreed until overseas newspapers ran the story and made further suppression in the US a nonsense.

The London Daily Telegraph reported that Davis was the acting head of the CIA station in Pakistan and was gathering information for drone attacks. A camera in his car included pictures of sensitive locations.

The British, American and Israeli governments have their agents all over the world to cause mayhem and stage terrorist events that they can blame on others while all the time taking the moral high ground against everyone else.

http://www.davidicke.com/oi/extras/2011/March/014.jpg

Two British SAS special forces soldiers, pictured here, were arrested by Iraqi police in 2005 after failing to stop at a roadblock in Basra. They were dressed as Arabs and wearing wigs.

The men opened fire, killing one Iraqi policeman and wounding another, before they were captured. These British elite soldiers, in their Arab disguise, had weapons, explosives and a remote-control detonator in their vehicle.

The car was booby-trapped and ready to explode. It was clear what the intention was - to set up a manufactured 'terrorist attack' to be blamed on 'insurgents'. Such things have happened many times in Israel over the years in attacks against Jews that are blamed on 'Arab terrorists'.

The British authorities were so desperate to spring their men before the full truth could come out that they used tanks to storm the Iraqi police station where they were being held. They 'rescued' the two agent provocateurs - terrorists - and took away their vehicle.

The British, American and Israeli cabal is nothing less than a global terrorist network that hides behind fake morality and 'what, who, me?'

'Oh no, we would never do that, we're the good guys - it's the baddies you want.'

http://www.davidicke.com/oi/extras/2011/March/015.jpg

There can be few greater examples of this scourge of hypocrisy than the American death camps in Germany at the end of World War Two.

While the British and American authorities were condemning the Nazi camps like Auschwitz, the best part of two million Germans died in American camps from disease, exposure and starvation systematically directed on the orders of Supreme Allied Commander and future US President, General Dwight David Eisenhower.

How many are taught that in their history 'lessons' (programming)?

Eisenhower made it clear in his own correspondence that he hated Germans and he set about killing as many as possible when he had the chance. He ordered that German Prisoners of War were designated as 'Disarmed Enemy Forces' or DEF - just as his successors would designate Prisoners of War in Afghanistan and Iraq as 'Enemy Combatants' .

In both cases it allowed the American authorities to bypass international laws on the treatment of prisoners. The Germans targeted by Eisenhower were not subject to the Geneva Convention, nor were they visited by the Swiss Red Cross who were supposed to inspect such camps and the treatment of prisoners.

http://www.davidicke.com/oi/extras/2011/March/016.jpg

In this way, Eisenhower, the American 'war hero', enforced the starvation, exposure and disease that took the lives of almost two million people.

A Canadian reporter, Peter Worthington of the Ottawa Sun, obtained documentation of this cynical mass murder and he wrote in 1989:

'... it is hard to escape the conclusion that Dwight Eisenhower was a war criminal of epic proportions. His (DEF) policy killed more Germans in peace than were killed in the European Theater.

For years we have blamed the 1.7 million missing German POW's on the Russians. Until now, no one dug too deeply ... Witnesses and survivors have been interviewed by the author; one Allied officer compared the American camps to Buchenwald.'

Martin Brech, a retired professor of philosophy in New York, was 18 years old when he was a guard and interpreter at an Eisenhower Death Camp along the Rhine River at a place called Andernach.

He said in 1990 that when he protested at the treatment of the German prisoners he was met with 'hostility or indifference':

... when I threw our ample rations to them over the barbed wire. I was threatened, making it clear that it was our deliberate policy not to adequately feed them."

'When they caught me throwing C- Rations over the fence, they threatened me with imprisonment. One Captain told me that he would shoot me if he saw me again tossing food to the Germans ...

... Some of the men were really only boys, 13 years of age ... Some of the prisoners were old men drafted by Hitler in his last ditch stand ... I understand that average weight of the prisoners at Andernach was 90 pounds ...'

http://www.davidicke.com/oi/extras/2011/March/018.jpg
Systematic mass murder in the vast Eisenhower death camps

This was done in the name of the same cabal that now jails people in some countries - and vilifies them in virtually all - for questioning aspects of the official story of the Nazi concentration camps when the 'good guys' who condemn such questioning were running their own.

And that's the point. There are no 'goodies and baddies' in this black and white fantasy that is daily sold to the global public mind. When Clinton or Obama condemn Mubarak or Gaddafi it is evil condemning evil.

Different face, different clothes or uniform, but the same mentality - cold, calculating, heartless and with that key Illuminati bloodline trait ... lack of empathy. This is the common theme that brings them all together as one no matter what 'people' they may claim to represent.

But their comeuppance is coming. It always does eventually in the realms of cause and effect where what you give out you get back, or 'what goes around comes around'. No-one can escape that, although it may seem long delayed for some.

As Martin Luther King said: 'The arc of the moral universe is long, but it bends towards justice.'

For those who mercilessly seek to impose their will on the mass of humanity that arc is about to get very steep indeed. The next ten years will see so many changes and challenges, but, as humanity awakens, the world will bend towards justice.

There are, however, going to be some massive upheavels before we get there. A lanced boil may be messy, but it is the start of the healing.

Lord Lucien
TL;DR.

RE: Blaxican
Not gonna make a big issue out of it personally, as I don't really care, but for your own protection Deano you should probably start linking the source of these copy-pasta's, Deano. You've gotten heat for not doing so at least a few times, haven't you?

That aside, I'm not really sure what to say about this. "How dare the West kill people and protect others?" I dunno. What do you think about the article, Deano?

Bardock42
Originally posted by RE: Blaxican
Not gonna make a big issue out of it personally, as I don't really care, but for your own protection Deano you should probably start linking the source of these copy-pasta's, Deano. You've gotten heat for not doing so at least a few times, haven't you?

That aside, I'm not really sure what to say about this. "How dare the West kill people and protect others?" I dunno. What do you think about the article, Deano? He does it again, every couple month, mods tell him to not do it, move his conspiracy threads to the conspiracy forum and he stops for a while.....then it happens again.


Personally I kinda like it, livens up the forum, and man, he's persistent.

Bicnarok
Originally posted by Bardock42


Personally I kinda like it, livens up the forum, and man, he's persistent.

I agree, not only that these articles have a point.

Rainbow Dash
Originally posted by Deano
Take Hillary Clinton - yes, please do - the cold and vicious US Secretary of State who supported and now oversees the slaughter of the innocent in Iraq, Afghanistan and elsewhere while demanding that the Middle Eastern bully boys, which she and her kind have propped up for so long, stop using violence against their people. I suppose she thinks that's her job.

Cue Hillary at the United Nations Human Rights Council on February 28th:

'Today the world's eyes are fixed on Libya. We have seen Colonel Gaddafi's security forces open fire on peaceful protestors again and again. They have used heavy weapons on unarmed civilians. Mercenaries and thugs have been turned loose to attack demonstrators. There are reports of soldiers executed for refusing to turn their guns on their fellow citizens, of indiscriminate killings, arbitrary arrests, and torture.

Colonel Gaddafi and those around him must be held accountable for these acts, which violate international legal obligations and common decency. Through their actions, they have lost the legitimacy to govern. And the people of Libya have made themselves clear: It is time for Gaddafi to go - now, without further violence or delay.

The international community is speaking with one voice and our message is unmistakable. These violations of universal rights are unacceptable and will not be tolerated. This Council took an important first step toward accountability on Friday by establishing an independent commission of inquiry.'

Er, how can I put it? Try this ....

http://www.davidicke.com/oi/extras/2011/March/003.jpg

Whoever wrote this whole article is more interested in reactions, than bringing forth a missed point. I get his perspective of hypocrisy, but he's comparing Iraq to Libya. I get that both involve violence and death, but they aren't the same situation. As opposed to Iraq as I am, it's unprofessional to compare the two. It is especially unprofessional to open fire at someone who is speaking up for the people of Libya.

In the end, who cares what she thinks about Iraq? What does it matter? Is she wrong in what she says? Hypocrisy is a terrible topic to write an article about, since many of the things he bring up and compare can not really be compared.

So I would like to know who wrote this, and maybe read something else by him. As it looks from where I am reading, he appear more like an agitator crossing his fingers for powerful reactions, than a seeker of truth stick out tongue

Should she, just because she's pro-Iraq (True?), ignore the events in Libya? Is she not entitled an opinion, a voice on the matter?

Deano
not sure why a discussion on the hypocrisy of war gets moved to the conspiracy forum.

what do i think of the article? it makes a valid point. the main reason i posted this was to maybe make the average person think a bit more. Its different than the usual general discussions and im sure people enjoy reading it, so why people get there panties in a twist i don't know

this is from the david icke newsletter. i deliberately leave the name out because the name alone causes childish ongoing responses that i have no time for.

Rainbow Dash
David Icke has a bad reputation?

Deano
he has far out there theories. even though i agree with 90% of what he says, the other 10% is unprovable and is the cause for his ridicule.

Rainbow Dash
Some of the things he has written here are ridiculous. He's actually flaming Hillary Clinton for speaking up for the victims in Libya, because of her (supposed?) stance on the Iraqi war.

How he involved the entire SAS special force due to the actions of two rotten eggs (Proven?) was rather ridiculous as well.

Much of what's written here is agitating and nothing more. It rallies the reader up, while actually saying very little. It's forcing ideas into your head, not facts. There is a lot of text, birthing a lot of heat and opinions, but very little is actually said in it. Theory after theory, assumptions, irrelevant or unnecessary pictures and more.

I can see why this author has a bad reputation. He is mostly playing with the minds of the ignorant and confused stick out tongue

Darth Piggott
Originally posted by Deano
http://www.davidicke.com/oi/extras/2011/March/015.jpg


Um boobs

but really this article is really interesting, and I can somewhat agree

dadudemon
Finding the "article" link is so incredibly easy.

http://waronyou.com/topics/the-jet-fuel-of-tyranny-hypocrisy/


Like so: copy and paste the title (2 seconds.) Ctrl +t then click your home button if it's google (2 seconds). Ctrl+v enter (1 second.) boom, first link. If you have google toolbar...even easier.

Also, boobs are in PG movies. The forum guildine is "PG-13." Ever see "Orderlies"? It's PG and it has boobs in it. Besides, that's a rather blurry picture. (This is a horribly argument that most people will not know why.)

Finally, I do not find it hypocritical to want to save as many lives as possible. I do find it hypocritical to have two different policies. It doesn't matter, though: as long as she's doing SOME good things, she shouldn't be faulted for doing those good things. It's okay to point out potential hypocrisy, though.

Mr Parker
Originally posted by Deano
not sure why a discussion on the hypocrisy of war gets moved to the conspiracy forum.

what do i think of the article? it makes a valid point. the main reason i posted this was to maybe make the average person think a bit more. Its different than the usual general discussions and im sure people enjoy reading it, so why people get there panties in a twist i don't know

this is from the david icke newsletter. i deliberately leave the name out because the name alone causes childish ongoing responses that i have no time for.

because somehow the mods around here consider facts to be conspiracy theories. laughing

Mr Parker
Originally posted by Bicnarok
I agree, not only that these articles have a point.

I agree as well and yes you are right,these articles DO have a point.a very good one at that. thumb up

Mr Parker
Originally posted by Darth Piggott
Um boobs

but really this article is really interesting, and I can somewhat agree

Great stuff Deano.

thanks for posting it.This part tells it all.the history of the united states were NOT supposed to know about and are never told about in the corrupt school system we have.That part about Jeannie they put there becaue tv shows and sporting events-should have put that there as well,are there for our diversions to keep the american sheepie people peoccupied thinking they are free when they really arent and so they can plans things against them. thumb up thumb up rock

Mr Parker
Originally posted by Deano
http://www.davidicke.com/oi/extras/2011/March/012.jpg
These peace prizes are such fun - who do I bomb next?'

Obama, this man of 'peace' and 'freedom', is another war-monger president who has overseen an incredible assault on the most basic freedoms of Americans and visitors to his country in the name of 'fighting terrorism'.

So it is from the very depths of hypocrisy that Obama seeks to free under the guise of 'diplomatic immunity' a professional American terrorist working for US intelligence in Pakistan and arrested after shooting dead two Pakistanis.

Raymond Davis shot the men when they pulled their motorcycle alongside the car he was driving in Lahore on January 27th. He says they were armed and he acted in self-defence, but he fired ten shots and got out of his car to shoot one of the men twice in the back as he ran away. Some reports say they were members of Pakistani Intelligence who were on to Davis, but this is unconfirmed.

A group of unidentified Americans in another car sought to rescue him as a crowd gathered and they ran over and killed a third Pakistani before the crowd intervened and ensured Davis was arrested.

Obama responded, as usual, with an outrageous lie by calling Davis 'our diplomat in Pakistan' and claiming that he was therefore immune from prosecution in Pakistan because of this.

http://www.davidicke.com/oi/extras/2011/March/013.jpg

It subsequently emerged that Davis is a CIA agent - hence the guns, maps, make-up kit, telescopes and long-range radio in his car - and some reports claim he is an employee of Xe, the notorious 'private security' firm formerly known as Blackwater, which acts as a private army of mercenaries for the United States government.

This is the same United States that condemns the use of mercenaries by Colonel Gaddafi - 'Mercenaries and thugs have been turned loose to attack demonstrators', Hillary Clinton shrieked this week.

(By the way, some media reports say that the Israeli (Mossad) arms distribution company, Global CTS, has provided more than 50,000 African mercenaries to support Gaddafi who apparently pays the company $2,000 a day for each one while the men themselves get $100. This is the Israel that Clinton cannot wait to praise, defend and eulogise.)

The mysterious Americans who tried to rescue Raymond Davis, a 36-year-old former special forces soldier, were also almost certainly CIA. Pakistani officials say that they were armed and lived at the same house as Davis.

The government of the 'Land of the Free', which claims to promote a free media across the world, pressured its own 'free' 'journalists' to suppress the story that Davis was a CIA operative. The lapdog media dutifully agreed until overseas newspapers ran the story and made further suppression in the US a nonsense.

The London Daily Telegraph reported that Davis was the acting head of the CIA station in Pakistan and was gathering information for drone attacks. A camera in his car included pictures of sensitive locations.

The British, American and Israeli governments have their agents all over the world to cause mayhem and stage terrorist events that they can blame on others while all the time taking the moral high ground against everyone else.

http://www.davidicke.com/oi/extras/2011/March/014.jpg

Two British SAS special forces soldiers, pictured here, were arrested by Iraqi police in 2005 after failing to stop at a roadblock in Basra. They were dressed as Arabs and wearing wigs.

The men opened fire, killing one Iraqi policeman and wounding another, before they were captured. These British elite soldiers, in their Arab disguise, had weapons, explosives and a remote-control detonator in their vehicle.

The car was booby-trapped and ready to explode. It was clear what the intention was - to set up a manufactured 'terrorist attack' to be blamed on 'insurgents'. Such things have happened many times in Israel over the years in attacks against Jews that are blamed on 'Arab terrorists'.

The British authorities were so desperate to spring their men before the full truth could come out that they used tanks to storm the Iraqi police station where they were being held. They 'rescued' the two agent provocateurs - terrorists - and took away their vehicle.

The British, American and Israeli cabal is nothing less than a global terrorist network that hides behind fake morality and 'what, who, me?'

'Oh no, we would never do that, we're the good guys - it's the baddies you want.'

http://www.davidicke.com/oi/extras/2011/March/015.jpg

There can be few greater examples of this scourge of hypocrisy than the American death camps in Germany at the end of World War Two.

While the British and American authorities were condemning the Nazi camps like Auschwitz, the best part of two million Germans died in American camps from disease, exposure and starvation systematically directed on the orders of Supreme Allied Commander and future US President, General Dwight David Eisenhower.

How many are taught that in their history 'lessons' (programming)?

Eisenhower made it clear in his own correspondence that he hated Germans and he set about killing as many as possible when he had the chance. He ordered that German Prisoners of War were designated as 'Disarmed Enemy Forces' or DEF - just as his successors would designate Prisoners of War in Afghanistan and Iraq as 'Enemy Combatants' .

In both cases it allowed the American authorities to bypass international laws on the treatment of prisoners. The Germans targeted by Eisenhower were not subject to the Geneva Convention, nor were they visited by the Swiss Red Cross who were supposed to inspect such camps and the treatment of prisoners.

http://www.davidicke.com/oi/extras/2011/March/016.jpg

In this way, Eisenhower, the American 'war hero', enforced the starvation, exposure and disease that took the lives of almost two million people.

A Canadian reporter, Peter Worthington of the Ottawa Sun, obtained documentation of this cynical mass murder and he wrote in 1989:

'... it is hard to escape the conclusion that Dwight Eisenhower was a war criminal of epic proportions. His (DEF) policy killed more Germans in peace than were killed in the European Theater.

For years we have blamed the 1.7 million missing German POW's on the Russians. Until now, no one dug too deeply ... Witnesses and survivors have been interviewed by the author; one Allied officer compared the American camps to Buchenwald.'

Martin Brech, a retired professor of philosophy in New York, was 18 years old when he was a guard and interpreter at an Eisenhower Death Camp along the Rhine River at a place called Andernach.

He said in 1990 that when he protested at the treatment of the German prisoners he was met with 'hostility or indifference':

... when I threw our ample rations to them over the barbed wire. I was threatened, making it clear that it was our deliberate policy not to adequately feed them."

'When they caught me throwing C- Rations over the fence, they threatened me with imprisonment. One Captain told me that he would shoot me if he saw me again tossing food to the Germans ...

... Some of the men were really only boys, 13 years of age ... Some of the prisoners were old men drafted by Hitler in his last ditch stand ... I understand that average weight of the prisoners at Andernach was 90 pounds ...'

http://www.davidicke.com/oi/extras/2011/March/018.jpg
Systematic mass murder in the vast Eisenhower death camps

This was done in the name of the same cabal that now jails people in some countries - and vilifies them in virtually all - for questioning aspects of the official story of the Nazi concentration camps when the 'good guys' who condemn such questioning were running their own.

And that's the point. There are no 'goodies and baddies' in this black and white fantasy that is daily sold to the global public mind. When Clinton or Obama condemn Mubarak or Gaddafi it is evil condemning evil.

Different face, different clothes or uniform, but the same mentality - cold, calculating, heartless and with that key Illuminati bloodline trait ... lack of empathy. This is the common theme that brings them all together as one no matter what 'people' they may claim to represent.

But their comeuppance is coming. It always does eventually in the realms of cause and effect where what you give out you get back, or 'what goes around comes around'. No-one can escape that, although it may seem long delayed for some.

As Martin Luther King said: 'The arc of the moral universe is long, but it bends towards justice.'

For those who mercilessly seek to impose their will on the mass of humanity that arc is about to get very steep indeed. The next ten years will see so many changes and challenges, but, as humanity awakens, the world will bend towards justice.

There are, however, going to be some massive upheavels before we get there. A lanced boil may be messy, but it is the start of the healing.

Boy that really IS the history of the united states were not supposed to know about.I had heard about this before about Eisenhowers death camps briefly but never heard all the fake history detailslike this before about him that this article exposed about him till now.again great stuff deano,thanks for posting it. thumb up

Text-only Version: Click HERE to see this thread with all of the graphics, features, and links.