Click HERE to see this thread with all of the graphics, features, and links.

Girl on Girl fight action after the champion McClane so obviously won against Van Zan, this non title bout with be an exhibition bout between two of McClane's ex-KMC foes.

Both are participants are fast light attack specialists, Riggs is LW3 Riggs.

Mrs.Riggs (aka: Roger Murtaugh) cannot intervene, to make it a fair fight, (yes I know that sounds outlandish as Murtaugh intervenes pretty much all the time in some manner, but for the sake of it not being the usual "...and Murtaugh shoots him at the last minute" situation, we forget the missus here.)

All h2h combat screen feats apply for both parties.

Who do you say winneth...?

Riggs destroys him.

Originally posted by the ninjak
Riggs destroys him.

+1

Poor Van Zan... Its just not his life, is it...?

Time to become a trash can robot.

Yep.

Originally posted by Sadako of Girth
this non title bout with be an exhibition bout between two of McClane's ex-KMC foes.

you misspelled "hoes"

My bad..

Well Van Zan is still unable to sit down from the McClane beating and Riggs still went toe to two with McClane, even though he lost anyway.

So seeing as how Riggs is still capable at the moment I say Riggs wins and make Van Zan unable to sit for another week.

http://img199.imageshack.us/img199/6411/achievementi.gif

Have a look in the Best actors thread in the movie forum...
He just won my best actor award.

Originally posted by Kazenji
http://img199.imageshack.us/img199/6411/achievementi.gif

Oh dammnnn!

Zan wins.

Yes....wins this..

Originally posted by Kazenji
http://img199.imageshack.us/img199/6411/achievementi.gif

....as Van Zan has zero Riggs copeing feats.

Originally posted by Sadako of Girth
Yes....wins this..



....as Van Zan has zero Riggs copeing feats. Don't be upset Zan crushed your hero and in your pain creating more threads for zan to win.

Riggs beats McClane too.

Well since it never happened, theres nothing to be upset about and the laughter at your butthurt makes tears impossible.

Perhaps the reason I cannot cry anyway, is that your constant stream of tears has quantum-sucked all saline greedliy from everyone in the world now in your selfish need to rage...

For your own sake, I beg you to keep drinking. Leaving yourself THAT dehydrated as you must obviously be now, is dangerous.


McClane trounced Riggs over and over back in the day, causing the butthurt in the poster who kept butthurtedly reposting many dupe threads over and over, that you so mindlessy, unoriginally replicated/copycatted since.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Don't be upset Zan crushed your hero and in your pain creating more threads for zan to win.

Riggs beats McClane too.

When did Zan defeat McClane? Let alone Riggs!

Oh lolz.

Quan you put a smile on my dial.

Originally posted by Sadako of Girth
Well since it never happened, theres nothing to be upset about and the laughter at your butthurt makes tears impossible.

Perhaps the reason I cannot cry anyway, is that your constant stream of tears has quantum-sucked all saline greedliy from everyone in the world now in your selfish need to rage...

For your own sake, I beg you to keep drinking. Leaving yourself THAT dehydrated as you must obviously be now, is dangerous.


McClane trounced Riggs over and over back in the day, causing the butthurt in the poster who kept butthurtedly reposting many dupe threads over and over, that you so mindlessy, unoriginally replicated/copycatted since. You can't cry because your constant emotional outbursts have dried out your tear ducts.

Originally posted by the ninjak
When did Zan defeat McClane? Let alone Riggs!

Oh lolz.

Quan you put a smile on my dial. In the other thread. Saddie creating more Zan threads is proof of it.

LOL At your mindlessly copyistic plagiarism attempt there...
Gonna have to start charging you for copyright infringement at this rate... Lets say half a cent for each transgression... lets see..... thats $117,200 so far...
Do try one day to think for yourself...otherwise I'll end up owning you in more ways that the regular and obvious ones here.



Actually I havent created any lately.

More arsetalking form the boy wonder of butthurt.

Originally posted by Sadako of Girth
LOL At your mindlessly copyistic plagiarism attempt there...
Gonna have to start charging you for copyright infringement at this rate... Lets say half a cent for each transgression... lets see..... thats $117,200 so far...
Do try one day to think for yourself...otherwise I'll end up owning you in more ways that the regular and obvious ones here.



Actually I havent created any lately.

More arsetalking form the boy wonder of butthurt. That's your other account.

I want to see this evidence that McClane beats Riggs, because he only won that thread because of the retarded "McClane Factor", which has since been thoroughly disproven. I'll say Riggs wins here, since he has better feats than Van (and McClane)

Good Its called The Die Hard movies. Particularly 5...also the Lethal weapon movies.

Riggs pwned by rookie cop who was shit at boxing with amere jab, for one....Riggs always getting saved by Murtaugh....the list was very very extensive. Everyone agreed that Riggs against McClane is suicide for Riggs...and that was BEFORE DH5 came out.

Originally posted by Sadako of Girth
Good Its called The Die Hard movies. Particularly 5...also the Lethal weapon movies.

Riggs pwned by rookie cop who was shit at boxing with amere jab, for one....Riggs always getting saved by Murtaugh....the list was very very extensive. Everyone agreed that Riggs against McClane is suicide for Riggs...and that was BEFORE DH5 came out. So despite you arguing for McClane in the past the majority is based off of his new recent film which just came out. You just outed yourself as a fanboy since the majority of your case didn't exist until Die Hard 5.

Riggs snaps Van Zan's neck.

This should have been a one page thread, but fangoys.

Originally posted by Robtard
Riggs snaps Van Zan's neck.

This should have been a one page thread, but fangoys. Based off of what ?

Originally posted by quanchi112
Based off of what ?

Feats.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Based off of what ?

Lethal Weapon 1-4.

Originally posted by quanchi112
So despite you arguing for McClane in the past the majority is based off of his new recent film which just came out. You just outed yourself as a fanboy since the majority of your case didn't exist until Die Hard 5.

Only a moron could read what I said that wa- ohhhh righhhht...

Originally posted by the ninjak
Feats. Which ones ?Originally posted by Robtard
Lethal Weapon 1-4. Be more specific.Originally posted by Sadako of Girth
Only a moron could read what I said that wa- ohhhh righhhht...

You just said the majority of your case was based off the new film but you argued for him well before DH 5.

Yeah cause Dh 5 was out back then right?

Nope the feats were based off of 1-4, and he won, and now 5 is out he wins like 3 fold compared to his prev winnage.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Be more specific.

I'm not going to hold your hand again, you've already decided Van Zan wins and you have no idea what his opponent is capable of.

If you had watched the LW series of films you would know that Riggs has neck snapping feats in them.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Which ones ?

Dude it's Riggs.

If anything the final fight in LW1 should show you that he is way above Zan.

It's spite. I'm serious.

Yet two posters here insist that its not spite, cause Van Zan is a big tough dude in their eyes..

PnSHQHXvaTU

Funny how Riggs has blatant better H2H skills than McClane's ever shown, yet he still somehow loses to McClane

Originally posted by quanchi112
You just outed yourself as a fanboy since the majority of your case didn't exist until Die Hard 5.

Originally posted by Silent Master
PnSHQHXvaTU

High def destruction.

Originally posted by the ninjak
High def destruction.

I would like to put forward the theory that quan is really an 12 year old emo girl.

My evidence is that quan loves Voldemort, but has never seen any of the Lethal Weapon movies.

Originally posted by Sadako of Girth
Yet two posters here insist that its not spite, cause Van Zan is a big tough dude in their eyes..

And whom would those two posters be?

Originally posted by Lestov16
And whom would those two posters be?

quan is one

Who is the other?

Originally posted by Lestov16
Who is the other?

Don't care.

I'm just pointing out that your lord and master thinks Van Zan wins.

Quan and I have different opinions on things. Maybe he sees a tactic Van can use to win that I'm too lazy to see. Also "lord and master"? You've been hanging around Sadako far too much.

Originally posted by Lestov16
Quan and I have different opinions on things. Maybe he sees a tactic Van can use to win that I'm too lazy to see. Also "lord and master"? You've been hanging around Sadako far too much.

Dude, you were basically worshipping him as the "forum's HP expert"....despite the fact that he didn't know that Tom lost multiple times throughout the series and died in the last movie.

So you're mad that I called Quan the foremost HP expert? How is that relevant to this thread at all?

^That's like basic HP knowledge.

Originally posted by Lestov16
So you're mad that I called Quan the foremost HP expert? How is that relevant to this thread at all?

Mad?

No, I'm pointing out that depsite his proven lack of knowledge, you still regard him as an expert....IOW, I'm pointing out your poor critical thinking ability.

Originally posted by Sadako of Girth
Yeah cause Dh 5 was out back then right?

Nope the feats were based off of 1-4, and he won, and now 5 is out he wins like 3 fold compared to his prev winnage. You said the majority of your case was based off part 5 so you admitted you didn't have much before this movie came out.

Originally posted by Robtard
I'm not going to hold your hand again, you've already decided Van Zan wins and you have no idea what his opponent is capable of.

If you had watched the LW series of films you would know that Riggs has neck snapping feats in them. Yes, I have seen him in action. I still remember Jet Li's character destroy him. I also recall Zan just laughing off Quinn's punches. Zan wins. Originally posted by the ninjak
Dude it's Riggs.

If anything the final fight in LW1 should show you that he is way above Zan.

It's spite. I'm serious. Riggs needed a partner in all his movies.

You fool.....its obvious that the 'mainly 5' thing refers to my CURRENT assessment. Max Planck just called me, he says to ask you when he can have his density back...

Originally posted by Silent Master
PnSHQHXvaTU

Originally posted by Sadako of Girth
You fool.....its obvious that the 'mainly 5' thing refers to my CURRENT assessment. Max Planck just called me, he says to ask you when he can have his density back... There, there. Just make sure mommy tucks you in for bedtime.

Concession accepted.

Originally posted by Sadako of Girth
Concession accepted. You conceded already.

Nah you raged and cried again and once again filled your little knickers... as given away by your resorting to 6 year old style insults.

(You're still at 4 year old level. Give yourself another couple of years experience before attempting that level of insult again.)

Originally posted by Sadako of Girth
Nah you raged and cried again and once again filled your little knickers... as given away by your resorting to 6 year old style insults.

(You're still at 4 year old level. Give yourself another couple of years experience before attempting that level of insult again.) Riggs doesn't have his partner here to save his life. Zan doesn't rejoice as there are dragons to kill.

He won't NEED anyone on this occasion.

Not against Van Zan, the featless man..

Van Zan only beats Riggs at suicide.

Riggs survived years of being a hollow point armed man on the edge and very suicidal.

Van Zan was champ and didn't survive 20 secs of it, before becoming Dragon Poop.

So Van Zan wins at the dragon poop/pavement pizza game.

Originally posted by Sadako of Girth
He won't NEED anyone on this occasion.

Not against Van Zan, the featless man.. I guess killing a dragon isn't a feat. LOL. Saving his partner from the shitter is the best feat out there, right ?

Originally posted by Sadako of Girth
Van Zan only beats Riggs at suicide.

Riggs survived years of being a hollow point armed man on the edge and very suicidal.

Van Zan was champ and didn't survive 20 secs of it, before becoming Dragon Poop.

So Van Zan wins at the dragon poop/pavement pizza game. Charging an opponent while trying to kill it isn't suicide.

You better write this in your sig, obsessed guy.

Failing to kill them and jumpimg into their jaws IS though. A pointless one.

Why are you talking to yourself with that last comment.

Ah well I guess it would be fruitless to expect to you to make a lick of sense, this far into your obsessive butthurt rage, I guess.

Riggs wins.

Yup.

Originally posted by Sadako of Girth
Failing to kill them and jumpimg into their jaws IS though. A pointless one.

Why are you talking to yourself with that last comment.

Ah well I guess it would be fruitless to expect to you to make a lick of sense, this far into your obsessive butthurt rage, I guess. So failing to kill an opponent you are trying to is now suicide ? LOL.

You can't even understand a simple word like suicide. According to you every single war is just mass suicide.

Yeah when you kill yourself doing it.

Nope. Thats you misunderstanding the plain english being spoken again or willfully misinterpreting it, as usual.

Originally posted by Sadako of Girth
Yeah when you kill yourself doing it.

Nope. Thats you misunderstanding the plain english being spoken again or willfully misinterpreting it, as usual. he didn't kill himself the dragon killed him. That isn't suicide.

Back on topic, Riggs wins.

Originally posted by Silent Master
Back on topic, Riggs wins. Based on ?

Better feats.

Originally posted by Silent Master
Better feats. Such as ?

Originally posted by Silent Master
PnSHQHXvaTU

Originally posted by Silent Master
That's it ? Are you joking ?

By all means, post a feat for Van Zan that matches beating a trained Merc while not at 100%(Riggs had just been tortured).

Originally posted by Silent Master
By all means, post a feat for Van Zan that matches beating a trained Merc while not at 100%(Riggs had just been tortured). This is a younger Riggs first off. Secondly, the guy he is facing isn't in a post apocalyptic environment. Zan won't even feel Riggs punches and will kill him.

Still waiting.

Another thread where Quanchi decided the outcome and he's ignorant of one combatant.

Originally posted by Silent Master
Still waiting. Watch the Quinn fight.

You are also assuming this is a younger Riggs.

Originally posted by Robtard
Another thread where Quanchi decided the outcome and he's ignorant of one combatant. I have seen all the lethal weapons. I know Zan wins. Don't be upset.

I asked for a feat that at least macthes, not one that falls several miles short.

Try again.

Originally posted by Silent Master
I asked for a feat that at least macthes, not one that falls several miles short.

Try again. Killing a dragon.

Next question.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Killing a dragon.

Next question.

When did Van Zan beat a dragon in HTH combat?

With lots of help and a harpoon (get basically pulling a trigger whilst everyone else does the distraction work...) Try again.

Not only is Van Zan dragon faeces, but he'll end up as Riggs faeces too.

Originally posted by Sadako of Girth
With lots of help and a harpoon (get basically pulling a trigger whilst everyone else does the distraction work...)

IOW, no HTH combat was involved, so it's a worthless non feat.

Originally posted by Silent Master
IOW, no HTH combat was involved, so it's a worthless non feat. That's two feats by my count. I gave you two more impressive feats than what a younger Riggs did one time. Zan wins.

Originally posted by Sadako of Girth
With lots of help and a harpoon (get basically pulling a trigger whilst everyone else does the distraction work...) Try again.

Not only is Van Zan dragon faeces, but he'll end up as Riggs faeces too. He asked for a great feat. The hand to hand one he ignored so I went for something neither him or his partner could do.

Originally posted by quanchi112
That's two feats by my count. I gave you two more impressive feats than what a younger Riggs did one time. Zan wins.

One gave one HTH feat and it didn't even come close to matching Riggs feat. The other feat you mentioned had nothing to do with HTH combat.

Try again.

Originally posted by quanchi112
He asked for a great feat. The hand to hand one he ignored so I went for something neither him or his partner could do.

No it wasn't ignored, but he recognised that you were simply talking out of your arse again.

Originally posted by Silent Master
One gave one HTH feat and it didn't even come close to matching Riggs feat. The other feat you mentioned had nothing to do with HTH combat.

Try again. I gave you two feats. You ignored one and pretended the other doesn't count. I am done answering your questions. Zan wins.

Originally posted by Sadako of Girth
No it wasn't ignored, but he recognised that you were simply talking out of your arse again. So you're saying I made the feats up ?

Yes, for all intents and purposes. As you misrepresent them all the time.

Originally posted by Sadako of Girth
No it wasn't ignored, but he recognised that you were simply talking out of your arse again.

Checking the time stamps on the posts, I commented on the feat less than 2 minutes after him mentioning it.

So once again, he's caught in a lie.

Originally posted by quanchi112
I have seen all the lethal weapons. I know Zan wins. Don't be upset.

Stop lying, you didn't even know Riggs has neck breaking feats.

Originally posted by Silent Master
Checking the time stamps on the posts, I commented on the feat less than 2 minutes after him mentioning it.

So once again, he's caught in a lie.



Originally posted by Robtard
Stop lying, you didn't even know Riggs has neck breaking feats.

Originally posted by Sadako of Girth
Yes, for all intents and purposes. As you misrepresent them all the time. Be more specific.

Originally posted by Robtard
Stop lying, you didn't even know Riggs has neck breaking feats.

Riggs has broken someone's neck while he had a dislocated shoulder.

I'd like to see how well Van can fight with that type of injury.

Originally posted by Silent Master
Checking the time stamps on the posts, I commented on the feat less than 2 minutes after him mentioning it.

So once again, he's caught in a lie. What have I lied about ?

Originally posted by Robtard
Stop lying, you didn't even know Riggs has neck breaking feats. Prove it.

You can prove it to yourself by watching Lethal Weapon.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Prove it.

Hmmm.

I said: "Riggs snaps Van Zan's neck".

You said: "Based off of what."

But clearly, you've seen the LW films and were aware that Riggs has broken necks. Cry more.

Originally posted by quanchi112
What have I lied about ?

See below

Originally posted by quanchi112
He asked for a great feat. The hand to hand one he ignored so I went for something neither him or his partner could do.

Originally posted by quanchi112
I gave you two feats. You ignored one and pretended the other doesn't count. I am done answering your questions. Zan wins.

Seeing as I commented on the feat in question within a couple minutes of you posting it and before the above two posts were made.....your claim that I ignored the feat is a lie.

Thats all you every get from Quanchi. Lie after Lie.

Originally posted by Sadako of Girth
Thats all you every get from Quanchi. Lie after Lie.

Instead of admitting that I caught him in a lie, watch him try and claim something along the lines of it was a "figure of speech" or I'm taking his words to literally.

Or something else that is equally ridiculous.

Originally posted by Silent Master
Instead of admitting that I caught him in a lie, watch him try and claim something along the lines of it was a "figure of speech" or I'm taking his words to literally.

Or something else that is equally ridiculous. What have I lied about ?

Originally posted by Silent Master
See below





Seeing as I commented on the feat in question within a couple minutes of you posting it and before the above two posts were made.....your claim that I ignored the feat is a lie. That isn't a lie. You need to recheck the thread. you should be embarrassed right now.

Originally posted by Sadako of Girth
Thats all you every get from Quanchi. Lie after Lie. Coming from the father of all lies that's funny.

A harder question would be "What have you ever told the truth about"...? Cause unless you answer 'nothing' you'll be forced to lie again out of ego.

'Cause you do it all the time but never admit it.
You dont care about truth or content. Just post counts.

Originally posted by Sadako of Girth
A harder question would be "What have you ever told the truth about"...? Cause unless you answer 'nothing' you'll be forced to lie again out of ego.

'Cause you do it all the time but never admit it.
You dont care about truth or content. Just post counts. You care more about my post count than I do. I care about being objective. You care about favs and bias.

Then how come you're the one always bring it up like its something worth mentioning ever?

Not at all...thats your thing.

Originally posted by Sadako of Girth
Then how come you're the one always bring it up like its something worth mentioning ever?

Not at all...thats your thing. To prove a point. I really just care about debating. My post count shows how much I love it.

You certainly like to mass debate.

Originally posted by Sadako of Girth
You certainly like to mass debate. Always have always will.

This is why you're so blind.

Originally posted by Sadako of Girth
This is why you're so blind. What am I not seeing ?

Originally posted by Sadako of Girth
A harder question would be "What have you ever told the truth about"...? Cause unless you answer 'nothing' you'll be forced to lie again out of ego.

'Cause you do it all the time but never admit it.
You dont care about truth or content. Just post counts.

You'll notice that he's still asking me what he lied about, despite the fact that I've already told him.

Originally posted by Silent Master
You'll notice that he's still asking me what he lied about, despite the fact that I've already told him. You will notice I already responded to that post.

...with more horseshit.

You saying it wasn't a lie, doesn't change the facts...you said I ignored the feat, when I clearly commented on it.

IOW, you lied.

Originally posted by Silent Master
You saying it was a lie, doesn't change the facts...you said I ignored the feat, when I clearly commented on it.

IOW, you lied. By ignoring it I meant you act like it didn't count. Is english your first or is it a second language ?

Originally posted by Silent Master
Instead of admitting that I caught him in a lie, watch him try and claim something along the lines of it was a "figure of speech" or I'm taking his words to literally.

Or something else that is equally ridiculous.


Originally posted by quanchi112
By ignoring it I meant you act like it didn't count. Is english your first or is it a second language ?

LOL!!

Originally posted by quanchi112
By ignoring it I meant you act like it didn't count. Is english your first or is it a second language ?

Thats a capital 'E' on 'English'.

Please stop bastardising the form.

I know you're all butthurt and ragey...but still..

Originally posted by Silent Master
LOL!! You clearly don't know what a figure of speech is.

Originally posted by Sadako of Girth
Thats a capital 'E' on 'English'.

Please stop bastardising the form.

I know you're all butthurt and ragey...but still.. This is just an internet forum. i will not be graded on my capitalization. Relax pointdexter.

Zan wins.

Originally posted by Silent Master
Instead of admitting that I caught him in a lie, watch him try and claim something along the lines of it was a "figure of speech" or I'm taking his words to literally.

Or something else that is equally ridiculous.

Originally posted by quanchi112
You clearly don't know what a figure of speech is.


LOL!!

Originally posted by Silent Master
LOL!! Second or third language. I am guessing a third language.

LOL!!!

Originally posted by Silent Master
LOL!!! You know 4 languages. yeah right. LOL.

Capital 'Y' on 'yeah' in that context. IE: After a period had ended the previous sentence...

So...when will you learn ONE language..?

Still waiting for you to post some useful feats.

Originally posted by Silent Master
Still waiting for you to post some useful feats. You lost that privilege when you started ignoring feats.

Says the biggest feat ignorer and dancertroll on KMC.

You haven't posted any HTH combat feats that are better than the one I listed for Riggs.

Therefore, Riggs wins.

Indeed.

Woah this thread went off with a blast, 7 pages already (or 7 pages of crap).

Originally posted by Kazenji
Woah this thread went off with a blast, 7 pages already (or 7 pages of crap).

It's 7 pages of quan saying that Van wins and then providing zero valid feats to back up such a claim.

Riggs wins

Certainly seems to be the case...

Originally posted by Sadako of Girth
Says the biggest feat ignorer and dancertroll on KMC. Feats aren't the complete picture anyway.

Originally posted by Silent Master
You haven't posted any HTH combat feats that are better than the one I listed for Riggs.

Therefore, Riggs wins. You ignored one and pretended the other one wasn't awesome.

One gave one HTH feat and it didn't even come close to matching Riggs feat. The other feat you mentioned had nothing to do with HTH combat.

Try again.

Originally posted by Silent Master
One gave one HTH feat and it didn't even come close to matching Riggs feat. The other feat you mentioned had nothing to do with HTH combat.

Try again. Not even feeling your opponents attacks and treating him like he didn't exist is better than your feat. You can pretend it isn't. The dragon feat takes the cake. You just ignore that one.

Riggs after being tortured was able to beat a trained merc, your feat doesn't even come close to matching that. and the dragon feat isn't a hth combat feat so it's worthless for this thread.

Originally posted by Silent Master
Riggs after being tortured was able to beat a trained merc, your feat doesn't even come close to matching that. and the dragon feat isn't a hth combat feat so it's worthless for this thread. Laughing off one the star of the film's punches who was surviving in a post apocalyptic environment is no small feat. You can pretend it was but it wasn't.

Again, Riggs after being tortured was able to beat a trained merc, your feat doesn't even come close to matching that. and the dragon feat isn't a hth combat feat so it's worthless for this thread.

Originally posted by Silent Master
Again, Riggs after being tortured was able to beat a trained merc, your feat doesn't even come close to matching that. and the dragon feat isn't a hth combat feat so it's worthless for this thread. Riggs had recovered. The guy he beat wasn't impressive nor did he have a big role in the film. Zan treated the star like he wasn't even there.

Riggs being fully recovered is nothing but your speculation, you have zero proof to back that up.

And no, the Quin fight is in no way as impressive as beating a trained merc.

Originally posted by Silent Master
Riggs being fully recovered is nothing but your speculation, you have zero proof to back that up.

And no, the Quin fight is in no way as impressive as beating a trained merc. Do you think he was out of energy for their fight ? Did it seem that way to you ?

Yes, it was since quinn was of no consequence. Riggs didn't shrug off his opponent like he didn't exist.

None of what you just posted changes the fact that Riggs being fully recovered was nothing but speculation as you have posted zero proof to back your claim up.

Or that the Quin fight is in no way as impressive as beating a trained merc.

Originally posted by Silent Master
None of what you just posted changes the fact that Riggs being fully recovered was nothing but speculation as you have posted zero proof to back your claim up.

Or that the Quin fight is in no way as impressive as beating a trained merc. I am going by what I saw. You acting like he was still physically taxed isn't what happened.
The ease in which Quinn was handled was more impressive than Riggs fight against the merc.

You still haven't posted anything that changes the fact that Riggs being fully recovered was nothing but speculation as you have posted zero proof to back your claim up.

Or that the Quin fight is in no way as impressive as beating a trained merc.

Originally posted by Silent Master
You still haven't posted anything that changes the fact that Riggs being fully recovered was nothing but speculation as you have posted zero proof to back your claim up.

Or that the Quin fight is in no way as impressive as beating a trained merc. The eye test. Most things can't be proven or disproven definitively. You hneed to think for yourself.

Yes, it is.

Still waiting for you to back up your claims.